Blitz 5: Netherspite's Blitz SORM Mafia [Game Over]

hi im Yakko · Post Post #83 (isolation #0) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:09 pm

VOTE: fire

Was looking at nintendo direct. Am here now. Also dwlee is scum.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #89 (isolation #1) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:10 pm

In post 86, Firebringer wrote:
In post 83, hi im Yakko wrote:VOTE: fire

Was looking at nintendo direct. Am here now. Also dwlee is scum.

YOU PUT ME AT l-1 WITHOUT LOOKING

Oops my b

hi im Yakko · Post Post #99 (isolation #2) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:13 pm

In post 97, Fro99er wrote:UNVOTE:

Did Idiot just claim judge?

This unvote triggers me.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #102 (isolation #3) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:15 pm

Also mario is not confirmed by the mod. It is a mod note restating what he has done in my humble opinion. On that note I'm a town investigative role.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #109 (isolation #4) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:19 pm

Lol that emotional inconsistency. We were gucci then we weren't, what do?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #114 (isolation #5) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:27 pm

My money is on a lurker.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #119 (isolation #6) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:33 pm

In post 116, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 78, Hippy Love wrote:
In post 75, Dwlee99 wrote:What are we doing? lol

we aren't lynching scum and mindlessly wagoning pple for no reason.

do you have a problem with this?

Yep lol.

I want farside on. o3o

In post 83, hi im Yakko wrote:VOTE: fire

Was looking at nintendo direct. Am here now. Also dwlee is scum.

Yakko is scum.

Easy, huh?

Easy? How do you mean? I would like to read the subtext you put into "easy, huh?".

hi im Yakko · Post Post #122 (isolation #7) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:43 pm

In post 121, Dwlee99 wrote:I am saying that declaring someone is scum is easy. What don't you understand about that statement?

I didn't understand what you were saying. I understand the above statement and knew you were implying something, but didn't know what. English is my second language.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #132 (isolation #8) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 1:09 pm

In post 126, farside22 wrote:Well so far I know I'm not voting fire and I'm sad the soft claiming stopped since we maybe to find scum in there.

vote: yakko

Why don't you keep it going by soft claiming?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #142 (isolation #9) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 1:27 pm

Context pls.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #147 (isolation #10) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 1:44 pm

Thread speed op. Must've skimmed past it. My b.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #148 (isolation #11) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 1:45 pm

Although it currently feels like people are just waiting for something to happen.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #154 (isolation #12) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 2:07 pm

In post 151, Fro99er wrote:
In post 148, hi im Yakko wrote:Although it currently feels like people are just waiting for something to happen.

Is that bad or good?

I was reading blitz game 1 because I was.

Good and Bad imo. Was reading through game 1 of that 2+2 thing were angry pidgeon and dipping were playing in. A lot of peeps there would just multipost like crazy so potential for more mistakes. If that makes sense. But since people are just waiting here then when it comes to lynching we might not be able to decide. Although I am not opposed to random lynching.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #163 (isolation #13) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 3:53 pm

Notice anything noteworthy in your read through?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #194 (isolation #14) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 6:03 pm

@fro99er in regards to jeanne are you saying those are usually if not always scum tells of his(?).

hi im Yakko · Post Post #195 (isolation #15) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 6:06 pm

In post 64, Fro99er wrote:I like Jeanne this game so far.

Cuz you said this earlier after a single post from that slot. I don't understand why you like them here but then 3 posts later dislike the slot. Like they have done next to nothing imho.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #196 (isolation #16) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 6:06 pm

I'd be willing to gamble and lynch fro99er

hi im Yakko · Post Post #198 (isolation #17) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 6:11 pm

I currently have my eye on active lurker jellyrolls as well.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #204 (isolation #18) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 6:31 pm

In post 200, Hippy Love wrote:
In post 198, hi im Yakko wrote:I currently have my eye on active lurker jellyrolls as well.

what about smithereens?

