1. Users start by forming an initial list of notable factors that might form the basis for a title.
2. Discussion from there further develops this list and maybe also prune out elements that aren't so notable or applicable.
3. At the same time, users identify potential words/concepts that might help concisely summarize some core factors from this list
4. Eventually, at least one good potential nomination is workshopped and the conversation moves to the main thread for confirmation
The idea is that we start by collecting all the usual elements of a good case for a title and sort of generate/deduce from there. From there, users can contribute to brainstorming titles even when they don't know the subject of the title that well!
This would be a good point where I write up an example applicable to someone here but honestly I don't know any of you untitled very distinctly! But below is an example of how even a bot ChatGPT that knows all of us even less can brainstorm titles from an example nom and a small list of user factors. So even if community members draw a blank once we've summed up a user, a good title nom could still be possible.
Spoiler: prompt
Spoiler: ai response