Given how hard Moz is making an ISO against himself, here's the results of yet another pass through the thread.
The first thing that caught my attention was the bvoight vote situation. Note post #7 below, wherein bvoight clearly states that "games usually begin with RVS (Random Voting Stage)" then votes mozamis "for posting first".
bvoigt wrote:Hi, everyone! Our games usually begin with RVS (Random Voting Stage) or RQS (Random Questioning Stage).
VOTE: mozamis for posting first.
This is Moz's reaction:
mozamis wrote:Hmm bvoigt seems pretty keen to jump on the first available bandwagon. Not gonna vote yet, but suspiciously scummy behaviour.
This is the first example of Moz tossing the phrase "suspiciously scummy behavior" (or a variation thereof) at someone for absolutely no reason. I also dislike the lack of a vote here, but that's a discussion for later in this post. Thian called him on it and Mozamis's next post is as follows:
mozamis wrote:Thian, i am holding a vote back cos i have no real idea whether he is scum ornot. Bit too early to tell and all that. Don't just want to vote out of mindless spite/retaliation. Why did you vote for me? *sad face*
I don't like "i have no real idea whether he is scum ornot [sic]". Just prior Moz called bvoight on "suspiciously scummy behavior" but now hedges this. Also, he says he doesn't want to vote out of mindless spite/retaliation but you'll see a lot of that before this is done. The last bit with the "*sad face*" and wink is interesting for a reason I'll point to later.
Post #28 marks the beginning of the "NOOOOOOB" declarations:
mozamis wrote:no exoerience on this site. played a couple of times with my mates years ago. so TOTAL NOOOOOOB really
Mozamis's next post (#33 in the thread) is the first one that really troubles me:
mozamis wrote:ok, so on the limited amount of evidence so far, my feeling is that Thian and bvoigt are scum. they seem to be the only players working in tandem/together. Of course, that might be completely wrong :) But they seem to be very eager to lynch someone as quickly as possible, whereas everyone else so far seems a bit more cautious, becuase they don't want to lynch a townie. bvoight and thian don't seem to be so worried about that...
He quickly connects bvoight's random vote and Thian's and says his feeling is that they are scum because "they seem to be the only players working in tandem/together". He then quickly hedges this and implies that bvoight and thian aren't worried about lynching a townie whereas "everyone else so far seems a bit more cautious". This seems to say "bvoight and thian must be Mafia because they aren't acting like me and clearly I'm town".
bvoight called this in post #34 and asked why himself and Thian. Moz's answer:
mozamis wrote:partly cos u both voted for me. and this isnt me answering for raudhr, but he did vote for you in the post that immediately followed him saying he found u suspicious. just to get the facts right.
Note "partly cos u both voted for me". So it's not okay to vote because of mindless spite/retaliation (which he'll do later anyway), but it *is* okay to link people together for stupid reasons and claim they're scum?
He continues to respond to bvoight in his next post:
mozamis wrote:the way it ends vote seemed jokey to me (he voted vordak as last person to confirm )
rg voted for u as u were the first person to jump on a bandwagon.
your vote is the only one that seems a bit scummy so far, the votes seem completely fair enough.
So bvoight's totally random vote "for posting first" is the only vote that seems a bit scummy so far? I'll also note that it took Moz four posts to reply to bvoight's one. That is a trend that bears noting.
My first post (#39) calls Moz on his throwing around of baseless suspicions, his lack of a vote and hedging. His response:
mozamis wrote:i guess we have different approaches. i thought being cautious at this stage might prevent us from lynching a townie by mistake. after all, i haven't got much to go on. so i just said what i was thinking, which was that voight jumping on the first bandwagon seemed scummy. but that didnt seem enough to vote for him. i didnt want to look like i was voting out of retaliation, as i explained above.
so i'm gonna remain cautious until we have a clear idea of who the scum is.
surely announcing suspicions is better than just flinging votes around?
