Open 290 - Double Day (Game Over)
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK?ConfidAnon wrote:Hiraki wrote:Psst. Meran's post is just as bad, and/or worse.
Parama wrote:the scumtell she is referring to is a day1 JEEP tell which are outdated as shit, but I still like this one
WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU CHANGE MY NAME IN THE QUOTETAGS?
@modis that legal? this is bullshit-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
I love how you are accusing me of this, yet adhering to what I told you to do (get off the RVS bandwagon)bvoigt wrote:
UNVOTE: Number 58Furcolow wrote:I dislike a wagon being 1/3rd of the way from RVS when the votes on 58 seemed joking and whimsical
I would encourage you all to join Hiraki or, you know, actually lynch scum with Singer and I.
VOTE: Furcolow
Why would you be worried about a 3-vote wagon when it's 9 to lynch?
Meransiel bandwagons with you +scumpoints, 2nd bandwagon in 2 pagesMeransiel wrote:That's a pretty good point. Plus, Number 58 is not here, so I guess we could always pressure him later.
Unvote
Vote: Furcolow
Unvotes off the bandwagon too, after it has stalled, and after I called them outHiraki wrote:Hmmzorz.
I want to put my vote on Confid because of his FoS, but Meran is meeeeeh for her distasteful BWing.
Unvote
Carry on children.
So, basically, I called out Bvoigt, Meransiel, and Hiraki for being on the largest bandwagon after only a page. The next 3 people to post? all 3 of them, and they all unvote.
Bvoigt reads town, as he disliked being told what to do and used it as a reactionary test
Meransiel and Hiraki accrue scumpoints from me, Meransiel for BWing, and Hiraki because he didn't need to unvote
his hmmmmmm also feels faked to me, because I feel as if IF he were town, he would actually vote without just unvoting. Simply unvoting feels like scum waiting to place a vote as opposed to actually fishing out suspicions which town should do. It could just be their playstyles, we'll see.
and where is your name?Nachomamma8 wrote:One lynch from {bvoigt, ConfidAnon, Furcolow, Hiraki, Klazam, Meransiel, Nobody Special, Pim, silverbullet999, singersinger, Starbuck, Stethoscope}
One lynch from {Number50, Twistedspoon, DrBokchoy, Hazard with a Glove, boberz}
I don't find the FoS/vote tell to be weak whatsoever. It is the only JEEP tell for d1 that I like, besides 3rd and 4th votes in 7-9 people gamesNumber58 wrote:
True it was a bad point, but there is a point to vote him.bvoigt wrote:Sorry but TBH, it really wasn't a good point. Plus, I don't like that you feel the need to justify changing away from your RVS vote.
Furcolow is trying to justify a tell that is apparently outdated, aken to weak, but still forces it to apply.Furcolow wrote:the scumtell she is referring to is a day1 JEEP tell which are outdated as shit, but I still like this one
Vote: Furcolow
Nobody Special why are you ignoring that the voting randomly part of the game has already ended since people are giving reasons for their votes already.
Explain?Pim wrote:
You do know that Hikari is much, much, much, ..., much, much more worse than Confid, right?Furcolow wrote:I would encourage you all to join Hiraki or, you know, actually lynch scum with Singer and I.
Go, go wagon.
Oh... NM.Hiraki wrote:Sitting back and just watching is a basic implication of fense-sitting.
Pim. Are you ever going to make a good post, or should I expect this crap from you for the entire game?
YET AGAIN WHERE IS YOUR NAME ON THIS LIST?Nachomamma8 wrote:One lynch from {Furcolow, Klazam, Meransiel, Nobody Special, silverbullet999, singersinger, Starbuck}
One lynch from {Number50, DrBokchoy, Hazard with a Glove, boberz}
Why did you remove Starbuck from your list here? Where is ConfidAnon? Why are you removing people at all?Nachomamma8 wrote:One lynch from {Furcolow, Klazam, Meransiel, Nobody Special, silverbullet999, singersinger}
One lynch from {Number50, DrBokchoy, Hazard with a Glove, boberz}
>.>
Silver, no.
