Newbie 2114: Life Imitates Art...in Memes! -- End
-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Waking up to this thread
-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Random question: how can I resize an image?-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
VOTE: DragonEater70In post 9, DragonEater70 wrote: I just really suck at generating content in RVS-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
What do you mean?In post 17, Maestro wrote: also, lol "generating content in RVS" is sad and baaad-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Big fan of mafia-like party games but had never played online until few weeks ago, when I joined the siteIn post 22, Aeronaut wrote: Also though, I think it would be fun to do real introductions. What do you like to do? What got you into mafia? Normally games just get real intense real fast, but I figure for the new folks it might be nice to get to know each other!-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
I'm not completely sure I understand the logic behind this. Would you not get good content out of people just by posting genuine posts instead of making intentionally odd ones? And don't you think this can backtrack on you?In post 98, DragonEater70 wrote: Reagrding my odd post: I was making an intentionally odd post to get reactions, because I like getting good content out of people early rather than having to wait for it.
I agree with others that I feel more confident on players that reason their thoughts and try to move the conversation forward, but would also add that I find also suspicious when a player starts toying with others, making "goofy" posts because that ends up making myself unsure about their reasons and more difficult to read tbh-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
A lot of people can put good thoughts into fewer posts and not necessarily more posts will lead to more contribution or mean that person is townhunting more. Good posts + good thoughts = goodIn post 72, patchwork wrote:
.. not really? i think saying thoughts = more posts = more discussion = more contribution = more townhunting = more scumhunting = goodIn post 63, Ircher wrote:
I disagree. It's a perfectly acceptable and widespread play style to be conservative with one's thoughts. You're imposing your vision of what town should do on me rather than thinking about what town actually does.In post 62, Aeronaut wrote: I also think it's pretty interesting that you are refusing to elaborate on things in a newbie game. Feels like the town motivated approach is to want to really flesh out your thoughts so people who are new to the site meta will get what you mean.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
It was more of a general comment, I wouldn't come with that conclusion just for that post at the beginning. But I have seen players trying to ping others just to provoke a reaction along a game, which may be just aimed at getting a reaction out of others, but I feel it generally makes me less confident and a bit more difficult to discern which posts are genuine and which are just trying to motivate discussionIn post 105, DragonEater70 wrote:
Maybe there's a misunderstanding here? I was specifically talking about my first post which is also what I thought Elpis was talking about. I don't see a way to share my genuine thoughts on my first post because I didn't have any genuine thoughts on anyone at that time - my post was the third overall, coming after two posts from you about image formatting. There's nothing to analyze at that point so I tried to make a post worthy of analysis.In post 103, bewolkt wrote:
I'm not completely sure I understand the logic behind this. Would you not get good content out of people just by posting genuine posts instead of making intentionally odd ones? And don't you think this can backtrack on you?In post 98, DragonEater70 wrote: Reagrding my odd post: I was making an intentionally odd post to get reactions, because I like getting good content out of people early rather than having to wait for it.
I agree with others that I feel more confident on players that reason their thoughts and try to move the conversation forward, but would also add that I find also suspicious when a player starts toying with others, making "goofy" posts because that ends up making myself unsure about their reasons and more difficult to read tbh
I genuinely think I succeeded, too, because we have had much more serious content here on pages 2-3 than some other games had by page 8.
And it did start with people attacking my post, then attacking my attackers, etc.
Feel ignoredIn post 107, DragonEater70 wrote: Very very very tentative, unfinal, prone to change readlist:
Townier than town - Aureal
Townie - Patch
Townie I guess - Elpis
Different levels of Null:
Kawaii
Aero
Ircher
Not really scummy but def not townie: Maestro
Scummy ig - no one
Really scummy - no one
pedit- I see you addressed it-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
I just feel it's a bit difficult to have such strong opinions so early in the game, but when I've questioned some things (like your "goofy" entrance or patchwork's association of more posts=better) it was basically because I thought those things were suspicious. But I will give a more detailed list now, also because I won't be able to post that much during the weekend:In post 180, DragonEater70 wrote: Okay I am going to go forward and VOTE: Bewolkt. This guy has made several posts since the game started, but none of their posts has any opinion stated on any player. If that's not scumlurking, I don't know what is.
Leaning town
Aureal - Her thoughts seem to be coming from a town perspective and I agree with most of their reasonings
patch - they come off as genuine to me and I like many of their thoughts but tbh there's also a part of me that is a bit puzzled by their way of reasoning. Too many posts which makes it a bit difficult for me to keep track of what their stance is at any moment
Unsure
Ircher - has contributed a bit more than others, and even though I can understand why he might be a bit more conservative, I don't feel I can read him better until he expresses some more thoughts. I don't have the feeling that his 164 is particularly townie and would like him to explain a bit more for example from where does his read on Maestro come from
Aero - they seemed pretty okay to me at first. Also I felt his 91 was in good faith to warn others about a potential lim early in the day. But what has pinged me is the way they've backtracked on Ircher. I don't see what in Ircher's reaction convinces him that is a good to be more conservative (not saying that this is bad by itself, but I am very surprised that Aero bought this after he took a strong stance on this topic)
Null and need more from them
Elpis - feel genuine so far but still need more from this slot
Maestro - I don't see why he's getting so much heat. Many of the points he's made I agree with them so waiting to see more of his thoughts on the game to develop a more grounded read
Kawaii - not much
Main suspect
Dragon - I feel his content has been mostly pushing the more inactive slots and some reactive posts to other player's content, so i'm not sure why he is accusing me from scumlurking. His readlist don't say much to me since I haven't see the reasons behind them. I also don't see from where his read on Maestro comes from or why for example he moved Aero from townread to null then townread again-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Just posted a readlist with some thoughts on him and others. I am happy with my vote but I to vote forward let's VOTE: ElpisIn post 175, Aeronaut wrote: Also, @Bewolkt, you are still voting for dragon. Do you still think they're scum? I liked your discussion with them.regarding reaction posts, but I'm curious about what you're thinking of them and others after that interaction.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
but to move forward*In post 186, bewolkt wrote:
Just posted a readlist with some thoughts on him and others. I am happy with my vote but I to vote forward let's VOTE: ElpisIn post 175, Aeronaut wrote: Also, @Bewolkt, you are still voting for dragon. Do you still think they're scum? I liked your discussion with them.regarding reaction posts, but I'm curious about what you're thinking of them and others after that interaction.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
I will just quote the last part of the post to make not create a super huge post, but I'll try to address everything you said.In post 194, DragonEater70 wrote: In conclusion, Bewolkt, I think your analysis is a pile of bullshit. You are not contributing and you are reading me as scum based on false premises.