Oh right! Hmmmmmm Damn lurkers be lurkin. I noticed jelly simply because he voted me. Seemed opportunistic then they voted kraeg increased my suspicion. I'd be okay putting Smithereens on the noose. Did that answer your question? It was ambiguous.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #207 (isolation #19) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 6:36 pm

In post 102, hi im Yakko wrote:Also mario is not confirmed by the mod. It is a mod note restating what he has done in my humble opinion. On that note I'm a town investigative role.

@ranger I soft claimed here in my fourth post.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #210 (isolation #20) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 6:47 pm

In post 201, Ranger wrote:
hippy love wrote:frogger this is 1 of those times where you have to trust me
I really don't.

VOTE: Hippy Love.

In post 202, Ranger wrote:
Yakko wrote:Also dwlee is scum.
Agreed.

Why aren't you massclaiming? (I know, pot, kettle,
I'm getting to it as I read
.There's something
very specific
I'm looking for from
a very specific person
before I claim, and if it's there then no harm done but if it isn't then I need to force a lynch on them.)

In post 206, Ranger wrote:Still haven't seen that specific thing from the specific person, though I'm caught up.

So still maintaining my hippy love vote.

Your vote and lack of removing it after finishing the read through i.e catching up suggests that the specific thing you were looking for is from hippylove.
The bold suggests/implies something but I'm not sure what. Are you saying you're getting to your own claim after you read through because what follows after the bold contradicts that line of thought. Maybe I'm just reading it wrong though. Care to enlighten me please and thank you.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #211 (isolation #21) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 6:50 pm

when can prods be issued out?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #217 (isolation #22) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 7:01 pm

In post 214, Ranger wrote:
Yakko wrote:Care to enlighten me please and thank you.
What it means is that I think hippy love is trying to claim something which is impossible by my own role.

Care to quote it because I'm not finding where hippy tried to claim. I was slightly suprised because I don't (didn't?) remeber hippy love claiming.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #218 (isolation #23) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 7:01 pm

Ebwop: remember

hi im Yakko · Post Post #222 (isolation #24) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 7:13 pm

In post 221, Ranger wrote:I am not an alt.

But I think you're trying to claim a Government role which would be impossible.

Okay but where is hippy trying to claim it? A post or a series/list of posts that led you to believe this.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #235 (isolation #25) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:19 pm

In post 226, Smithereens wrote:
In post 154, hi im Yakko wrote:
In post 151, Fro99er wrote:
In post 148, hi im Yakko wrote:Although it currently feels like people are just waiting for something to happen.

Is that bad or good?

I was reading blitz game 1 because I was.

Good and Bad imo. Was reading through game 1 of that 2+2 thing were angry pidgeon and dipping were playing in. A lot of peeps there would just multipost like crazy so potential for more mistakes. If that makes sense. But since people are just waiting here then when it comes to lynching we might not be able to decide. Although I am not opposed to random lynching.

In a mass claim game why the fvck would you want to go random lynching?? Especially when you've got a nice sized handful of players who aren't claiming.

Huh? What are you talking about? Saying "I'm not opposed to random lynching" is not meant to be taken as "I want to random lynch today". The nuance is compeletely different. You sound extremely displeased as opposed to annoyed. I would think it would be the latter. Maybe I'm wrong not that it matters all that much yet. (Also what is with the v in fuck?)

hi im Yakko · Post Post #242 (isolation #26) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:27 pm

One if not both of those neutral benigns need death.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #247 (isolation #27) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:30 pm

In post 243, Professor Bozo wrote:
In post 242, hi im Yakko wrote:One if not both of those neutral benigns need death.

we arent lycnhign frogger though?

Right now? Currently? I believe we are in the process of lynching fire. Fro99er can go next if you push hard enough on them I guess. Plus the neutral random 66% chance of a bad roll (maybe even 100%) no me gusta.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #248 (isolation #28) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:32 pm

In post 237, Professor Bozo wrote:ok so ranger is scum number 2 good to know.