How come you ignore Pim's post right above this one, Hiraki? It actually made sense, yet you ignore it, and the fact that their post said you were ignoring things isn't helpingHiraki wrote:Nobody_Special. You don't think that 58 was merely stating his opinion in a direct format?
vote: Hirakifor being obtuse-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
more than confid? i dont care about more thans, i want to lynch a scumPim wrote:@Furc, Do I still need to explain or is it understandable why I think Hiraki is more likely scum than Confid?
we can only lynch 1, i dont give a fuck which it is
not reallyMeransiel wrote:
That's a really weak point. A really ,Furcolow wrote:his hmmmmmm also feels faked to me, because I feel as if IF he were town, he would actually vote without just unvoting. Simply unvoting feels like scum waiting to place a vote as opposed to actually fishing out suspicions which town should do.reallyweak point.
explain why you think so
someone changed my fucking name in a quote, that is bullshitsilverbullet999 wrote:Fur, why the blow up on post 96?
So you are admitting to completely misrepresenting someone's word who had their vote on you? Cool story broConfidAnon wrote: I copy and paste the text into the reply box, then add the quote tags. For some reason, in my head you became Parama. Sorry.
I am also voting you for not responding to Pim's case against you whatsoever and being generally obtuseHiraki wrote:
I do, but I realize that your entire case on me, is on the basis of a misunderstanding. Therefore, I don't really care about it.Pim wrote:You do know that you have permission to my points against you, right Hikari?
I liked 58. Sure, there was no reason to do it, but does that mean I can't do it? He didn't need pressure at that moment, I needed to see which one that did.Furclow wrote:Hiraki because he didn't need to unvote
Oh right, Nacho wants to lynch himself. Totally forgot.Furclow wrote:and where is your name?
Also, Furclow's point is based off of me BWing when I had the first RVS vote. How is that me BWing?
It is of note that Meransiel didn't include my other points, instead only strawmanning as well, so definitely have my eye on her with you-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
You are doing thatsilverbullet999 wrote:-Fur
This is a sly double sworded question. I find you suspicious for your what I would deem overreaction. But now this question if answered implies I'm fully defending confid and more generally i am or was attacking his attackers. I don't like this one bit.Silver_bullet, answer this before I answer you, are you done defending confidanon/attacking his attackers?
Now please answer my question posted to you.
VOTE: Furcolow
I don't mind your vote on me, it furthers your chainsaw defense of him
those two and silverbullet are the ones I would be happy lynching at the moment, yes.Klazam wrote:
So you believe that both hiraki and confid is scum?Furcolow wrote:
more than confid? i dont care about more thans, i want to lynch a scumPim wrote:@Furc, Do I still need to explain or is it understandable why I think Hiraki is more likely scum than Confid?
we can only lynch 1, i dont give a fuck which it is
this is not the response I was looking for. I felt like Pim's case on you was pretty good, actually, for d1.Pim wrote:Hiraki wrote:Pim. There is no misunderstanding. You have horrible reasoning against me, that's it.
Besides that, you still have permission to explain.Hiraki wrote:I do, but I realize that your entire case on me, is on the basis of a misunderstanding. Therefore, I don't really care about it.
I don't care if you're getting a town read on me - you must not be familiar with meMeransiel wrote:
Cause it is. A lot of people unvote and then sit on their votes, it is completely unrelated to their allignments. Also, this was the only point I had to debate because the others were good points, but it seemed a bit like you were trying to overmotivate and overexplain.Furcolow wrote:
not reallyMeransiel wrote:
That's a really weak point. A really ,Furcolow wrote:his hmmmmmm also feels faked to me, because I feel as if IF he were town, he would actually vote without just unvoting. Simply unvoting feels like scum waiting to place a vote as opposed to actually fishing out suspicions which town should do.reallyweak point.
explain why you think so
In short, I do believe the guy's kinda scummy, but I'm not getting town reads on you either.