So you just accusing me of pushing inactives, and saying that I am your main suspect, but now you are pushing a null slot? How does that make sense at all?
I think bewolkt is pretty scummy atm and hooe you guys join me in voting them.
P.S. I think I did explain my reasoning for the Aero reads but if not: I liked their overall vibes and reasoning. Not sure tbh why I put them into the null category afterward, maybe I just second guessed my read and felt it wasn't based on a lot of substance, but their later play continued the same town vibes from earlier.
First, I don't know if there has been a misunderstanding here or you are trying to twist what I said. I wanted to say that I don't find very coherent you voting me because "none of their posts has any opinion stated on any player" because I don't feel yours have been high on that. I didn't say it was bad in any way to try to push others to get more output from them (which you are very right it is what I did with my vote) or that is scummy in any way to react to others' interactions with you.
I also acknowledged your readlists, so I don't know why you feel the need to mention them again. I said that they don't give me the reasons why you placed ones higher than others so I can't see why do you townread or scumread other players. Can you explain why you sr Maestro? Also I still find a bit puzzling that Aero went from your top tr to null, but it's fair, I guess our reads are very variable and not very strong right now.
Last, you mention the following 2 posts as examples of you being proactive. I had read both as what I categorized as you 'pushing the more inactive slots': for Aero you praise the engagement of Maestro but say of Aero's that 'is not serious enough' and for me that 'none of their posts has any opinion stated on any player'. So I thought of both as attempts to make us engage more and contribute to the game. It's true that for Aero you say that he's attempting to buddy others, so I'll give you that
In post 34, DragonEater70 wrote: I like your engagement tbh. I think Aeronaut on the other hand is not serious enough and ia too fluffy, and deserves a vote for attempting to buddy all the other players.VOTE: AeronautIn post 180, DragonEater70 wrote: Okay I am going to go forward and VOTE: Bewolkt. This guy has made several posts since the game started, but none of their posts has any opinion stated on any player. If that's not scumlurking, I don't know what is.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
I wanted to see more opinions from both kawaii and Elpis and since kawaii already said that they were coming back with their thoughts (still waiting for that) and tried to push Elpis to be more open about their thoughtsIn post 207, Ircher wrote: Can you clarify what you mean here by "to move forward"? What was wrong with keeping your vote on Dragon if you are still happy with it? What do you expect voting Elpis will accomplish here that makes it better than keeping your vote on your scum read Dragon?-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
I thought you removed your vote to avoid having Aero at E-1 like you said. I hadn’t thought before about why you didn’t vote anywhere else tbh but it makes sense that if you’re arguing that the reason for elimination should not be playstyle, then you’re not going to sr Maestro because his playstyle is focusing on the people that do not contribute that much.
Why didn’t you put your vote on another person? It could be that your top sr is still Aero and you didn’t want the conversation to shift to anyone else at that point-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
@kawaii what do think so far?-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
His post #87In post 252, Aureal wrote:
What leads you to say Maestro's play style is focused on people who don't contribute that much?In post 235, bewolkt wrote: I thought you removed your vote to avoid having Aero at E-1 like you said. I hadn’t thought before about why you didn’t vote anywhere else tbh but it makes sense that if you’re arguing that the reason for elimination should not be playstyle, then you’re not going to sr Maestro because his playstyle is focusing on the people that do not contribute that much.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Mostly what they said to Dragon about the need to "generate content" which I also didn't like. And to some extent the playstyle thing as well. It always makes me wary when someone accuses other but they say they won't give a reason or don't feel the need to explain why.In post 263, KawaiiKame wrote: beo- the meat of content is #185, I like the reads but I do want to know what specifically he agrees w/ Maestro, I'm assuming the anti-conservative play thing
But it wasn't that much about his content but that I felt that what they had said didn't warrant those scumreads from others. Now that they've come back I don't really feel that anymore. I'm waiting to see his post with his reads today but I didn't like the way he reacted. I might understand his frustration but it's okay from others to be expecting some more from the player that has not said much and he could just have explained it. This might be just frustration from scum because their wagon isn't dissipating-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Who do you think are the more likely mafia/scum team right now?In post 321, Elpis wrote:
I agree that it's not good, but I feel a bit like I was pushed to vote on people I didn't think were scum for the sake of "pushing things along" so I did so. I will undo that now since Kawaii has been posting moreIn post 288, Aeronaut wrote: This Kawaii wagon is really bad
UNVOTE:-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Yeah, I understand what you mean. But maybe they were just away? I'm curious about how you feel about Maestro now that they've come back.In post 270, Aureal wrote:
Maestro has also basically not contributed anything since that post. So I don't know how to take that seriously. There's no indication he even knows I'm in this game, that's how little he's given us. I've been trying to give him some time since he did indicate he had something going on this week, but it's Sunday afternoon now, over three full days since his last post. If I'd known prods don't happen on weekends in this game I don't know if I'd have been so lenient but I think I've wasted enough time waiting now and I'm just going to VOTE: Maestro.In post 268, bewolkt wrote:
His post #87In post 252, Aureal wrote:
What leads you to say Maestro's play style is focused on people who don't contribute that much?In post 235, bewolkt wrote: I thought you removed your vote to avoid having Aero at E-1 like you said. I hadn’t thought before about why you didn’t vote anywhere else tbh but it makes sense that if you’re arguing that the reason for elimination should not be playstyle, then you’re not going to sr Maestro because his playstyle is focusing on the people that do not contribute that much.
