Newbie 521: Game over, SCUM WINS!
-
-
Kison
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
Who is anxious to roleclaim?Twister wrote:Why is everyone so anxious to role claim?
Role-claiming generally is good practice when you believe your lynch is inevitable. If you happen to have a role, you can feed that information before you're lynched, and it is confirmed by your role being revealed upon death. It's not always about saving yourself. However, role-claiming should be the last card in your hand.Twister wrote:Sierra
What good will that do? If you're ready to lynch them and they role claim is that going to change your mind or make them seem more scummy? If you're the cop and you think you're going to be lynched and you investigated someone the night before and found scum, then your claim will help the next day, but I doubt it will save your own life.They of course should also claim when we're about to lynch them.
There are, of course, other situations where mass role-claiming can be beneficial, such as end-games.-
-
Kison
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
Hi.
Yet, don't you think a townie would say that?Xtoxm wrote:
I think it's the type of thing a mafia would try and slip in casually, as he did, to try and sound town-side...I have been refering to all parties in the 3rd personGodot wrote:Why do you think it's suspicious to refer to the doctor as ours?
Sorry but I'm not quite seeing what's suspicious about his reaction. He's stated he wants the game to move on, and even if he misinterpreted the meaning behind the vote, it's consistent with what he's been saying.Godot wrote:I got my eye on youXtoxm, his vote was hardly serious, he is just trying to pressure you, he said so himself. Your reactions to his post are concerning, but could easily be dismissed as noob eagerness, so I won't place a vote on you, yet.
Unvote
Vote : Godot-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
1) Lack of better optionsTwister wrote: Godot said himself that he was willing to dismiss it as noob eagerness and wouldn't place a vote for him. I can understand someone raising a FoS (Finger of Suspicion), but why do you think Godot's suspicions warrant a vote for him? Your vote for him, especially as an IC (Inexperience Challenged) makes me slightly suspicious. Isn't part of your job as an IC to teach us how to use words like IC and FoS?
UNVOTE: Xtoxm
FoS Kison
2) It looks like he's trying to cast unnecessary suspicion
Why would scum be enthusiastic about a vote? Why would a townie? That's why I think it's legitimate enthusiasm about the game progressing.Godot wrote:I find it hard to see how someone who is enthused by being voted for, whether the game is going slow or not. This, in my opinion, does warrant some suspicion.-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
1) I had a random vote. My new vote is placed on someone I find more suspicious. That's how voting typically works, my friend.
2) Yet, contrary to Godot's vote, mine was placed for what I consider a legitimate reason.
Also, I never said that we should only be suspicious of people who I think we should be suspicious of. You're blatantly skewing my words to sound like I'm saying something I never even implied.-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
Hi,
Honestly, it's not a very hefty vote. We're still in the early stages of the game. To me, it's just something that stood out, and well, we wanted to get beyond the random voting stages, correct? So there you have a vote. It did do a good job sparking discussion and gain reactions. Those are good things.Godot wrote:Kison: I would say his vote on me is fine if he didn't take something I said out of context and used that as an excuse to vote me. I've said it multiple times that I didn't not say I found Xtomxs reactions suspicious, yet he seems to think that I did and has used it as a reason to vote for me. I do not see where this is coming from. I do not like how he has stretched his evidence to support a vote, I thinking most scummy player here.
On to the point as to whether or not you cast suspicion on your comment to Xtoxm, by saying "I'm not going to vote youyet", you imply that what he said bothered you, but not enough to vote. Nontheless, if it bothered you on the same grounds as a vote, just not to that extent, you imply it is scummy. I, however, disagree in that I think it's _not_ scummy, and therefore unwarranted.
Basically, don't take the vote so personally. If you've nothing to hide, the best thing you can do is find who is indeed scummy instead of fight the votes against you.
I shall try and make a list of my own later.-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
Since we aren't being given a vote count, here's one I've come up with.
Code: Select all
Twister (2) : Xtoxm, Thok Godot (2) : Kison, Sierra Kison (1) : Twister Thok (1) : Franzie Not Voting (1) : Godot
Please correct me if I'm wrong, here.
