AKnottedRope wrote:Ty for making a case robo, now I get to refute it :3
You call this sad attempt "Refuting".
About what you quoted up at the top: Aparently you misread what I said. I'm saying that unless you're a power role, voting is the only power we have as a town. This isn't rolefishing.
If thats what you meant, then why isn't that what you said? Hm?
ISO 0:The massclaim was a joke, and doesn't deserve particular mention.
So you can mention every little detail and tunnel and get away with it? Since when do you decide what deserves attention and merit?
ISO 1:I was asking for clarification, as I wasn't sure if GT was serious about his vote or not, and I was wondering if he was being defensive. Apparently he was.
Apparently, It was completly obv his vote was a joke. I don't understand why your still sticking to this. Stop being stubborn and listen.
ISO 3: I did read your entire post, and I had seen you do your RQS in other games before this one even started (It took a while for mith to verify my acc, so I read through some noobie games while I waited). To say that me telling you to answer your own questions implies that I didn't read your entire post is a fallacy in its self. So yes, I was doing this to fish for reactions, is this scummy? I'm trying to get information on you.
This is a lie. You were not searching for reactions. You just admitted to purposefully telling me to answer my own questions when I stated I would. Once again, your sticking to stuff you need to let go of.
ISO 5: Well thank you
Pfft.
ISO 7: I ask him a direct question, it would be nice for him to at least acknowledge it
Just shut up about your Second posts question on a joke vote! It was a JOKE! J-O-K-E! It doesn't matter it has no purpose and has long since been left alone. Why must you cling to such meaningless stuff?
ISO 8: I'm not entirely new to mafia. I've played 5-6 games outside this site on a private forum, and our games are modeled after this style of play. The questions I'm answering are a matter of opinion, and just because you've played more games does not mean that i'm not entitled to my own.
Sorry but you don't really act like you've played before. Some things aren't a matter of opinion, some are fact. And if you base every single suspicion off of opinion then you'll never have a solid arguement.
ISO 9: What I said is "you must at least have a slight read." To go through a RVS or a RQS and not have at least a tiny read on someone is pointless.
To gain suspicion from RVS(AkA jokealot stage) is pointless. What you just said is wrong.
ISO 10: I'm just throwing bussing out as a suggestion, and I never said that he was "dong good and making an argument." Stop putting words in my mouth, that's scummy.
Bussing and tunneling and RVS votes as serious and having good analysis deserves FoS's and Kleed could be a PR. Im not putting words in your mouth. Thats the beauty of ISOs those things REALLY happened. Why don't you just admit it and move on?
ISO 11: So you think that because I threw bussing out as a suggestion, that I'm now fixated on it being why cove and GT were arguing? Huge misrep here. Also, I just want a clarification on why Cove sees my suggestion as scummy.
Whatever.
ISO 12: How is this null? IMHO confirm votes are scummy and drilling someone about one is pro-town.
the confirm vote thing has already been discussed, moving on. This is my problem with you. Your not moving on. Your so focused on what has happened and possible hidden meanings that your paying attention and having and luck with finding scum. Scumhunting is using logical reasoning and FACT to provide a logical PROVABLE answer for who is scum. Simple as that.
ISO 13: Well, let's see here. There are two scum in this game, and those were the people looking scummiest to me at that instant. That's how I say that without sounding controversial.
The ISO specifically said that you were suspicious of GT and Cove, yet a light suspicion. But as I recall you tunneled pretty deep.
ISO 14: I want the lurkers to post. Your point?
My point? You mean the one that you just totally missed? Let me just tell you " My point". You had just said that you could see how you were being too aggresive, then you quickly change to how Aqua and Kindred are lurking. You averted eyes by calling out Aqua and Kindred for lurking. We already knew that they were lurking, its only totally obv.
ISO 15: I misinterpreted what he said, which he clarified. Unintentional misinterpretations aren't scummy.
I think that misintrepreting TOO MUCH is scummy. Which your doing.
ISO 17: I was still misinterpreting. I thought he said that he knew there was only one PR in the game, not that he was judging the probability of scum being able to fakeclaim.
My point proven, you were still running off of an misintrepretation.
ISO 20: I unvoted because he made it clear to me that I misinterpreted what he said, so it was not in the town's best interest for me to keep my vote there. Also, loaded rhetorical questions will get you nowhere, it's slinging mud.
Ya I remember, You backpeddled so bad it was funny. I made sure it was rhetorical because you keep slinging mud by answering them.
ISO 21: Ok, let me clarify. FoSes are pointless if you're not already voting someone or if the person you want to vote is close to lynch.
Hey, have I placed an FoS yet? i'm pretty sure you placed one after that ISO post. That was my point.
ISO 23: Being rude doesn't help your case, just putting that out there.
I wasn't being rude, thats what it sounded like in my mind.
ISO 25: Your point?
First of all, you find three people scummy in a two scum setup. Second, you name two of like 5 people who are lurking. Third, You placed your lurker votes before the one with some actual merit which is Coves Confirmvote. Fourth, you think that its all right.
ISO 26: This has been explained. A lot. Please read what I've said.
I spent almost an HOUR readin what you said, I don't recall you explaining this. So by all means, show me where you explained it.
robo wrote:The rest of his posts, are these three things
-Dumb
-Stupid
-Dumb
This is not a case. Why are they dumb/stupid/dumb?
Sorry I must admit I went a litte overboard with that. My apologies. I get a little worked up some times. Its just a game, meant for fun.
robo wrote:I have to say the most townie focused player here is GT.
How, exactly? Especially when I've questioned him AND PLACED VOTES ON HIM, yet he has not directly addressed me all game. Is this exempt from your "Scum don't need to read every post" rule?
Dude, are you seriously saying that your Lame xcuse for scumhunting in your second post on a joke vote is questioning? And who says that a single vote matters, If you voted me, I would giggle at the OMGUS of it but If I was in GT's shoes then I would just ignore you. I wish I didn't have to address you directly...