bv, you seem to have done a good job talking about things outside the game. Only relevant post is to wagon Shotty. Go ahead. Look at his ISO.
AGar, any reason for a bandwagon on Andrew in particular? Why not anyone else?
This seems like a pretty scummy post. are you not interested in the game? if so, please replace out.don_johnson wrote:I done been prodded. Who are we lynching? I would prefer to not have to read up.
I'm not sure that I have too much more to add. I was leaning town on the xite wagon, now it seems like that view for me might change, xite is in a grey area for me. Well, was. As I'm going back through, I see xite's posts about not having power roles counterclaim seem to be coming from a townie. The only thing I would like to say is that while I have posted little, my posts have been comments about the game, and putting down my thoughts. He has posted a lot, but has said little about the game. I believe there is a difference there. Also, looking at my ISO of 2 posts, sorry, I'll try and start posting more.ConfidAnon wrote:This seems like a pretty scummy post. Setting yourself up to take whatever stance on the Xite wagon is most beneficial to you. You haven't contributed much either, yet you are attacking someone for not contributing much.smashbro_of_the_SSS wrote:This seems like a pretty scummy post. are you not interested in the game? if so, please replace out.don_johnson wrote:I done been prodded. Who are we lynching? I would prefer to not have to read up.
Anyway, I originally saw Xite as town, but I'm wavering on that read. not really sure what to think now.
as for bv, he still hasn't contributed much, jumping on the Xite wagon, and still having few, if any, posts about the game and doing scumhunting. vote stays.
which is very true, and reminds me why I started to find him suspicious. However, when he posts next, it seems to be of good quality. Not sure on him yet, because while his posts seem town, his voting pattern suggests voting strong wagons.AGar wrote:Posts #101 and #103 have seemed to slip under the radar completely.
#101 discredits both Mysterio and Xite as townies. Not a mason and a townie, but two townies. I find this peculiar.
#103 is contradictory in an incredible sense of the word. Basically ignores the mason issue, and goes after a player not contributing with their vote while not contributing themselves. Middling and going after a lurker. Looks fantastically scummy.
VOTE: Kaiveran
assuming this was for me. No, I do not believe that I have contributed more than pretty much anyone, but im trying to start now. Looking at this game from an outside point of view, i would see myself as neutral, possibly leaning scummy. There would not be enough info on me to judge really, and because of that, I would see myself as a liability at least. I know I haven't contributed much yet. I'm trying to work on that.nopointinactingup wrote: @SSBF: You vote on me is kinda funny, especially considering such a weak case you have and that you mentioned all those analysis unrelated to me in the same post ). And btw, do you think you've contributed more than me SSBF? If not, do you think you are scummy SSBF?
don_johnson wrote:xite's too easy.
remember: two nightkills. scum teams don't win together. if we get it wrong, scum can get it right, or vice versa, or we can get it rightandscum can get it right.
drmyshottyizsik wrote:yes you hammer and I will Prod the Mod and tell him we have a lynch
This is a scummy few posts. Don's willing to vote only when he is told to, and trying to avoid voting Xite in the first place. Also, Dr.shot isn't doing much to help the town. I believe that one of them is scum or werewolf, but probably not both. In my experience playing with him, don usually does things like that, so it's not out of his character to make that move, even if it was a bit scummy.don_johnson wrote:deal.
unvote, vote: xite
Read it over along with the iso, it seems accurate/true. you brought up some good points, and I agree with it. The quick vote and then unvote of Xite is a good point, didn't notice that before. I willa2rudeboy wrote: @sss:
you said you already had suspicions of CA. what do you make of my iso breakdown?
Alrighty, done waiting. So, first few posts are not about the game, and then votes on shotty for a wagon. not too bad, since at the beginning of the game wagons are a common way to get things started. still, not helping for you.bv310 wrote:The game's been open less than a week and you're already trying to push an ISO lynch? Lern2Wait.
IN game post 79, Xite mentions a few of CA's posts, calling him scum for no good reason. Then, a little bit of back and forth between the two.Xite91 wrote:CA you're so cuuuute.
Wanna be my watcher tonight?
Originally thought that the buddy might be in here, but now i'm tihnking not. Kai is the only one of the three left in the game.Xite91 wrote:First, piggy-backing is riding the tail of someone else's case. (I agree, plus -insert small null tell here-)
Second, People that should be looked at tomorrow = Don, Shotty, Nopoint, Kai, and possibly Andrew based on their voting habits.
Don - Obvious reasons, although I think he just did it to avoid a stalemate, also it could be revenge (still sorry about that game, Don)
Shotty - Go back and read his case on me... wait you can't, there isn't one. He pushed it because I was the one with the most votes.
Nopoint - A lot like Shotty, he was blatantly wagoning (he even said so himself) but didn't take off his vote when I got to L-1? That's not what people do when it's just for pressure/discussion.
Kai - "I don't have as much suspicion on you, but I'll keep my vote, just in case" <--- that's what I was getting from her posts
Andrew - Looks a lot like confused town, but eh we'll see.
@Shotty - WTH should I claim? You're gonna find out soon anyways