First we have the "different approaches" statement which will continue to crop up. We have more remarks designed to imply that Moz cares deeply about the town. He continues to note bvoight "seemed scummy" and he continues to be clear that he cares very much about his appearances and doesn't want to vote "out of retaliation".
In post #45 I explained why, at the time, I was getting a slight town read off of bvoigt. I also explained why Moz's overly-cautious play and throwing suspicions around was concerning. In the next post, bvoight notes of Moz "While he does look scummy, my gut is telling me newbie town."
Moz's reply in #47 is *very* interesting for a number of reasons:
mozamis wrote:i think all of vordarks points can be answered thus : bvoigt is more experienced than me, this is my first game. so he is probably behaving in a more "normal"/"acceptable"/town way than i am.
bvoigt knows the form better than i do -what looks town/scum etc. apolgies if i am coming off scum, but i'm just posting" stream of consciousness stuff" really, ie just typing what i think.
and of course i'm worried about how i look to others! i dont want get lynched, you see...
maybe voight is town -thats why i havent voted yet.
as to my passivity, i am reading a few of the older games on this forums, and it does seem that common practice is to vote more rather than FoS. still, clearly i will be voting at some point, just not yet.
i'm gonna check who hasnt posted yet -what do u guys think about lurking being scummy?
The first bit of this post is him hiding behind the noob card immediately after bvoigt said "my gut is telling me newbie town". Moz attempts to explain away his prior and all future suspicious behavior right there. He follows this up with "apologies if i am coming off scum".
He continues by now saying "maybe voight is town", beginning to distance himself from the previous discussion. The last sentence is important because it sets up Moz's future votes: "what do u guys think about lurking being scummy?"
In post #52, Thian is the first to note that scum hide behind the noob card all the time and asks why he is brining up being a noob so much. He also draws attention to Moz's stupid linkage of himself and bvoigt. Moz's response:
mozamis wrote:Thian wrote:mozamis wrote:ok, so on the limited amount of evidence so far, my feeling is that Thian and bvoigt are scum. they seem to be the only players working in tandem/together. Of course, that might be completely wrong But they seem to be very eager to lynch someone as quickly as possible, whereas everyone else so far seems a bit more cautious, becuase they don't want to lynch a townie. bvoight and thian don't seem to be so worried about that...
Mozamis:
observations, okay we get it, you're a noob. Scum hide in "Noob" cards all the time, why are you bringing up your noob factor this much. Also reason for your want to pair myself up with bvoigt because we are working in tandem? You are purposely trying to misdirect suspicion off of you onto 2 others right now as a divide and confuse tactic. I don't like it.
wow this was an aggressive post. dont like that much. Am sensing am i going to have to toughen up to survive here
I said i was new once. thats not "bringing the noob factor this much". you and voigt both voted for me, so i saw that as working in tandem.
Yes, i certainly am trying to misdirect suspicion from me, as i am town. Although "dividee and confuse" tactic is exagerating what am i doing. I simply said that i thought you and voigt were suspicious.
Or is that too confusing for you?
Am not keen on how you are EXAGERATING and OBFUSCATING and RIDICULING my arguments. I may not know a lot about mafia. But i know these are ancient rhetorical devices to make your opponent look weak/silly/a liar.
Bit scummy of you?
First up, he calls this an "aggressive post" and says he doesn't like that much. "Am sensing am i going to have to toughen up to survive here ". This is a blatant attempt at gaining sympathy. He continues to use the fact that both Thian and bvoigt voted for him as evidence of their working in tandem.
Notice the last paragraph is entirely devoted to saying "You're being mean", with the last line being yet another example of tossing "suspiciously scummy" at someone. This is a prime example of Moz's entire strategy for defending himself. "Stop being mean to me! I'm not scum, you are!"