As for the not voting him earlier thing, it was a combination of things. I unvoted to avoid Aero being E-1 and didn't think to vote someone else right away since my focus was on avoiding the possibility of a quickhammer. After a little while I remembered what I'd thought about Maestro, but decided to hold off a while to see if anyone poked me about it. Nobody did, so I decided to use it to poke other people for opinions; and came to the conclusion that our scum are probably not very active/aggressive, or have already decided they don't want to bother trying to cast shade on me. Which also leads me to be more willing to vote Maestro here.
And about the last paragraph: don't you think town should have picked up on it as well?-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Very much agree with this. @Ircher, would you give us some of your thoughts on the game?In post 335, DragonEater70 wrote:
I know this wasn't aimed ta me but tbh you are probably the hardest olayer to read this game, exceot maybe Kawaii.In post 294, Ircher wrote: 2. Why aren't you paying attention to me? Do you really have no thoughts on my alignment?
And how did you use your vote actively to generate momentum through the game? You were on Maestro the whole timeIn post 233, Ircher wrote: I would like to encourage people to use their vote more actively! The game is stagnating because there is no momentum. To generate momentum, we need wagons.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
VOTE: Maestro. I don't see their bitterness/frustration as anything positive like others have said. I found it much more different the way others like Dragon/Elpis/kawaii have acted when being pushed/questioned and in this case I still don't see him being collaborative or trying to help the game move along-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
He was the biggest wagon at some point but so were others and they reacted more genuine as town to my eyes while also being frustrated and defensive as wellIn post 383, patchwork wrote:
i mean yeah sometimes scum actgs really overdefensively but for me it doesn't feel like it's coming from scum? the frustration reads very very genuine and it's not even that overdefensive considering they were like, the biggest wagon for some timeIn post 377, Elpis wrote: I feel like it'd be the opposite, but I'm not really experienced enough to speak on that.
I appreciate you expressing this, though-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Why do you think this?In post 375, patchwork wrote: tbh towniest post so far from elpis but aureal/elpis is a possible pairing-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
I think I was not clear enough with my question. I was wondering where do you see the aureal+elpis association (sorry if you already explained this, but I don't remember you doing it)In post 422, patchwork wrote:
idk, it's just a vibe thingIn post 413, bewolkt wrote:
Why do you think this?In post 375, patchwork wrote: tbh towniest post so far from elpis but aureal/elpis is a possible pairing-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
I agree with your reads on patch and elpis, but regarding myself, you're wrong on the reasons I voted Dragon then. My main reason was that he was pointing players saying that they were scumlurking and not giving their opinions on others and I pointed out that he was doing the same to my eyes. Not because pushing others, being reactive or giving readlists without reasons is bad (and I said that as well and I have been doing some of those) but that he didn't give me the reasons and opinions of those and he was asking others for theirs.In post 461, Kanna wrote: bewolkt: the first content post in their iso is their readlist in 185 which i don't love. the worst read imo was dragon's because it does seem ridiculous to have him as your main suspect with reasons like "pushing the more inactive slots and some reactive posts to other player's content" (this isn't scum-indicative) and "His readlist don't say much to me since I haven't see the reasons behind them."-- how is the fact that someone's readlist doesn't have reasons a reason to scumread someone? their last line is also bad since it seems to be just not understanding something they did (and there's no reason why that specific discrepancy is scummy). i totally understood and agreed with dragon's jump on this. i'm also not sure why they voted elpis when dragon is their main suspect. it's weird.
if i'm understanding correctly, they later explain that they didn't say these things were scummy but dragon was their main *suspect* because they didn't understand the the things they mentioned. i do kinda understand this but.... idk i don't think i like it. their other posts don't say anything significant i don't think -- just kind of is there. one thing to note though, is how quickly they were willing to vote maestro after my first readlist. they could've easily faked inactivity then so they could see how the winds would blow if they were partners so that leads me to believe they aren't.