I dislike your admission of strawmanning
You linked to this post:
? I don't give a fuck if there was a motive, it's something you just don't do. You don't misrepresent someone as someone else to make your response look different. It's improper. Why are you even focusing on this as a case of an overreaction? All you said is "you blew up" and then you defend confidanon, which I'm sure you're doing; you're chainsaw defending him, and you recently furthered it by voting one of his attackers (me)silverbullet999 wrote:-Fur
I still don't see why the blow up. Yes confid accidentally/purposefully 'misquoted you' in stating that parama stated what you said. However it's not even like Parama is in this game so it's not like there's some super secret motive or plan (that I can see) for confid to purposefully do such a thing.someone changed my fucking name in a quote, that is bullshit
Would you be offended if I had the above and below quote quoted as fur said instead of your full 'name'?
How did he misrepresent your word... please expand on this.So you are admitting to completely misrepresenting someone's word who had their vote on you? Cool story bro
P-Edit
-singer
ehhh let me just dig a lil bit more
Now, if there's anything I missed, let me know.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
I lost a big post due to a power outage. I will summarize.
I feel like strawmanning is ignoring the meat of an argument, which is what you were doing Meransiel. Your little "I like the rest of your argument" tack on just proves that you're only focusing on a miniscule point. Let's not argue over semantics, you even admit you weren't focusing on anything but a minute detail that is of no importance. Why would you do that? hmmm to make me look bad. Why would you want to make me look bad? You're reaching.
Silverbullet, I had a huge response typed out for you, and I am honestly glad that my computer died. Your play is offensive, and YOU are the one out of line here. This issue was between ConfidAnon and myself, and I am not going to respond to you whatsoever in this thread anymore if I can help it. Good day to you, sir.
I'd like for you to go back to Pim's post and actually respond to it... I am beginning to believe you might be town, but you're not helping it much, honestly.Hiraki wrote:
Again, the case leans on the possibility that Confid is scum.Furclow wrote:this is not the response I was looking for. I felt like Pim's case on you was pretty good, actually, for d1.
You diagnosing me as town has me suspicious of you, but I like where your vote is, so I really don't care. I am leaning town on you regardless, as I can somewhat pick apart scum from town focusing on townreads. I am just notNumber58 wrote:ConfidAnon - You have not responded to what I have said, or the same question that has been asked to you by other players. Can you please do so?
I think that Furcolow is more likely town then mafia given what he is saying. I actually think that he is doing some good question asking and the way he is reacting is from someone who is town. I think that ConfidAnon still needs more votes because he is not answering anything that is put against him, and the increased pressure is a good way to assure that we get the answers needed to lock in on an alignment.quitesure how to take this. If you HAD to lynch someone other than ConfidAnon, who would you choose #58?
I've read your posts, and not only are they bad, they are honestly offensive.silverbullet999 wrote:-Pim
You really should start reading my posts...But then I wonder, what's the reason for Furc-scum to overreact on it?
I'm feeling less lazy today so I'll quote it in my most recent post.
You over reacted and went straight to the mod about this (something I think a scumbag would be more inclined to do if they feel they can pull a mod action from it which would obviously more than likely benefit scum).
I liked Confid's recent post. It seemed to show genuine scumhunting
unvote
vote: Meransiel
I'm going with Nacho for now.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
LOL I HAVE A WAGON ON ME AND YOU ARE MY SCUMBUDDY PLZ HELP ME CONFIDMeransiel wrote:@Confid: lol, then I don' understand anything about him anymore.
I agree with this. I had to QFT.Hiraki wrote:
You should try it more often. Especially if the other person can't bring up any reason. It's a nice way to find easy scum.Meran wrote:@Hiraki and singersigner: I actually have a problem reading this two chaps. They both have a...way of posting, that I don't know whether I should attribute to personality or alignment. Hiraki is being overprotective of himself, immediately questioning everyone that shows even the sightliest suspicion of him.
I don't like Apokalypitka's first post. Especially the part where he votes Nacho, and then he FoS' bviogot. You wanna know the problem here? He completely misses all the little elephants in the room.
I'm keeping this at the top and pasting the rest, though, because I want my question to Singer at the bottom, as it is the thing I want responded to the most. You are helping my opinion of you. I'm still looking at Meransiel and ConfidAnon, personally. What are your reads past Meransiel, Hiraki?
SilverBullet you make me want to beat you. You need to lay off me, this is ridiculous, your play is terrible.