In post #57 Moz continues to make the fact that he's new crystal clear:
mozamis wrote:hmm, glancing over my posts i have mentioned that i am a NOOOOOOOOOOOOB aa few times lol
Oh well, what of it? So are most people here. My point was that, to a semi experienced player, bvoigts posts are going to look more strucutred, more purposeful, and in short, more town than mine.
the fact that he looks more town than me, doesnt of course, mean that he is town and i am scum.
He admits he keeps calling himself a noob, laughs it off, then explains that others posts are surely going to look more town than his because of his lack of experience. I'd like to point out that this entire post is Mozamis again using the noob card to explain his behavior, so he's doing again exactly what was just pointed out. The constant message from Moz here is "I'm new and I'm town".
In post #68, Moz continues:
mozamis wrote:Mozamis:
Why are you agitated? Your posts are coming across this way. Now that you agree that you have made the mention of your "noobness" more than just once. i will re-state, the fact that you are playing the "noob" card doesn't excuse you from being mafia or being questioned. Often times, newer players will throw the Noob card out there to get a free pass. I found it odd that you are throwing that around like you are hiding in it to get sympathy points.
Guess i was agitated because I'm innocent, and i always find it annoying to be wrongly accused. Like everyone else But again, I suppose have to get used to that in mafia I don't mind the questions. I just found your "ok, we get it" post slightly aggressive. Not trying to get sympathy (how could that work when there are so many noobs in this game?), merely pointing out that when peole are not used to an agreed format of something, they are likely to behave in unpredictable ways. Eg "OMG! he's playing the noob card!-classic scum tell! when in fact, he is just posting like a noob.
I do see your point though, how scum might like to hide behind that. But i have nothing to hide. And nothing to declare, except my genius
On the RG thing, surely best not to try and get him replaced? He is posting, which is more than can be said for a lot of people.
He explains his agitation by continuing to claim town, uses the words "wrongly accused" and continues to call Thian's post "aggressive". Then he immediately throws out "Not trying to get sympathy (how could that work when there are so many noobs in this game?)". That is a glowing red flag. No one yet had suggested Moz was trying to gain sympathy, yet here he is defending against the accusation. Also, he uses this as yet another excuse to use the noob word.
Moz's post (#85) has be LMFAO:
mozamis wrote:have to say, i think all this talk about night phases/the rvs etc is a bit of a distraction from scum hunting.
Yeah, the talk about night phases and RVS was distracting. I'm glad we got rid of that to make more room for Moz's one-line emotes like his humming a song and yawing. Thank god we've got Moz on the case to save us from distractions. I think this post was just a clever attempt to appear town, which Trendall bought in his later analysis by calling this post "very pro-town" (in post #102).
In the very next post, Moz throws out the first of his lurker votes. Note that in a post above he announced his intention to vote the lurkers.
mozamis wrote:he said he was absent until mon. its now tuesday. So i'll whack my vote on trendall and see if it gets him to speak
VOTE TRENDALL
Shortly after this he made another post:
mozamis wrote:shall we all just whack votes on the lurkers, ie trendall, maxous and vordark? feel free to put your votes back on me when they show up :)
But would be nice to speed things up beyond the pace of an asthmatic snail :)
This is all "See, I'm voting the lurkers! I totally have a pro-town reason for my votes!" This is voting the easy targets while avoiding the need to offer any real reasoning or discussion.
After Trendall posts, Moz quickly moves the vote to another lurker:
mozamis wrote:yes, for anyone who rereads this thread, page four -after post 87- is in the wrong order. the forum went down last night.
detailed posts from trendall HUZZAH!
So to try and get Maxous to post
UNVOTE VOTE MAXOUS
Again, easy vote. He doesn't actually discuss anything in Trendall's post or ask any questions, just moves on to the next lurker.
Post #119 continues to raise my level of suspicion:
mozamis wrote:Thian wrote:Mozamis:
I don't see myself voting for a lurker just yet. Some have stated they will not be around. So my vote isn't moving from you just yet. you are not out of the woods that easily. You stated you want to move the game along. I am assuming you want the night phase to hurry up? Why is that?