To your second part I didn't jump to vote Maestro after your readlist when I had already expressed in 323 before you entered the game that I was already finding his behaviour scummy. I said I would wait to see his thoughts as he promised and because he keep going with the same and not giving anything I voted them-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
If you think maestro/andante claimed PR as scum to out the town's PRs why do you think then that it is best that she fully claims so that the town PRs are outed?In post 470, Kanna wrote:
why do you think this? isn't it pretty common practice to claim pr as scum to draw out the town prs?In post 456, Aeronaut wrote: I guess I'm just feeling like you'd have to be pretty stupid to claim a PR in the setup as scum.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
I am townreading patch because we have a previous game together where they were acting similarly. I agree that they are not the player that contributes the most or the clearest, but I still haven't seen anything that pinges as they not acting like their usual self. I know that this is not a reason good enough to be sure about someone's alignment and I'm open to that changing later when we get more information, but as of now they still feel genuine to meIn post 446, Andante wrote:
and like, pulling up the joint ISO of bewolkt and patch, the 2 have just about no interactions with each other, and if you're only leaning 2 people town, why aren't you talking with them both to see where their head is at? cause before this, it's a bunch of patch and whatever with aero/aurel (I'm not sure what happened, but I see patch quoting like every post and responding to something)In post 185, bewolkt wrote: Leaning town
Aureal - Her thoughts seem to be coming from a town perspective and I agree with most of their reasonings
patch - they come off as genuine to me and I like many of their thoughts but tbh there's also a part of me that is a bit puzzled by their way of reasoning. Too many posts which makes it a bit difficult for me to keep track of what their stance is at any moment
I don't believe that you genuinely town lean patch, and patch really seems to be avoiding interacting with you tbh 413 is bewolkt's attempt to start getting actual interactions, and patch just shrugs it off like "idk vibes" (legit post... 422)
So I'm sitting here, like, yes, obviously I'm tunneled on these 2 right now, but I see a bunch of posts from patch jointing this aero/aureal thing, but then when patch is asked about their thoughts on something they said... it's just "idk" this is seriously feeling like patch and bewolkt are partners, and patch doesn't really care about interacting with bewolkt, cause they're trying to get towncred with the town or something? idk the reasoning, but yeah, I'm 100% confident this is the scum team tbh
Regarding our interactions I would have to ISO both to check but I feel patch has reacted to many of my posts like they usually do with others? And for myself I feel that the amount of interaction that I've put on patch is quite similar to what I've been having with others, so I feel maybe you're indeed a bit tunneled here-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Yes I know they said it as a "positive" thing in their scumread since they were also scumreading that slot. I just wanted to make clear that their readlist wasn't in any way a motivation for my vote and that I was ready to do it before, regardless of what he thinks of that slot.In post 494, DragonEater70 wrote:
You're misunderstanding Kanna, they made a point in your favor about how if you were Maestro's scum partner you wouldn't have voted them, but you did and rather quickly.In post 475, bewolkt wrote: To your second part I didn't jump to vote Maestro after your readlist when I had already expressed in 323 before you entered the game that I was already finding his behaviour scummy. I said I would wait to see his thoughts as he promised and because he keep going with the same and not giving anything I voted them
But yeah I am also more inclined to believe they are really town. It's possible that it is a fake PR claim just stay alive but after their content I doubt it.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Does the fact that you both agree on Elpis being town mean that you find Kanna less scummy? Why are you happy being in agreement with your scumread? I think that might be more of a red flag than anything elseIn post 476, KawaiiKame wrote:
Why am I so high to you, and why is maestro so low? Happy we in union with elpsis being town, did you scumread beowolkt b4? Aero feels low to me lemme reread your readsIn post 471, Kanna wrote: new list!
[dragon, patchwork, aureal, kawaii]
[elpis]
[bewolkt]
[aero]
[maestro]
Also, what are your thoughts on Dragon at the moment?-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
What? I also think in principle that there should not have been a claim. Unless we were in column C there is the potential of having a protective PR that would protect Andante so he wouldn't be killed anyway and we would have more information at later daysIn post 512, Kanna wrote: one comment i read on this page was “it’ll let scum know what setup we are in” — yes that is true. but I don’t think that knowledge is as much of a benefit to scum as it sounds on paper. at least I can’t think of a way i could use it as scum to massively swing the tide in my favour. I’ll invite anyone reading this to think on this in case I’m missing something though — put yourself in scum’s shoes. If say you know the prs are a jailkeeper and a friendly neighbour (or whatever combination), how will that change how you play the game going forward? since I can’t think of the inherent benefit of scum knowing the setup, I consider this point negligible
Now I think Andante did well in claiming because a Tracker won't be killed anyway because they can be protected so there is no loss. But with other roles that's not the case and you shouldn't have encouraged that imo. I think the chances of fakeclaiming as scum were low (why would she risk doing that?) so it feels you were just trying to out her to get more info for scum
VOTE: kanna-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
@kawaii can you answer this?In post 509, bewolkt wrote:
Does the fact that you both agree on Elpis being town mean that you find Kanna less scummy? Why are you happy being in agreement with your scumread? I think that might be more of a red flag than anything elseIn post 476, KawaiiKame wrote:
Why am I so high to you, and why is maestro so low? Happy we in union with elpsis being town, did you scumread beowolkt b4? Aero feels low to me lemme reread your readsIn post 471, Kanna wrote: new list!
[dragon, patchwork, aureal, kawaii]
[elpis]
[bewolkt]
[aero]
[maestro]
Also, what are your thoughts on Dragon at the moment?-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Really surprised by the claim. I was starting to scumread Kawaii...
Still feeling it shouldn't have been necessary to fully claim since now scum are fully aware of the setting and I'm surprised no one else was against it-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Okay I'm re-reading the full claim/not claim situation and I'm trying to reassess the situation and make sense of it:
So first there was the initial soft claim. If Andante were scum, that could have already been risky since there was the possibility of being outed by masons if there were in the game. After that, I believe there was no as much pressure on Andante as there was before, so I don't think he was in that much danger anymore. There was still some push for a full claim and he did claim Tracker.
