Newbie 897 ~ Mafia Marching Band (Game Over!)
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
werdna0418 wrote:I /boldVOTE MCGRIDDLE (i think thats how you bold if not can someone help please) becasue i went to mcdonalds the other dar ordered a mcgriddle and got an mcmuffin and im still bitter about it
Hahaha made my day
you bold by hitting the box with aBin it, it will do the work, hit it once before the statement, and once more afterwords.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
6 games on the site, 4 ongoing , none IRLYankee wrote:Hello everyone! I am your IC this game so any questions related to the game you can ask me about and I will give you a straight forward answer regardless of my allignment. With that said, I would like to mention that it makes it much easier if everyone has an avatar (Werdna). If you need any help figuring out how to get an avatar then send me a PM and I can walk you through it or something. So to try and get some discussion started, I would like everyone to answer this question:
How many games have you played before, either real life or online?
I personally have played 9 games on this site, 6 completed and 3 ongoing. Also on another site I have completed 5 games, and 1 ongoing. No games in real life though.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
LolLacey wrote:
A little worried McGriddle? I don't see you offering advice on scum hunting...McGriddle wrote:
So are you voting me or not? lolFlareonage wrote:I do it manually
[b*]VOTE: MCGRIDDLE[/b*]
Just take out the *'s
Unvote: werdna0418, Vote:McGriddle
A. I'm not worried, but you should be, you put me at L-3 already That's even more scummy
B. I am sorry, I didn't see your post about good advice, let's seeeeee, being aggressive is not a scum-tell, scum doesn't always want to see people get lynched, a lot of scum want to not be a part of any wagon so they can have 2 kills while under the radar.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Lol I said it with a tongue out, meaning it's a joke, I don't care that she put me in L-3, just giving an opinion, I didn't vote nor did I OMGUS. Not over-reacting. BUT that being said, you just put me at L-2 for a real reason, and that doesn't sit well with me.Yankee wrote:really Mcgriddle? You bring up the fact that she put you at "L-3" when she is only the second person to vote you. L-3 should not ever be mentioned as doing something scummy, especially in Day 1... No scum in their right mind would try to hammer this early in the day on day 1. And you do seem a little uneasy to me. For this, and the reason that I dont have a vote yet....
Vote: Mcgriddle-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Wow, Marco, you come on here, and you are ready to put me up to L-1 for such an empty reason? You guys are willing to lynch an SE for making the accusation that I was "upset" that someone put me at L-3?Marco91 wrote:I agree with Yankee as well.
Vote: MCGRIDDLE
This is SO scummy.
Lacey, please read the next post by me.
The day started yesterday and you guys are ready to mis-lynch off of random voting and mis-understanding? I'm sorry, but this type of play is NOT pro-town.
I can't believe that Marco put me at L-1, that is the scummiest thing I have ever seen.Unvote, Vote: Marco91For putting me at L-1 SOOOO early in the game without a chance to really get started, andFoS on Flareonagefor attempting to hammer so soon.
Don't vote me because of random voting.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
A chance to explain yourself? You didn't give me one, you asked no questions, and posed no reason (other than agreeing with another player). I think a vote is a very important thing, and I disagree with changing it quickly without questioning and having a good basis behind the vote.Marco91 wrote:
Dude, its Marco.Slaxx wrote:unvote. Vote Marcos
@Lacey, I knew, i was putting him at L-1, but i didn't know that would make people mad, as flareonage said this is a newbie game, so i didn't know.
That doesn't mean i will unvote because of that.
Now because of that most of you wil vote for me, and that would be convenient wouldn't it?
And you say everybody should vote for me, without the chance to explain myself?
No thanks.
Unvote; Vote: Lacey-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Nevermind. I won't explain more unless somebody asks lol.McGriddle wrote:Lacey, it is terribly anti-town to list your probable townies, although I agree with Yankee that your scum-hunting list is indeed pro-town, you NEVER want to list your probable townies. I will explain more on this after breakfast.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
That is because I have been busy all day. No time to do anything. I was going to help her understand what AtE was, I wasn't calling her out or anything.Lacey wrote:
How about answering all the real questions? You keep saying you will when you get "free time", or "after breakfast", but you haven't. We're not going to forget.McGriddle wrote:
this is an AtE. I will post more when I get dome freeeeeeeeee time.werdna0418 wrote:Lol I am so sorry I really am trying to play and figure it out please done hate me guys...
BTW everyone, I made my own McGriddle this morning. And to answer your question, it was great. Baha.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Just a quick question, if that seemds like the most scummy thing to do, why not hammer Marco? You don't seem to have any substance to your posts. No FoS'ing, and no tells coming from you. Seems like you are trying to fly under the radar rather than scum-hunting or asking any questions.werdna0418 wrote:that is what i was originally thinking also about the i want to but i dont want too-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
I am sorry, I thought A. Marco was at L-1, B. You hadn't voted him, and C. You weren't scum-hunting, I ISO'd you and turns out you are doing a pretty good job.werdna0418 wrote:@mcgriddle how am i not asking questions when i just sent all that stuff at flame? i am deifnitley not UTR The marco theory i dont understand what you are trying to say why not hammer marco...idk but then if you wanted to use that example why not say i am tempted to hammer marco but im not like flam did for you?
@flame This is all i need to see again you do not answer any of my questions you just say lets test the theory....
I thing Flare is my next pick for scum, he puts somebody at L-1 so he can "test the theory" if you don't have a real case against anyone why would you vote them? much like your attempt at a hammer vote on me for fun.
Marco- You L-1'd me VERY early with no real reason. You OMGUS'd Lacey, and you buddied up with Flare to get a force-hammer.
Flare - you are Lurking and you wanted to hammer without a reason other than 'he is an easy kill, and I really like hammering, it is fun'-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
I think I would like to put Flareonage at L-1, he seems to want a quick-lynch which is scummy, he also seems to flop his votes based on everyone elses emotions on the situation, I want to see what he will do with a little bit more pressure on him. At the same time I think Marco is also scum, both seem like scum, it seems like a Flare/Marco scum possibility. I would like toFlareonage wrote:Werdna never unvoted. The post was not bolded and therefore doesn't countunvote; vote: FlareonageIf anybody wants to hammer ask for a claim first. Flareonage please answer the questions and the claims against you.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Okay, fair enough, I will do this right now.Lacey wrote:And for the record, I am not putting my vote anywhere until we hear from:
Yankee
Slaxx
and
mavsfan41
regarding the posts today. I'd also like to hear fromDatadanneif he can log in.
McGriddle, you're posting a lot but not answering our questions. This is very scummy. It shows you do indeed have the time you claim not to have.
I'm still FoSing McGriddle, Flareonage, and Marco91
1. Done1) You've still not chimed in with how to get scum lynched.
2) As Yankee said, complaining about L-3, especially when we're more or less just random voting right now is a bit of an over reaction.
3) Calling my vote on you scummy, followed by this post is pretty classic scum.
