Why? You mean Mafia requires reasoning?
Are you all...serious?
Well, I'll give you this
First "d" is lowercase.
GTFO SCUM.
Oh right. Questions. I like questions, they're always fun.Andrius wrote:Yo guys, I didn't ask some questions to hear myself speak. XD
1) No, I've played a couple of games on Scorehero, and it's private site, Mafiahero. Mafiahero is a invision site, so I'm too lazy to link it or anything.Andrius wrote:1) Is this your first mafia game? If not, give a little background info as to your experience with mafia.
2) What is your favorite alignment?
3) What is your favorite role?
L-1? Don't you mean L-2? If it's LYLO, scum could quickhammer pretty easily. I mean of course, on a regular day, this wouldn't seem bad, but this is a newbie game and all. With all the responses that I've seen so far, it looks like the majority has never played a game before. I really wouldn't want to lynch someone on the basis that the might've accidentally quickhammered because of voting at the same time, and/or near the same time. It's just something that I caught.Andrius wrote:Do not claim your role until you are at L-1. While it may seem tempting and we might want to lynch you, do not claim your role until L-1.
This is true but meh, it's a newbie game. We don't take substantial risks on relying on townies when they could easily be fail town.andrew94 wrote:DO NOT LIE AS TOWN. Even if you are at L-1. Do not claim Cop when you are not the Cop. have u ever heard of drawing the nk target?
Yeah, I guess that is true. But still, I think L-1 is a really bad time to claim. At L-1, in a newbie game, I think someone should automatically take their vote for L-2 for the person to claim, just because. Probably just my opinion though, I'll hold it through, if needed.Leiskyre wrote:From what I've seen, it's more common to claim at L-1 instead, especially since we've only just begun the game. LYLO will, of course, change things a lot. In LYLO, it'll probably be advisable for nobody to vote (since the scum can just pile on and hammer) until roleclaims are over...
But that's what IAndrius wrote:No, I mean L-1. If someone quick-hammers outside of LyLo then we lynch them for the previous quicklynch.Hiraki wrote: L-1? Don't you mean L-2? If it's LYLO, scum could quickhammer pretty easily. I mean of course, on a regular day, this wouldn't seem bad, but this is a newbie game and all. With all the responses that I've seen so far, it looks like the majority has never played a game before. I really wouldn't want to lynch someone on the basis that the might've accidentally quickhammered because of voting at the same time, and/or near the same time. It's just something that I caught.
In LyLo we all be careful.
Oh that makes sense. Goons do suck. <___<Andrius wrote:No, he just finished a game I moderated. He was a Mafia Goon, who self-hammered D1.Hiraki wrote: There's a scum role that causes one to get lynched? What do you mean? This is just curious me btw. I've never heard of a scum role like this. Unless you're making a pun or something, which I want to assume. I'd hate to play that role too.
There are no numbers in this thread. What are you talking about.noraaa wrote:This is starting to look like math to me. D;
This is a pitiful RVS vote bro. If you wanted to vote him/her for being a female, you should realize that women don't exist on the internet.andrew94 wrote:vote noraaa
cos female? Oo
1) Yes. Any contradiction is bad. Especially in logic.andrew94 wrote:1) lynch all liers?
2) lynch all lurkers?
Mod might be strict and spell name right, but idunnolol.displaced wrote:So Hikari, you have voted for me for no reason. Why shouldn't I make a tit for tat response and vote for you? In fact why am I even asking that.Hiraki wrote:Vote: displaced
Why? You mean Mafia requires reasoning?
Are you all...serious?
Well, I'll give you thisreasoning.
First "d" is lowercase.
GTFO SCUM.
vote Hikari
This is petty hard on my iPod. >____>Andrius wrote:They do, actually.hiraki wrote: This is a pitiful RVS vote bro. If you wanted to vote him/her for being a female, you should realize that women don't exist on the internet.I'm quite aware of that. It's a Internet meme. Moving on.
Re: andrew94
1) I'm down to lynch all liars, especially in a Newbie Game. There's no role-related reason to lie in here.There's no role-related reason, but I'd lie for scumhunting.
Ok, new question. For everyone who hasn't played enough to know a favorite role,which role in this setup would you rather have? (Aka, Doctor, Cop, VT, Mafia (Goon/RB)). While being Cop is fun, I find it to be very stressful, because you can single-handedly win the game for the town with that role. Doc is easier, but you have to be able to read people very well. I prefer, in Newbie Games, to be VT, because all you need to do is play normally, and attempt to draw the NK (and RB) away from other potential PRs.According to my EpicMafia mafia skills, I'm pretty good at PR snipCing/tells. Therefore, I'd like to try Doc, since I was RB already. Fun Fact too. When I was Roleblocker, no one suspected me until Massclaim on LYLO, where a scummy dude was actually Town Watcher. Guess you can't win em' all.
Usually, the mod will count it as long as its clear who he's voting. So you guys can be Vote: Andy and he'll know its me.Hiraki wrote: Mod might be strict and spell name right, but idunnolol.Just saying. I've seen mods that are that annoying to pester about spelling.