My gut says ranger is town.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #256 (isolation #29) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:37 pm

In post 250, Aronis wrote:
In post 248, hi im Yakko wrote:
In post 237, Professor Bozo wrote:ok so ranger is scum number 2 good to know.

My gut says ranger is town.

That's a really helpful explanation, thanks.

How to explain a gut read. Hmmmm I doubt mafia would say that blatant a lie i.e. Hippy claiming x when they clearly haven't claimed anything.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #271 (isolation #30) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:46 pm

Also I think kraegs(?) reason for voting fire pmakes sense prima facie. But playing it out doesn't. Did that make sense? Sorry sorry. What I mean is. I don't think it was relevant that fire claimed a protective role and declared a game breaking strat. No matter how you look at it a game breaking strat by mass claim has a decent chance of working out in this instance; ergo hiding the protective claim goes to number 2 on the priority list and winning is of course number 1.

If a game break strategy that invoved claiming was brought up by someone else all protective roles would still have to claim eventually. The fact that a protective role brought it up should be immaterial.

UNVOTE:

hi im Yakko · Post Post #276 (isolation #31) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:48 pm

In post 266, Zymf wrote:
In post 242, hi im Yakko wrote:One if not both of those neutral benigns need death.
But if Frogger were anti-town, why would he claim neutral to begin with? The fact that he had the gut to claim neutral makes me trust him a bit. The same does not apply to Yreckt though, as he claimed last.

@Idiot Savant: Don't drag previous games into this one please

I don't think early bird gets the worm is the best steategy or policy.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #284 (isolation #32) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:51 pm

In post 279, Zymf wrote:I'll just vote for someone who hasn't claimed for now..
VOTE: Ranger

I'll be back later today.

@Kraeg: You didn't say yourself that it was an excuse, I know that. But the fact that you hadn't claimed at that point, makes it possible to make the interpretation that I made. If a mafia is being pressured to claim against his/her will, wouldn't he/she naturally critizise the massclaiming?

I believ ranger already soft claimed a govt role.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #288 (isolation #33) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:55 pm

In post 221, Ranger wrote:I am not an alt.

But I think you're trying to claim a Government role which would be impossible.

Rangers claim here

hi im Yakko · Post Post #292 (isolation #34) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:57 pm

In post 214, Ranger wrote:
Yakko wrote:Care to enlighten me please and thank you.
What it means is that I think hippy love is trying to claim something which is impossible by my own role.

In post 221, Ranger wrote:I am not an alt.

But I think you're trying to claim a Government role which would be impossible.

I think it is. Why quibble we can confirm when she gets back.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #298 (isolation #35) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:02 pm

In post 295, Firebringer wrote:Nobody knows how to play this.
I hate this game already.

Lol did you just call the one guy you're arguing with everyone in the negative? It's just one guy. I was thinking we were gonna lynch in the surplus of roles and to the day a third party.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #299 (isolation #36) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:02 pm

Ebwop: to end the day

hi im Yakko · Post Post #302 (isolation #37) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:06 pm

Would you mind voting someone else that is my town read

hi im Yakko · Post Post #304 (isolation #38) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:08 pm

VOTE: hippy love

hi im Yakko · Post Post #305 (isolation #39) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:09 pm

Oh no no no I'm so stupid

hi im Yakko · Post Post #307 (isolation #40) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:11 pm

In post 306, Aronis wrote:
In post 305, hi im Yakko wrote:Oh no no no I'm so stupid

Mario is confirmed govt. Ranger low key claimed govt. I believe and still kinda do that ranger is town. Facts disagree with me though.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #309 (isolation #41) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:13 pm

Wait I'm still high. Since zym claimed govt as well. Sigh. My puny brain might explode.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #313 (isolation #42) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:24 pm

VOTE: kraeg

hi im Yakko · Post Post #316 (isolation #43) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:32 pm

That is hella sketch

hi im Yakko · Post Post #319 (isolation #44) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 9:39 pm

My sides lol.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #324 (isolation #45) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:11 pm

In post 322, Professor Bozo wrote:
In post 321, ForWhomTheJellyRolls wrote:There are definitely too many people claiming town, (obviously) I'm all for going after one of the town protective claims to figure out what's what.