2. I wasn't complaining I was just saying it's pretty aggressive.
3. You had no legit-reason to put me in L-3 so I did what I could to show it was a bad vote on me, but not be TOO heavy-hearted or defensive about it because it IS only L-3, not a big deal.
BTW This is really scummy
Flare:
You say this in a scum point of view, saying it pisses everyone off, meaning you know I am town, and voting me would piss everyone off so you're not going to do it.I'm EXTREMELY tempted to hammer. I have done it so many times already but it just pisses everyone off so I'm not gonna do it now.
^^ Sticking up for MarcoI doubt he was aware he was putting someone at L-1. This is a newbie game, he probably wasn't paying attention.
Now, you don't want to list probable townies because that can give those "probable townies" a free pass, they can show that if any of the people you are thinking are townies is on a wagon, hammer voting, or L-1ing a townsperson the fact that they are listed as probable townie will provide no pressure from them. Scum would be able to use a probable townie list to their advantage and if the scum is good they will most likely wind up on the probable townie list, giving them a free pass the rest of the game. If you have a probable townie list it is better for town to keep it to yourself.
Now I think that is everything, if I have missed something please feel free to ask.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
I disagree with your view of a probable townie, if there is no evidence on a player that is a 'neutral player'Lacey wrote:
I disagree heavily with this. "Probable town" doesn't mean "don't look for evidence" it just means "no evidence yet, and some evidence for pro-town".Now, you don't want to list probable townies because that can give those "probable townies" a free pass, they can show that if any of the people you are thinking are townies is on a wagon, hammer voting, or L-1ing a townsperson the fact that they are listed as probable townie will provide no pressure from them. Scum would be able to use a probable townie list to their advantage and if the scum is good they will most likely wind up on the probable townie list, giving them a free pass the rest of the game. If you have a probable townie list it is better for town to keep it to yourself.
I gave you scum-hunting tips like you asked, it is for newbies to notice in a thread, IE: "being aggressive is not a scum-tell, scum doesn't always want to see people get lynched, a lot of scum want to not be a part of any wagon so they can have 2 kills while under the radar."
Showing that usually the less-aggressive players are more likely town and more-aggressive players who banter other players but does not have a vote are more likely to be scum, but if someone is aggressive and sticks with their vote from their own reads, and contributes more than personal shots they are probably town. I hope that clears up some confusion.
Lacey, it seems like you have tunnel vision on me from you "gut".Wins/Losses - 99/15
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
No, I could see how this could be misinterpreted, I wasn't telling anyone I was town, I was merely saying he was implying that he knew I was town, and knew if he voted me it would be a mislynch, in his own words.Slaxx wrote:
I dont like that bolded phrase. He tried to awkwardly integrate it into the argument. The idea of course, being that he is town. I don't know, it reads awkwardly and doesn't sit well.McGriddle wrote:
Okay, fair enough, I will do this right now.Lacey wrote:And for the record, I am not putting my vote anywhere until we hear from:
Yankee
Slaxx
and
mavsfan41
regarding the posts today. I'd also like to hear fromDatadanneif he can log in.
McGriddle, you're posting a lot but not answering our questions. This is very scummy. It shows you do indeed have the time you claim not to have.
I'm still FoSing McGriddle, Flareonage, and Marco91
1. Done1) You've still not chimed in with how to get scum lynched.
2) As Yankee said, complaining about L-3, especially when we're more or less just random voting right now is a bit of an over reaction.
3) Calling my vote on you scummy, followed by this post is pretty classic scum.
2. I wasn't complaining I was just saying it's pretty aggressive.
3. You had no legit-reason to put me in L-3 so I did what I could to show it was a bad vote on me, but not be TOO heavy-hearted or defensive about it because it IS only L-3, not a big deal.
BTW This is really scummy
Flare:
You say this in a scum point of view, saying it pisses everyone off,I'm EXTREMELY tempted to hammer. I have done it so many times already but it just pisses everyone off so I'm not gonna do it now.meaning you know I am town, and voting me would piss everyone off so you're not going to do it.
^^ Sticking up for MarcoI doubt he was aware he was putting someone at L-1. This is a newbie game, he probably wasn't paying attention.
Now, you don't want to list probable townies because that can give those "probable townies" a free pass, they can show that if any of the people you are thinking are townies is on a wagon, hammer voting, or L-1ing a townsperson the fact that they are listed as probable townie will provide no pressure from them. Scum would be able to use a probable townie list to their advantage and if the scum is good they will most likely wind up on the probable townie list, giving them a free pass the rest of the game. If you have a probable townie list it is better for town to keep it to yourself.
Now I think that is everything, if I have missed something please feel free to ask.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Well if you disagree at least do it respectfully. You are still showing tunnel vision, and when you say i'm "trying to mislead the town" that's your OPINION not FACT. I am trying to help the town, especially the newer players, see some ways to tell if somebody is pro-scum.Lacey wrote:
This like all your "scum hunting" tips is absolutely false. You are trying to mislead the town. McGriddle, you convincing me more and more that you are scum.McGriddle wrote:Showing that usually the less-aggressive players are more likely town and more-aggressive players who banter other players but does not have a vote are more likely to be scum, but if someone is aggressive and sticks with their vote from their own reads, and contributes more than personal shots they are probably town. I hope that clears up some confusion.
The Wiki: Mastin's Insane Tells wrote:Caution is a scum tell, where Recklessness is a Town Tell.
The fact that you treat my tip as 'misleading' means you don't like the way I do things. If you didn't want to have me try to help out newbies with some scum-hunting tips of my own, then you shouldn't have asked and you SURE as hell shouldn't have pushed so hard for me to tell my advice.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
You really don't have anything good on me. All of your so-called tells on me are far-fetched and opinionated.Lacey wrote:
Nice try scum, but I'm doing nothing of the sort. Slaxx asked for pressure, I'm applying it, because I am not yet ready to lynch Flare, or you for that matter, until we hear from Yankee and others on today. I'm more than happy to lynch either of you two, or McGriddle by then.Marco91 wrote:
And i find odd that you vote me only to prove that you are pro-town.Lacey wrote:
Fair enough, though right now I'm leaning Flareonage.Slaxx wrote:I find it odd that Lacey hasn't put her vote on anybody. Some pressure> No pressure.
Vote: Marco91
Tunnel vision meaning you think I am scum and no matter how good I defend myself, or how much of your theory I disprove, your opinion of me is always the same. I have seen players like you before, and my and their personality never mix well so I can understand your negative feelings for me and your 'gut-tell-scum-read" on me. But you are only debunking my scum-tells with opinionated junk.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Except your vote was on the 2nd or 3rd page during RVS lol
If flare flips scum he didn't do much to help you by buddying up with you.