Twister: Leaning Scum
+Does bring up some valid points about roleclaiming
-Implies that everyone was anxious to roleclaim.
-Suggested that roleclaiming prior to lynch would not be a good move.
-Finds that Godot's suspicion of Xtoxm is warranted.
-"Saying we should only be suspicious of the people you say we should be suspcious of sounds scummy to me. " - blatantly twisting my words.
*I can see where he was coming when he was suspicious of Xtoxm when he thought he put me at L-1
Xtoxm: Slight Scum Vibe(not with Twister)
--Oddly placed vote on twister for using the word "our" - Calls it a serious vote.
*Had that outburst where he claimed Mafia. Not sure what to think of this, but worth noting.
Franzie: Neutral
+Contents of post 43 give me a town vibe.
-95% certain on Thok? Huh???
Godot: Slight Town Vibe
-Threatened to vote Xtoxm for wanting the game to speed up.
+Took my vote fairly objectively
Thok: Neutral/Slight Scum
-Only slightly lurkish
-Ignored Twister's defense
*Wanting to hear response to Twister's defense.
*I'm naturally cautious of this guy.
Sierra: Town
+Raised a somewhat valid point against Thok
+Sparking a beneficial discussion regarding the setup & town tactics to follow
Kison: Town
+++++++Totally town
Twister really does look bad if you put everything together.
Unvote
FoS : Twister
I believe you need to remedy some of the points I've brought up. As I said before, what you said to Xtoxm about putting me at L-1 does not shine a bad light on you, to me, as I understand what you're saying.-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
The fiasco with Xtoxm being happy over being voted for.Godot wrote:
What suspicion?Kison wrote: -Finds that Godot's suspicion of Xtoxm is warranted.
He said it HERE. Near the bottom.Godo wrote:
I've just reread him and fail to find where he said that. How ever I am half blind and probably missed it so if I could get a quote that would be nice.Kison wrote: -"Saying we should only be suspicious of the people you say we should be suspcious of sounds scummy to me. " - blatantly twisting my words.
More later.-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
-
-
Kison .GIFted
- .GIFted
- .GIFted
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: January 22, 2007
I didn't even get to use this!
Kison wrote:Since we aren't being given a vote count, here's one I've come up with.
Code: Select all
Twister (2) : Xtoxm, Thok Godot (2) : Kison, Sierra Kison (1) : Twister Thok (1) : Franzie Not Voting (1) : Godot
Please correct me if I'm wrong, here.
Twister: Leaning Scum
+Does bring up some valid points about roleclaiming
-Implies that everyone was anxious to roleclaim.
-Suggested that roleclaiming prior to lynch would not be a good move.
-Finds that Godot's suspicion of Xtoxm is warranted.
-"Saying we should only be suspicious of the people you say we should be suspcious of sounds scummy to me. " - blatantly twisting my words.
*I can see where he was coming when he was suspicious of Xtoxm when he thought he put me at L-1
Xtoxm: Slight Scum Vibe(not with Twister)
--Oddly placed vote on twister for using the word "our" - Calls it a serious vote.
*Had that outburst where he claimed Mafia. Not sure what to think of this, but worth noting.
Franzie: Neutral
+Contents of post 43 give me a town vibe.
-95% certain on Thok? Huh???
Godot: Slight Town Vibe
-Threatened to vote Xtoxm for wanting the game to speed up.
+Took my vote fairly objectively
Thok: Neutral/Slight Scum
-Only slightly lurkish
-Ignored Twister's defense
*Wanting to hear response to Twister's defense.
*I'm naturally cautious of this guy.
Sierra: Town
+Raised a somewhat valid point against Thok
+Sparking a beneficial discussion regarding the setup & town tactics to follow
Kison: Town
+++++++Totally town
Twister really does look bad if you put everything together.
Unvote
FoS : Twister
I believe you need to remedy some of the points I've brought up. As I said before, what you said to Xtoxm about putting me at L-1 does not shine a bad light on you, to me, as I understand what you're saying.
Anyway, good game all. Hope to see you folks in future games.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-