Kanna kept pushing to out the other PR (I'm using PR here as any role that is not a townie since I've seen some discussion over what is/isn't a PR). I was disagreeing with that reasoning but it is true that if Andante was scum and knew we were in column C, and they were already aware that there were no masons, it would be a 50/50 chance with a false doctor/tracker claim. But for Kanna to think we could be in column C and Andante would have gambled for 1 setting there... That's a big jump imo if you have no information. But given this, if Kanna is scum then we are for sure in column A, because if she knew we were in column C she didn't need any more info because there would be no other roles to protect Andante.In post 578, Kanna wrote: this means if mafia know we are in column c, they have the potential to claim doctor or tracker and *not* be counterclaimed. but mafia also have a risk as they choose the wrong option out of doctor or tracker, they will still be counterclaimed. cop counterclaims tracker and jailkeeper counterclaims doctor. and of course mason counterclaims both because they know if they exist, we must be in a3 or c3.
Also I kind of disagree here going back to it. If Andante's gambit had been "Either I survive or out the cop" they would have claimed tracker from the beginning. They softclaimed first which was an "only survive" type of claim and then they were pushed into full claiming. It was really the push from the rest that went to draw out the other PR.In post 619, Kanna wrote: I’m sorry but that wasn’t a good gambit like, from what I’ve seen scum usually claim pr when they’re in trouble so a ~vague pr~ claim certainly wasn’t going to make me townread you, and then tracker is probably also the most scummy pr to claim alongside doctor cause those are the only two fake claims scum can use. actually, tracker *is* the scummiest pr to claim because a cop has to be outed to counterclaim it. so for scum, it’s like you either survive by guessing the right cell or draw out the cop (both of which are good) or you’re just unlucky and there are masons.
In post 589, Kanna wrote: a vague cc is perfectly acceptable
That being said, it is also true that she wasn't pushing to really counterclaim but just to get confirmation that there were no one that could counterclaim it, which is more town. But I have the feeling that even if no one had counterclaimed she would still be thinking that was just Andante guessing the setup somehow, so there was not really another out of this than the full claim.In post 579, Kanna wrote: bewolkt
Aureal -- no cc
Elpis
DragonEater70 -- no cc? please confirm
patchwork -- no cc? please confirm
KawaiiKame -- no cc? please confirm
Kanna -- no cc
Andante
Aeronaut-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
I don't feel it has to be necessarily between Kanna and Aureal. I would like to hear more from Aero as well. I felt they were much more active and they contributed a lot (and in a good way) at the beginning but he faded away lately, which makes me suspect a little bit tbhIn post 636, Elpis wrote: Just woke up and got on, it seems like I've missed a LOT, reeling a bit to try and take everything in.
So, Andante claimed tracker-- but is actually a mason with kawaii, and did so to try and bait people who knew the setup? How would people know the setup? Having a little trouble following but I think I understand the general idea. That seems worrisome as information to have out on day 1, because the benefit of masons is mostly later in a game, right?
As for the vote on Kanna, I'm not very comfortable with the idea, especially since they seemed to just be trying to analyze and push Andante for some information, but I also can see that people have set their sights on the latest information rather than past, and intend to try to information gather through Kanna's elimination maybe? If the choice is between Kanna, and Aureal, though, I would be more inclined to vote against Kanna. Aureal has felt really heavily town for me the whole game, and I don't really understand where the suspicions are coming from in that regard. However, I may do another ISO of her soon to see if I've missed something there.
Personally, I am leaning towards a patch/aero scum team, but that's still a work in progress feeling, and I'm not confident.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
About Aureal I'm still feeling town. I'm trying to be cautious because in the previous game I played I was townreading someone too much and then I was wrong so I'm trying to not make the same mistake now and keep my eyes open. It's true that I'm not super sure about her being town, but I still don't see anything that makes me very suspicious.In post 641, DragonEater70 wrote: Tell you the truth, your analysis is a fair one but I feel we're not going to get very far with setup talk RN. I think we should focus on scum hunting, which is not something we actually have a lot of time to do. I thought it might be Aureal, I do have doubts, would like to hear your opinions.
Further, someone suggested it might be Aero and I'm open to the possibility and will ISO them, but also want to hear your opinion on that slot.