LOL i find this post a bit ridiculous "you obviously want the night phase to hurry up (COS MOZAMIS IS SCUM PEOPLE!)
i think its fairly obvious that i just wanted the game to speed up a bit.
And after lots of juicy posts last night ,it has :)
Either Thian is town and genuinely thinks i am scum, or he's scum.
Without trying to take it personally, i am finding his posts a bit scummy. all this exageration of my comments, and "sinisterisation" (not a real word lol?) of my comments seems a bit scummy.
I'm keeping my vote on maxous until he posts, but thian looks dodgy to me. Unless she's just very clumsy town *bangs head against brick wall* :)
Moz continues the pattern of calling posts against him "ridiculous", "exagerations" and continues to say anything of the like "seems a bit scummy". Of course, Moz's last sentence gives us yet another hedge, making sure he's covered his bases.
With post #120, Moz begins to ramp up the totally useless posts, many of which I've already highlighted. Posts like these serve only to fill the thread and Moz's ISO, making it more difficult to extract anything of note.
In post #122, Moz moves onto the next lurker, although he doesn't vote, just drops in a casual one line post:
mozamis wrote:ps anyone else feel that Nobody special is just blending in a bit?
This is buried in the middle of a continuous string of *EIGHT* short posts from Moz (#118 - #125). Of course, two of these posts were single line posts to throw suspicion on another lurker:
mozamis wrote:hmm, second time maxous has been browsing this forum without posting. is that suspicious or laziness?
mozamis wrote:i see ya there maxous! post! :)
Post #128 is one of the most laughable things I've ever seen:
mozamis wrote:so, in another game, at the end, one of the scum(who lost) said "yes, i should have mentioned my scum partner at some point. not mentioning him was a mistake. so heres a list of all the players and who they havent mentioned. Not saying this proves ANYTHING, just a reference list at this point.
MOZAMIS: has NOT mentioned NO-ONE :roll: nice grammar.
VORDARK:" " RG,THIAN,MAX,NS.
RG: " "VORDARK,TWIE,THIAN,TRENDALL,NS.
TWIE: " "NO ONE
THIAN: " " VORDARK,TWIE,TRENDALL,MAXOUS,NS.
BVOIGT: " "VORDARK,TRENDALL
MAXOUS:" "NO ONE.
NS: " "VORDARK,TWIE,MOZAMIS,THIAN,TRENDALL,MAXOUS.
so by this logc, if i was scum,NS would be my partner because he hasnt mentioned me yet.
Totally realise the problems with this (eg TWIE and MOZAMIS have mentioned everyone, but obviously could just be blending in etc).
Still, i was bored :P
Moz compiles a list of who mentioned who which conveniently "clears" himself. Note that this was right after a set of posts from Moz where he quickly mentions all the lurkers, which looks a lot like he was trying to fill out his own list. Of course, at the bottom he makes it clear the he and TWIE have mentioned everyone, but then laughs it off and concludes with "Still, i was bored". This is Moz bringing us "evidence" but Moz immediately distancing himself from it and writing it off as the result of boredom in case anyone called him on it.
Also note that this is a back-door means of highlighting two lurkers (TWIE and Maxous).
Now, in post #130 I ask our IC just how much weight should be given to the "noob" factor. Moz had been giving me scum vibes since page one, but everyone here seemed to be willing to write this behavior off. It was a post that I think made it quite clear that I remained suspicious of Moz but was looking for some tip from our IC concerning how much is typical to read into a new player. At the very end of my post I made the remark "If it is reasonable to discount Mozamis's behavior thus far on account of inexperience, Thian's continued reaction as a more experienced player bears further scrutiny and TWIE's comment here makes more sense..." Moz's reaction?
mozamis wrote:so you're suspicious of Thian?
He completely ignores all of the other comments, offers no insight to post itself and instead writes a one-line post to direct suspicion back to Thian.