That and your L-1 vote that had no reason of your own was pretty major. I personally think you are new-townie, so I don't necessarily think you are scum, but you should look into some games and the consiquences of putting someone at L-1 or hammer-voting if they flip town, or if you have no good reason.Wins/Losses - 99/15
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Oh my. I think we can all agree that Flare was the most reasonable vote. That may have been too quick, but his overall attitude and lurkyness made him the best candidate.
Well, that being said my next person I had wanted to pursue was datadanne. But Lacey was killed N1 so that rules him out for the most part. His vote on her made no sense, and he did not give a reason even though everyone asked for one. But why would he kill somebody he was putting pressure on? That is why I am leaning the other way on him.
My next candidate would have to be Marco. Marco was full of scummy-actions that would have made him the most suspicious if Flare flipped scum. I do not know what to think of Marco at this point. I want to say Marco is scum, based on the fact that Lacey was on his wagon, and when she left she and Flare flipped Doc she would be right back to Marco.
More to come. Bummer.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Oh also, just a thought, datadanne could have done it to make himself look pro-town? idk. just a theory, a weak one at that lolMcGriddle wrote:Oh my. I think we can all agree that Flare was the most reasonable vote. That may have been too quick, but his overall attitude and lurkyness made him the best candidate.
Well, that being said my next person I had wanted to pursue was datadanne. But Lacey was killed N1 so that rules him out for the most part. His vote on her made no sense, and he did not give a reason even though everyone asked for one. But why would he kill somebody he was putting pressure on? That is why I am leaning the other way on him.
My next candidate would have to be Marco. Marco was full of scummy-actions that would have made him the most suspicious if Flare flipped scum. I do not know what to think of Marco at this point. I want to say Marco is scum, based on the fact that Lacey was on his wagon, and when she left she and Flare flipped Doc she would be right back to Marco.
More to come. Bummer.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Can anyone tell me why I am still scummy? I have dis-proven everyone's theories, and added a lot of useful information about other players. I don't know why I am still on the chopping block. I am not complaining, and I am still scum-hunting to the best of my ability. But I would just like to know. I don't feel I have done anything wrong. I don't have any votes on me, so I am not complaining in the least bit. I just want to know everyone elses thoughts on me, and why I am considered scummy?mavsfan41 wrote:I agree that Datadanne putting a random vote on Lacey without a reason was weird. He had been lurking and then randomly cast a vote on Lacey. Flare was the most reasonable vote, but hammered prematurely. He didn't get on final thought in before Lacey hammered him. My suspicions still sit on McGriddle and Marco, but I don't believe they're scum together. I have no thoughts on a partner yet. I will let you guys know when I do have a partner or decide that McGriddle and Marco are indeed scum together. But for now, I'm pretty sure one of them is scum. I don't know which of them is scum though.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
good post, I like your way of thinking. Even if I don't follow that way of thinking I still encourage it. Lol, Now, I am not COMPLETELY clearing him of anything, I just said he was a major candidate, like I would have applied most of my pressure on him, because his vote was ridiculous and out of place. But I am wishy-washy on him because If he was on her wagon and trying to get her lynched why would he kill he during the night? but at the same time he could have done it to look pro-town.mavsfan41 wrote:McGriddle wrote: Well, that being said my next person I had wanted to pursue was datadanne. But Lacey was killed N1 so that rules him out for the most part. His vote on her made no sense, and he did not give a reason even though everyone asked for one. But why would he kill somebody he was putting pressure on? That is why I am leaning the other way on him.
@ McGriddle, why do you clear datadanne just because Lacey was killed N1? I don't see your reasoning for that. That vote didn't make much sense, and one tiny vote when Flare was one away from being lynched isn't that much pressure. Pressure had already been put on Lacey, making her expose her notes. Yankee had claimed that Lacey is not scum since scum would not be this dedicated to scum-hunting, taking most suspicion off of her. I just want you to know McGriddle, I have not voted for anyone this entire time. I will not vote for anyone until I'm almost 100% sure that the person I have voted is scum. A miss-lynch with 9 people is very bad and even worse with 7 remaining, two of them being scum. If I do think you're scum, I will vote for you and give you all my reasons for voting you. Until then, keep posting your suspicions and thoughts.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
You get on here with a bunch of questions, avoid them, then contribute nothing, you lurk more than anyone in this game. You are stirring up trouble, and you give no reason behind anything you do. I would like some pressure on you.Datadanne wrote:/facepalm
Voting the wrong guy is bad.
I don´t see you bing helpful, At all.right now i wanna hear from datadane i think that he was pretty suspicous yesterday and has not been helpfula t all i want some thoughts from him...
Nothing more to say, Really, Except that one of Marco or McGiddle are probby scum.Vote: Datadanne
And again, I would still like to know why I am considered scummy.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
No just recently I started asking everyone to give me reasons because I am towards the top of a lot of peoples LoS and nobody is giving me any reasons. I wasn't WIFOMing I even said it was just a thought and a curious [weak] one at that. I am not going to completely negate night actions as a way of hunting scum. If you are pro-town you will use all possible resources to get the best reads off of people and use that for questioning.Yankee wrote:I do find Data scummy for his actions as of late, however I believe he is probable townie. I say this because if he were the type of person that would NK the person he votes for, then in my opinion he would have voted for the bandwagon to get them lynched. But Data actually near the end was opposed to people voting flare, which wouldnt make sense for him. He would have to be cunning to do that and have a thought out strategy like that, and if he did, then he wouldnt NK the person he voted for in the day. Just my thought on the matter. As for Mcgriddle being suspicious, it is just some things I have noticed over time, like you using WIFOM in several of your posts, and also constantly asking people why you are suspicious. Scum are more likely to ask why they are suspicious so they can change their ways, just something I have also noticed over time playing mafia.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
I agree, I am only voting to apply pressure. He hath done nothing ITT to help anyone with anything lol.mavsfan41 wrote:I would also like to add that Marco is acting too pro-townie, but I feel as though it is fake. Just the tone, and how he words everything, it just seems so fake.
I don't know what to say about Datadenne's refusal to post. I don't want to lynch this early. Currently he is at L-2. I want to advise everyone to not lynch Datadenne too early. He seems like the easy target right now, but please hold back for now.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Ahhhh Marco. I think I am going to put my vote back on you. I released pressure off of you, after you L-1'd me for no substantial reason. You continued to do nothing impressive. I wanted to see some goodness out of you, I wanted to blame it on you being a newb, but you haven't done anything really pro-town. Datadanne is well... I don't really know. He is an easy target, because of his anti-town actions, but Marco is the scummier player.
Vote: Marco91
You are at L-1 now. Do not rush into a lynch everyone, I just want some good pressure.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
VI edited it I thinkYankee wrote:Um, Marco is not voting himself?....
Daykill: McGriddle ~Vi
*Note: McGriddle is not actually dead, although he might be if he messes my name up again.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Oh yes, you are not the "VI" I apologizeMcGriddle wrote:
VI edited it I thinkYankee wrote:Um, Marco is not voting himself?....