I think Firebringer is town and the weird vibes I was getting for Yakko are gone. Probably town too. Kraeg and Idiot Savant, I'm not so sure about. Something doesn't sit right with me about Dwelee either.

there were only 2 protective claims?

There was (were?) 3. Fire/aronis/kraeg

hi im Yakko · Post Post #325 (isolation #46) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:14 pm

Oh no aronis claimed govt thing. Nvm. Whonwere the two protectives? @servant

hi im Yakko · Post Post #328 (isolation #47) » Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:23 pm

Hmmmmm. I'm gonna go get a snack and some coffee.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #347 (isolation #48) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:09 am

In post 345, Smithereens wrote:I understand we're all sheeping a confirmed townie, but the eagerness gives me doubts.. Why did nobody ask or challenge..?

I'll assume you caught up from this post. Mind giving us a read list?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #352 (isolation #49) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:22 am

In post 349, Smithereens wrote:
In post 347, hi im Yakko wrote:
In post 345, Smithereens wrote:I understand we're all sheeping a confirmed townie, but the eagerness gives me doubts.. Why did nobody ask or challenge..?

I'll assume you caught up from this post. Mind giving us a read list?

Yes, everyone of you is fvcking drunk or high. FB I like, I feel like he def would not be so eager to die as scum to prove a point. The others I'll wait and see. Kraeg I read null, as he raises points but doesn't actually attempt to push. Which is just lackluster. I'll hammer if we run out of time. Otherwise you should probably explain to me why he is the best possible lynch as opposed to the others in his category.

No scum leans?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #357 (isolation #50) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:26 am

In post 351, Fro99er wrote:At least one of Aronis or zymf is scum

I'm down.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #362 (isolation #51) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:31 am

There are several third party so technically

hi im Yakko · Post Post #363 (isolation #52) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:33 am

Personally I'm feeling the dwlee lynch

hi im Yakko · Post Post #376 (isolation #53) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 1:13 am

In post 373, Dwlee99 wrote:I am town investigative. I will try to post more when home.

This makes 4

Myself, jelly, smith, dwlee.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #382 (isolation #54) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 1:42 am

In post 379, Hippy Love wrote:will you guys listen to me
now
about smithereens plz

VOTE: smithereens

I still don't like fire or aronis!

VOTE: smithereens

What about dwlee?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #387 (isolation #55) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 1:51 am

In post 386, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 382, hi im Yakko wrote:
In post 379, Hippy Love wrote:will you guys listen to me
now
about smithereens plz

VOTE: smithereens

I still don't like fire or aronis!

VOTE: smithereens

What about dwlee?

Dwlee seems like an obvious town to me, what about you?

That's not a vote :/

hi im Yakko · Post Post #388 (isolation #56) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 1:52 am

I'm not even certain that can be called content.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #392 (isolation #57) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 1:59 am

How to explain to scum he is caught scum?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #395 (isolation #58) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:14 am

In post 394, Dwlee99 wrote:But I am town??

