In post 264, patchwork wrote:
In post 249, Dionysus wrote:Not at all! If you read my post in #196 you'll see I was already scumreading you. All you have done is be rude to people about their reads (whether tr or sr) and ask irrelevant questions about pronouns or favourite pokemon. Beyond that you have made no noticeable effort to actually hunt scum yourself and had to be pressed harder than you should have been to post a simple list of reads. The reads themselves are not very sensible, but that's not why I'm voting for you.
i don’t actually think i’ve been that rude, actually. maybe more agressive or passive-agressive, but never does it get rude. i think i call the reasons dumb or something but never am i actually throwing around insults, condemning people for reading certain people, etc. like at least when i say i dont like a read i will explain it.
for instance, your early townread on me was objectively REALLY DUMB. it felt like a stretch to me and then your later read about how i rejected it was also dumb, because both town and scum can do that!! like at least im gonna tell you why i think your read sucks, instead of your “putting herta at the top of your list was a choice” with a crap ton of negative tone.
so, no, i was not being rude, and someone could maybe explain it to me and i would accept that i was maybe being rude but like. blind assertions are stupid (like the one you just made about me being rude!). maybe i was being rude but. like. How.
and while i concede the pokemon thing is irrelevant, am i not allowed to be excited over seeign someone who knows the same content that i do?
like hadrian has red as their profile picture!! usually i get laughed at for liking “middle school things” but if i see someone who has the same interests as me i’m obviously gonna be excited. and what was the alternative? pm them? that would be weird because they’re literally someone off the internet, and i also can’t figure out how the pm system works anyways.
i only made two comments about pokemon anyways: one in my opening post, where i expressed excitement regarding their avatar, and another on like. page 5 or 4. dont remember. but it was about “ughh i would ask them what their favorite pokemon is but it would be fluffposting”. the thing i was trying to avoid was fluffposting lol.
and its kinda weird to pm someone you havent talked to before on a mafia website about the pokemon adventures manga, lol. way better to mention it once in a game and then hold respect for them
on the pronouns: dumb fucking take. maybe i’m being rude now but holy shit that is so dumb. pronouns are absolutely not irrelevant, like what?
~ four people in this game do not have their pronouns listed so i’m forced to use gender-neutral pronouns for them despite the fact that they might not prefer those pronouns?
without pronouns: would you rather me say “dionysus scumreads patchwork because patchwork wasn’t posting patchwork’s readlist and dionysus doesn’t like the way patchwork plays”. like that’s just lumpy, whereas i can just say “they don’t like the way i wasn’t writing readlists well enough and didn’t like how i played”. like the reason why pronouns exist are so you can talk about people without sounding like an idiot, and when it’s all just they/thems you can’t understand the sentence either.
and i’ve been pretty explicit about my pronouns so far this game, with the glaring aroace pride flag, the they/them under my username, and yet i’ve already gotten misgendered. like..... what?
i think it’s pretty damn important to at least talk about what your preferred pronouns are because not everyone in this game uses he/him pronouns and it’s a little annoying to have to refer to multiple people and then use multiple “they”s referring to different people each time, because then it gets annoying to differentiate and hard to read. it’s not killing me to not know what people’s pronouns are, of course. but like. it’s pretty important when this is a social deduction game when you have to talk about people and the actions of the people around you.
on readlist: as already said, i like to put thought into my readlists. i’m ngl, i don’t care if you vote me out, it just makes you guys look like clowns, but i’m here to learn and grow as a player. social deduction games like mafia (the game we’re playing right now) requires a lot of thought! your take on someone might be different than someone else’s take, and so it’s important to EXPLAIN WHY you think they’re aligned one way or another, so clash about your point can be way easier to discuss.
in the end, mafia is based on the decisions of an aligned town, and if you can’t have these wholehearted discussions with your time and effort put into them, you’re gonna lose.
so i can see how the push for a readlist can be viewed as scummy, yeah. but honestly, do i care? read it as scummy if you want, actually. but in my eyes, it is absolutely not. wanting to put more thought into a game is not inherently bad, and it does not make me scummy.
for instance, let’s talk about that one readlist of yours. all you did was highlight important points. where’s the explanation? do you state why you read certain players certain ways? no, you do not. that’s iioa, and it makes talking about reads really annoying.
it also allows for inconsistencies to go unchecked, btw! if a person doesnt state a reason in their initial readlist and then bullshits another reason later on, you can’t say “hey, your reasons are different now”, because there wasn’t a reason in the first place.
also, not gonna bother with the “you’re actively contributing” point. i literally am not, that’s 100% fair. i can’t really be that active and i’ll probably miss out on a lot of important things. also, might not be what you’re saying, but it kind of reads like an activity scumread. which i’ve seen a few times in this game already, but i’m not gonna jump to assumptions about what you’re saying, ‘cause then it gets messy.
anyways, sorry for the longpost. i’m personally garbage at reading long posts so i tried to break up each section with some line breaks and stuff for better accessibility.
In post 262, Dionysus wrote:
Genuine question to patch: how can you argue you're too busy to contribute to the hunt more than you have from the top of the post count? It's not very credible.
i come on every once in a while and post
a lot
. if you look at my iso, it's just me making every post one or two sentences, responding to every quote in seperate posts, etc. also, never said i was too busy to scumhunt. just too busy to type out a proper analysis of every single player (and it's kind of pointless to do that anyways, since we're ten pages in anyways).like, if you haven't noticed, i have bursts of activity. i might make one or two posts sometimes but once i log on i can post a lot very fast before disappearing again. case in point: logged on this afternoon and posted like ten times in a row lol