Yes, OMGUS (OhMyGodUSuck) is generally seen as bad, but he's probably just over-reactive/defensive newb. Wanting to mislynch him based on his being defensive isn't exactly a town thing to do. When I first joined here I played defensively, as my gut wasn't tuned to the scum yet. I commented on other people's actions, but didn't actively pursue an agenda.Meh. I found him a good ML because we could get BW stuff. If he wasn't scum, then scum surely would've been on the wagon/lynch. That's basically why I said ML, rather than lynch. I'm unhappy no one caught that, but w/e.
Speaking of which,FoS: Hiraki, because from my experience, it looks as though you're trying to push an easy mislynch on displaced. While I don't have a read on him yet, its not exactly a good way to approach things: picking a candidate for a mislynch. And yes, you did actually call it a mislynch. However, if you're right that he is newb-scum, you have to be town, as no Newb-scum would buss their partner on page 2. XDIt'd be pretty badass to do it though. Can't say that I wouldn't feel bad for my partner though. LOL.
And here's our WIFOM.Wraith wrote:I wish I was scum. VT gets boring after a while. And I mean a while. I was hoping to pull the wool over newbie eyes and finally win a game as scum but the dice didn't roll by way this time.
1)I was on my iPod where editing is horrible for forum posts, therefore, when I'm using my iPod, no. There was only one bold in Andrius' post, so I don't believe he could've been that hard to find.andrew94 wrote:hiraki. can u not talk inside other ppl's quotes
also, u said u doubt anyway that is town would lynch wraith, why the heck did you vote him then?
and how i 'trying to hard'
No, I am not happy. You forgot the part where you called Post 4 an RVS vote. Therefore, you're scum.Wraith wrote:Okay, sequence of events:
1. Introduction post
2. Thought of "genius reasoning" for an RVS vote
3. randomvoted andrew for being the other SE
4. didn't like displaced overreactive OMGUS at all
5. switched votes to displaced
6. totally forgot I had switched votes to displaced
7. unvoted because I thought I was on an overly populated randomwagon
Happy?
Yes I agree. However, I doubt that Andrew's was looking for reactions.tj94 wrote:To get this clear how did this wagon on wraith start? From what I saw what happened was Wraith said lynch all Liars. He was pointed out for a "lie". This in itself is not scummy at all he wouldn't intentionally not mention a role hes been. After it seems he may overreacted a bit when Andrew applied some pressure. At first I thought Andrews arguments were scummy and overly aggressive but i realize that he was trying to see wraiths reaction. If this is the case and I'm not sure it is I think Wraith is the most likely to be scum at this point followed closely by displaced.
First off, there's something terribly wrong with this post. Meta isn't the best idea to use on a D1 Lynch, maybe on LYLO with absolutely no leads, but it's in my personal opinion, that Meta is more like the icing on the top of a cake, rather than the base. I mean, no one likes when you put sprinkles in the middle of a cake, it's not really cool.noraaa wrote:Okay. As I said I would do last night, I looked over everyone's iso/meta (if applicable) and wrote down a general list of personality traits vs. play-as-type traits that I could see offhand from them. So this will help me work out who is what. I'm not sharing it until I have more of a case against someone; right now it's more gut feelings than anything.
Hariki and andrew94 seem the most noticeable for me so far. The OMGUS by displaced could be a newbie overreaction. So far I haven't seen anything from Wraith that would make me want to lynch him; I see no holes in his reasoning (so far).
Hariki, as I stated before, just seems to be trying too hard to seem town. That could be a personality trait, but under his previous account that he used only a couple of months ago (not ages ago like he mentioned), he was very solidly pro-town and very easy to read (until being replaced out). I feel uneasy about him.
This is Post #3 from Wraith.Wraith wrote:This is terrible. That was obviously an RVS vote, you are overreacting incredibly. This is one of the few instances I will vote for an overreaction this early, especially because this seems like a serious response.displaced wrote:Hello all this is my first mafiascum game, but I have played in a few games on a different website. I've very little experience of the various roles and alignments; I have never been given an evil role and only once been given a power role, that of cop, which I have to say was the most fun playing.
So Hikari, you have voted for me for no reason. Why shouldn't I make a tit for tat response and vote for you? In fact why am I even asking that.Hiraki wrote:Vote: displaced
Why? You mean Mafia requires reasoning?
Are you all...serious?
Well, I'll give you thisreasoning.
First "d" is lowercase.
GTFO SCUM.
vote Hikari
Unvote Vote: displaced
This however, is Post #5 from him.Wraith wrote:Yes, lynch all liars. They're either scum or dangerous.
And it wasn't a bandwagon, that was a belated randomvote.Unvote
I can't say I didn't find you a bit on the scummy side, but I resent that now. You're mostly neutral for me at the moment, because of this post. While nitpicking isn't necessary, and it really didn't get us out of RVS, it still did get the game flowing like you said. It created leads, and sides.Leiskyrie wrote:I didn't like andrew94's 'nitpicking' although I do believe that in early game nitpicking is necessary to some degree to get things flowing. As for displaced, I'm still waiting for him to respond.
First off, Andrew doesn't say who this is addressed too. I really don't know about you guys, but this could be FullCircle, or TJ. Either/or really.andrew94 wrote:to me it seems you are active lurking
You mean like, people do that stuff? Like Leiskyrie has to submit something every single post that is somewhat of a scumhunting detail? Like you've done that a lot with your Wraith to make itandrew94 wrote:do some scumhunting instead of sitting on the fence plsLeiskyrie wrote:I didn't like andrew94's 'nitpicking' although I do believe that in early game nitpicking is necessary to some degree to get things flowing. As for displaced, I'm still waiting for him to respond.