Could you rephrase this? I view them both as town, though Number58 has me feeling a little squirmy for some reason, and it is hard to get a read out of Nacho since they are only repetitively posting that list.Nobody Special wrote:So. I've played with Furc before, and while he's essentially a loose cannon, he's ... different this time. I'm not liking that.
However, I'm still sold on Number58.
@Number58, what's your view on the Furc/silver argument?
@Furc, what's your take on the Number58/Nacho thing with me?
@silver, don't worry about Furc. You're doing fine, AFAIC.
I haven't really noticed anything from you, tbh, you seem to be drifting by.
Well, lets see how you respond to someone putting anothers name on your quote. Aggressive? how?DrBokchoy wrote:FOS Fur
Quote wars generally arent helpful. seems very defensive of himself. seems very aggressive and isnt gaining any town points from me
I wasn't aware I needed to fake anything for you, since I'm totally scum bro, because I'm TOTALLY NOT GETTING ANY TOWN POINTS FROM YOU. SO COOL. gag me.
I understand you voting Nacho to pressure them, but this is not going to be helpful. Believe it or not, what Nachomamma is doing is probably the most protown thing going on this game..Apokalyptika wrote:Hi guys! Glad to be playing with you all.
From initial readings, I get a fairly null read on Furc (null leaning scum, though). Silverbullet gets townie points for how he responded. I'm not liking Meransiel, mostly for focusing on one little facet of furc's argument. For the record, I don't think it was that weak; in general, voting someone is more town than not voting someone. That being said, I'm not inclined to put her at L-3 right now. Nacho's lack of content is thoroughly irritating, and I think it's a way to get by without making any useful comments. I have enough respect for him as a player to think that he could get away with it, so I'm going toVote: Nacho. Also,FoS: bvoigt, because his posts 1 and 2 really seemed like trying to trap someone into agreeing with him. Also, I think that the point was a quite reasonable one.
it is certainly better than SilverBullet posting a wall about someone who has already promised to ignore them and not respond to them, but hey, it saves me from having to read it. The thing about it is I don't really believe scum would do that, and town can definitely make a bad case on town a lot more easily, so I guess the fact he did that makes me lean town on him a little, even if I would be completely fine with lynching him because I simply don't want to read his posting or respond to him.
Singer, are you happy with your vote? You've had the same vote since D1 over the JEEP FoS/Vote tell for scum, are you that confident in that tell? What are your thoughts on Meransiel?-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
my response was genuine. I don't like Parama.
If he had quoted it and put HackerHuck or Ythill, I would have been flattered.
Hiraki, why the flip flop on Meransiel right after my questioning? What have I done that makes you view me as town?
EBWOP: I agree TS
I like the list style for d1, but I want content on subsequent days-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
This isn't even about Confid and I anymoreDrBokchoy wrote:Silverbullet, I am with you. I do find fur annoying and I'm switching my vote from nacho to fur VOTE: fur
Fur is pretty rude and dismissive to other players and it doesnt seem to be getting anywhere. I think it just increases scum points on him and him being this way while defending himself is scummy. Why is fur still so mad and aggressive over someone changing his quote tags? It's over and I don't see why you have such as overreaction for this type of thing.
This is a ploy that Silverbullet is using to beat a dead horse
Glad you replaced out, though, as you must be bad to give in to this
It's not flattery; don't take it the wrong way.HackerHuck wrote:
For starters, acting anti-town is more likely to come from scum than town.bvoigt wrote:
It may not be very helpful, but what makes Nacho's actions more likely to come from scum than town?HackerHuck wrote:I had some time to do a quick read-through. I actually agree with Apokalyptika on his Nacho vote. I don't like the gambit and I don't see it helping town at this point.
vote: nachomama
If you look at the way he's posting, besides the obvious lack of content surrounding the game, he's basically just dropping in his town reads and it doesn't appear that he's going back and reevaluating anyone. The only bright spot I see is his (+1) on Maransiel, which actually appears to be him hunting scum, rather than just hunting town.
Furcolow's flattery is noted.
I haven't gone back through the thread yet, but will do so shortly.