Oops my b.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #531 (isolation #59) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:26 pm

Lol que? @530

Also why did we move from smithereens?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #536 (isolation #60) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:51 pm

@farside are you okay with an aronis lynch?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #543 (isolation #61) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 3:14 pm

Ummm? This isn't who makes the best arguments which you would lose since you're not making any. Hippy love is asking you to show her what she isn't seeing/is missing. Asking why someone is scum after being asked why they are town is not productive if you simply plan to attack hippys arguments/thought process.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #545 (isolation #62) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 3:21 pm

Is smithereens dumb telling right now?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #564 (isolation #63) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 4:18 pm

In post 549, Smithereens wrote:
In post 543, hi im Yakko wrote:Ummm? This isn't who makes the best arguments which you would lose since you're not making any. Hippy love is asking you to show her what she isn't seeing/is missing. Asking why someone is scum after being asked why they are town is not productive if you simply plan to attack hippys arguments/thought process.

BoP is in the wrong position.

My post is meant to get ranger to talk. Sunce they have been holding their cards close to their chest from what I recall.

Is that innocent until proven guilty approach? Why can't they have an equal burden? Of course how burden is measured is who has the most vs least brownie points imo. And a lot of peeps hace expressed interest in your lynch Smithereens.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #565 (isolation #64) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 4:23 pm

Intent to hammer.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #566 (isolation #65) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 4:25 pm

I dont think ranger announced -1

hi im Yakko · Post Post #567 (isolation #66) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 4:59 pm

VOTE: Aronis

hi im Yakko · Post Post #577 (isolation #67) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 7:22 pm

Aronis is lynched already

hi im Yakko · Post Post #578 (isolation #68) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 7:28 pm

VOTE: dwlee

hi im Yakko · Post Post #581 (isolation #69) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 7:43 pm

Zero contribution. Zero reads.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #596 (isolation #70) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:40 pm

@mario do you have a reads list?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #600 (isolation #71) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:06 pm

In post 599, Yreckt wrote:
In post 598, Smithereens wrote:
In post 597, Yreckt wrote:VOTE: Dwlee99

You really aren't helpful at all...

Is this a thirdnparty claim?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #604 (isolation #72) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:17 pm

Actually farside might be scum.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #637 (isolation #73) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:40 pm

I'm a town citizen now.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #639 (isolation #74) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:04 pm

Tax evasionnis a dangerous thing. Looking at jeanne and jellyrolls atm.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #641 (isolation #75) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:20 pm

In post 640, Professor Bozo wrote:
In post 639, hi im Yakko wrote:Tax evasionnis a dangerous thing. Looking at jeanne and jellyrolls atm.

do you mind claiming your role then i know you claimed catagory. i see no reason to know role at this point.

Town lookout. Not sure how that helps. Why did you wanna know my role? 9/10 times in a situation like this it is immaterial. 10/10 times in a situation like this your post is just fluff.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #644 (isolation #76) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:36 pm

Hmmmmm paranoid af right now. I'm gonna go chill. I accuse savant of being useless for asking me my role then fire comes up as says here is how it is useful.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #646 (isolation #77) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:44 pm

In post 643, Firebringer wrote:I think if we claim full roles today it would help just completely fix the game.

I am
Bodyguard

How would it help?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #653 (isolation #78) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:56 pm

In post 649, Firebringer wrote:Kraeg was Town Protective or Town Killing.
Same as me.

He could be in either of those slots.

In post 650, Firebringer wrote:If your role has another category, you should claim it.

VOTE: firebringer doesn't know town were given the specific category they were in via pm.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #656 (isolation #79) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:02 pm

@firebringer what do you think of jellyrolls and jeanne?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #657 (isolation #80) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:03 pm

@firebringer who are your current town reads?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #659 (isolation #81) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:04 pm

Lmao that was so bad of you.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #660 (isolation #82) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:05 pm

I think if you read hippyloves posts closer you would have realized it

hi im Yakko · Post Post #662 (isolation #83) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:34 pm

I'm all giddy with excitement at the upcoming savant death after fire.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #666 (isolation #84) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:47 pm

Pretty tempted to say fuck you mario for trying to steal my glory.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #668 (isolation #85) » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:52 pm

I'm gonna go get a snack.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #687 (isolation #86) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 1:29 am

In post 667, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 666, hi im Yakko wrote:Pretty tempted to say fuck you mario for trying to steal my glory.