Andrew's book?andrew94 wrote:no but your reaction was way out of proportion, which is a major scumtell in andrew's bookWraith wrote:The wagon started because:
1. I made a late randomvote
2. andrew blew a memory mistake waaaay out of proportion
The only reaction fishing andrew did was the lynch all liars question. He nitpicked an early post, which is a major scumtell in my book. Town don't need to look for slip-ups to use against someone, they'll see them clearly enough.
Could you post what you think is far-fetched? I'd really enjoy it.tj94 wrote:Hiraki while agree with a lot of the points you made I think you took all of them to the extreme. In my opinion at least those are all fairly mild scumtells and im not comfortable with any lynch right now. I agree Andrews scummy but Im not ready to call him scum yet and i dont think Wraith has done anything to deserve a lynch yet. We have plenty of time. Your last post also was primarily about Andrew and you ended with lynch Wraith. While you still suggested we lynch Andrew and Wraith I dont see why Wraith is more deserving then Andrew of a lynch today.
It takes 5 to lynch. He's at L-3 now, IIRC.tj94 wrote:I unvoted so he wouldnt be hammeredHiraki wrote:Well the only reason that I didn't Unvote was that I wanted him to claim.
Now that you Unvote, I guess I don't find a reason to not vote.
I also don't like the Unvote.
Unvote
Vote: Andrew94
I don't have time to reply to the other posts now, but I will get to them.
So, you'd rather lynch someone who OMGUS'd and is lurking--Wraith wrote:I'm comfortable with my displaced vote until he does something that convinces me otherwise. His lurking isn't helping his case, unless he has a viable excuse.
Scum would've killed N0. Not to mention, I lie after I'm lynched all the time.andrew94 wrote:o yea, fullcircle/noraaa is prob the other scum
preview edit: why would i lie when i dead = =
(i checked tj94 night0 and hes scum) so lynch him 2 morrow
This is why I don't do votals.tj94 wrote:I hammerred you really are bad at keeping track of that stuffHiraki wrote:Scum would've killed N0. Not to mention, I lie after I'm lynched all the time.andrew94 wrote:o yea, fullcircle/noraaa is prob the other scum
preview edit: why would i lie when i dead = =
(i checked tj94 night0 and hes scum) so lynch him 2 morrow
Intense WIFOM. If I didn't hammer, then someone do it. Like now.
Obv. scum.Wraith wrote:Also, scumweredefinitely on the andrew wagon. Possiblyboth. I told you it was a stupid wagon, and now we have almost zilch to analyze.
Let's analyze, shall we?Leiskyrie wrote:I haven't been posting long messages because I don't have any huge overriding suspicions on anyone at the moment. This was my take on the whole andrews/Wraith thing that has been going on:
1) andrews points out Wraith's BWing
2) Wraith unvotes, which to me was extremely strange. However, after I read his response, I think that he could possibly have forgotten about his vote on displaced...
3) I do not like andrews' nitpicking at all, which I mentioned before. I honestly do not see how Wraith failing to mention his role in one of the many games he played could possibly mean that he is a liar and thus should be lynched. In fact, I don't even think that 'lynch all liars' always applies. I know this is a newbie games where there will most likely not be any gambits, but sometimes scumhunting does entail some degree of 'lying'. I honestly believe that andrews is overdoing it.
That being said, I still don't get Wraith's implied claimThis most certainly does not sound like something a townie would say...Wraith wrote:I wish I was scum. VT gets boring after a while. And I mean a while. I was hoping to pull the wool over newbie eyes and finally win a game as scum but the dice didn't roll by way this time.
As for Hiraki, how would a displaced lynch be any good? You say that there would be two confirmed scum on the BW if he flips town, but that doesn't even make sense. If we were pushing for a displaced lynch then maybe, but so far you seem to be the only person to even suggest that he's a good lynch.
So far, I'm still getting slight scumreads from andews/wraith and mixed feeings from Hiraki. Of course, some people haven't really been posting so I am still waiting for more development.
I found this a quite funny. You could say that Andrius is lurking. Hmmzorz. We'll do him next. Moving on.tj94 wrote:I find this a bit suspicious for you to be pointing out because I think your an IC and your very active. Its almost as if subliminally saying if i were scum Id be lurking. Might be a bit of a reach but this dosnt sit right with meAndrius wrote: And an IC who is lurking is probably scum, let me tell you right now.
I'm quite aware of the difference between a fluff post, and a post that is short, but contains a lot of information.Leiskyrie wrote:Oh, and to answer Hiraki, the 'contradictory' part of tj94 to me is his ISO 5 and 6. In 5, he agrees with andrew94 being scummy (well, takes a rather uncertain stance) and then in 6, proceeds to defend him. I interpreted it as this- if andrew94 had flipped scum, then it can be seen as somebody defending a scumbuddy without outright saying 'You're wrong!' to people who found him scummy. In other words, a rather subtle means of persuasion. I did say, after andrew claimed cop, that I would be re-evaluating everything and after that occurred, I am slightly less suspicious. One of the main reasons why I am still slightly suspicious is because of what Andrius had mentioned- the convenient times at which the two of you voted and hammered. That's all.I saw it as a stance of, I'm probably not sure, but I'm leaning toward scum. However, I do agree with you it's a bit odd. I don't see itthatscummy to constitute a lynch, especially seeing that no one voted or took a stance toward trying to get rid of Andrew after that post. The only two posts between those two posts was one by me, and Wraith. Wraith posting to clarify my post about him, and me responding to TJ's initial post. tl;dr: This doesn't seem too scummy, and it could be considered over-reacting on Leiskyrie's part. But that's if you want to be critical.