The only thing that I found a bit weird was the asking others about their own vote. I didn't understand very well the purpose and at some point I thought it might have been scum trying to look more townie by just pointing at her own minor inconsistencies. But other than that most of her posts seem to be trying to contribute in the good direction and coming from her own perspective-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
We have 40 hours so please help alongIn post 648, patchwork wrote: well fuck me with a rusty chainsaw
we literally have four hours and i don't think i'm gonna be on for any of it-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Well the first post comes from RVS and the others comes from much later in the day, and I don't really see any inconsistencies there, probably his read on Ircher changedIn post 663, DragonEater70 wrote: So in conclusion, Aero thought that Ircher voting Maestro was completely fake, was thinking that I was scum, and still liked the Maestro wagon and called it organic? And why would you like a wagon you think a scum is pushing? What?-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Can you explain what you mean here? I think I sort of understand it but at the same time, I feel it's very normal to look for potential associations. Like the way Dragon is explaining why they think flipping Aureal would be valuable to them given that they consider her associations with other playersIn post 739, Alisae wrote: it's super easy in the mafia to conf bias yourself and think you're right just because one thing went your way-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Where do you see the Elpis - Aureal connection?In post 746, Kanna wrote: i am inclined to vote aureal here. i really liked alisae's comments and suddenly feel like the game makes sense now
and if it's aureal, elpis is probably her partner-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Why are you explaining Alisae's vote?In post 752, DragonEater70 wrote:
So yeah, Aureal is unvoting Andante because they are claimed PR, but in this post she's still thinking Andante is scum. Therefore it being an "unvoting andante post" doesn't make it a townpost for Aureal at all.In post 697, KawaiiKame wrote:
Why you voting aureal in this unvoting andante post?In post 694, Alisae wrote:
VOTE: aurealIn post 454, Aureal wrote: Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
UNVOTE: Andante I guess. Honestly, I felt a little uncomfortable with the way Kanna was talking about people being willing to eliminate the slot, felt a little like trying to push the narrative that it was inevitable and I kinda wanted to unvote at least temporarily to at least make sure Maestro continued to talk. His case on patch was interesting and I can't say it doesn't resonate with some feelings I've had; I kinda felt that sort of thing starting with when patch seemed to agree with me that it was unnecessarily risky to e-1 people early then promptly put Aero at e-1. However, his last few posts were mega WTF, like he was trying to screw with us, so I still feel pretty bad about the slot.
Given the claim I suppose it's best to see what a new day brings in that regard. But it feels bad to go after patch either at this point. The way Maestro started to case them and it promptly got picked up by the replacement makes me worry that Andante saw plans of the sort for a patch push in the scum PT. And I don't know that I agree with the reasoning about lack of interaction. Heck, I'm not sure I've really interacted with some slots, I'd have to check isos to better judge.
I'm not really sure what direction to go at this point, I'll need to do a little more thinking and poking at things.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Do you mean what Dragon is doing here? I think if he is mistaken and is trying to justify a vote that it's not his, this is town. I guess scum would be more aware of their interactions and wouldn't have made that errorIn post 759, Alisae wrote:
What alignment do you think this comes from?In post 756, bewolkt wrote:
Why are you explaining Alisae's vote?In post 752, DragonEater70 wrote:
So yeah, Aureal is unvoting Andante because they are claimed PR, but in this post she's still thinking Andante is scum. Therefore it being an "unvoting andante post" doesn't make it a townpost for Aureal at all.In post 697, KawaiiKame wrote:
Why you voting aureal in this unvoting andante post?In post 694, Alisae wrote:
VOTE: aurealIn post 454, Aureal wrote: Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
UNVOTE: Andante I guess. Honestly, I felt a little uncomfortable with the way Kanna was talking about people being willing to eliminate the slot, felt a little like trying to push the narrative that it was inevitable and I kinda wanted to unvote at least temporarily to at least make sure Maestro continued to talk. His case on patch was interesting and I can't say it doesn't resonate with some feelings I've had; I kinda felt that sort of thing starting with when patch seemed to agree with me that it was unnecessarily risky to e-1 people early then promptly put Aero at e-1. However, his last few posts were mega WTF, like he was trying to screw with us, so I still feel pretty bad about the slot.
Given the claim I suppose it's best to see what a new day brings in that regard. But it feels bad to go after patch either at this point. The way Maestro started to case them and it promptly got picked up by the replacement makes me worry that Andante saw plans of the sort for a patch push in the scum PT. And I don't know that I agree with the reasoning about lack of interaction. Heck, I'm not sure I've really interacted with some slots, I'd have to check isos to better judge.
I'm not really sure what direction to go at this point, I'll need to do a little more thinking and poking at things.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Okay maybe I misunderstood it. I thought Kawaii was asking Alisae why did they vote Aureal based on that post. Then you answered which I thought it was a mistake from you thinking that the vote was yours and not Alisae'sIn post 775, DragonEater70 wrote:
I'm explaining why Kawaii shouldn't assume that an unvote = Aureal town. IDK, maybe Alisae can explain it better.In post 756, bewolkt wrote:
Why are you explaining Alisae's vote?In post 752, DragonEater70 wrote:
So yeah, Aureal is unvoting Andante because they are claimed PR, but in this post she's still thinking Andante is scum. Therefore it being an "unvoting andante post" doesn't make it a townpost for Aureal at all.In post 697, KawaiiKame wrote:
Why you voting aureal in this unvoting andante post?In post 694, Alisae wrote:
VOTE: aurealIn post 454, Aureal wrote: Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
UNVOTE: Andante I guess. Honestly, I felt a little uncomfortable with the way Kanna was talking about people being willing to eliminate the slot, felt a little like trying to push the narrative that it was inevitable and I kinda wanted to unvote at least temporarily to at least make sure Maestro continued to talk. His case on patch was interesting and I can't say it doesn't resonate with some feelings I've had; I kinda felt that sort of thing starting with when patch seemed to agree with me that it was unnecessarily risky to e-1 people early then promptly put Aero at e-1. However, his last few posts were mega WTF, like he was trying to screw with us, so I still feel pretty bad about the slot.
Given the claim I suppose it's best to see what a new day brings in that regard. But it feels bad to go after patch either at this point. The way Maestro started to case them and it promptly got picked up by the replacement makes me worry that Andante saw plans of the sort for a patch push in the scum PT. And I don't know that I agree with the reasoning about lack of interaction. Heck, I'm not sure I've really interacted with some slots, I'd have to check isos to better judge.
I'm not really sure what direction to go at this point, I'll need to do a little more thinking and poking at things.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Hi everyone!
