VOTE: DJD
Challenge accepted, friend. No hard feelings right?
Don't be scummy today, ok? Or if you are scum, go ahead and be scummy.
In post 51, DoubleJD wrote:^^Scummy. My vote on sala is no longer random vendetta vote.
In post 56, Whiskers wrote:Except, you're not "naturally scummy" when you bother to give one flying feather. You've proven that much in the past.
SINCE you've proven that much, I expect more of you this game. I know you're capable of not-stupid play and if you don't play not-stupid in this game I will lynch you.
In post 63, greygnarl wrote:DoubleJD seems to be on more of a personal agenda than a town one.
In post 68, DoubleJD wrote:FOS mcstab.
In post 61, ProsecutorGodot wrote:Thanks for the offer, but I'll respectfully decline to make your cockfight a two-way bout. It's a game. Have some fun.
In post 64, Whiskers wrote:Yeah... but it would make my day to get to lynch Salamence too. Iknowthat feel.
Anyway: greygnarl, he may appear to be tunnelling, but DJD's attack on Sal looks pretty strong-- as far as a pge 2 attack goes.
[Connection: greygnarl & Salamence]
In post 102, Om of the Nom wrote:Well aren't you cocky?
Don't worry, I won't hold it against you though. I'm the same way
The funniest part was how you were more interested in why Whiskers was town than you were in why you were scum. Trying to find Masons now are we?
Malakittens wrote:I'm not big into Sal's meta, but I don't see how his post was really scummy.
Though Sal.. I don't see them as scum partners. It's way too obvious, but they are joking around and poking fun at each other. It's a null tell, but I asked the possibilities thing to make it aware to them that it came off as they are blindly trusting each other.
Whiskers wrote:Backed off of Greywing's wagon because I don't fully understand why either of them (Greywing or... PG?) is up for voting. I voted Greywing becauseI didn't want McStab to have control over who we lynched first.
In post 117, DoubleJD wrote:Just because i dont like salamance, does not make my point mute. Which, he has completely ignored.
In post 54, DoubleJD wrote:Scummy because you claim PG is scummy but also a Village Idiot.I dont see how you can already claim him to be town at this point if you also think theres legit reason to think hes scummy(I've been called scummy and VI before, believe it or not, you can be both, this is not scummy)In addition, you dont know about the other cases on people...so you only seem to have been looking at pg. Thats very curious. Couple that with 3 lines of fluff to start the post and i see a solid scum post from you.(Like everyone else has said, his random RVS is scummy, but it would be something a noob would do, it would be something I would do for the lulz, and I am not going to hold that against him, because its rediculous when we have better scum suspects, such as Om and McStab).(Again, skimming at the time, wasn't going indept)
Other wagons are all meh at this point, and everyone should join me in lynching you(Meh!? Shitty opinion, if you ask me)(This is a try-hard push attempt.)
DoubleJD wrote:Hey sala, ill give you different questions to answer since you didnt like my first few.
Which parts of PG's first three posts make you feel he is a VI, and which parts made you think he was scummy? Why does him not being a vi in post 105 make him town? Does this contradict your previous thoughts about his scummy behavior?
Whiskers wrote:@Salamence: McStab said two people were scummy: PG and Greywing. Right? He wanted to lynch PG go go go, iirc. He gave reasons for both of them being scummy, then voted the less scummy one. It didn't seem right, so I voted for the more scummy one.
What doesn't make sense about this?
In post 28, McStab wrote:In post 19, ProsecutorGodot wrote:Alright. Day 1, new game, RVS time.
Courtesy of random.org, the number 4.
VOTE: Paschendale
We're officially out of RVS, folks.
Vote:ProsecutorGodot
This is mega scummy. Why feel the need to go to random.org? Worried about appearing suspicious? This is also a detriment to everyone because RVS isn't supposed to be truly random.
Wagon ahoy!
In post 149, Paschendale wrote: Salamance: Seems to be talking about himself more than anyone else. His analysis of Om is fairly weak, and is mainly about the playstyle issues I mentioned above. He says we need to lynch Om over this, in very certain tones, but then says that McStab is his scummy read. Sala feels very inconsistent to me. (Slight scum)
In post 158, McStab wrote:In post 156, Malakittens wrote:Your vote on him was really scummy.
How?
@Sala: Did you just read what I took all that time to point out to you?
Proposition 1: PG is scum.
Proposition 2: GW is related to PG.
Conclusion: GW is scum.
It's not explicitly said "GW is scummy" it's inferred.
Everyone jump on the Sala wagon, full speed ahead
In post 198, greygnarl wrote:I went back to do a reread of Om to find quotes and more exact evidence and noticed the wiki page on his profile.
My defining traits:
As Town:
~Motivational problems if the game has low activity
~Aggressiveness and thirst for blood
~Not afraid to say scummy shit
~Frequent yelling
~High activity, especially near the start of the game
~Gut, gut, gut, gut all the way
~Getting annoyed at people when they don't listen to me
~Contradicting myself because I forgot something, or using keywords to juice up my posts to get someone lynched
~Not reading the thread when I replace into a game with more than 20 pages
If this is true then I would remove him from my list of suspects.