[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7566640 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Blitz 19 | Fire and Ice with Rooms | Endgame - Mafiascum.net
I guess that answers that question. Now who is the crazy one here. Ranger with the gambit? Or reaction test? Did they catch him? Or fall into his trap?
Post
Post #72 (isolation #10) » Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:08 am
Postby lane0168 »
In post 68, Political Clout wrote:The issue is not coherency lane. It is more why you disagree with those reads or oppose them? And why that disagreement makes phantom scum. Currently it looks like you're just omgusing. Even if cobalt isn't serious about them. This is called the subtle push or soft omgus. Is not giving reads a town motivated thing? I find it susp you don't ask phantom why. It suggests you initially didn't believe he was serious. More importantly an action cannot be if x then y if not x then maybe y. Just omgus him you'd look better for it or take stance. Igmeoy.
I want to put heart in a room with someone. Currently no good candidates.
I see your point. What I'm looking at his him calling me and ranger scum, but moving off of the ranger wagon to vote me alone.
I wanted to see if he was serious or spewing rvs stuff.
lane wrote:I guess that answers that question. Now who is the crazy one here. Ranger with the gambit? Or reaction test? Did they catch him? Or fall into his trap?
VOTE: political clout
The player who most fits the description of "falling into my trap" is actually you.
VOTE: lane.
Scorpious
may
be scum, star's a remote possibility, but everyone else on page one is varying degrees of null to town, PhantomCobalt as strongest town.
In post 43, lane0168 wrote:If he's serious, I'd put him on a scum lean. If he's just throwing stuff out there, it's null
This doesn't make any sense to me
Idk how to put it any more clearly
Pro town thing to do is get out of rvs asap
A serious vote does that
Just throwing stuff out there for that sake of throwing it out there comes off as filler to me
Lane when you're off v/la your input on this would be appreciated
Sorry been a few days so I'm trying to remember where my head was at.
What I meant was if he was serious about his reads, that includes me and Ranger as being scum but he unvited ranger. If he wasn't then he was possibly reaction fishing or just throwing filler. That's why that's null to me.
I understand you're probably way past this but I'm catching up
rkvothe wrote:Too easy for scum to hop on while giving no reasons. Look, he's at L-3 with not much reasoning behind the votes.
This is a good point!
lane wrote:How?
Literally every post of yours is filled with scum motivation.
PhantomCobalt wrote:Get a room: PhantomCobalt, Ranger, Flubbernugget
While I realize the value of having a room to share reads, I must decline: time spent in a room is time spent not in-thread, and I feel my presence is absolutely required in order to get a lane lynch in.
I really hope I find a better answer than that bs excuse of a scum read explanation
Post
Post #476 (isolation #19) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:45 am
Postby lane0168 »
In post 473, pignash wrote:That's not a real question. I don't have time to do a catch up post. I'm at work. Ask me something specific. Anything is unhelpful.
Asking for reads is not a real question? You have no reads or anything to comment or any original thoughts whatsoever... ok
Post
Post #477 (isolation #20) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:48 am
Postby lane0168 »
Not to mention, just because you get a room doesn't exonerate you from participating in the main thread here. So participate.
Seems like you want to talk in secrecy so you can get someone to hopefully town read you, can say whatever you want with only one person so question you, and then have them not be able to say anything about what you say for however many hours or is that they can't talk about you
Post
Post #491 (isolation #21) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:46 am
Postby lane0168 »
In post 478, pignash wrote:Asking for a readslist means you want my thoughts on everyone. I am going through rangers ISO now because pepto asked me.
I am participating currently.
But you're not saying anything. You're not sorting anybody. You haven't done anything except say that you'll do something if someone asks you. Presumably only if we ask the right questions so as not to incriminate yourself.
Fine don't give the entire list, but you haven't given a single read or contributed anything
Post
Post #500 (isolation #24) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:23 am
Postby lane0168 »
In post 478, pignash wrote:Asking for a readslist means you want my thoughts on everyone. I am going through rangers ISO now because pepto asked me.
I am participating currently.
Continues to say he will do something. Yesterday said he would post and came up with along hiplop about fb. Today said he was iso ranger. But continues not to say anything...
Post
Post #509 (isolation #29) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:16 pm
Postby lane0168 »
Flubbernugget, how do you feel about ranger finding doc crumbs in the posts he linked? Still bs? Cause I see nothing, but that could just because I see things differently than him
Post
Post #512 (isolation #32) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:49 pm
Postby lane0168 »
In post 408, Ranger wrote:So...
-Radiant is not an rkvothe scumbuddy. (Radiant pushed rkvothe.)
-lane is not an rkvothe scumbuddy.
-itlepip is not an rkvothe scumbuddy.
-startfromtheheart is not an rkvothe scumbuddy.
-Flubbernugget is not an rkvothe scumbuddy.
That leaves: {Peptobislawl (top choice), pignash, hiplop, Firebringer} as possible scumbuddies.
Post
Post #513 (isolation #33) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:51 pm
Postby lane0168 »
God I suck. Was gonna ask where radiant pushed rvkothe, but there's 2 radiants to iso. Not exactly a push, definitely doesn't rule out the option of being the scum buddy
Post
Post #516 (isolation #36) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:02 pm
Postby lane0168 »
In post 6, Ranger wrote:Would you believe me if I said I had a serious scumread on rvothe?