Oh, and could you please stop saying that my posts are extremely short? Non-walls-of-text =/= short. Additionally, non-walls-of-text =/= fluff. Thanks.
This is a good point. Leiskyrie also FoS'd TJ for this same point, I want to check back on this, I'll be back for this.FullCircle wrote:Leiskyrie worries me, just a tiny bit. Although he's certainly more active than I am, his posts have all been kept short and to the point, which could point to a mafia trying to avoid giving themselves away or simply someone without a whole lot of time or any big suspicions as of yet.
May I ask why?Noraaa wrote:I like Hiraki a lot more after post 86. You finally felt real. Before it felt like you had a fake persona on and I didn't like that at all.
And here's where I hate Meta more. First off, this assumes that Andrew, every game, is scum, whatever he claims. I should've picked this up before, but this is like a mind blowing statement. While I agree that Inoraaa wrote:I wouldn't believe him if he -did- claim, because every game I've seen of him he's been scum that fakeclaimed doctor just before being lynched. Soooo yeah.
Leiskyrie wrote:No, I do not believe that short posts of me expressing my opinions (and using it as a way of organizing thoughts) constitute as fluff. Fluff contains no content. I do not believe that me saying to not quickhammer or explain how I voted displaced in anticipation of his response in short posts = fluff. Especially since you went and said I was BW'ing displaced today when I already explained that I wanted to see his response during D1.Correct, I was wrong. I forgot/didn't see your post. My mistake.
However, your posts are fluff. When I say, "Andrius is an IC." and end a post, then I say that the post is quite fluffy. There's no content. It's fluff. That's the end of it.
And note: I AM NOT HERE TO PLAY ACCORDING TO WHAT YOU WANT TO GET OUT OF ME.
Now, moving on. There is no problem with the fact that tj94 hammered. It's that he hammered too early (and what worries me most- was susceptible to your suggestion too easily."
(from Hiraki)I'm done with Andrew. I will be too surprised of he's not scum, because he's scummy as hell. Someone better end this.
And then tj94 hammers. Just like that. Don't say that's not scummy because hammering without any more potential discussion could be. And yes, I've looked at tj's post and agree with some of his reasons- however, I do not believe in rushing into arbitrary lynches. However, you [Hiraki] appear to have no qualms about doing so.Because we needed to discuss what? Discussion with no point leads to finding a new target. While, in this case, the target may have been better, for the usual game, it's usually not. This is one of the first times where I saw that. Also, I would like to know how it is scummy. I don't see how it is.
from Hiraki. What kind of logic is that? Town should not use lynches to see "hm, I'll lynch this person to see if the person they suspect is scum. Oh, if it's a waste of a lynch, ho hum." When you talked about lynching displaced, this was my concern as well since you were saying that he's the best mislynch. The point is that TOWN DOES NOT WANT MISLYNCHES.I wouldn't mind lynching Leiskyrie, just to see if TJ is scum...
Unless I'm mistaken, I don't think you know the true definition of Mislynch.
Mislynching is where a game has a lynch, and isn't in danger of a scum win. D1 and D2 of Newbie games are both mislynches. I hope that clears somethings up quite easily.
I've never FoS'd you, but I'm quite suspicious of you and noraaa. Do you disagree? While yes, I did saw you FoS'd, it's quite obvious you were suspicious of him. Just because I said FoS, doesn't mean I totally made everything up.Leiskyrie wrote:By the way, Hiraki, check your facts.
IneverFoS'ed tj94. Please refrain from making things up.
Not sure what to think of this. I'm a bit annoyed that I'm on it, obv.Wraith wrote:Just putting it out there. I'll do more once I get home from school:
Top suspects: Hiraki, TJ, JennyFan
@mod: Displaced should be JennyFan on the votelist
Fixed your tag for ya.
...JennyFan wrote:Hiraki first wanted to stop from hammering, but on the next page has no problem with quickhammer. Seems scummy to me.Hiraki wrote:Unvote
For now, to stop quickhamma.
FoS: Hiraki
Quite displeased. Can you make a list of your case so we can have a more orderly discussion about this? It'd make me happy, and you like happy me. Don't you?Leiskyrie wrote:Vote: Hiraki
Forgot to do this last night.
Wraith defended himself quite nicely. That's why he wasn't scum for the reasoning back then. Also, it just seems odd for me, that it seems TJ is referencing this post, just because he's in it, and a candidate to be lynched tomorrow, if my reasoning is correct, and people go along with me, which he's trying to go against.tj94 wrote:I dont like how Hiraki is trying to dictate all the lynches many in advance. Day 1 he said something like lynch wraith and then if hes not scum lynch andrew one of them is definitely scum. Today he said lynch Leiskyrie and if hes not scum lynch me because im scum. Yesterday it was also him who suggested some hammer. I did hammer but his calling for it made me think twice.
