Open 321: Kc's FIRE and ICE: Game over.

[verydark]

Confirmed. Ahoy everyone!

[verydark]

@ConfidAnon

LOVE your avatar. I miss that show so much.

Oh, Anderson Cooper, you're so dreamy.

[verydark]

@malpascp

FUNNY PICTURE TO CONFIRM OR GTFO.

RTFPM.

[verydark]

Oh noes!

Another wagon on VE? This happened in his last game #320.

Why no one love you, VE?

[verydark]

VOTE: VisceraEyes
Asking to be lynched is a clever ploy, too bad it's actually going to happen.

-The Teacher

Based on what? You just put him at L-3 during RVS.

VOTE: iBetrayal

For the record, I will not support or join wagons based on nothing. This wagon on VE is baseless, and hopefully, a joke.

[verydark]

He self-voted to pull suspicious away from him without any tactic to actually pull it off.

I'm pretty sure his self-vote was just a joke...we ARE still in RVS.

VE, were you trying to be funny?

[verydark]

VE, I think you forgot how serious this is.

[verydark]

Yay! Another WAGON!!!

UNVOTE

VOTE: PersonalIdiot

[verydark]

Ok, I'm only on the PI bandwagon because it was RVS, but since we're getting into serious votes by serious people, I'll go ahead and seriously UNVOTE: PersonalIdiot

FoS: Viscera and Cirno

Your back and forth with eachother gives me a feeling that one of you are scum, possibly both.

[verydark]

OMGUS ALERT!

On July 28th, 2011 - VisceraEyes suspiciously fingered me in retaliation of my fingering of him, and gave no reasons why.

Finger.

Fingering.

Ew.

[verydark]

"You know, they call them fingers- but I've never really seen them "fing"."

[verydark]

So you voted PI during the RVS, but you don't support wagons based on nothing? Was it a random vote or a real vote? (Because this one was before PI and looks real)

It was random. I assure you, if I place a vote on someone here out, you will have some text to read as to why I'm voting them. That's the difference between RVS and normal voting. RVS you don't give solid (if any) reasons for your vote.

In other news, I also disagree with gb's attacks on PI. Questioning or refusing to join a random wagon (or join in on rvs in general) is a very common occurrence among people who are new to mafiascum and I think that calling PI's post an about face is a stretch.

Yeah, I know I was really leery about RVS in my first mafia game a few months ago. PI is null for me currently.

[verydark]

@mod

I unvoted in post #121

[verydark]

I see I pushed Viscera to L-1. Pretty comfortable with that, actually. I want to see a claim at this point, and I don't see Mafia quick-hammering in this situation.

This is scummy as shit. Force-claiming/rolefishing on page 8 when we are basically

still in RVS

.

Attention: This vote is

NOT

a RVS vote, and it will stay here until I see more definitive scum behavior.

VOTE: MediocreJPop

But seriously, WTF. You come out of the woodwork and then put someone at L-1 (thank god you didn't really...). What if scum or a noob hammered VE and he was town?

Congratulations, you are awarded with the "Most Not Pro-Town Player" award.

[verydark]

A few players have commented that I am apparently misunderstanding what RVS is...

No.

RVS didn't end on page 3 like you're indicating. Go back and read page 6 and 7. This is when RVS ended, everyone starts unvoting their RVS votes on page 6, and there's still a lot of casual "getting to know you" banter on page 7.

1. Is there anything in particular that feels off about the Cirno-Viscera exchange?
2. I'll just copy-pasta. Because I'm lazy. I find the fact that he FOSed both Cirno and Viscera, then found Viscera's FOS on him an FOS OMGUS, and then didn't back that up with a vote when he wasn't voting anybody, odd. Why come?

1)

The posts to eachother felt short and contrived, almost staged.

2)

I didn't vote for him because I really have no solid argument other than a hunch. His FoS on me

was

OMGUS. I simply made a

single one sentence

comment about him, which sent him into a tizzy and he fingered me.

[verydark]

...so this is moving along at a snails pace.

Are the new people properly adjusted? Let's hunt some scum.

[verydark]

Ummm, we've moved past RVS, so unless you have something to back up that vote...

[verydark]

Buddying, noted.

This was an A & B conversation...

You know the rest.

[verydark]

I'm inclined to believe that VE's playstyle is just over-the-top and emotional. Don't believe me? Check out his play style in game #320

http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=18294

He flipped town, but acted much the same way he is here.

Anywhoozle, I really don't know what to make of this game...we still haven't really heard anything from a few players ::cough:: malpasc ::cough:: and a few people are VLA. We have a hydra...or two...

I've never been more confused in a mafia game, ever.

[verydark]

I've found the four scum. The problem is people not lynching.

Care to enlighten me? Maybe I'll support a lynch if you bring me a case to look at.

[verydark]

Thanks for that exhaustive response, Empking.

...and I would be the 4th scum pick, Yank.

VOTE: Empking

I find that short, punctuated responses tend to be scummy. It usually means they don't want to reveal anything, as to avoid a potentially disastrous scum slip.

After reading you in ISO, I'm stunned. Not a SINGLE one of your posts has been longer than ONE sentence. And you're very snarky and catty, which might deter some people. But not me.

We need to get a wagon started, and I propose either mediocre or empking.

[verydark]

unvote, vote:verydark

Ummm, are you going to ever post anything besides a vote with no explanation?

[verydark]

Jesus christ.

Wake me up when we have a game going.