Open 296: MAFIA WINS GONNA TEACH YOU TO BURN

[Empking]

Vote: No Lynch

and the Cop should claim. Fun has nothing to do with it.

[Empking]

No Lynch.
No Lynch.
No Lynch.

[Empking]

for the record, admiral, lane and stefunny were the first 3 people to quash the idea of follow the op originally.
might be scum in one of those three?
still, up to kingpin of course.

You rfealize that Iece is pretty obvious scum right?

[Empking]

Vote: NL

Unless the Cop has a guilty result then he shouldn't announce it.

Votecount
No lynch (3): Empking, RangeroftheNorth, lane0168
Not voting (8): Iecerint, ThAdmiral, Nachomamma8, Bella, Hero764, The_Kingpin, MrTrow, Stefunny
With eleven alive it takes six to lynch.

Deadline: April 30th

[Empking]

Vote: No Lynch

we should lety Kingpin on this wagon.

[Empking]

Vote: Stef

Ten alive, six to lynch.
Stefunny (4) Empking, Iecerint, Bella, RangeroftheNorth

[Empking]

We've got two investigations left, right?

[Empking]

Yeah, claim all the innocents, and we can work from there.

Vote: Bella

- Gut.

[Empking]

Heh. That's a much better argument.

Unvote

Vote: Ranger

[Empking]

lol, well that sucks for ranger. i guess sometimes bussing IS the best policy

vote: Ranger

Unvote

Vote: Lane

[Empking]

Care to explain that vote switch, Emp?

It looks too eager.

[Empking]

Care to explain that vote switch, Emp?

It looks too eager.

....

It's just as eager as your vote.

Don't be an idiot. Lane's vote wasn't rational. There was one argument and suddenly Ranger is certainally scum? Too eager.

[Empking]

Question to everyone:

You can all see the diffedrence between "Heh. That's a much better argument." and "lol, well that sucks for ranger. i guess sometimes bussing IS the best policy", right?

Lane wants to lynch town and saw Bella's post as a fine way to do it. I voted not expecting or gunning for a lynch. To repeat myself: There was one argument and suddenly Ranger is certainally scum? Too eager.

i mean i'm pretty tired and all... oh right, it was that trap you set that i fell into. nevermind, [sarcasm]you're basically confirmed town[/sarcasm]

Town would not react this way to a vote.

[Empking]

why are you voting for people you dont think are scum?

Because they had the highest chance of being scum and we had yet to really start getting back into the swing of the game.

[Empking]

@Empking:
[/b]

why are you voting for people you dont think are scum?

Because they had the highest chance of being scum and we had yet to really start getting back into the swing of the game.

Then who do you think is scum if it's not who you're voting?

1. Lamne is scum and that's who I'm voting.
2. With my Ranger vote I was kind of at a loss to who has scum. Think of it as the same certainty as a just out of RVS vote.

[Empking]

Care to explain that vote switch, Emp?

It looks too eager.

....

It's just as eager as your vote.

Don't be an idiot. Lane's vote wasn't rational. There was one argument and suddenly Ranger is certainally scum? Too eager.

That's the same logic you used.

How so?

What argument convinced me that Lane was scum?

[Empking]

Your own argument that her vote was too eager. One argument, and suddenly lane is scum.

1. It wasn't one argument, I only became certain after seeing her reaction to my vote.
2. Leaping on somebody else's point is completely differently with agreeing to your own argument.

[Empking]

Mod: What are the DL rules?

I will go with no-lynch rather than leading wagon.

[Empking]

Bella: On a scale of 1-100 where are ThAd, Ranger and Lane?

[Empking]

I'm not so sure that Ranger is basically confirmed town. I can totally see Lane feeling things weren't going her way and then deciding to bus. I still agree on the Bella point though.

Unvote

Vote: Bella

[Empking]

Actually I'd be comfortable with a No Lynch right now.

[Empking]

Actually I'd be comfortable with a No Lynch right now.

Why on earth would we no lynch right now?

Boosts the odds.

[Empking]

Not today. Scum just kills the confirmed townie.

Oh duh. I forgot ThAd was confirmed.

[Empking]

On what was your read on lane based prior to the 'too eager'-post?

Null I expect.

Unvote

Vote; MrTrow

You dont "guess i`ll have to check my read on you again." by doing a pbpa. pbpa are for getting people people lynched. (Oh yeah I'd also reccomend people ISO him.)

[Empking]

Your own argument that her vote was too eager. One argument, and suddenly lane is scum.

1. It wasn't one argument, I only

became certain

after seeing her reaction to my vote.

You became certain of a null-read?

My vote on Lane not my vote on Ranger.

[Empking]

1. It wasn't one argument, I only became certain after seeing her reaction to my vote [on Lane].

[Empking]

Lane jumped on Ranger.
Emp jumped on lane.

The situation was such that if mafia had banded together they could have just about taken the game out. Vis-a-vis I find it extremely unlikely that either of these two would be scum.

That makes sense.

What do you think of Mr. Trow.

[Empking]

I think the way lane went in on the Ranger wagon makes me more sure he's the one.

In what way?

Lanescum jumped quickly onto voting for him when there was a weakish case against him, and the statement he made gave the impression that he was convinced about Ranger's guilt. It felt to me like the kind of vote scum makes when trying to distance between each other.

Why didn't you think that yesterday?

[Empking]

Unvote

Vote: TBM

[Empking]

Mr.Trow: If you don't vote TBM then I'll do my darndest to policy lynch you.

[Empking]

Vote: NL

[Empking]

Knew it!

[Empking]

lolBella

Ranger has been obvobvtown ever since lane supported his lynch way back. The only conceivable mislynch today should've been Bella.

Maybe itys just because I'm working off more info but did you see that last madia kill? Bella was clear.