Daykill: McGriddle ~Vi
*Note: McGriddle is not actually dead, although he might be if he messes my name up again.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
AtE. Don't give up, don't crack, that's the worst thing you can do if you are indeed a VT like you say you are. Everyone knows what will happen if a mislynch occurs, that's why we try so hard to get it right. That being said, I think we have found scum, and I would not be opposed to a hammer vote, Would you care to full-claim Marco?Marco91 wrote:
I don't know who is scum at this moment.werdna0418 wrote:why is marco 91 voting himself....and marco i would like to know who you think is scum and why?
I'm usually not this terrible at vote counts. Sorry... ~Vi
But if you guys wanna just lynch me, go ahead.
You will sacrifice an innocent townie, and more innocet lifes will be lost.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
What? Your reasoning is pretty dumb. I asked for a claim because he was at L-1 getting ready to be lynched if another player wanted to hammer. I don't want PR blood on my hands if he claims cop. If he claimed cop, I probably would have post-poned my vote, getting more information about him before making a decision of whether I think he was BSing me or not. Besides, I asked him if he WANTED to claim, he doesn't have to. I've been scum-hunting this whole game, I brought the original wagon on Marco, then he went to L-1 through that reasoning. If I were scum, I would care less who the cop was, scum wouldn't want to know if somebody was the cop, when in lylo they would probably try to figure it out, but it is too early in the game to throw such far-fetched accusations around. Marco is obviously showing his scummy side, everything he has done has had a scummy-esque way about it, and cracking under the pressure proves it. Marco already 'hinted' that he was VT by telling us all that he was an "Innocent little townie", If I were scum, and he partially-claimed townie, why would I pursue him being anything else? Players who claim townie get lynched anyways, as they are not PR's, so if I were scum wouldn't I have just waited until he was lynched to see what he was? You show complete tunnel vision on me in post #253. It seems to me like you were busing Marco, then when he was in L-1 you decided to unvote and vote me because I am reasonably set on Marco, unless he does something to impress me. It seems like if Marco IS scum, which all signs point to yes, you are in fact his scum-buddy. Further more, if I were scum, and there was a cop, then that set-up involves a role blocker, why would I want to kill the cop if I or a scum-buddy had the role of role-blocker? Your logic is false, and you fail at your reasoning. You have shown a complete fallacy in your last posts, and frankly I am disappointed.mavsfan41 wrote:McGriddle wrote:
AtE. Don't give up, don't crack, that's the worst thing you can do if you are indeed a VT like you say you are. Everyone knows what will happen if a mislynch occurs, that's why we try so hard to get it right. That being said, I think we have found scum, and I would not be opposed to a hammer vote, Would you care to full-claim Marco?Marco91 wrote:
I don't know who is scum at this moment.werdna0418 wrote:why is marco 91 voting himself....and marco i would like to know who you think is scum and why?
I'm usually not this terrible at vote counts. Sorry... ~Vi
But if you guys wanna just lynch me, go ahead.
You will sacrifice an innocent townie, and more innocet lifes will be lost.
Something occurred to me with this post. The last sentence is really, really, scummy. It seems like a very innocent act, pro-town asking Marco91 to claim. McGriddle asked Marco91 to full-claim. So, I'm doing this...
Vote:McGriddle
I know I told you in one of my earlier post that if I voted for you, I would tell you why. Here it is...
When Flare was lynched, he was proven to be the townie doctor. This tells us, that out of the four possible set-ups, two are now ruled out, the one without townie power-roles, and the one with the lone townie cop. Now, that means that two possible set-ups remain: the one with the lone townie doctor and two normal scum. The other possible set-up is the one with the doctor, cop, scum, and roleblocker. The scum OBVIOUSLY know which of the previous set ups we are playing. One of the scum players knows if there is a roleblocker. And, if a roleblocker exist, they know a cop is still around. Since McGriddle asked for a claim, the only claim that Marco91 would provide would be the cop. Since this is the only townie who can be affected by the roleblocker, a cop claim would be golden for the scum. Since McGriddle also attempted to make Flare claim, I have come to the conclusion that McGriddle is scum aligned trying to figure out who the cop is in order to role-block him or NK him. If McGriddle were town aligned, then he has know idea of which set-up we're playing, and a claim of VT would occur if there is no cop remaining. McGriddle is the only one asking for claims. McGriddle is NOT scum hunting, he is townie hunting to figure out who the cop is. He is scum looking for the cop!!!!!!
Another reason: at the beginning of the day, everyone was suspicious of him, and his only concern was to figure out why. This is really scummy play.
Even more reasons: Another scummie post made by McGriddle was 199. In this post, McGriddle provided a motive for his vote attempting to clear himself very early in the day. For all these reasons, I am almost certain that McGriddle is scum.
What does everyone else think??
What do you think McGriddle?????????-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
What do you mean of course I would hop on the wagon? I started it originally, then went to flare because I was convinced of a flare/marco scum pair, and I decided flare was more scummy than marco. I'm not going to OMGUS vote you, that's stupid and besides, I don't think you're scum. Your reasoning is just so far-fetched that it creates a fallacy.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
McGriddle wrote:
Wow, Marco, you come on here, and you are ready to put me up to L-1 for such an empty reason? You guys are willing to lynch an SE for making the accusation that I was "upset" that someone put me at L-3?Marco91 wrote:I agree with Yankee as well.
Vote: MCGRIDDLE
This is SO scummy.
Lacey, please read the next post by me.
The day started yesterday and you guys are ready to mis-lynch off of random voting and mis-understanding? I'm sorry, but this type of play is NOT pro-town.
I can't believe that Marco put me at L-1, that is the scummiest thing I have ever seen.Unvote, Vote: Marco91For putting me at L-1 SOOOO early in the game without a chance to really get started, andFoS on Flareonagefor attempting to hammer so soon.
Don't vote me because of random voting.
begining.
Called by Lacey, and I agreed.Lacey wrote:Marco was at L-1, werdna unvoted, putting him at L-2, Flare voted for him, putting him at L-1, I unvoted to prevent a hammer.
Marco is at L-2.
.
I think Flare knew it, as did Marco and they're putting on a show to make us think they aren't scum personally
there go.McGriddle wrote:
I think I would like to put Flareonage at L-1, he seems to want a quick-lynch which is scummy, he also seems to flop his votes based on everyone elses emotions on the situation, I want to see what he will do with a little bit more pressure on him. At the same timeFlareonage wrote:Werdna never unvoted. The post was not bolded and therefore doesn't countI think Marco is also scum, both seem like scum, it seems like a Flare/Marco scum possibility.I would like tounvote; vote: FlareonageIf anybody wants to hammer ask for a claim first. Flareonage please answer the questions and the claims against you.
McGriddle wrote:Oh my. I think we can all agree that Flare was the most reasonable vote. That may have been too quick, but his overall attitude and lurkyness made him the best candidate.