Oh. Hmmm.Leiskyrie wrote:Hiraki wrote:
Unless I'm mistaken, I don't think you know the true definition of Mislynch.
Mislynching is where a game has a lynch, and isn't in danger of a scum win. D1 and D2 of Newbie games are both mislynches. I hope that clears somethings up quite easily.X
No. That is not what mislynch means. If it were, the term MYLO would not exist.
...Leiskyrie wrote:YesterdayHiraki wrote: I've never FoS'd you, but I'm quite suspicious of you and noraaa.I don't have time right now to type very much. Will have to wait until later tonight.Hiraki wrote: First off, let's look at my primary FoS for today.
Leiskyrie.
(b"b)noraaa wrote:Hiraki- My posts have not been fluff, my posts have been me describing who I was concerned about, with examples. And as to your "may I ask why?" comment, it's a gut feeling that I explained in that very quote.No you didn't. You just said why. I was asking what made you change your mind. It seemed like you put technical words into a sentence to make your views look more convincing because you didn't like me D1.
I don't care if you hate meta. I explained already that I haven't many tools at my disposal. And if you read andrew's games and didn't see him playing like shit in all of them then I'd like to see what kind of glasses you're wearing. He's not always scum in every game, no. But in the ones where he is, he often fakeclaims. In the ones where he is AND isn't scum, he plays so ridiculously that it's rather impossible to determine his usefulness. Which, by your own vote, you agreed with.True, but my vote was placed because he was Anti-Town. I didn't vote him because I looked at his past games and determined that because he played the same, he must be scum. Even Andrius, in what seems to be a SE Helping Post, comments on Meta. And I quote,Andrius wrote:Meta is useful. However, it is a tool you use in congunction with other tools. You cannot make a cake with only a spoon. Likewise, you cannot expect to lynch scum with only meta.
But we're done with andrew. If you honestly feel that there was nothing in his meta that looked weird, then I'm again looking to you. It's not an OMGUS, because I don't care if you suspect me. I care that you ignore andrew's gaming and my obvious scumhunting as a way to determine I'm the target.Your obvious scumhunting? What significant things have you given to the town? In fact, in my ISO of you, you only really have 2 big parts in this game. One was a useless arguement with Andrew which determined that you use meta, as you had already stated, and posts on your feelings. That's it. While sure, you figured out that Andrew lied, which we had already done, you have beenquiteuseless to the town.
FOS- Hiraki.
Welp.noraaa wrote:@ Hiraki-I didn't realize that researching people that seemed scummy and trying to show why I felt they were wasn't scumhunting in your book. Maybe I should just attack everyone like you do, Hiraki. One of us is bound to be scum, and then you can feel safe knowing you mentioned our name at least once.Obviously one of us is bound to be scum. That's the point of the game. /lolasshole
No, it's not the reason that you didn't scumhunt anyone, it's the reason that you said you were scumhunting, and you weren't at all. To move on, to the town's help, you've done nothing, so if you're going to vote me for basically accusing you in a manner that you seem to dislike and seem is scummy, I can't say that I don't think that's one of the worst votes I've ever seen.
Also "you want me to be happy, don't you?"
Personally, and I'm not Lieskyrie, but I don't give a damn if you're happy.Just to say, making people aggravated makes them give out crappy logic. Therefore, in mafia, it's generally better for one not to be in a crappy mood because they come off as scum more.I agree with tj that you seem to be trying to act like a leader, but the thing is, I don't agree with you and you're not leading me anywhere.Okay. So, you think I'm leading people, but you're not following, TJ isn't following, at least since he knows my conspiracy of being a leader now, and Liekskyrie for sure isn't following. That's 3/7 people that won't follow me. Andrius is a SE, he knows better than to follow crappy logic, except if he's scum, and JennyFan doesn't like me. I think she'll change deciding on her next posts though. Y'know.Your basis that Lie is scum is "fluffy posting" and that mine is "talks meta." Wow, what great reasons to lynch someone.Really? My walls have given you only that? Perhaps I should make them longer, or shorter. You choose. /lolassholepart2I've already mentioned why I had used meta, if you have any other pointers for me (a newbie), why don't you share them. I can only go by analyzing what I see, and gut feelings. Which is pretty much how this game works, right?Gut feelings? Here's my advice. You should try to lurk for at least an hour on the Wiki, look at some people's profiles, check their win/loss precentage, see what they say, and just watch some games. You can't come in here and expect to be a pro just with logic, you have to have experience, or see experience in action, per se.
Here's an idea, let's "mislynch" you and see how badly it hurts town. I don't think it will, because I'm beginning to reaffirm my previous beliefs that you are not town. Just a very loud piece of scum.With great reasoning, to be noted. Again, I feel stupid for being wrong for almost a year now about Mislynch. You can point and laugh.
You wanted to know why that one post made you seem more town to me? Because you acted more town. Usually you act a little too full of yourself and like we're all idiots that you need to direct in the right way. I for one, don't like it and don't feel that is beneficial to the town in any way.I'd like some reasoning why you think this, because I really don't think anyone here is an idiot. Sure, some people I call "fail" may be doing things that I consider to be fail. Fail =/= Idiot. People make mistakes, I make mistakes. Fail is just an adjective on the scale and/or an opinion on how badly an action by a town is by. Not to mention, being rash is more of a towntell then a scumtell, but I could see someone saying it's null. Depends on the person.