Nobody Special responded to my question in post #134, which Moz replies to:
mozamis wrote:Nobody Special wrote:Vordark wrote:@Nobody Special:
How much weight is reasonable (or simply typical) to give to experience or inexperience in determining whether or not behavior is suspicious and worthy of scrutiny? Thus far, I have been giving it near zero weight, but I am beginning to think this may be an error.
Normally, I don't factor "newbness" int omy suspicions; at least not
too
much.
I look at mozamis as a cute, adorable puppy so full of energy, bouncing around the room, trying to get
everyone
to pay attention to him (her? I default to male, and haven't checked its gender field yet).
I'm sure (I hope; it's bordering on annoying) that mozamis will expend all that energy at some point, and will grow into being a good and respectable Mafia player.
In other words, to boil it down to a word, at the moment I see mozamis as Neutral.
lol BIT patronising? I am just trying to be active. "good, respectable mafia player" how pompous of you. Everyone has different styles, nobody special. At the moment your style seems to be to post without much content...
Again we have "You're being mean to me" and Mozamis highlighting that he's "just trying to be active". He concludes with "At the moment your style seems to be to post without much content". So Mozamis makes clear mention he's trying to be active, all the while pointing an FoS at the lurkers and now NS.
In #137 he continues:
mozamis wrote:vordark, why dont you like "how hard i seem to be trying". Talk about "you are damned if you do, damned if you don't". I am posting a lot cos i enjoy it, and i want town to win.
Sorry if thats suspicious.
Mozamis is "posting a lot cos i enjoy it, and i want town to win". Again, "I'm active and I'm town". Notice that this is post #137 and Mozamis hasn't actually contributed *anything* real to the game. The sum total of his contribution is a few obvious votes on the lurkers, all the while setting himself up as a sympathetic, "active" newbie.
In post #138 we get:
mozamis wrote:ok, I admit this vote is partly cos he's last post irritated me (OMGUS i believe?), but he has been very vague. seems keener to be the IC than to hunt scum. so:
VOTE NOBODY SPECIAL
if he gets a bit more involved in the hunt, i'll reconsider :)
Oh, so Moz *will* vote out of mindless spite/retaliation. Also, he's clearly an uninvolved lurker which Moz has already established is bad, unlike himself who posts a lot.
In #141, the discussion has turned to RaudhrGarm:
mozamis wrote:On RG, if hes mafia i'll eat my left toenail.
Gotta be very clever scum to play the way he's been playing. I know this gets a bit circular, but if i was scum, i'm not sure i'd want to look quite as "can't be bothered to help town" as he has.
Be amazed if he is scum.
Here Moz says "if i was scum, i'm not sure i'd want to look quite as 'can't be bothered to help town' as he has". Note again that this is Moz pointing at the lurker and making it clear that his own behavior wouldn't match. In other words, "If I was scum, I'd be doing the opposite of what I'm doing now. I'm clearly town because I'm posting a lot and I keep saying I want to help the town win".
Of course, after this post Moz makes certain to put another one in as padding:
mozamis wrote:oh, and if i ever buy heavy metal, please lynch me ;)
This continues the trend of surrounding anything game related with accusations of meanness or one-line drivel. Anything to get that post count up and make an ISO harder.
In post #148, Trendall makes a statement that really starts me looking hard at Mozamis once I went back and re-read it:
Trendall wrote:
Actually, I'd say that Mozamis has done the least 'blending in' out of anyone here. He's posted like a million posts or something and is really putting himself in the foreground right now. Problem is, I think Mozamis is the kind of person who would do that regardless of whether he was town or mafia, so I'm still neutral.
In post #149, Mozamis gives a "response" to an earlier post by Thian.
mozamis wrote:Thian wrote:Mozamis:
You gave us the reason "why" you stated "Being new....avert attention". However, why do you feel the need state it? Even prior to me questioning you about the subject, you kept stating it, unprovoked, why did you feel it is necessary?