Well, that being said my next person I had wanted to pursue was datadanne. But Lacey was killed N1 so that rules him out for the most part. His vote on her made no sense, and he did not give a reason even though everyone asked for one. But why would he kill somebody he was putting pressure on? That is why I am leaning the other way on him.
My next candidate would have to be Marco.Marco was full of scummy-actions that would have made him the most suspicious if Flare flipped scum. I do not know what to think of Marco at this point. I want to say Marco is scum, based on the fact that Lacey was on his wagon, and when she left she and Flare flipped Doc she would be right back to Marco.
More to come. Bummer.
and now I'm back at Marco. I think my vote has been pretty consistent with my feelings and actions towards Marco. I think he is scum, so my vote stays with him.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
mavsfan41 wrote:McGriddle wrote:
What? Your reasoning is pretty dumb.mavsfan41 wrote:McGriddle wrote:
AtE. Don't give up, don't crack, that's the worst thing you can do if you are indeed a VT like you say you are. Everyone knows what will happen if a mislynch occurs, that's why we try so hard to get it right. That being said, I think we have found scum, and I would not be opposed to a hammer vote, Would you care to full-claim Marco?Marco91 wrote:
I don't know who is scum at this moment.werdna0418 wrote:why is marco 91 voting himself....and marco i would like to know who you think is scum and why?
I'm usually not this terrible at vote counts. Sorry... ~Vi
But if you guys wanna just lynch me, go ahead.
You will sacrifice an innocent townie, and more innocet lifes will be lost.
Something occurred to me with this post. The last sentence is really, really, scummy. It seems like a very innocent act, pro-town asking Marco91 to claim. McGriddle asked Marco91 to full-claim. So, I'm doing this...
Vote:McGriddle
I know I told you in one of my earlier post that if I voted for you, I would tell you why. Here it is...
When Flare was lynched, he was proven to be the townie doctor. This tells us, that out of the four possible set-ups, two are now ruled out, the one without townie power-roles, and the one with the lone townie cop. Now, that means that two possible set-ups remain: the one with the lone townie doctor and two normal scum. The other possible set-up is the one with the doctor, cop, scum, and roleblocker. The scum OBVIOUSLY know which of the previous set ups we are playing. One of the scum players knows if there is a roleblocker. And, if a roleblocker exist, they know a cop is still around. Since McGriddle asked for a claim, the only claim that Marco91 would provide would be the cop. Since this is the only townie who can be affected by the roleblocker, a cop claim would be golden for the scum. Since McGriddle also attempted to make Flare claim, I have come to the conclusion that McGriddle is scum aligned trying to figure out who the cop is in order to role-block him or NK him. If McGriddle were town aligned, then he has know idea of which set-up we're playing, and a claim of VT would occur if there is no cop remaining. McGriddle is the only one asking for claims. McGriddle is NOT scum hunting, he is townie hunting to figure out who the cop is. He is scum looking for the cop!!!!!!
Another reason: at the beginning of the day, everyone was suspicious of him, and his only concern was to figure out why. This is really scummy play.
Even more reasons: Another scummie post made by McGriddle was 199. In this post, McGriddle provided a motive for his vote attempting to clear himself very early in the day. For all these reasons, I am almost certain that McGriddle is scum.
What does everyone else think??
What do you think McGriddle?????????I asked for a claim because he was at L-1 getting ready to be lynched if another player wanted to hammer.I don't want PR blood on my hands if he claims cop. If he claimed cop, I probably would have post-poned my vote, getting more information about him before making a decision of whether I think he was BSing me or not. Besides, I asked him if he WANTED to claim, he doesn't have to. I've been scum-hunting this whole game, I brought the original wagon on Marco, then he went to L-1 through that reasoning. If I were scum,I would care less who the cop was, scum wouldn't want to know if somebody was the cop, when in lylo they would probably try to figure it out, but it is too early in the game to throw such far-fetched accusations around. Marco is obviously showing his scummy side, everything he has done has had a scummy-esque way about it, and cracking under the pressure proves it. Marco already 'hinted' that he was VT by telling us all that he was an "Innocent little townie", If I were scum, and he partially-claimed townie, why would I pursue him being anything else? Players who claim townie get lynched anyways, as they are not PR's, so if I were scum wouldn't I have just waited until he was lynched to see what he was? You show complete tunnel vision on me in post #253. It seems to me like you were busing Marco, then when he was in L-1 you decided to unvote and vote me because I am reasonably set on Marco, unless he does something to impress me. It seems like if Marco IS scum, which all signs point to yes, you are in fact his scum-buddy. Further more, if I were scum, and there was a cop, then that set-up involves a role blocker, why would I want to kill the cop if I or a scum-buddy had the role of role-blocker? Your logic is false, and you fail at your reasoning. You have shown a complete fallacy in your last posts, and frankly I am disappointed.
These two parts I have pointed out are two more reasons you're scum. The first part is about you putting Marco at L-1. You did the same thing to Flare. I want everyone to know that McGriddle did the same thing to Flare before he was lynched. This is McGriddle's way of hammering townies while appearing not to. He puts them L-1 so it looks as though he is not hammering them, then he waits for another townie to finish them off. He did the same thing with Flare, and is now doing it with Marco.
The second part, you are BSing bad. You're scum, and I think the scum would love to know who the cop is. You know there's a cop, and you're trying to WIFOM the town into saying that scum wouldn't want to know who the cop is. That is complete BS. Anyone who is scum wants to know who the cop is. Thats basic. After looking at your counter argument, I feel as though any doubts in my mind are gone, and that I'm 100% sure that you're scum.
For anyone who thinks I'm scum for attacking McGriddle, namely Slaxx, I think you should take a good look at what has happened so far in this game. McGriddle put Flare at L-1 and has gotten a townie lynched, and now he has hunted for the cop. As for me, I have not wrongfully lynched anyone. I am pushing for McGriddle, who has looked scum the whole time. I don't think Marco is scum only because I believe that Slaxx may be McGriddle's scum partner.
Every single piece of your case is an opinion. I bad one at that. You said previously that you were 100% sure, now you are saying you are definitely 100% sure. Which is it? It seems to me like to just want everyone knowing that you are 100% sure I am scum. Every piece of your arguement against me is an opinion, and could only be true if one thing were to happen. I was lying. I haven't lied this whole game, nor has anyone had a reason to accuse me of a lie, so you are just reaching in the dark to try to get some far-fetched case against me that nobody is even considering, because you are not providing a good case at all.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Here's a few thing i'm concerned about with you.mavsfan41 wrote:If you have such a great case against Marco, why did Slaxx change his vote. Clearly he doesn't agree with you, so he changed his vote to me. You may have presented a case for Marco, but Slaxx has changed his opinion from your case to voting for me on the basis that I'm convicting McGriddle. I don't know why though.
A.) I never said anything about 'having a great case against Marco, and that's why everyone changed their vote, and I am the only reason Marco is being voted' (Paraphrasing here) all I said is that YOU were reaching in the dark for a bad case against ME.