Just because I like you more than Parama doesn't mean any more than that. You're both good players, so this isn't anything to do with ability, more on just the fact I dislike Parama's attitude. I'm sure a lot feel the same way about me, but that's very subjective, is it not? I'm sure you dislike me.
HH, you saw me as scum in a 17 page game, what are your thoughts on my meta?
You also saw me as town about a year ago in Mafia in Mendo... did you not?
Thanks. I don't really participate as scum. Glad you could notice.Klazam wrote:
I dont see a response to this. You seem to have forgotten i was in this game.Klazam wrote:Mera-
My vote was on you because of your response. It felt wrong to me. Instead of posting something meaningful- you act like "pressuring you" was a joke.
Then your reply.... It's like you think its not worth the effort for me to question you. One thing i did get from your second response was the impression that you thought it would have been better for me to leave my vote on Hiraki, who claims he got two games mixed up. Why is that? It seems that you think that Hiraki's wagon had a good reason behind it or something.
Then you dimiss bvi in a jokey manner.
This is a lot of things i just gained from voting you. It seems that my vote was justified.
in other news, Silver and Fur both feel town to me. Their efforts at generating these kinds of posts seem nonscummy to me.
OK, so who are you suspicious of?Meransiel wrote:If you would check my last posts on the last 2 pages or so, you will see that my suspicion of Hiraki has decreased quite a lot.
Plus, I was not upset by the fact you were voting me. Hence, my laughing off your suspicion was neither a counterattack nor sarcasm, it was just...me being myself, dunno.
TwistedSpoon?
You are close to where I want to unvote, but I'm really not sure
What is so damning about your interaction with him? He was "trying to lead the town"?Nobody Special wrote: WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT ME AND NUMBER58 INTERACTING THE WAY WE DID?
(thanks hackerhuck for referencing that in your post, I really hate to have to sift through pages to find what someone is talking about)
I didn't really notice anything other than a little pissing contest. Hardly worthy of a vote. I view him as trying to help the town, I view you as more anti-town, niggardly, and detrimental in that exchange.
However, I'm not sure you're scum. I haven't seen enough from you to pick one or the other, so I would guess town, as my odds are better with like 12 vs 3.
I missed you missing themHiraki wrote:WTF. I missed three people.
YUCK.
Apokwhy not a vote on Confid?
unvote;
vote: ConfidAnon
like so.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
not contentless, but making a wall is very easy. if i can do it, i'm pretty sure you can.Meransiel wrote:
Because he accused me of omgusing.bvoigt wrote:
But why did you bother saying, "It would be omgus if I would be voting you for it"?Meransiel wrote:
There was no actual point in it. He said my accusations on him bandwagoning are silly, whenbvoigt wrote:And how does arguing over the definition of OMGUS defeat his argument? It may make his argument look weaker, but it doesn't address the actual point.the topic was full of people justifying why I would be a good vote. See the contradiction there? I don't need to defeat a player which defeats himself.
@Fur - not that easy to make a wall provided only a couple people post regularly, and the main points have been presented already, aye? Wrote what I thought was notable, collected my own set of reads and suspicions, I don't think I'm exactly posting contentless, if that's what you're accusing me of doing.
He hurt his town read from me a little bit.Twistedspoon wrote:
why?Furcolow wrote:i'm disappointed nacho actually posted, btw
Slightly, though, but it's still there and it is what it is.
I viewed it as a solid town player trying to stay out of the spotlight, personally, and make it to D2/part 2 of d1 here. Had he waited to come out then, I'd be like, ok... town.
I'm interested in whether or not scum have daytalk here. If not, it will be very hard for them to communicate through 2 lynches. 1 lynch is hard enough, but 2 will be painstaking.
I've been in this setup before, in zachtown in the mountains, and I'll tell you this:
Lynching scum in the first cycle was HUGE for the town's ego.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
both seem like easy lynches... popular.bvoigt wrote:Meransiel and DrBokchoy.
why these two?
Klazam seems to agree with you.
How can we know... only you can know...Meransiel wrote:Because, don't know, I am a popular lynch, I could get killed, if I get killed, the town has 1 vote less, true?
I kind of felt the same way. Your expoliation of bvoigts tops seems town, though, so don't feel like I've got heat on you or whatever from this.Klazam wrote:...