--
Separately, I'm curious about more input from the quieter people. I can't really feel out any scum/town reads on them if they don't post.Agreed. This is basically why I'm not voting, to be quite honest. I'd like some posts from FC(or his/her replacement), and JennyFan, the most.
For now, and I'll stick with this D2 unless anything substantial changes, VOTE: Hiraki
Here's my suspects.Andrius wrote:(BTW, I'm an IC, not a SE.)Same difference. <_______<
I'm not opposed to a Hiraki lynch, as he's definitely not a towny-townie. BUT, we should begin looking for possible scumbuddies for all suspects. Let's say Hiraki is scum. We need to start looking for his scumbuddy now, so we narrow out the field. I think that the #1 scumbuddy for Hiraki would be Fullcircle. Its partially gut, but FC has been avoiding the thread for most of D2 (IIRC).I asked for a prod. Do you honestly think I'm more anti-town then someone like Noraaa, or even yourself?
1) Hiraki is a mediocre scumread, though I'm not ready to vote yet.Seems like you're pretty damn sure. Not gonna lie.
2) I'm 80% sure that the last scum is either in the lurkers (Jenny/FC) or the Active lurkers.I was thinking this. Jenny is my favorable target. FC doesn't seem as bad as a townie as Jenny seems already.
It'd be nice of you to comment on my actions, rather then make your vote look like a newbie scum BW.JennyFan wrote:Unvote: Hikari
I thought Hikari was at L-2. Don't want to hammer too soon, now do we?
I like the other points, I don't want to comment on them. Moving on.Leiskyrie wrote:Okay, I honestly don't think I need to post a huge wall against Hiraki because much of what I wanted to say has already been said in my previous posts. I'll just point out some contradictions that he has made over the course of the two (game) days.
So, to clarify, Hiraki says displaced was a good mislynch, rather than a good lynch. Given the definition of mislynch Hiraki provided, this wouldn't make sense. I am finding it difficult to believe that he is actually telling the truth about not knowing what a mislynch is because it really does not require much logic to figure out. Especially after having played for so long...Hiraki wrote:Andrius wrote:hiraki wrote:
Yes, OMGUS (OhMyGodUSuck) is generally seen as bad, but he's probably just over-reactive/defensive newb. Wanting to mislynch him based on his being defensive isn't exactly a town thing to do. When I first joined here I played defensively, as my gut wasn't tuned to the scum yet. I commented on other people's actions, but didn't actively pursue an agenda.Meh. I found him a good ML because we could get BW stuff. If he wasn't scum, then scum surely would've been on the wagon/lynch. That's basically why I said ML, rather than lynch. I'm unhappy no one caught that, but w/e.What? How does it not make sense?
As I say in other posts, a ML, as I thought it was, would be a lynch that was on a day that was not LYLO, and therefore it was okay to lynch a Townie. Because Displaced was both scummy, and newbie, this would be a good ML. Again, this is because he could be scum, and if he's not scum, at the least, one scum would be on his BW.
Next, once again about Hiraki calling some of my posts fluff. I know that I've already posted about this, but there is one more thing I would like to say. One of my quotes that he linked to and called fluff was actually what he used in D1 to say that it made me neutral to him whereas I was somewhat suspicious before. Obviously then, this was not fluff.True, but put it this way. D1's beliefs were in D1. It's D2 now. That's a big change. Let's also note that you had more posts. Just because I picked one from the bunch that I may have said was townie in the past, doesn't mean that I'm obv. contradicting because it put me off the fence there. I don't like it now, and that's final. Not to mention, so far you've been able to counter a whooping1post from not being fluffy. The others? Nadda.
Also to add on, you did say that no one was pushing for a displaced lynch but you still did vote for him. c wut i did thur?
Hiraki, you've been trying incredibly hard D2 to push lynches without providing truly substantial reasons. That, coupled with your attitude about mislynches for town, is why I voted for you.See, this is what I like about Lieksyrie. He knows how to make me a bit happy. However, he saddens me at the same time. The only reason you're voting me, is because I'm scumhunting. You can't find anyone but me, because I'm trying. Go ahead, call it intense WIFOM, but it's the truth. Not to mention, my attitude for mislynches, as I say it, not as the real definition says it, makes a lot of sense to lynch scummy people who may just be overdefensive. The only reason I abandoned the Displaced lynch was because he disappeared, and Andrew came on the rise with Wraith.
This is true. My apologies.JennyFan wrote:I did; I commented on them in the previous post.
Nope, I feel better in Jenny/Noraaa scum.noraaa wrote:Hiraki I don't "avoid your points." You ignore that I reply to them. I've said what I need to say, if you want specific answers from me that you feel you aren't getting then then ask them. I'm done bickering with you. You just turn anything people say in circles anyhow.
Tonight and tomorrow I'll be looking at the other players and I'll say who/why I think they're scummy. Like I did day one. Like Hiraki says I never did.
1) The only thing about your fluff posts that you said was that they weren't fluffy because they weren't walls of text, and that little tidbits of views weren't fluff posts. This is a repetition of what Noraaa is doing. You're not telling meLeiskyrie wrote:Clearly you did not read my previous posts. I had 1) already discussed my 'fluff' posts and 2) explained the reason for my displaced vote (which was not to lynch.) READ BEFORE POSTING KTHXBAI.Hiraki wrote:Not to mention, so far you've been able to counter a whooping1post from not being fluffy. The others? Nadda.
