[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7613513 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Blitz 24: Great Idea Mafia - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #61 (isolation #11) » Sat Jan 30, 2016 4:47 am
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
In post 60, lane0168 wrote:Did you think it was a joke because you're rc's buddy? And did you take a grand reaction towards ranger cause you know he's not your buddy?
Pedit: its also a convenient excuse to not get lynched and help town
but why would you help town as survivor? You just die to mafia.
and your trying to make associations before anyone flipped on page 3 ;/
Post
Post #64 (isolation #12) » Sat Jan 30, 2016 4:53 am
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
RadiantCowbells wrote:It wasn't, as it happens, a joke.
I was fully serious about making the claim at the time that I made it but decided against it for various reasons.
but why would you help town as survivor? You just die to mafia.
and your trying to make associations before anyone flipped on page 3 ;/
yeah pretty much.
revenge kill is plus I feel like there's no way I'll make it to d2 without screaming that someone is scum and needs to be lynched.
Regardless, how do you feel that the claim was originally real, and fake, with the sole purpose of trying to stay alive? And then he realized that wasn't a good idea. So he retracted the claim as fake?
Feel how you wish about it, but it will be neither the first nor the last time I've fakeclaimed to try not to get n1ed.
If the claim was serious, why retract it? Because you dident want to claim survivor? Because you already claimed survivor so thats pretty useless. If you arent survivor, then why fakeclaim in the first place.
Post
Post #69 (isolation #13) » Sat Jan 30, 2016 4:57 am
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
In post 67, RadiantCowbells wrote:I am not survivor.
I claimed Survivor in the hopes that it might allow me to live a few days in and be able to play LyLo which is where I really shine, but the only LyLo I've seen this year so far has been one I replaced in and the other towny was way too stubborn to let me lead so I sheeped him into a town loss. I want to be able to actually play this game for multiple days, not just one.
I once saw you mason claim with firebringer. You were scum
Did you click the links?
I fakeclaim as both alignments.
@rc: What makes you so sure you'd be killed N1 without a claim?
you don't know me.
but you wouldent live unless you dont do jack shit as survivor, and if you dont do jack shit then you would probably die anyway.
In post 105, RadiantCowbells wrote:like you read all of my town games and people are like "urgh we should trust RC because he's been so pro-town but I have this gut read that he's scum"
whereas I'm scum and people are like "oh he changed his claim 3 times but I feel like he's definitely town this game"
it's pretty funny.
if you were scum, would you claim to townread me or scumread me here and why?
probably townread because you always see right through my fake scumreads on you.
urgh you're pinging me really bad right now but I don't want to scumread you.
Post
Post #152 (isolation #22) » Sat Jan 30, 2016 1:26 pm
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
In post 151, Ranger wrote:...Huh. This is interesting. So...reading the text. I'm not actually sure. It says I return a mafia result to all alignment investigations. But I don't know what that means in the context of whether it's universal or not.
it returns mafia, which means to a fbi agent it wont return sk because sk is not equal to mafia
Post
Post #176 (isolation #26) » Sun Jan 31, 2016 6:48 am
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
In post 174, itlepip wrote:Guys you almost always just lynch survivors day 1, it is an awful claim and when it was rescinded you can just ignore it. For RC that whole thing is NAI.
Post
Post #543 (isolation #29) » Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:07 am
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
Read up
Not lynching Lane, SRMP or guilty, prefer not to lynch itlepip, lilith, and persivul. Fine with lynching ranger (not for the miller, but for not being active), radiant, or xtoxm (same as ranger) (I know I was inactive, but im not excusing myself either and I only am because I know im town)
UNVOTE: RangerVOTE: Radiantcowbells
I know its rc, but they were still scummy with wanting cop to claim (and according to numbers they are most likely to be scum, but im not lynching based off that)
Post
Post #549 (isolation #31) » Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:14 am
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
he knows RC isent confirmable as he can be mafia fruit vendor, xtoxm doesent have solid play and I dont know where he got that from, especially since hes scumreading guilty
Post
Post #562 (isolation #34) » Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:27 am
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
In post 555, lane0168 wrote:Either hes in regular 9p mindset. Or he has exactly 1 partner.
VOTE: itelpip
the fact he acknowledges fruit vendor (which wouldent normally be in 9p setups I dont think but too lazy to check) makes me think the first possibility isent what happened.
Not lynching Lane, SRMP or guilty, prefer not to lynch itlepip, lilith, and persivul. Fine with lynching ranger (not for the miller, but for not being active), radiant, or xtoxm (same as ranger) (I know I was inactive, but im not excusing myself either and I only am because I know im town)
UNVOTE: RangerVOTE: Radiantcowbells
I know its rc, but they were still scummy with wanting cop to claim (and according to numbers they are most likely to be scum, but im not lynching based off that)
What do you mean by according to numbers, RC is most likely to be scum?
yes, there is a 50% chance they are the town fruit vendor, and 50% they are mafia fruit vendor (or they are scum and lied altogether but eh.) No, I dident base my lynch off of those numbers.
Post
Post #720 (isolation #46) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 4:33 am
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
In post 719, Persivul wrote:I sign up to play a game in order to actually play the game. So, when a game goes dead, I keep posting. That requires going outside the box and unfortunately, whether town or scum, I get scum read for it. So, yeah, you may as well lynch me.
actually, its because the game is too dead for us to have time to get onto anyone else, and we arent Nling.
In post 661, RadiantCowbells wrote:Including you.
1 page you're sincere, Ranger puts you as #1 scumread, instant vote.
Now he's voting me for calling him out for it.
No, I'm voting you for your scum slip. The facts indicate a single anti-town faction, but you know that it's multiball.
It has been shown slips arent reliable, why use them?
In post 686, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't understand why Lilith's so obsessed with the vote on her or why she's not voting Persivul when she's talking like she's scumreading him.
Why are you so interested in Persivul's vote on you if you don't think it's scum opportunism?
If you think it's scum opportunism, why aren't you voting him?
It sort of feels like you're more interested in the vote than his alignment atm.
These are the first townie posts you've made today.
Is this because they are questioning the people attacking you?
Post
Post #749 (isolation #50) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:38 pm
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
In post 747, lilith2013 wrote:I liked srmp's last post better and probably leaning towards pers as scum unless he is in fact claiming supersaint. And even then I'm not sure that it's a town claim.
What do you mean by "like"? Was it due to the content?
In post 747, lilith2013 wrote:I liked srmp's last post better and probably leaning towards pers as scum unless he is in fact claiming supersaint. And even then I'm not sure that it's a town claim.
What do you mean by "like"? Was it due to the content?
In post 747, lilith2013 wrote:I liked srmp's last post better and probably leaning towards pers as scum unless he is in fact claiming supersaint. And even then I'm not sure that it's a town claim.
What do you mean by "like"? Was it due to the content?
want an answer.
It seemed like you were actually saying things that were logical vs. your previous posts.
Post
Post #761 (isolation #54) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:12 pm
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
In post 759, lilith2013 wrote:Like.. It just feels like you are actually trying to do things in that post as opposed to everything else you've said today.
so im townier for doing something scummy, just because its doing something?
Post
Post #762 (isolation #55) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:12 pm
Postby Some Random Mafia Player »
In post 759, lilith2013 wrote:Like.. It just feels like you are actually trying to do things in that post as opposed to everything else you've said today.
so im townier for doing something scummy, just because its doing something?