No, i was provoked by Vordark as i explained in my previous post. I am as keen as everyone else to drop the "noob thing" but you keep bringing it up.
So my posts are "provoking" him? Again, this is the "You're being mean to me" defense. Mozamis then tries to say he wants to drop the "noob thing" and it's Thian that keeps bringing it up. This is a deflection. Mozamis was very intent on making his noobness clear to everyone and now that someone is pressing him on it, he's trying to get distance and put the "issue" back on the "aggressive" attacker.
In post #150, Mozamis responds to Trendall's remark above:
mozamis wrote:Actually, I'd say that Mozamis has done the least 'blending in' out of anyone here. He's posted like a million posts or something and is really putting himself in the foreground right now. Problem is, I think Mozamis is the kind of person who would do that regardless of whether he was town or mafia, so I'm still neutral.
(TRENDALL)
LOL you sum me up perfectly. One of my fav songs is called: "Bigmouth Strikes Again" ;)
Not only is this post useless for the town, but it is yet another blatant attempt to gain and maintain sympathy.
In post #152, Mozamis continues to respond to Thian's pressing:
mozamis wrote:Thian, please look again at my replies to you ,post 38 (p2) and posts 54 and 57 (p3). In all of them I respond to your questions, and quite clearly i thought.
This leads me to conclude :
1) You are an uncomprehending townie.
2) You are scum.
2)seems more likely, and yet what makes me unsure is that surely the mafia would use better tactics than you are. Your tactic (if u r scum) seems to be repeat the same accusation and ignore the answers. That doesn't seem a great scum ploy to me. Or is it one that is used?
anyone else got any thoughts on Thian?
I will note that posts #38, #54 and #57 contain only his already noted weak justification of bvoigt's "scumminess" and his "stop being mean to me"/"I'm a noob" defense as previously noted. Mozamis also counters with his other standard response, "You must be scum!" and tries to put the attention back onto Thian.
He follows up with:
mozamis wrote:ah. got it. if you r scum, i guess the tactic u r using is" get everyone to go off on a wild goose chase", ie whack suspicion on me. Is that called diversion?
but if you r town, thian, i hope you now understand my postion and we can move on.
So clearly, if Thian continues to press the matter he's scum and not town.
In post #161 TWIE points out some clear issues with Thian's recent posts, to which Mozamis replies:
mozamis wrote:*cheers TheWayItEnds* :lol:
In posts #163 and #164 Mozamis makes a very weak and transparent attempt at a personal attack on Thian, now that he smells some blood in the water.
mozamis wrote:So this is from Thians first ever game on this site (end of the game, he was town):
@ kingdavid. you couldn't have said it any better. I did make a fool of myself through the game.
It was hard for me to come across pro town
and I am not surprised I became that target. Next time I will try to not be so flakey with posts and take a little time thinking.
I am more used to playing mafia in person
as conversations happen at that moment. Sleeping on something and then coming back to it and then flipping through countless of pages.
It was hard for me to keep up
but yeah, if I hadn't known any better, I would have pinned me as being scum LOL
(Thian, Newbie 963,p30,post 732, my bolding)
Still, at least you didnt play the boob card in your first game, eh? ;)
mozamis wrote:lol i like my freudian slip
Why say with one post what you can say with two or three? Gotta get that post count up so that no one notices I haven't actually contributed anything but a few lurker votes.
In post #167 Mozamis drops the funniest whopper I've seen in a while:
mozamis wrote:no ones put forward a decent argument yet as to why my behaviour is scummy.
The argument seems to consist of:
1) Mozamis didnt vote when he was supicious of someone.
2) he then claimed newness as his defence.
3)therefore he is scum.
As syllogisms go, its pretty weak.
There have been many arguments put forth for why Mozamis's behavior is scummy. Half of the people in this game have said that Mozamis's behavior is scummy. This isn't a defense, it's a hallucination.
Posts #172, #173 and #174 push "You're being mean to me", continue to gain favor/sympathy and push suspicion away on the mean and agressive player.