In post 92, Ranger wrote:{PhantomCobalt}
{Politcal Clout}
{hiplop, rkvothe}
{pignash, TheTinyPeach, Flubbernugget, TheShadow}
{starfromtheheart}
{Scorpious}
{itlepip}
{lane}
In post 151, Ranger wrote:{PhantomCobalt}
{Politcal Clout, rkvothe}
{hiplop}
{Flubbernugget, TheShadow}
{Firebringer}
{pignash}
{starfromtheheart}
{Scorpious}
{itlepip}
{lane}
For reference: this is everyone moving up on the list, not anyone moving down.
In post 289, Ranger wrote:Can't do a proper readslist, but can do an informal one.
{Politcal Clout, rkvothe}
{hiplop, Firebringer}
{Peptobislawl, pignash}
{Radiant Moonlight}
{startfromtheheart}
{itlepip}
{lane}
In post 297, Ranger wrote:Actually, gonna do something rash with my readslist:
{Political Clout, rkvothe, hiplop, Firebringer}
{pignash}
{Peptobislawl}
{Radiant Moonlight}
{startfromtheheart}
{itlepip}
{lane}
pignash isn't as solid as I would
prefer
, but is looking town. I'm also comfortable with my callout of hiplop and Firebringer to move them up to the second-tiered townreads. If I'm wrong on one of my four scumreads, Peptobislawl is the most likely outside of them to be scum.
I like how he slowly climbs up his read list. But that's right. The doc crumbs he conveniently made up
Hiplop, why such a negative reaction to FB so far? Doesn't seem different than normal to me.
In post 289, Ranger wrote:Can't do a proper readslist, but can do an informal one.
{Politcal Clout, rkvothe}
{hiplop, Firebringer}
{Peptobislawl, pignash}
{Radiant Moonlight}
{startfromtheheart}
{itlepip}
{lane}
In post 297, Ranger wrote:Actually, gonna do something rash with my readslist:
{Political Clout, rkvothe, hiplop, Firebringer}
{pignash}
{Peptobislawl}
{Radiant Moonlight}
{startfromtheheart}
{itlepip}
{lane}
pignash isn't as solid as I would
prefer
, but is looking town. I'm also comfortable with my callout of hiplop and Firebringer to move them up to the second-tiered townreads. If I'm wrong on one of my four scumreads, Peptobislawl is the most likely outside of them to be scum.
What about pignash was solid whatsoever to move him to second from top townread, with 0 of his posts in between?
lane wrote:So you think it's town to not answer questions or give reads?
Given the circumstances?
Actually?
Yes.
Scum have reason to be afraid. They get lynched, then either it's game over (ice), or their faction is down to half power and can be cross-killed any night or lynched any day (fire). That gives them incentive to contribute.
Town hold no fear. They get lynched, it's inconvenient for their faction, but not a game-ending loss. They get lazy. They don't crack.
See also: PhantomCobalt yesterday.
And anyone who doesn't realize pignash is a carbon copy reproduction of the PhantomCobalt lynch is either an idiot or scum.
startfromtheheart wrote:How about ranger vs start?
Well, dead scum's dead scum, so I wouldn't mind at all, but I'd rather eliminate ice rather than kill one fire and have both ice/fire alive at night.
Peptobislawl wrote:Care to add some reasoning?
Care to add some of your own, hmm?
What are the circumstances that make it town to not give reads and refuse to answer questions, and not give any input whatsoever?
lane wrote:I'll ask you again ranger, what about this iso puts pignash second from the top of your list?
Actually, third from top.
PhantomCobalt, as stated multiple times, was at the top.
pignash may not have given much, but I liked 9, I had no problem with 146, and I thought 166 was excellent. The idea of the room being town, and then asking about Firebringer.
What's to dislike? How little there is? 'Cause that is no problem given pignash has been absent.
I read players off of what content they post. One post of content, a hundred posts of content, one post of content with one total post, one post of content with twenty posts, doesn't matter. I pay attention to what the content says. The content says pignash would at worst be null, at best be town.
Can't say the same for, say, startfromtheheart.
Or Peptobislawl.
You/itlepip are borderline.
Second level from top scum read. Yes I dislike how little there is but there is nothing there to put him that high. You're just making shit up.
You like him saying good morning. Brilliant. Null.
No problem with the next. Null.
There's nothing about the one post that puts him at second from top of your scum list. Absolutely nothing.
And you just happen to have a strong scumread on scum first post of the game.
lane wrote:What are the circumstances that make it town to not give reads and refuse to answer questions, and not give any input whatsoever?
The threat of being lynched if he doesn't follow through.
This was itlepip's alleged tell on PhantomCobalt yesterday, even! Scum under pressure crack!
pignash is, and has, been under pressure. And has given...nothing. While that's certainly no rock-solid proof of township, it's at least a mild indicator.
Your missing the point. It's not that he's not cracking under pressure. HE KEEPS SAYING HE'LL MAKE A POST BUT DOESN'T! THAT SHIT IS SCUMMY!
Post
Post #551 (isolation #50) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:30 pm
Postby lane0168 »
No. Its not null at worst. To lurk through 20 pages promising content day one, and then doing the same day 2. How can you say what you're saying with a straight face?
Post
Post #555 (isolation #51) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:34 pm
Postby lane0168 »
In my experience the people I scumread that have someone come in and say oh that's just them, turns out they actually are Scum and I'm right. As in pignash. Not you