For thinking the RVS is fun
Open 236 - Pamplona Mafia (C9++) Game Over
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
Unvote, vote: drmyshottyizsik
Yeah, I don't believe that one can make assessments on my playstyle that quickly. If you really like meta so much, you would have learned about the search feature by now.
Well, the wording kinda bothered me at first, but I can see what people are having problems with now.Well, pro or antitown is an opinion, so can't really be a mischaracterisation.-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=13395
^Last game as town
No games on record as scum.-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
Okay, so I've been taking a closer look at the Ythan-Aldusskel argument and here are my thoughts:
Ythan's claim that Alduskkel's random vote is a lie is interesting because it's a very strong accusation. However, I can't think of a good reason for someone to lie over a random vote.
Ythan and Alduskkel both accusing each other of active lurking is a pretty pointless argument, imo. Same with the argument over quoting.
---
No it's not clear. Who do you find scummy?kyle99 wrote:Err, is it really not clear from my recent posts?-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
There was no indication of suspicion, when normally I'd expect an active lurking accusation to be a somewhat strong accusation.Fonz wrote:What the hell gives you the impression that I had no suspicion of him?
I didn't disagree because I didn't think of a problem with the question.Prox wrote:Why not?
Because Fonz had not expressed suspicion of Zajnet when normally active lurking is something that players find scummy.Ekim wrote:Why does that bother you?
Don't like this exchange. If someone asks me to change my vote, the last thing I'll do is change it.Zajnet wrote:
Sure.Prox wrote: Oh hey Zajnet, could you please change your vote to someone who is scum? Or at least a different scum? That'd help.
UNVOTE: VOTE: beefster
What's dr's legitimate excuse for lurking?Zajnet wrote:I think you're lurking, but you seem to have a legitimate excuse. If you resume lurking that badly again though, I will vote for you.
Why don't you just tell us what you think? Instead of suggesting everything is implied.Prox wrote:Because, really, can't you guess why scum might "randomly" vote a player on the Day after N0?
Stupid logic. If you think someone is scum, then you lynch him.Prox wrote:The case on Al isn't currently strong enough to get him lynched today. And there's more than one scum. I'd rather have a known scum alive N1 than an unknown one; this game has a vig in it.
Which is when?drmyshottyizsik wrote:It's a fun hobby I took up at the start of thursday morning murder
Were you suspicious of him or were you just doing it for the hell of it?drmyshottyizsik wrote:The game was moving along slowly so I thought I may as well start an attack on him,,, but that really didnt go anywhere
Hello!Prox wrote:Hi, Netlava, welcome back!
---
I'm currently suspicious of dr, Prox, and Zajnet.-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
Dry-fit's kill looks more like the vig kill than Ythan's. I thought it was suspect how the wagon swung off of him at the last moment, but apparently he's town too... Either way, I think it looks like we can conclude that there is no SK, as it would be poor play for the SK not to shoot 2 nights in a row.
Zajnet is my top suspect. I'm really not fond of his sudden vote change when he was asked to do so by Prox. It seems unnatural and overeager, as if he were looking for a reason to change his vote. Switching your vote off your presumed top suspect, which is normally a compromise, isn't something that I'd expect to be done so eagerly and enthusiastically.
Prox is my second suspect. His reasoning about Alduskkel doesn't make sense and seems almost arbitrary at points. I'm not fond of his general posting style either.
Also, as a general note, we are close to lylo. With 3 scum in the game and 8 players left, after a mislynch and a NK, then it's 3 scum remaining in a 6 player game. So we need to be careful about our votes.-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
Also, does anyone actually believe this?? Where exactly is the misrepresentation?Zajnet wrote:I think this is an attempt to misrep the situation to get townie points, as we are not "close" to lylo, we are at lylo.
Granted, if the vig hits scum tonight, we won't lose, but we are still technically at LyLo today, plus, he doesn't mention the vig at all in that sentence.-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
Prox should say something first as he managed to skate through D2 without saying anything. Right now, my top suspect is Prox for lurking through D2.
The other scum, I think, would be ekim. He's also been quite lurky himself.
Also, it should go without saying that voting rashly should not happen but it happens way too often anyway. And also, I think a massclaim would be appropriate now.-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
The reasoning for a massclaim is that we can confirm the doctor, whereas running up a person and then having someone counterclaim is less clear because scum may counterclaim in lylo.
Reasoning for this?Fonz wrote:You know, looking back over the game, it's really hard to see why a scumgroup NOT including Netlava would kill Zajnet. I suppose there's the 'He's very scummy so unlikely to be protected' factor. I don't see any vig tells.-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
All this theorizing on why Zajnet got nightkilled is nice and all, but I'm not buying it. I think it's a stretch to theorize that a certain player is a certain role on a certain team as fringe theories are less likely to be accurate than general assessments of scumminess.
Not to mention Fonz's theory on how only I would NK Zajnet as scum is completely incorrect. If I were scum, I wouldn't NK Zajnet because he's a mislynch target, and I had expressed suspicion of him during the day. If I knew that he was a vig, nightkilling wouldn't change all that much as the vig kill would still go through (as it did). What would stop a kill on the other hand? Roleblocking. Zajnet getting NKed doesn't explain anything in my opinion, other than that scum made a poor nightkilling choice imo. Unless, of course, the "townier" looking players are actually scum. *shrug*
Speaking of general assessments, I think Prox's lack of activity is scummier than any so-called theory that has been conjured up so far. And also, I don't follow ekim's claim that Prox seems "town" because of some farfetched theory and Fonz's claim that ekim seems "town" because he successfully swang a mislynch. Doesn't make sense. I'm a bit wary of Fonz's defense of ekim, as defending other players is something that scum tend to do more often.-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
-
-
Netlava Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: April 12, 2008
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-