Also to add on, you did say that no one was pushing for a displaced lynch but you still did vote for him. c wut i did thur?
I'm not commenting on the first part because I believe no one is budging. I find it to be a useless argument.Leiskyrie wrote:Why did I not comment on your entire post? For one thing, it's late. I'm tired. I would much rather wait until I have a clear head before making any disputes. It is not benefical to myself or anyone if I try to do things without being in a state in which I can properly express my thoughts. Also, half your post is Jenny/noraaa. I've already covered my opinions on them.
Sorry, like I've said before, my posts are not made to make people angry. They're made to get straight to the point.noraaa wrote:Hiraki- I've told you before, I'm a girl. So stop acting like you don't know that. It's next to my avatar, if you are that short-sighted. The only thing that annoys me about you is your decision to act like you run this thread. You don't make me angry, sorry to disappoint you. And again, I DON'T CARE if you like me or if you're happy. I really don't give a crap. You're obnoxious and I think you're scum.
Sigh. I hope We don't have a game withnoraaa wrote:This post is dedicated to Hiraki. Rejoice, rejoice, rejoice.Rejocing.
In one post. IN ONE POST I felt you were "finally" seeming somewhat town. And then, you opened your mouth again and it all went away.Seems so.
I didn't say you were avoiding my points, I said you were ignoring them. Semantics to some, perhaps. I find it hard to break down your posts and their ridiculous lack of clarity so I honestly just blow off replying to them. Tomorrow if I have time I'll devote my posting just to you. Let your little heart flutter.Clarity? This is the first time you've brought this up. Perhaps if you brought this up the first time I did it, I'd change my ways. Now? Ha.
--edit before posting--
No, I'll do it now so you don't have anything to say about me not getting to it. I've got homework that will take precedence over this tomorrow. All posts listed are ISO posts.I wouldn't have said it because you said you would do it. Ignoring my points is something I expect a player to do.
post 29- Lie/displaced buddying based on a RVS vote and displaced never posting again is ridiculous
again, Lie is not fluffy poster and neither am I. fluff is elevator talk. Both of us are contributing to this thread (just not up to your majesty's standards)No. Fluff are posts that have no meaning. Saying that you agree with someone is in fact fluff. While your views may differ with mine in the end, your posts are still fluff.
speaking of which, why are we (more me now) bad because of this but the non-posters are not really getting any suspicions noted for their very absences?This is true, but I'm not going to lynch lurkers. Lurking is a null-tell. Not to mention, I am FoS'ing Jenny, highly. Just sayin'.
post 32
You very quickly jumped hard onto Lie, off of Lie, and hard onto me.Because I liked Lie's responses, compared to your defense.
I think your definition of a fluff post needs to be looked at, much like other definitions you were misusing. Based on your examples from Lie's past in this game. A quick "this is what I'm thinking about this" isn't fluff, it's just not your wall of text. Random unconnected things that aren't aimed at trying to figure things out, are fluff.No, trust me. I know the difference between fluff and content. Note that I'm saying that you two are the majority of the fluff poster. If I really didn't know what it was, and it the definition that you think is my definition, almost everyone playing would be scummy for being fluffy, no?
Again, I never said you seemed town from the beginning, except in that one post where you lashed out on andrew. I said that you seemed TO BE TRYING TOO HARD TO LOOK TOWN. If you don't understand what that means then at this point ask someone else to explain it.I still don't get what you're playing at, but I honestly don't care. Lynching Pro-Town people is not smart.
me:
"before it felt like you had a fake persona on and i didn't like that at all"
you:
"may i ask why?"
..uh, why you had a fake persona on, why you seemed not to all of a sudden, or why I didn't like it? That's a gut thing based on your style of talking. If you're not into English and literature it's sort of hard to break that down more than "a feeling," which obviously isn't good enough for you. If you think a gut feeling isn't good enough to go on, then tell that to the millions of detectives out there that use that very tactic in their jobs.Because youknowthat those detectives base most of those cases on gut feeling. Whether you do or not, this is not investigating a crime, this is finding scum. In semantics, this isn't too far away, however the method we use to find scum is logic and reason.Notgut feelings.
As for the andrew/meta thing. If he tends to fakeclaim, and when is town doesn't claim, then yeah, I think that's a legitimate historical precedent to use toward determining if he's likely to be scum again after a claim. Also he flat-out lied in his responses to me about his past gaming and knew I couldn't link to them because they're ongoing. It's one thing to say "yeah, I was like that, but I'm moving on." It's another to consistently lie, even to the end, like he did about the N0 investigation.Agreed.
As for being annoyed that wraith suspects you? uhm. wow. I find that hilarious actually. You got "displeased" when Lie voted you/FoS you. Are you an only child? You feel like an only child. Or the baby of the family.What? I say that to bring in humor. If you're happy for someone to FoS or Vote you, then I don't know what you are. If you're going to look too hard into these posts, I should just stop here.
post 34
My posts on my "feelings" as you put it, which are "quite useless" are how I play. I'm sorry that I don't play the way you do, but I don't. So replace feeling with whatever logical word you like better into my posts and reread things so that you actually pay attention to the fact that I'm making a position in them.Does anyone need to know that Mafia looks like Math to you? No. Therefore, according to what I see Fluff as, this is fluff.