Also beginning to like Silver recently
HH seems to be having a good effect on his questioning.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
he listed two people as scummyKlazam wrote:
Rephrase please. I cant understand this sentence.Furcolow wrote: Your expoliation of bvoigts tops seems town, though, so don't feel like I've got heat on you or whatever from this.
you addressed them a page ago extensively
you doing it actually flowered it out, expanded on it, and explored tangents
he simple said something like A & B are scum, I liked yours as town more and his as scum.
Well, he's taking notes.HackerHuck wrote:
Not really, I'm still hoping for some content from singer...Furcolow wrote:HH seems to be having a good effect on his questioning.
Singer lurking is her scum meta, btw.
The good kind... but it was a game with BenMage as town, so town will not ever get complacent. That guy loves pressure and quicklynches.Twistedspoon wrote:
the good kind or bad kind?Furcolow wrote: Lynching scum in the first cycle was HUGE for the town's ego.
confidence or complacency?
in my mini game we lynched scum d1 and go so complacent the rest were town lynches; we thought our advantage was enough
still, lynching scum d0.5 would be fantastic, I just wouldn't want us to get complacent though
Way to see-saw and have a weak meta defense.Meransiel wrote:
Interested in how those new reads will look like, though.Nobody Special wrote:As a (sort of) disinterested party here, I just read it that he wanted to update and refine his reads, not that his initial reads were flawed. Really, SB, I think you're making too much out of this.
By the way, reinforced my pro-town reads on silver.
Not exactly easy to motivate the uses of phrasings. Seriously, the second best way that crossed my mind was to show a game where I was town and used the same phrasing. So yeah, not many good ideas. More like answering a question to have it answered, rather than providing a real answer, that which, in this case, may not even exist.Furcolow wrote:
How can we know... only you can know...Meransiel wrote:Because, don't know, I am a popular lynch, I could get killed, if I get killed, the town has 1 vote less, true?
that doesn't seem like a townie reaction from DrBokChoy to you?bvoigt wrote:
Meransiel- He hasn't done anything overly scummy, but you can ISO me to find some little things I don't like; for example, this post:Furcolow wrote:
both seem like easy lynches... popular.bvoigt wrote:Meransiel and DrBokchoy.
why these two?
DrBokchoy- It seems like much of his content is hypocritically asking Nacho to provide content. Here is his second post of the game:Meransiel wrote:Just surprised is all. I mean, everybody needs pressure, if a wagon is already half-started, why abandon it and go for someone new?
Not a bad strategy, no, just unexpected.
Put any questions, point to anything I've said and done that looked scummy, and I'll gladly answer.
DrBokchoy wrote:nacho, wanna add some content rather that just post that stuff over and over again.
I agree on Meransiel, also dislike their vote on me since I'm so suspicious of them
I like this post from Silversilverbullet999 wrote:Players who have really died:
Nacho,
sing (though obviously now V/LA)
Confid
Number58?
Pim
Above players... let's undie and post some yes?
(Especially you nacho, I see you lurking and this isn't like you from previous games)
P-Edit
Disregard Nacho, though i'm holding soon to be within the next 3 days...
his last 2 posts have been really awesome
I am not scum distancing and then buddying from him
I am simply addressing changes in gameflow, general changes.
This is not some sort of scum disclaimer
it is heartfelt-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
If you want to count you sheeping someone elses point in the RVS as a serious voteMeransiel wrote:Voted you before you started suspecting me, so no, that's not why I have my vote on you.
Also,I am not scum distancing and then buddying from him...wasn't that defense kind of unneeded?