B.) If he disagreed with me, why would he change his vote to you at all?
C.) You seem VERY concerned that Slaxx put his vote on you. I just want to ask you, why are you so defensive?
D.) He never said he was voting you because you are convicting me, you are reaching into the dark to try and convince the town that we are 'scum-buddies' based on your OPINION that I am scum.
E.) The BIGGEST problem I have is your tunnel-vision that you have for voting me, and that your support is only backed up by opinions. I didn't think you were scum, but you seem to be convincing me other wise, pushing for a lynch with no real case against me, then claiming Slaxx is my hypothetical scum buddy off of more bad opinions, and that is as scummy as it gets.
Unvote, Vote mavsfan41
For reasons I listed above, and I want to see what he will do with more pressure on him. He is already being over-defensive about his 1 vote.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
mavsfan41 wrote:B) If he were to see it your way, he would vote for Marco. If you made a good case, then it would make sense that Slaxx would put his vote on Marco instead of me.
C) ARE YOU SERIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!! All you did at the beginning of this game was f*cking b*itch that you got like 2 or 3 votes during the RVS period. All you have been doing is whining and complain non-stop about votes and people being suspicious of you.
The thing that upsets me is that you and your partner are probably getting off the hook because the townies will vote for me along with you guys. You claim I don't have a good case, but you vote for me. If you weren't worried about my case since its opinionated and has major flaws, you shouldn't be worried at all. I'm not scum and I think I have shown it. After you guys lynch me, I want the townies who voted with you guys that they F*CKED UP BAD!!!
So, after lynching me, what the next plan???? Another townie will be NK, and then 5 are left, and then a miss-lynch means you guys lose. A miss lynch of me will result in one more chance to get the scum. With so many people being suspicious, a miss lynch today and tomorrow are extremely likely. The only thing I have left to say is that we desperately need more town activity.
Wooooooow, I have to agree with slaxx, you are really cracking and freaking out. You are grasping at straws, and AtEing SO bad. I don't think you will be a mis-lynch otherwise I wouldn't have my vote on you. I can see a mavsfan/marco pair. I think if we lynch you, and you flip scum, then we have a real shot at winning, with only 1 scum left it shouldn't be too hard to figure out who it is.
B. Again you are accusing a scum-buddy pair of me and slaxx, that's the only logical way this can make sense. We are not buddying up or anything, so I could care less if he supports my case on Marco, or makes his own case against somebody else. In fact, I prefer he doesn't follow me because I want to see other factors in this game that I haven't noticed before to make somebody else a more scumesque player than who I think is scum. I want people challenging my vote and making LOGICAL accusations. If he disagreed with me he would have spoken up, but he votes you instead. So the fact that you suggest he is doing anything with relation to me is just ridiculous. And how funny is it that you are accusing the two people with votes on you to be a pair? Priceless scummy OMGUS behavior.
C. Yeah, getting somebody lynched during RVS is the dumbest idea you could possibly have. Of course I would QUESTION why people were doing it. Unlike you, in which you are flipping shit over 2 votes on you. You seem really uncomfortable with the position you are in, and are grasping at straws from the opinionated straw-man.
Stop trying to AtE by telling everyone if you get voted off we're effed because that is scum trying to prevent L-1 and a hammer.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
mavsfan41 wrote:B) If he were to see it your way, he would vote for Marco. If you made a good case, then it would make sense that Slaxx would put his vote on Marco instead of me.
C) ARE YOU SERIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!! All you did at the beginning of this game was f*cking b*itch that you got like 2 or 3 votes during the RVS period. All you have been doing is whining and complain non-stop about votes and people being suspicious of you.
The thing that upsets me is that you and your partner are probably getting off the hook because the townies will vote for me along with you guys. You claim I don't have a good case, but you vote for me. If you weren't worried about my case since its opinionated and has major flaws, you shouldn't be worried at all. I'm not scum and I think I have shown it. After you guys lynch me, I want the townies who voted with you guys that they F*CKED UP BAD!!!
So, after lynching me, what the next plan???? Another townie will be NK, and then 5 are left, and then a miss-lynch means you guys lose. A miss lynch of me will result in one more chance to get the scum. With so many people being suspicious, a miss lynch today and tomorrow are extremely likely. The only thing I have left to say is that we desperately need more town activity.
Wooooooow, I have to agree with slaxx, you are really cracking and freaking out. You are grasping at straws, and AtEing SO bad. I don't think you will be a mis-lynch otherwise I wouldn't have my vote on you. I can see a mavsfan/marco pair. I think if we lynch you, and you flip scum, then we have a real shot at winning, with only 1 scum left it shouldn't be too hard to figure out who it is.
B. Again you are accusing a scum-buddy pair of me and slaxx, that's the only logical way this can make sense. We are not buddying up or anything, so I could care less if he supports my case on Marco, or makes his own case against somebody else. In fact, I prefer he doesn't follow me because I want to see other factors in this game that I haven't noticed before to make somebody else a more scumesque player than who I think is scum. I want people challenging my vote and making LOGICAL accusations. If he disagreed with me he would have spoken up, but he votes you instead. So the fact that you suggest he is doing anything with relation to me is just ridiculous. And how funny is it that you are accusing the two people with votes on you to be a pair? Priceless scummy OMGUS behavior.
C. Yeah, getting somebody lynched during RVS is the dumbest idea you could possibly have. Of course I would QUESTION why people were doing it. Unlike you, in which you are flipping shit over 2 votes on you. You seem really uncomfortable with the position you are in, and are grasping at straws from the opinionated straw-man.
Stop trying to AtE by telling everyone if you get voted off we're effed because that is scum trying to prevent L-1 and a hammer.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Well, your overall activity is pretty lame, but I can't really say that's a scum tell especially since datadanne is doing the same thing. I just think you are a noob, and are trying to cover your ass so you don't get lynched, which is reasonable.werdna0418 wrote:slaxx just ahve reread the thread i have spoken about the same as you have have answered any question anyone has given me...what makes me more supsicous than you when em and u ahve about equal participation in this game?
I would like to get more out of you in the situations we're in.
@ Werdna0418 - what do you think about mavfan's vote on me? would you agree that it is a pretty far-fetched case based off of opinion? Or do you really think me and slaxx are in a 'scum-pair' like mavsfan said?-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
way to be anti-town there mavsfan. You should care about the town no matter WHAT happens to you if you are town. If it were to come to a situation where you were mislynched you could still win the game if the rest of us play our cards right.mavsfan41 wrote:
I just wanted to point out that you're defending McGriddle. With this post you're even attempting to clear McGriddle. I never did anything like that. All I said about Datadenne is that you're wasting your time by asking him questions. When is the last time Datadenne has posted anything related to the game? I will say this again since you didn't understand it the last time, but stop asking stuff of Datadenne, he probably ins't going to answer any questions. (btw, this is not defending him.)Slaxx wrote:Communication here is waning. Waning is bad for town. So here it goes.