There has been a lot of content in the last few hours. It was Saturday night here in Europe that's why I wasn't here since I had plans + sleep. I will give a list with my reads to explain where I'm at right now but just wanted to address first that I feel the push on me it's mostly motivated on:
- My amount/style of posting: Maybe I should be posting more random thoughts and stuff to increase my post counts idk. I like to question others on things that I feel will advance the game and I don't have a problem with giving my thoughts when I'm question about them. But I also don't like to accuse others if I'm unsure and in general at day 1 I feel I'm mostly trying to figure out the other players. That's why I relate for example to Kawaii in that I also think she feels similarly but I understand that some frustration might come out of it (like I was at one point starting to suspect her). In any case, anyone can have a look if you want at my two completed games here: Newbie 2110 (full completed game) and Newbie 2113 (where I entered as a replacement in D1). I was also poked there for some reasons that are similar so feel free to take a look at them if you'd like.
- My association with Aureal: I can't believe people are scumreading me because we were both townreading each other at some point. Not because I even defended her or anything. But what I'm most baffled by it's that this is coming from someone that posted 732 and 733. Don't look for pre-flip associations but at the same time I warn you that I am going to be hypocritical and use the associations to prove 2 are wolves.
So if Aureal and me are wolves, why are we doing that?In post 757, Alisae wrote: I think it's pretty easy to look for what one thinks wolves do instead of what wolves actually do because identifying what wolves actually do is really hard! It takes a lot of experience and understanding of the game to be able to identify why it is someone is a wolf and it's really easy to posts support one alignment in reality it doesn't and it's something that can happen as any alignment-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
It's true that I didn't say it explicitly but my townread on you it's in a big way based on the previous game we played together. What I meant in 647 is that I was afraid about townreading you too much because in our other game you were very obviously town to me (until I got confused by a potential association and I panicked, why is the same I think it's happening to some players here). So maybe now I was following that feeling too much but and maybe now you were scum.In post 879, Aureal wrote: Oh yeah, and bewolkt failing to say anything about me other than asking "why Aureal and Elpis" is really pinging me. Everyone and their mom are trying to 'meta' read me based off of one game even though I explained that I react to the game I'm in. Meanwhile bewolkt actually played a game as town with me, unlike Alisae and Andante who played with me as scum and thus weren't really trying to read me. And bewolkt hasn't offered any comment, one way or another, not even a "I don't feel like I can meta-read Aureal." Which would be perfectly appropriate. But sound wishy washy.
But yes, I hadn't felt any big difference with the way you played on both. The only time that you felt a bit off for me was with the 'Why didn't I vote Maestro?' thing. That felt a bit strange to me-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
In post 887, Andante wrote: yeah that whole thing is just.. nothing lol also, why explain the unsure more than town leans?? if for any reason other than to "hide" your partner...
I wanted to make a difference between players that I was unsure about their alignment (I saw things that made me tr them but also some that I found suspicious) and those players that I felt I could not have formed a read on them and I needed to hear more from them. It's not necessarily that one is above the other or anything. And because of that I explained more the unsure because I had conflicted feelings about them so I elaborated a bit on them while on the others it was more 'need more', 'feeling good'...In post 885, Andante wrote: hmm here's like one of the few posts of "stuff" I'm not super impressed, definitely can see bewolkt + aero team with this, cause your early read on a partner is not going to be strong scum or strong town, feels like a lot of explaining for "unsure" like, why unsure over null? like, you're putting unsure above null... as if to imply the null are scummier? well.. 2 of the null are masons..
And I gave my list because Dragon wanted me to contribute more, so I explained where I was at that moment. But if that hadn't happened I probably wouldn't have done that at that pointIn post 889, Andante wrote: also, bewolkt's list comes after dragon gave a list.... scum tend to start copying lists when others do them...
VOTE: Bewolkt-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
I'll re-read a bit and then I will post my updated list of thoughtsIn post 1040, Elpis wrote: The bewolkt thing is just a restatement, but it does have some validity, even if it's extremely brief. Bewolkt needs to talk more and be involved more, and I want to know their thoughts on Alisae thus far.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Updated reads
Town
Kawaii + Andante
confirmed masons
Dragon
he is trying to solve and I feel his push on Aureal feels really townie even if I think they are a bit tunneled and getting swayed a bit by Alisae. They are swinging a lot which feels natural as well. The only thing I'm a bit confused by is on his stance on Kanna. They were suspecting her and seeing a possible association with Aureal but they also locktown her at the same time. Based on some of his other interactions I guess it's mostly based on that he buys the whole claim thing and they're in agreement about the Aureal push, but still makes me wary about a potential association here
Null-town
Elpis
Still feeling good about this even though some of their posts seem a bit too vague to me. But I very much relate to that feeling and I can see from where their reluctance comes from. Also I find very townie that they didn't jump at Aureal like others and they feel like they're trying to think independently. Also their comments on Alisae seem pretty spot on to me
Aureal
I feel her exchange with Dragon is town vs town. I think there's a lot of nitpicking in both sides, like 740 and 791, but I don't think in any case those are meaningful reasons to scumread each other and they are getting a bit defensive. Like they are getting frustrated at each other from being accused based on semantic things and misunderstandings so they are going after the other, but none of that seems to me really indicative on either's alignment.
I also still don't see the big inconsistencies in her posting like others are saying. I relate very much with her frustration on Alisae. I would like her to expand her thoughts on what they've been doing since their entrance, because I think that will be very valuable for town.
patch
I wish we could hear more from them because that's my main complain. I'm willing to give them the benefit of doubt because I still feel they were townie and I want to believe they are really busy. But I can't discard the possibility of them just trying to fade away and don't have any attention on them.
