I think whimsy fits you more than anything.In post 2, Killthestory wrote:can two people pick one?
I'd choose concision and will if so, if not, concision and solism.
this seems fun !
Honesty in the strength of one's reads and people who will say ANYTHING to get someone lynched seems like a pretty noticeable dichotomy to me.In post 5, callforjudgement wrote:I'm not really sure I'm at any of those extremes. Like, I acknowledge that the scales exist, I'm just in the middle of most of them. I guess I'm more verbose than average, but…
I guess I'd go for Verbosity + Rigor if I were forced.
By the way, you should have a scale for Honesty (admitting when your reads are bad) against Exaggeration (always claiming your reads are the best and pushing them hard). I'm a long way on the Honesty end of that, and I know there are other people who are well on the Exaggeration end. Additionally, none of the existing domains really seem to reflect it.
I probably used to be the impersonal Rigor type player -- but these days I think I focus mostly on Syncretism/Honesty.