The fact you still have your vote on me is a joke, considering how obviously town I am
I disagree with you. There are only 3 scum, and I read him as a dumb townie, though I could be wrong.bvoigt wrote:
No, why?Furcolow wrote:
that doesn't seem like a townie reaction from DrBokChoy to you?bvoigt wrote:DrBokchoy- It seems like much of his content is hypocritically asking Nacho to provide content. Here is his second post of the game:
DrBokchoy wrote:nacho, wanna add some content rather that just post that stuff over and over again.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
expoliation.Klazam wrote:Fur- you mean explanation not exploitation, then? It's clear now. Thanks.
i guess i mixed exfoliation and explanation
a flowering out of an explanation into tangents from something small (naming 2 fos) into something larger (expanding on them in your next posts which he[bvoigt, here] was unable to do)-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
"why's" i like his post?Apokalyptika wrote:Hey Furc, why's you like silver's last post so much? It's just a list of inactive players, seems pretty null to me. Out of all silver's posts, it seems baffling that you'd fixate on this one...an opportunity to get back into his good graces now that he's so townie looking?FoS: Furc
i dunno man, why's don't you like take an English class?
His list has exceeded your town play; you have done nothing.
He also posted a wall, and even if I didn't read it, that feels town.
I am going to vote you for not having the balls to vote
All townies have are their vote, and all we have are townies, so someone who is afraid to vote needs to go
unvote: Meransiel
vote: Apokalyptika
It's weird seeking a policy lynch, but we have one more wagon, and there is at least over a 21% chance you will flip scum by simple game design, but that ~80% you won't I don't give a flying fuck about because your play is fucking terrible.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
I'd like to see Confid/silver/singer/pim/nacho give reasoning for not being on the top wagons
Confid recently said he was "happy with his vote"
Nacho is "exploring other avenues" with singer, but wants to lynch Meransiel iirc unless he changed his mind
Singer apparently is the most inactive mafia player on the site when compared to the amount of games she is in
Silver has stopped tunneling on me, so I guess he might be ok to change his? idk
I'd like to see these people join the top 3 wagons
If we are wagonning outside of these top 3 I'd like to do it on Singer if she will not replace out-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
What happened to your case on #58?Nobody Special wrote:I would prefer a Nacho lynch over a meran lynch. I don't see how meran is being all that scummy (and I think he's kinda new) but Nacho is being very actively anti-town, and should die.
@pod person: I meant I like that particular JEEP tell. People still FoS their partners while voting other people D1 all the time. It's referred to as distancing, nowadays. It doesn't just have to be constrained to the RVS, but it is easiest to detect there.
At any time I would hammer ConfidAnon simply for that.
"why are popular lynches bad"
they're not, but you're sort of snatching that out of context. In fact, I am only suspicious of bvoigt for that, not klazam. I detailed how Klazam's furthering of those reads was much better than bvoigt simply listing them as scum.
@Silver: not understanding how I'm #1, go read a game I played as scum, then get back to me. Ok?
@singer: you responded to it by quoting yourself, which made me feel a lot better. I've seen you make excuses way more as scum than town, in the newbie game where I had a flawless town win as a doctor, and I've seen you lurking as gummybear where my play in my hydra helped lead to another solid town win. I've seen you as scum, and you lurk as scum. You have been lurking here, and only make a dedicated post when called out to do so, much like what I just saw from you in Metropolis. How can you not understand that? It is pretty simple, and you know it.
There is no irony in me reading him a dumb townie. Nice backhanded insult. I am not dumb, though I am a townie. I had a near MENSA level IQ the last time I was tested, so I am nearly a genius. Get off of that,now.
Your post is ridiculous, and shows that YOU are the dumb one.
You say Nacho caught up, posted now, is town. Did you not? I will quote it if need be.
You then go on to vote Nacho
This is pretty bad standing alone, but it is WAY worse considering you called Meransiel town, then went on to say "Meransiel is the only obvious lynch for today", THEN vote Nacho.
Look at these blatant contradictions.singersigner wrote: NACHO EXPLAINS. Yay. : )
…Nacho’s town.
-cut-
Meransiel is definitely town
-cut-
Merasiel’s the only viable lynch for today
-cut-
I would rather lynch Nacho, though. He’s not acting in a pro-town manner anymore.
Are you really that much of an idiot? I'll give a disclaimer that you said "though you're against it, Meransiel is the only viable lynch", but when you fucking say someone is the only viable lynch or something is the only viable option, that's what you fucking do.
This contradicts you saying he was town when he was posting in your previous post which I highlighted.singersigner wrote:Ah yes. Simply put, the explanation for why he was doing what he was doing made sense, giving me a town read, then as he started posting, he fell victim to inconsistencies and scummier behavior.