In post #175 I highlight Mozamis's behavior, especially the flood of useless posts which are making it harder to sort out people's statements (especially his own). Mozamis's response:
mozamis wrote:dont be rude Vordark. I'm just trying to enjoy the game.
Yep, the "Stop being mean to me" defense.
In post #178...
mozamis wrote:Thian wrote:Mozamis:
The pressure is fine. Votes are votes. You need to realize, that TheWayItEnds, is just as guilty as the next person in this game. Just be careful when someone is coming to your defense, you shouldn't just readily accept it because they could just be mafia trying to buddy up to you, then night kill you and no one will know any better because you didn't suspect them.
Oh, i wasnt acceptng it, but i did enjoy it. Of course, i relaise he could be scum But he destroyed your arguments completely.
Here Mozamis continues to cheer on TWIE and gain sympathy, even flattering him in the last sentence. He does that in #182 as well...
mozamis wrote:Thian wrote:Mozamis:
So you won't bother questioning why TheWayItEnds is defending you? Or Why he called you bait? Do you know how he knows you are lynch bait. He is essentially confirming you are town. How would anyone know that except for mafia. Wake up mozamis. Please.
Of course everyone is suspect. Do try and be sensible. I just liked the way he ripped your nonsenscial "argument" to shreds. Of course, he could be scum and you could be town. But i liked his style
Mozamis likes your style, TWIE. Won't you be his friend and keep the mean people away?
In #183, he responds to me:
mozamis wrote:Vordark wrote:mozamis wrote:dont be rude Vordark. I'm just trying to enjoy the game.
Grow a thicker skin, mellow out and stop the useless posts. I've begun leaning town on you since I am finding it really hard to believe that a newb mafia wouldn't have shut up by now. However, right now you are glowing, red hot distraction that is drawing too much attention away from scum hunting. You obviously have a lot of time in front of the computer which could be very useful for us, but you are burning too much of it on being defensive, voting for people that upset you and trying to be the center of attention. I'm not the only one who thinks this, so maybe, just maybe, it's not us it's you. So please, just chill out and help us hunt.
You need to calm down, grow up and stop being rude. Your persistent attacks on me are a volossal waste of the towns time. I'll you off cos 1) you're a NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOB and 2) you're probably a kid.
So look through all my replies to thians ridiculous arguments from the beginning.. You'll see that i answered them early on. Since then, he has merely being repeating them, As have you. Either you are scum, or just not very bright. Please try and sharpen up, and stop being rude. They only serve to devalue your already flimsy arguments.
And unless told otherwise by the Mod, I'll post as much as I like :P
I'm still being mean oh, and now I'm a noob kid. Jeesh, is Mozamis using the "personal attack" strategy he decried earlier? He then highlights the non-existent/useless responses he's supposedly made. Then it's more personal attacks, "Stop being mean" and calling the arguments against him so far "flimsy" again. As a final note, he continues to make it clear that he'll keep posting as much as he wants, even though that sort of thing hurts the town.
Post #184 proves that...
mozamis wrote:"hums You're Not The Boss of Me"...;)
Now he's back to hammering the lurkers, specifially Nobody Special because he smells blood there and he's an easy, risk-free target.
So, again, look through what Mozamis has posted here and see it for what it is. His total contribution? Easy votes on obvious targets, the justification for which he was careful to establish beforehand, all the while continuning to make it clear that these people are doing the opposite of what he is doing. He has not offered any real analysis on anything. He's pointed an FoS randomly around the room, voted only when it's risk-free or to vote against mean people. This is *all* that he has contributed.
Moz's only defense to any of these suspicions has been either "I'm new" or "Stop being mean", usually followed with "I'm not scum, you are!"
And throughout all of this, he has been blatantly attempting to gain sympathy, hide behind his noob status and inflate his post count so it's harder to ISO.
So again, how much of this obviously scummy behavior do we write off?