Questions asked this game wrote:My Experience
My opinion on Vigs claiming
I have enough.
No. But before I comment any further, I'd like to have Izak respond to my questions towards him later in this post, and I'd like to get a more objective look at the plan before I speak. I don't like wasting words.
My response to Izak's post here. The two main points that I'll be addressing are:
andwe don't give a damn about your meta.
you being against a vig claim is an incredibly anti-town move.
Quote 1. Don't speak for the town. You're not the town, you're not confirmed. Don't act like it, it's deceitful. Meta is actually very important, like for instance you've played like scum this game. My first reaction is to vote you. However, you don't ever really play towards the town in the games I've seen, and in the games I've played with you. You play with VI tendencies, and therefore I can't vote you just off of the few points I have against you, considering that's how you play. Your VI meta saves you from being lynched in a lot of the games you're probably in.
Quote 2. Before you make such a bold statement (again, speaking on behalf of the town), please explain to me how this plan is so "incredibly town oriented" that voting against it would just be preposterous! Last time I checked when you made this post, it was just an opinion on a playing approach to take for this game, not a set in stone circle of life in which we all will abide to. So the fact that you can make such a hard-set statement both surprises me, and makes me suspicious of you.
BBmolla, I'll sum up my points against you and not make you read a whole bunch here.
BBmolla wrote:Or we lynch you, and because you're scum, we're one step closer to achieving our victory condition.
Close-minded tunneling is anti-town. Stop it.
BBmolla wrote:Hopefully your mafbros can come up with better reasons not to then you could.
This is called trapping, or in better words, appealing to fear. You've now intimidated everyone in this game that wants to oppose your "precious plan", by setting the trap to make it seem like the ONLY people that could possibly be opposed to this plan are scum, thus when town have issues, they become scared to say it.
BB wrote:I don't want ANY mishammers(meaning hammer without a claim) and you will be lynched if it happens.
I don't know if it's your motivation, or just your playing style that I really don't like. But threatening again "you will be lynched" is angering me. ATF(appeal to fear) is not a town motivated style of playing, which I called you out on once already so far just in this game and it's only been a day. You may be pushing the town right now, but you're definitely not leading it. You will be lynched if it happens? Great, so if it's town misvoting, we now have two lynches why? Because you said so? I don't know what motivation as scum you'd have to bring up your plan, I'd have to take another look at it before I say anything about it, but I will say this... you're not playing town-motivated so far. Be careful how you play. Appealing to fear does not help your case as town.
Glow, I really only have one thing to say to you, besides hi!
Glow, stop playing this game with that emotion. I know your emotional, I like that about you. But if it's going to make you flip out, and give us pages of non-sense that really doesn't further the game at all, stop. It's Anti-Town as well, and while I believe you to be town this game (due to my last game with you, and how you responded to that plan... sigh) you're not helping us at all. Us being town, scum, SK, Vigs, whatever. This game is not being furthered by this rediculous arguing. If you want, just lay out your vision once and for all against the plan. Let them lay out their vision overall for the plan, and we'll go from there. No need for debating opinions you know?
Another note to take into consideration: I don't like this Izak, Maru, and BBmolla triple team going on here band waggoning. It could be potentially dangerous in this game, and I'm pretty certain at least one of the three aren't playing town motivated. Which one, I can't narrow down yet. I'm pointing this out so that you three in particular can see the wrong that's happening here, and hopefully shift your views of one another so we don't have a triple team happening all game. It's how town losses and this is not a game we should lose.
Piggy, while her vote was predictable and senseless in my opinion, it was attempting to be original and unique. I really believe it's town motivated, even if it is misplaced. I implore you Piggy to take a look around at how the day is going, and do not be swayed with the waves of posts, but be aggressive in your views, and don't allow the sway to make your perceptions change.
Piggy, Glow, get your votes off of each other. Neither of you are playing terribly scum motivated.. at least right now. There's no reason to be pushing lynches against each other at the moment. And yes, I read your cases. Don't go there with me.