Scum
Kanna
I put Kanna first even though they are my main scumread but I think it's better if I explain this first. I dropped the talk about the PR claim after 641 and tried to focus on something else but I still don't understand why others don't give more importance to this since this is the most important thing that has happened that is actual game information because there has not been a flip yet. I was also scumreading reading Maestro at that point as well but moved away with the claim so I still don't see why others didn't backtracked that even if I think there were enough reasons to suspect that slot before. I still think that what happened was one of a) we are in column A and she was trying to find first the setting and later the Jailkeeper (most likely) or b) we are in column C so she was surprised by the fake Tracker claim so she was surprised since that is not possible and she was trying to find a cc or more info.
After that I don't see that much other than they jumped into the aureal train which is not really unexpected since she was a big wagon and this fits her perfectly since the heat is moving somewhere else
Alisae
I think they have a potential association with Kanna. They came in and started to move the conversation to others. She has doubted everyone else in play (Aureal, Elpis, Dragon, patch, me) but not Kanna and her response to my accusations on her are things like "this is so bad", "nooooo", "not buying this". I would like to see some real thoughts on why that doesn't make sense.
Also not a fan of how they talk like they're showing others how to play the game and that it's so obvious, something that also Maestro was doing. In this case I think it's sort of working because other players are also not really questioning her and her motives.
After pushing mostly Aureal and to some extent also me, then they're also like "I'm not picking sides", "I'm open minded to be wrong". On the other posts I don't really feel that they are not very certain of their comments and it feels to me that they're pushing the conversation towards where they want but at the same time keeping their options open so that after the flip they didn't look like they were pushing so much.
So for me the flip that I think it will give more information remains Kanna, also because of the fast vote that patch put on her before dissapearing.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Which are the questionable choices?In post 1040, Elpis wrote: But I do understand placing Kanna relatively towny, because I do agree on that front, even if some questionable choices have been made.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Don't know if you had time to read my full list, but at this point it's Kanna/Alisae. At this point the only thing that gives me pause it's that I believe Alisae doesn't seem a player that would defend her teammate so openly, but maybe she did it just out of necessity.In post 1066, DragonEater70 wrote: Let me ask you this question: what is your suggested scumteam, if it's not you and Aureal?
Waiting to see what else patch has to say warming up more and more to them, after conveniently coming here to jump into my wagon after being also in the Kanna wagon. But now apparently my conclusions don't make sense anymore?-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
pedit - but I am warming up*-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
That you also voted Kanna after the PR claim thing but now I am sticking to my vote and that's somehow a lmao conclusion?In post 1098, patchwork wrote:
sorry wtf does this mean lolIn post 1095, bewolkt wrote: after conveniently coming here to jump into my wagon after being also in the Kanna wagon-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Yes of course. I also don't have any problem to give my thoughts on anything at each moment. But I wouldn't have made such a list so early since I try to not give that much importance to the reads on RVS and I feel much changes and I need much more to solve (and even now I'm not even sure that what I have it's the solve, but it's the best I can do now). Now I'm getting a lot of heat for it for being open/vague but it was very early on the gameIn post 1067, DragonEater70 wrote: Would you have given it at any point though?-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Ok can you explain why did you vote Kanna in 613? And why do you want to vote for me now?In post 1101, patchwork wrote: i dont understand you sorry-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Okay sorry I did not see that you already posted thisIn post 1099, patchwork wrote: i voted kanna because i didn't have time to think about the game and i thought we were nearing deadline (was going by the timer on pg1) lmao-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
So do you have time now to think about the game? Will you give us your readlist?-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
This is very interesting. But wouldn't it be the same? Us having to do majority voting to choose a leader? Do you think we won't be disperse for that? But if I had to choose it would probably be one of the Masons since they are already confirmed townIn post 1083, DragonEater70 wrote: Okay guys do you know what we need?
We actually need to work together.
I feel we are extremely dispersed as town with more or less everyone doing their own team and no agreement is being reached.
Please have a look at this link (it's a pretty short read):
viewtopic.php?t=90488
I think we should do what this guy says and elect a town leader who will just choose a lim and we all agree beforehand to follow the lim.
I'm nominating myself and Andante.
You guys can vote for whoever you want to be townleader.-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
I think this is a fair and interesting analysis, but I would swap Dragon and patch there tbh. At least Dragon had expressed some doubt about Aureal before, so his push felt somewhat more consistent. It was Kanna and Patch both who swapped their reads from before to join you after your pushIn post 1254, Alisae wrote: Like the reactions from town (I'm not considering Kawaii and Andante here because they're masons) are all different from one another, but the reactions from wolves are very similar and look like capitalizing on the situation.
In post 746, Kanna wrote: i am inclined to vote aureal here. i really liked alisae's comments and suddenly feel like the game makes sense nowIn post 1082, patchwork wrote: i vibe with alisae, i like their reads and their vibes and the way the play-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Wow...
Why are you so sure patch is town and it was a mistake?
-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Very much agree with thinking things through. D2 went by too fast.
Will try to post a more detailed analysis later but still my main sus is Kanna, I feel she took advantage of any situation she was involved since the push on D1-
-
bewolkt Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: January 18, 2023
Going to read Kanna's theories now, but first:
Patch, where did you think Alisae was trying to pocket you? I'm having a look at D2 and I'm not really seeing any of that