Re: vote...it seemed as though you felt you had legitimately found a scumslip indicative of scum, but chose not to switch your vote. Why was Meransial a better vote at the time?
If it's between Meransiel and Nacho, I am definitely wanting to keep the better player alive. I am open to a wagon on Singersigner/confidanon/nobody special/bvoigt. Confid for the RVS bit with the JEEP tell, the others for their interactions with Meransiel. I DON'T SEE ANY OTHER LYNCH AS VIABLE, BUT I'M GOING TO ACTUALLY VOTE THE VIABLE LYNCH, UNLIKE FLIPPY FLOPPY SINGER.
unvote;
vote: Meransiel-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
I did call you out on it. Now you are lying.singersigner wrote:But I...didn't...get called out on it?
I very explicitly explained my reads and who I'd be ok with lynching. I can't help it if you didn't read my post in order. Though I will apologize for not explaining why I felt Meransiel needs/should be lynched today. That did come across as ambiguous.
I read your post in order, then when I got to the bottom, I realized how contradictory it was with the top.
"ambiguous" is not the word. I am not as concerned with the Meransiel aspect, I am way more concerned with you saying Meransiel's lynch was the lynch for today, nigh imperative, and that we had no other options..... yet you didn't vote Meransiel, you voted Nacho, who you called town.
Did you or did you not call Nacho town? I will definitely quote the shit out of it and vote you if you lie about this. Please quit dodging and explain yourself fully here, or I really am going to derail all wagons and tunnel the shit out of you.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
@pod person: I agree having a flip makes the RVS a little easier to understand, and can be damning, especially with that tell
I'm really liking #424 from number 58. I find it both refreshing to see someone elaborate on new reads, which he follows into leads. I agree with his town assessment of who he assessed as town in that post as well. I would rather lynch the other two up for lynch, personally, and would consider voting apok or singer if the chance arises near deadline.
I am probably going to save singer for the 2nd cycle.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
I don't like Nobody Special's post
mentions the deadline extension like he is nervous
jumps on the major wagon, defending the pressure against apok
I like Nacho's recent posting in terms of attacking the 2nd lynch (town)
addressing a town read (town) - though, nacho, please watch your wording. How can you KNOW singer is town?
I am going to join the apok wagon. I feel we get more information out of it now, and that is key/vital/important for the 2nd phase.
I have experience in this setup, and enjoy it. I will definitely put this game in front of others in terms of my posting as I have demonstrated, as it is the only vital way to win this scenario for my faction.
Do with this as you may:
vote: apokalyptica
Sorry if I spelled your name wrong.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
Defense is overrated, but I feel you have taken not answering questions and cases on you to an extreme. You should want to appear protown, to scumhunt, and to quell any suspicion of you. You are not doing the latter. I have raised a few good points against you, whether you want to admit it or not, but you repetitively just brush shit off.Hiraki wrote:
It was because your attack was weak. In fact, your attack had no basis at all. Why should my defense something other than proportional?Furcolow wrote:I'm just refuting how weak your point in defense was
You have no room to be calling someone out on dodging suspicion, this is hypocritical in my eyes, as per my above statement.Hiraki wrote:Silver. Your constant push on me is really giving me the wrong tingle.
Just because you believe they had no significance, doesn't mean that I haven't said anything.
Also, nice question dodge.
@Silver, why so quick to forgive? I feel you are possibly barking up the RIGHT tree for once.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
unvote;
vote: Hiraki
more scumhunting and analysis in that one post than Hiraki has had all game
Meransiel implicated Hiraki in their first vote with a FoS on Hiraki which, since it is a posted tell, is somewhat outdated... but people really overlook this one. I really like this tell, and that is why I refrain from early FoS in RVS due to flipping implications of association-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
I also dislike $573, "I'm not going to defend myself any more/better than this" feels scummy. Town would/should be like "I don't need to defend myself to you" not "my defense is weak"
If Meransiel dropped that tell on purpose to get you lynched, sorry, but I don't see them being that good of a player.-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky
-
-
Furcolow To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- To Be Frank
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: March 21, 2010
- Location: Kentucky