Open 787 || Lovers Mafia — Game Over
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
innocentvillager's playstyle is hilarious, but I must say it at least seems effective at getting the game out of RVS
"Way of playing" implies that you townread the playstyle. But a playstyle this unique needs to be consistent between alignments, so I'm surprised you can tr what iv has shown here with no consideration to metaIn post 47, NorwegianboyEE wrote:With that said, i think your way of playing is town indicative-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
+town for resonanceIn post 49, word321 wrote:should I sl u for this?
But why do you vote Nash rather than Norwee here?-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
IV: makes low info super low prob readsIn post 51, innocentvillager wrote:the point of this game is to be more certain and reduce the amount of uncertainty. It's certainty scummy to cast doubt and just keep every possibility open because this is a scum!motivation not a town!motivation
Norwee: calls him out
IV: surprised pikachu
I respect that IV tried to find reads out of the low probability phase in this game, but the idea that town should increase certainty is absolute nonsense. Mafia is probabilistic, and reads should reflect that fact. If available information suggests a 40% chance X is scum, but Y says it's 75%, then it ispro-townfor X to reduce certainty by disagreeing with Y and arguing that it is 40%, so that town has moreaccuratereads by which to maximise their EV.
This is a rubbish reason to scumread Norwee. And you straw man him heavily with "to cast doubt and just keep every possibility open".-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
In post 87, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Why would you unvote if you thought it was a hammer? That wouldn’t change anything.In post 84, Battle Mage wrote:oh fine, I thought it was a hammer.
Two reasons to doubt that BM genuinely mistook that for a hammer. The unvote comes off as bad acting due to reason 1. Reason 2 gives a cognitive mechanism as to why players are more likely to notice that it was only L-1 than they are not to.In post 90, innocentvillager wrote:how could it possibly have been a hammer when we have 4 people and Norweeg obviously didn't vote himself, feels like a basic sanity check-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
I'll let you know what I think of Nash when I get to a single Nash post. I haven't read his post on this page but I do see that it concludes with a vote on me, which is very ? ? ?In post 238, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Listen to this. How does a Battle Mage/Nash team sound? BM is surface level scummy AF, while Nash seems to be keeping his options open and playing with an agenda. He claims to scumread IV but "puts ghost vote" on Norwee.-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
Or we could go for the higher EV play of just not eliminating NorweeIn post 255, word321 wrote:im ok with that course of action
it seems both norwee and deimos r rly motivated with BM
so let me tell ya somethin
deimos, vote for norwee so we can end the day and ull be my conftown
ill sheep u to whoever u want tomorrow, no matter whom
how bout that?-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: October 16, 2016
- Location: Finland/UK
-
-
Deimos27 Mafia Scum
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.