Just because noone has yet.
And wouldnt it be ironic if the two people stalking each other were scum... hmmm.
Funny enough, I hate the twilight series. My name was back when I was 16 (10 years ago.) so they copycat me.Deer wrote:Not really a fan of random voting, but...
vote: RPG*Twilightbecause I don't like the twilight series
Ellibereth wrote:What's wrong with wagoning on the first page? There really is no point on just having 1 or 2 votes on everyone.RPG*Twilight wrote: Wagon is dully noted, maybe my vote on Elli wasnt a bad idea.
Elli, why would you wagon on the first page?
I'm not worried in the slightest, for those exact reasons. But is there any harm in asking?SensFan wrote:I don't think it is possible that you are at L-2 on the first page, and we get two Town people not currently voting you, who decide to come in and vote you, without anyone currently voting you noticing this and unvoting.
Newbs games often end up with someone freaking out about a page 1 lynch that almost happened. Relax, you won't get lynched on page 1. And if you do, we'll nab the Scum for 'ya.
Very eaisly. If 3 townfolk vote for one townfolk, then that leaves two mafia to hammer. That didnt happen, and seeing as everyone is active, it's pretty safe to assume that there was at least 1 mafia in that wagon. That's what people are getting at, and that's why it's pretty simple for a page 2 lynch.elli wrote:Why would you even think that a page 2 lynch would be possible...
First off, I appreciate that you're the IC. But really? What trivial details were we getting hung up on? This whole game is about discussion. Why would you need to step in as an IC and defend her? She made a wagon, I questioned it.sensfan wrote: I'm the resident IC for this game. My job is to make sure you guys don't get hung up on trivial details like that. It had nothing to do with defending Eli in specific, more just pointing out why the whole logic of attacking Eli is wrong.
Umm. I beg to differ, two quotes here that kind of contradict this.jee wrote: That is another reason my random vote on Twilight, was not so random. Mulitple votes pressure people.
Then, without an answer, and only two posts later.jee wrote: So where do these random votes take us?
But, isnt that a random vote masked as a very weak argument? It doesnt sound, smell, or look like a case. It's just a vote, for really no reason. "The same reason I did" is a pretty random reason, given we posted in the same minute. But then you say that it isnt random, and that it was there to pressure me. But you never explain that until you unvote. Yikes, the contradictions!Jee wrote: Unvote
Vote: RPG*Twilight
Copy Cat. For using the same reason for his random vote, as i did, one post earlier.
What would be your case against me? Would you really have put up a fourth vote based on little more then the RvS that was there. What information do you have? I'll gladly answer your questions, but if you were really considering putting up a fourth vote, and then dont to "save face", that is noted and very interesting. You had little more to go on then the rest of us, and the fact you were even considering putting me at L-1 with no evidence, is pretty much like putting a vote, and a fairly scummy one at that.sensfan wrote: To be honest, I looked at ths screen for quite a while last night, contemplating if I wanted to place a fourth vote.
Well i'll be... It is. My apologies.Deer wrote:Hey RPG, I said "So where do these random votes take us," not jee. Just thought I should clear that up.
I never had you answer this for me, Jee. But what in the heck do you mean by this? You dont want ME to put suspicion on you? Why not? If you're town, what are you afraid of?Jee wrote: @ Twilight. yah that wasn't me. you confused me. Also, you don't want to say, "Oh I'm not going to random vote during RVS, so I will put a second vote on someone." That may create suspicion on me. I saw that you had one vote, so I put a second one on to create pressure, discised as a random vote.
What reaction were you looking for? The only reaction you'll ever get out of that is exactly what you got. Nothing more can really come of that. Especially when two posts that should have been substantial in content were "I have my reasons" and "Me". People were waiting to see what you had to say, and you bailed on that and now you're saying it's just because you wanted a reaction. El contrair, we actually wanted a response out of you. But you gave us none trying to use the "reaction" tactic. It just seemed like a good bailout plan.Jee wrote: I was answering the questions asked, giving no reasons because i was looking for reaction
Interesting. For two reasons. You're not committing to voting or to helping the town by withholding information about SensFan. I do see in the beginning you were against my L-2 lynch, pro-town, yes. But is it smoke and mirrors? From your latest actions, it does kind of sound like it, doesnt it?DarklightA wrote:I've seen a pattern in scum. You seem like one of them. Partly because of your leniency towards people you suspect,and the way you're not committing yourself to voting.
and to reitierate the quote from above:DarklightA wrote: A hypocrite is a person who says one thing and does the opposite.
Just a thought...DarklightA wrote:I've seen a pattern in scum. You seem like one of them. Partly because of your leniency towards people you suspect,and the way you're not committing yourself to voting.
This makes no sense. EVERYONE got on DLA, that's what makes this difficult. And DLA was our BWCS, given that he offered us nothing when SensFan had to repeatedly ask what he was talking about. DLA was making no sense to anyone, so it's really a null-tell. I think it's more the fact I think scum took advantage of this.Mr. Finch wrote: My other candidate right now is SensFan. He started on DLA (admittedly DLA did not help himself at all) and never let up until he got what he wanted when we lynched a townie.
Now, although I agreed with you, DLA flipping town probably isnt the best thing now after reading this comment. He didnt do any of his part, that I understand, but now that I re-read this with new information, the word "hypocritical" "demanded" "most suspicious" "hounded" seems like a plea to hound DLA.SensFan wrote: Do the rest of you really not see how hypocritical it is that DarkLight hounded me to explain something I already had, demanded quotes, and then refuses to explain why he thinks I'm one of the most suspicious people here?
For visual proof. She could have very eaisly thrown two names into that hat. (Or maybe one is, and then instead of her name, threw in another... the possibilities)Ellie wrote: I'm comfortable claiming whatever I think, and I think there exists that possibility that jee and deer are scum.
As a matter of fact if the game were to end now and I had to guess who the scum were, I'd say them.
Yes, I understand that is what you were supposed to do. Doesnt mean you couldnt take advantage of it as scum.SensFan wrote:What was I supposed to do, RPG, when the player I thought was Scum wasn't doing anything to let me see where he's coming from, and the rest of the Town didn't appear to be following me? Hindsight is 20-20.