Werdan is suspicious due to lack of original contribution and vague posting.
Datadanne is suspicious for frustratingly obvious reasons.
Mavsfan is suspicious for vigorously defending him and whining about L2.
Marco is suspicious for 'not caring' as seen in one of his recent posts.
Im getting good vibes from Yankee and nuetral vibes from Griddle.
I think your reasons for being suspicious that you have listed above aren't enough to vote anyone yet. You have put your vote on me, and that's fine. A miss-lynch now is very, very bad. Since I won't have to deal with the turmoil that comes after I'm voted and lynched, it doesn't matter to me too much.
As for clearing me? He didn't clear me of anything, all he said was he had GOOD vibes from Yankee, and Neutral from me. I have made a few anti-town errors, but I have also made a lot of good play for town. That's what a neutral read is. he doesn't know what I am.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
This is purely opinionated tunnel vision on an OMGUS term. Lol, I have never seen OMGUS, tunnel vision, AND based all off of OPINION. You have still not shown me any reason, based off of fact, of how I look the scummiest. I think you are the biggest candidate for scum for reasons above and throwing your vote around so carelessly. You obviously don't care if town win, otherwise you wouldn't be trying to appeal to emotion by telling us the town won't win if you get lynched. What kind of way is the play you are making? I am almost positive you are scum, and if you aren't you are really-bad town.mavsfan41 wrote:Well, I guess you could say that I'm being anti-town. The way I see it, the people who are anti-town are those not contributing and the people who are being very anti-town are the ones who vote for me and miss lynch again. I may be showing signs of anti-town play by not caring what happens after I'm lynched, but those who lynch me are the ones being more anti-town than me. I'm not really defending myself, I'm just really frustrated with the lack of activity on this post. The town is in a tough spot right now and is in a tougher spot now without contributions made by some of the people lurking and posting useless stuff. Slaxx posted his thoughts, so here are mine, which I'm sure you're all aware of:
Slaxx and McGriddle - probably scum together, McGriddle being the roleblocker
Yankee - townie/cop
Werdna - not confirmed townie/cop, but more likely townie than Slaxx or McGriddle
Datadenne - ??? I really hope this guy isn't the cop, he has really been useless this entire game
Marco - still have doubts about him, but, with Slaxx and McGriddle being scum, that would make him a townie/cop. the way he doesn't defend himself when he's about to be lynched, I think he's a townie rather than the cop. maybe Flare was right in saying that people should dismiss him due to him being new, although Flare said that and Marco voted against him. I'm pretty sure that Slaxx and McGriddle are scum, but I wouldn't be surprised to see McGriddle/Marco pairing, with McGriddle knowing that going into the day, one of them would be lynched since they were the most suspicious. A lot of pressure would be off if he were to throw his partner (that being Marco instead of Slaxx) under the bus. With a lynch of scum lead by McGriddle, he would then use that to make himself look extremely pro town.
Those are my thoughts and how I view players up to know. The only thing I can say is that McGriddle is scum and paired with either Slaxx or Marco.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
I don't have a lot of time right now, but basically what I am going to say is everything in the post is false. None of my votes are from opinions, and my vote on you is not an opinion. You saying scum want to find the cop is an opinion.mavsfan41 wrote:PS 37 – Two kills under the radar, Flare, and attempted Marco, now me (early in the game) putting Flare and Marco at L-1
PS 122 – Attempting to force a hammer by threatening throwing suspicion if there was no hammer
PS 181 – attempts to force a hammer without doing it himself
PS 199 – Give motives for vote without too much pressure (@ McGriddle, if I'm lynched due to you, this is what you should do - copy and paste when I’m lynched)
PS 235 – Another L-1 vote, ways of hammering townies while under the radar, letting another townie hammer while he can bust them for their votes
PS 254 – already had PR blood after voting to lynch the Doctor, SCUM wants to know who the cop is FACT!! My post in which I voted McGriddle wasn’t attempting to defend Marco like you think it was, it was to lynch the roleblocker. Your whole defense in this post is based solely of WIFOM, which is scummy. Like Yankee has previously stated, all you do is WIFOM the town, and it continues here.
PS 267 – All cases on anyone ever are opinionated. The only way it wouldn’t be opinionated is if you said and claimed scum. Then people would know you’re scum, which would be fact. I am not accusing you of lying, I’m accusing you of cop hunting.
PS 279 – attempting to get wagon so when I come up townie, he’ll have more people to convict
PS 283 – based on McGriddle corrupting the town with miss lynches, theres NFW the town will win with a miss lynch here. Where do you start? I guess you would avoid NKing Marco, so he would be an easy lynch to win
PS 285 – I have given you plenty of reasons. The excuse “Tunnel vision” is really getting old. Here’s more reasons I think its you versus anyone else. Me being bad townie will help your case when I’m lynched with you leading the case. It's an easy evasion route when there is another misslynch
Lacey being NK when she was trying to push for you and Marco
Lacey PS 125 which is what I did with Marco
PS 144 – Cop hunting, attempting to figure out PR’s without much effort
PS 150 – REALLY fishy
PS 153 – Same defense over and over. Everytime anyone has any suspicion on you, it’s the same thing over and over
PS 160 – Same old same old, disproving theories for you means typing "tunnel vision" or "opinionated"
PS 161 – Coming from a proven townie
PS 162 – Slaxx defending McGriddle
PS 208 - WIFOM
Hunting cop isn’t opinionated, that’s fact, that's what you're doing.
Here are the reasons I'm voting you. This is all evidence you have against you. The analysis I have gathered from each one are opinionated, since nothing is really fact until someone is revealed. That's fact. The only facts of the game is that Flare was the doctor and Lacey was townie. Your case for both Marco and me are both opinionated. There is no way you're voting me based of facts, because if that were true, then you wouldn't be voting me.