What glory?

This makes me sad. You don't enjoy catching scum?

Dwlee is the last third party methinks.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #798 (isolation #87) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 8:23 am

I don't like that fire became quite. I must have freaked them out. UNVOTE:

Farside vs smithe I'd agree with far.

Okay with a jelly lynch okay with a smith lynch.

Let me make it easy for peeps. Everyone has claimed. Simply ask what they claimed instead of looking like idiots post game.

VOTE: dwlee

hi im Yakko · Post Post #807 (isolation #88) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 8:34 am

I would wait to say in case someone says they performed x and are fars target.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #808 (isolation #89) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 8:34 am

hi im Yakko · Post Post #812 (isolation #90) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 8:43 am

I would vote jelly or smithereens over ranger. They def dumb told.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #817 (isolation #91) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 8:54 am

Mod vc is messed up

hi im Yakko · Post Post #820 (isolation #92) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 9:04 am

I think that was completely fine.

Also is it me or does smithereens just want seem to want to be right? I definitely see lack of town motivation behind her posts. And they don't relate to hw the other person is scum but instead how they are wrong and they equate that with scum qualities? It's weird.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #827 (isolation #93) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 9:59 am

Hydra dissonance oh nooooes. Mollie mind explain your line of thought in regards to farside?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #852 (isolation #94) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 12:28 pm

In post 846, Professor Bozo wrote:
In post 845, Hippy Love wrote:
In post 843, farside22 wrote:I looked back and apparently firebringer and savant are the only claimed protective roles.
Jeanne was the other person it could have been.
Dwlee said nothing about not getting results.

Vote: dwlee

JEANNE CLAIMED TOWN KILLING NOT PROTECTIVE

ALSO DWLEE SAID THAT HE VIEWED US AND GOT NOT SUSPICIOUS.

mollie... deep breath

Cool meme

hi im Yakko · Post Post #859 (isolation #95) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 12:44 pm

This fuckin game. I'm gonna shower. You all sort this shit out.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #907 (isolation #96) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 1:56 pm

Back who are we lynching?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #911 (isolation #97) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 1:59 pm

VOTE: dwlee

hi im Yakko · Post Post #920 (isolation #98) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 2:09 pm

In post 915, farside22 wrote:
In post 912, Ranger wrote:
farside22 wrote:and hasn't claimed and anyone whom claimed under the category of being a possible bus drive has claimed there full role already?
So I was wrong about it being a busdrive. I read my role PM and came to post that immediately. But my result is what it is.

You seem to think yakko will be alive to confirm you.

No seriously I want two lynches this game day.
Please?

I woulda said yes but looking at the NAR nope.scum.exe

hi im Yakko · Post Post #924 (isolation #99) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 2:21 pm

Has smithe full claimed?

hi im Yakko · Post Post #929 (isolation #100) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 2:37 pm

Her scenario doesn't work anyways as I would ay before being recruited and would show up as citizen.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #938 (isolation #101) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 3:09 pm

Savant shouldannounce who he is gonna be on so no one can say oops we were on the same person.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #940 (isolation #102) » Sun Nov 15, 2015 3:15 pm

In post 939, Smithereens wrote:@Hippy Wtf!? I did target you, I saw exactly nobody visit you, which is why I know Dwlee is lying when he said he investigated you.

Is this a lookout claim?

hi im Yakko · Mon Nov 16, 2015 12:34 pm

VOTE: jeanne11

hi im Yakko · Mon Nov 16, 2015 12:38 pm

In post 959, Ranger wrote:(Yakko, it'd be nice if you'd confirm in-thread, even though yeah, you know.)

We're butt buddies.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #976 (isolation #105) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 1:19 pm

Smithereens claimed lookout iirc

hi im Yakko · Post Post #983 (isolation #106) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 1:52 pm

More importantly results