Newbie 843 (Game Over)
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
Hi Meji. Nice to see you too. Too bad you died so soon in 807. I was disappointed by the end of it.
FoS: Zachrulez
Putting Meji at L-2 was suspicious specifically
His next post also just seems like he is jumping on other people's ideas.Zachrulez wrote:Bandwagoning for the sake of bandwagoning.
I'll post more tomorrow. Night.-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
Manho: 1 post instead of 4 please
Scum or town: I prefer town; you know less so it's more of a challenge.
So when you're town you don't proofread your posts to see if anything suspicious pops out at you?EtherealCookie wrote:WrathOfShadows:
Already thinking about what might catch people's attention, and what might not?WrathOfShadows wrote:The "If i were mafia" comment always seems bad to me since that will ALWAYS catch someone's attention in the worst way possible.
Where did he say he knew it wasn't going to be a tell? The brush-off was after Manho responded (or at least that's what Wrath implied).EtherealCookie wrote:
So you know it isn't going to be a tell, yet you still see the need to see what reaction he'd have?WrathOfShadows wrote:@Meji-Manho didn't do anything suspicious, but that for me makes me suspicious. everyone says something to set someone else off at some point and i was just trying to see what reaction he'd have to it. Unfortunately, a brush-off isn't much of a tell one way or the other
The town creates the "reasons." The scum just have to grab on to those reasons and add a few of their own. Have you played as scum before? (Sorry if that was already answered)EtherealCookie wrote:
How are the mafia going to use that to their advantage? If they have no good reason for lynching someone, and are just joining a bandwagon, that really gives them away Day II. Now, if they NK suspicious people, more power to them. They just allowed us to turn our attention away from suspicious townies that are now dead.Suppose there are a couple people that others seem suspicious about. The mafia may use that to their advantage to remove the competition without ever exposing themself/themselves.
THAT is my problem with using scumlists in the first place.
He never said he wasn't going to post.EtherealCookie wrote:
So basically, you're not going to try to get people to react, and get any responses?WrathOfShadows wrote:I don't make a vote unless i have what i conceive to be concrete reason.
The rest of you I haven't given a good look over yet, but will get to. However, as of currently...
Vote:WrathOfShadowsYou seem like a smart guy. Yet you're keeping quiet and trying to stop discussions like scumlists from taking place, and aren't really making an attempt to find scum.
Wrath was right, you were juggling his words.
Vote: EtherealCookie
More tomorrow.-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
In case you didn't notice, I wasn't defending Wrath, I was critiquing your arguments which held no water.EtherealCookie wrote:Someone just randomly comes into the defense of Wrath and votes for me with a terrible reason to, as well. It was already obvious Wrath's reason for voting for me was just a retaliation. Funny you support him. Hmmm. If Wrath gets lynched and shows scum, I'll know who to look into next.
See bolded. Additionally, mafia aren't the only ones who make slips. If they're good scumhunters in the first place they'll realize what's scummy about the townies' posts.EtherealCookie wrote:
Uhm. Yes. One game off these forums that was poorly done. Secondly, have you ever seen scum grab onto the reasons? It's a bit obvious. They have poor reasoning for why they agree, other than "What he said." They don't bring anything new for suddenly switching the vote as soon as a band wagon starts.crazypianist1116 wrote:The town creates the "reasons." The scum just have to grab on to those reasonsand add a few of their own.Have you played as scum before? (Sorry if that was already answered)
Regardless, you're moving the target.EtherealCookie wrote:
Regardless, that was a very pointless post. Even if it didn't get brushed off, how exactly was it going to reveal anything?crazypianist1116 wrote:Where did he say he knew it wasn't going to be a tell? The brush-off was after Manho responded (or at least that's what Wrath implied).
Finally the if I were mafia comment was just bad. What I would and wouldn't is WIFOM.
My vote stands.-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
1. No it isn't.tubby216 wrote:
1)waiting till deadline to simply get a lynch is weak,Soyasushi wrote:Tubby, even if the deadline's coming up there's still time to think properly about who we should vote for! You say that you think yernab's the most suspicious, as do I, but you voted for Wrath even though you didn't suspect him at all. He'll be lynched by deadline anyway, with his number of votes, so why rush it when there's no absolutely concrete evidence?
Is this scummy or VI?
2) day1 lynches always have the east amount of info/evidence
3) my hammer isn't a VI move if anything you may call it scummy.
4) after wrath reaching L-1 his damned if he does damned if he don't post kinda sealed it for me. It diddn't appear that he was going to defend himself any longer so i figured i'd simply put him out of his misery.
2. More time = more evidence on day 2
3. Yes it is scummy
4. "I figured I'd simply put him out of misery" sounds scummy.
If you aren't scum, I don't know what this game has come to.-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
-
-
crazypianist1116 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 634
- Joined: June 18, 2009
- Location: Madison, WI
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.