The only evidence you have to vote me is due to my suspicion on you. Most of these posts were made during the first day. Compare the level of scummy for you compared with me. There is no way I would come out of the woodwork from day one to be completely scum today. I know that McGriddle knows that I'm not scum since he's scum and he knows who scum is and who townies are, but there is no way I would be partnered with Marco and completely ignore that he was at L-1 if he and I were scum buddies, only to vigorously defend him like you say I am. I am not defending him. The only thing I did by taking my vote of him was to prevent an early hammer day two. The other thing I did with my vote was take it off him to put it on someone I knew was scum.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
well from a scum point of view, if it finds the cop then what? the cop gets killed. it's too early in the game to find the cop, if someone were to claim that they were cop and they investigated somebody and found they were scum in a mylo situation, then a counter claim from scum would happen in which the scum would act like they investigated someone else and they came up clean. The town would lynch one of them, and if they lynch scum, whoever he said he investigated and came up clean would be on the chopping block the next day. then scum win virtually. If the town lynches the REAL cop then scum wins. It is beneficial for scum to want to wait until mylo for a cop claim. I asked for Marco to claim because I didn't think he was cop, he hasn't stuck to a single player this game. So if he would have claimed cop i would have unvoted him for a little while so he could explain himself better if hadn't already, then decided if he were lying or not. I would most likely come to the conclusion that he was lying because he told us he was a townie. If I were scum, why would I want someone who plays bad like Marco (no offense Marco you are a newb lol) to be lynched then go into a mylo situation without him? I have pretty much debunked your idea of how scum would want to know who cop was right now. It's an opinion because nobody knows what scum could be thinking. The fact that you already know there is a roleblocker, and know there is a cop tells me that you are scum. How else could you know this? I have done exactly what you told me, I debunked your theory and shown you how its an opinion, if you don't take your vote off me now, as you said you would if I could convince you otherwise, then I will be 100% sure that you are scum.mavsfan41 wrote:The best play for the scum is to find the cop. That is the best play for scum right now. The cop is the biggest threat for the scum. You saying that the scum doesn't want to find the cop is the biggest fallacy in this whole entire game. You know there is a cop, and you're acting as though you don't care. This is pure BS. I will drop my vote from you if you can convince me that finding the cop is completely an opinion, and not the best move for scum.
@everyone: What are your thoughts on this situation?-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Okay, wow. I don't believe this claim. Why were you so fixed on Marco being the cop earlier? It seems like you are pulling at straws, and I don't believe it. You said you would take your vote off me if you could be convinced that your theory is wrong, and you didn't even though my opinion is feasible and what scum try to do. I never said anything abut myself being scum and not caring who cop was. Your argument against me is based off of you thinking im looking for a cop, which is not true. I am looking for scum, you are looking for somebody who is looking for the cop, thats basically what it all boils down to. And the fact that you knew what setup we were in made me think you were either cop or scum. For reasons I listed above I believe you are scum because you have apparently been silently suspicious of me the whole game, so you would have investigated me and came up with the proof that I was your "so-called" scum. You never said anything about an investigation and what you came up with. You are scum, you know the setup and you said if a counter-claim occurred they are scum.mavsfan41 wrote:Since the one piece I need to make my case is the cop role, and I'm sure whoever the scum is, they know that I am right about one of them being roleblocker, they must have figured it out by now. I am the cop. I claim cop. Anyone who counter claims cop is SCUM!! I know that I didn't want to come out this early and reveal myself as cop. As the pressure mounts and mounts and more people vote me, I want them to know that they are attempting to lynch the cop. I have a reason for being upset that people are voting me. I know I'm the cop, and it came out that Flare was doctor, therefore, I know that one of the scum partners is indeed the roleblocker. Since McGriddle is fishing for roles, my bet would be that he is the roleblocker. This is why I'm not going to take my vote off him. I thought I may be able to go a little longer without claiming, but I figured at this point in time, the scum must be wondering why I know there is a roleblocker, and I'm sure they have figured out that I'm the cop.McGriddle claims that he doesn't want to know who the cop is, he can just roleblock him, effectively preventing him from clearing anyone.So, if you guys lynch me due to people doubting my claim, I want the townies who voted me to know that you have lost the game for the town. Cop + Doctor = Roleblocker. Since McGriddle is fishing for roles, I assumed that McGriddle is the roleblocker. That's the origin of all my suspicions of McGriddle, along with some questionable actions I have listed. Without claiming, I figured that McGriddle was roleblocking and have attempted to get him lynched without claiming. You got me to claim, you figured out the cop, what next McGriddle??
The bolded above is the BIGGEST scum-tell.You are lying to everybody.You know that I never said that at all. You are taking my usage of a theory on how scum would go about trying to win the game by finding the cop and using it in a context as if I said that's what I would do. You are claiming that I am a roleblocker with no evidence. You have no real ground to have a case on me, you are struggling to stay afloat, and you are now lying about things in the game. Then you AtE by telling everyone they will loose the game if they vote for you. You lied about things I have said, what makes me believe that you are really the cop? Why would anyone believe you with what you did and the lack of evidence? Furthermore if you do provide evidence you will pick random people and they will think "Oh he is the cop, I better not vote for him, he knew I was town" so you will probably either tell me you investigated the doc, you investigated a random player and came up with the fact that they are town, or you will tell us that your scum-buddy is up there as a townie. So basically you will tell us 1 real townie and your scum-buddy you investigated both coming up as town. Then you will proceed to tell everyone you didnt investigate me yet, but you were hoping you didnt have to claim so you could tonight, because if you already investigated me like a REAL cop would have done then you would have said it in your last statement.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
Wowwww, you cracked open like an egg. If you really are the cop TELL US WHO YOU INVESTIGATED!mavsfan41 wrote:McGriddle's post on 198, didn't really care to read much of it. Here's the deal, I know that I'm the cop. You said that I was lying in the sentence you had in bold. The way I see it I'm going to be lynched, and thats THE WORST TOWN MOVE that could have possibly happened now. Since I know that I will either be lynched or NK'ed I don't give a shit anymore about this game. This is the last post I will make to contribute to this game. This is to help out the scum.
VOTE:MAVSFAN41
This is spite for all the townies who don't contribute and let the scum brainwash your asses. If anyone at all hammers me, I don't think anyone would put it against them. Please hammer me so I can prove to EVERYONE that I'm the cop and that McGriddle is FULL OF SHIT. It is in everyone's best interest to lynch me. I won't contribute to this game anymore. I will be more useless than Datadenne. Lynch me and put me out of my misery. F*CK YOU ALL!I didn't call you a lier because you claimed cop (although I am pretty sure of it) I called you a lier in bold because you put untruthful words in my mouth.Since you onle read the bold, I will bold that for you. If you do flip cop I have to disagree with Slaxx that it is my fault. He dug himself into his own grave, and he lied. My case against him is legit and I think he is scum. But if he is not then we made a mistake, and it's nobody elses fault but his own. Especially since he cracked so bad.-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009
What? I don't have a guilty conscience, I thought you were referring to me when you said "we know who to vote for the next day" unless you meant something completely different, which you are. I am a little confused here in what you mean by that statement. Please don't be so vague with your statements, we can't afford that in this stage of the game. Were you saying that because of me and mavsfans arguements and interactions and claims that if he flips cop its my fault, or were you saying that who he says he investigated? I am so confused lolSlaxx wrote:I like that guilty conscious you have Mcgriddle. I never said it was your fault. I said
"Okay, so we lynch mavsfan today, if he flips scum, cool, if he flips cop we know who to vote for the next day. Its kind of risky but at this point it might be our best option. We get a scum either way, unless he flips vanilla town, in which case he just made a terrible mistake. Who did you do your investigation on the first night then? "
Thats why I wanted to know who he investigated and his results. And don't say you assumed either, because you ask him in the same post, right before you disagreeing with something I never said, who he investigated.
So now we've got a few things that need to be explained. Now.
unvote-
-
McGriddle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: November 21, 2009