Open 258 --- Night Watch --- Game Over

Empking · Post Post #426 (isolation #0) » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:18 pm

2/9 is too high just for one dead scum (IMO)

Vote: Dryfit

- I don't like his interactions (or lack of it) with Hop and the Hop wagon.

Empking · Post Post #429 (isolation #1) » Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:04 am

Actually I like Andrew's lynch the vanilla plan.

As a second point of order has anybody thought about getting the watchers to claim. Get them to agree to protect Andrew (2/5) of the each and the other watch (3/5) then we'll be able to have all of our three vulnerable PR's protected (more if our hider hides behind one of them.) If we do go that route then obviously Andrew shouldn't claim his result yet (use it to disagree with a false claim.)

Empking · Post Post #431 (isolation #2) » Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:47 am

nameloc1986 wrote:Yeah, but then the watchers will be exposed themselves. .

They won't because they also have a 60% chance of being watched as opposed to the 50% chance of just being killed randomly.

Nameloc, is shotty your main suspect?

Empking · Post Post #472 (isolation #3) » Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:27 pm

OK, I'm confused,

Is shotty a watcher or not?

Empking · Post Post #474 (isolation #4) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:25 am

S for Shotty and
P for peace are also capitalised.

Empking · Post Post #486 (isolation #5) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:25 am

andrew94 wrote:well.. im not going to tell scum whether shotty is a watcher or not- we are just not lynching him.
zedenek why voting for jason

look, are we going to lynch the 'vanilla' person or not

I lean toward yes.

Empking · Post Post #507 (isolation #6) » Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:04 pm

BAZZ: Night 0

I don't see the Jason case really. Also, nameloc certainly should not agree to a plan where they get a watcher and a hider in one night.

Empking · Post Post #510 (isolation #7) » Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:35 am

nameloc1986 wrote:
Empking wrote:BAZZ: Night 0
What is this referring to?

When I think Shotty was investigated.

Empking · Post Post #512 (isolation #8) » Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:36 am

nameloc1986 wrote:
Empking wrote:
nameloc1986 wrote:
Empking wrote:BAZZ: Night 0
What is this referring to?
When I think Shotty was investigated.
No he investigated Joystick, that was the whole reason Joystick got lynched.

Oh, now I'm confused.

Empking · Post Post #531 (isolation #9) » Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:04 pm

I'm much more an anti-wagon fan than the Jason-wagon fan and since Dryfit isn't going to get votes (and you can all see why he's scummy and don't need me to tell you.) I'll be willing to hammer Anti (though I agree the claim was premature.)

Empking · Post Post #540 (isolation #10) » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:22 am

Reading through antihero I'm not seeing him as scum.

Empking · Post Post #543 (isolation #11) » Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:43 am

OK. I was thinking about NL but that's too big a gamble. I'll hammer tomorrow if need be.

Empking · Post Post #549 (isolation #12) » Sat Oct 30, 2010 5:52 am

I'd suggest hiding behind CKD.

Empking · Post Post #584 (isolation #13) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:34 am

Vote: Antihero

Empking · Post Post #619 (isolation #14) » Fri Nov 05, 2010 10:07 pm

I'm waiting for Dryfit.

Empking · Post Post #623 (isolation #15) » Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:51 am

Vote: CKD

Empking · Post Post #631 (isolation #16) » Sat Nov 06, 2010 11:33 pm

Andrew, don't you dare waste your watch. Watch me.

Empking · Post Post #636 (isolation #17) » Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:37 am

So that explains the mystery of how Dryfit knew Andrew saw CKD kill Shotty.

Empking · Post Post #644 (isolation #18) » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:18 am

Vote: Jason

Empking · Post Post #671 (isolation #19) » Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:10 am

Absolutely perfect play by Andrew. Well done.