As far as the comments about andrew there, that I proved he lied "which we already had done" show me where. Show me where I wasn't the one that pointed out andrew was a liar. My first step in this game was to sit down and write out how I felt about everyone.Well that's good. If you write a post on how you feel about everything in the game that's fine. We have more posts in abundance that speak about one person, and that generally agrees with another person in the game, especially after they say something.
post 36
You mistake the point of my first statement. OBVIOUSLY ONE OF US IS BOUND TO BE SCUM. yeah, so lets attack everyone because sooner or later we will hit gold, right? I was using sarcasm at your methods to show my distrust of them. Maybe I should come out and say it more clearly for you. YOU FINGER TOO MANY PEOPLE. IT LOOKS BAD FOR YOU.If I didn't see the part where you called it sarcasm, I wouldn't think there was sarcasm, btw. Also, fingering(hehehe) too many people isn't bad. It just shows who I'm suspicious of. Just because I'm suspicious to a number higher then the confirmed amount of scum, doesn't mean that I want to lynch them all. I'm just suspicious of them.
Also, if your logic sucks when you're mad, oh well. not my problem. Don't be obnoxious, and you won't be annoyed.What? I'm not annoyed. While yes, I was pissed off at the end of the other post, it doesn't mean that every post I am now the raging mafia player. This just seems like another awful attempt to avoid my logic, rather then telling me where the fault is, like you've been doing to the other part of this post, btw. And this is where you end. The other 8 posts? Welpity welp.
He has a point.tj94 wrote:Wraith no need to rush why do you want a lynch so fast
Then explain it to me please, instead of calling it self-explanatory. Obviously it's not self explanatory to the person who doesn't get it.tj94 wrote:Hiraki the trying too hard to look town thing is self explanatory.
1) The italics are where Wraith responded to my quote, as stated in his post.Andrius wrote:Wait, I'm confused Hiraki. Are the italics yours or the person you're quoting? And quote-walls look bad, but they help us out alot. Then we don't have to look for who said which quote etc.
WAIT. Tj, why are you voting Wraith but calling Hiraki non-town? You just said in 268 that Hiraki hasn't done anything exceptionally scummy, but then in 270 you critique him? I'm confused as to your (seemingly wavering) stance on Hiraki.
Booyah.jmj3000 wrote:THIS IS A MOD POST. THOR665 REPLACES FULLCIRCLE EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY.
I was mostly addressing your point, and not the posts content. For example, what you say, is something that a townie would say, however that doesn't constitute it to having flaws, ex. WIFOM. Nice find though, I'll be surprised if you're scum.Leiskyrie wrote:AndHiraki wrote:In my eyes, this doesn't seem suspicious to me. It just seems like something someone would say, and not really care about what they were saying because everyone attacking them made very small, and stupid pointsI think you need to make up your mind...Hiraki wrote: Saying that "I hate being town, I'd rather be scum" isn't WIFOM is laughable.
Other than that, nothing much to contribute. :/
Guess we have to wait for replacements...
1) She's lied multiple times that I didn't quote her/answer her questions, which only happened with Lieksykrie. I am feeling the "hmm this guy is getting BW, let me hop on fast" feel.Thor665 wrote:I personally kind of doubt she's scum at the moment - if you want her lynched present a concise, clear explanation of what she's done that is scummy and how it's scummy and maybe we'll talk. I seem to recall the case mostly being "blargh, I disagree with you" which isn't much of a case.
Yeah sorry, I misread that it was starting 28th, I thought it was the 29th.Andrius wrote:Yeah, we're just in normal ol' D2.
Where is everyone?
I will admit that my posting has gone down in the the few days/weeks. I've been a bit busier.MafiaMann wrote:Well who did thor replace as "town leader" when he showed up?
Hiraki. Hiraki lost a lot of pull when thor came. The only reason im not voting Hiraki now is thor did try to dismantle Hirakis wagon.
First off, no one would agree with Wraith, being scum or town, but you'll probably find this scummy too. I voted you because you had a higher chance of being lynched, rather than Noraaa, my second target. I'm fine with either you or Noraaa dying.Ibarra wrote:Once again sorry for not being able to post much. IRL stuff happen
Let's look at the suspicious things Hiraki did: 1)
He preempts himself by saying that his style is usually aggressive. (not sure if "preempt" is the right term) He even says to a certain degree that because of this aggressive style, people say that "he's mafia".And..this makes me scummy, because?
2)
Used "Attack the Person" on andrew94 and joined the bandwagon.Oh btw., I didn't start it or anything. No, of course because when I unvoted for a claim, that's scummy, and joining a BW.
3)
He agrees to Lynch all Liers, but he himself lied.More specific, please.
4)
At first he says he has three viable lynches then stops and says that he will continue, then abandons writing the two other.Correct, but that's because I got busy. What's your point about this? I later did say Noraaa and Leikskyrie were good MLs, starting the debate of what a ML is, and therefore, I did have 3 Viable Lynches. Now, I have 2.
5)
He uses Relativist Fallacy in the arguments against the "fluff" posts by noraaa and Leiskyri.Because I didn't say later that it was more a reaction test.
@Hiraki:
You were dead set on lynching Noraaa yesterdayu
What made you change your mind and vote me? Unless it's just as what Wraith says.