With everyone else getting a vote, I didn't want anyone to feel left out.
Open 88 - Polygamist Mafia (Game Over) before 650
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
^ I agree.kloud1516 wrote:
I do not agree with you here, Jahudo. Jebus suggested random lynching on page 3 (or page 2, I am not sure). This would provide the town with little to no information, and would force us into a lylo minus anything from Day 1 to go on. This is not pro-town imo, and continuing to defend the idea does not change this opinion. To me, the defense of a detrimental suggestion to the town continues to stand out. Anyone can defend a posistion, but that does not necessarily provide indication that they are town or not.Jahudo wrote:I think Jebus was the main one to suggest random voting now as opposed to scum hunting. Interesting he/she proposes it, defends it twice, defends a third time but gives in that "random lynch anyone but me" as factoring into the odds, and now asks to be replaced.
Jebus is opposed on this issue by multiple people but stands by the theory and that seems pro-town not being afraid to stick out of the fray and being called wrong.Then again, the timing of this replacement request is right after losing an argument vs. the group and getting FoS'ed. To me the defense under pressure outweighs the replacement timing and the fact that the random lynch was a bad idea.
I can't help but also notice that this is the second time you have provided a defensive explanation of Jebus' actions, Jahudo, which is interesting.
I don't think that a random lynch is a good idea here. Random lynching isn't really what mafia is about. Given the pros and cons that Goatrevolt gave us, I think that the cons definitely outweigh the pros.
As for the Jebus thing, I think that the behavior and the defense by Jahudo is suspicious, but not enough to warrant my vote yet.-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
That summary doesn't do anything to convince me that you're pro-town; in fact, it does the opposite.Adel wrote:paraphrased quicktopic thread:
xtox opens thread
Jebus: We should random lynch someone since we only have to kill one scum to win and there is no night phase. Day 1 our chances are 2/5, and day 2 wit will be 3/5, so overal it will be 50/50. I will introduce the idea. We should roleclaim early.
3jf: early roleclaim will just make us a target. We should random lynch though.
3jf: Also we should vote for somebody different every two days to avoid suspicion.
Day 1 you should fos, and then I'll vote for them.
Day 2 we both pick separate people scummy people
Jebus: It is a plan then. I'll go after kloud
xtoxm closes thread
Randomly lynching is not a good idea, and it really takes away the element that makes mafia fun.
First bolded part: Why would you worry about that too much, unless you're scum?
Second bolded part: That sounds more like what scum would do.
Third bolded part: That also sounds more like what scum would do.
Oh yeah, and when I was popcorning back on page 2, I forgot that the Pope's Tiara had already claimed.-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
That doesn't add up to me.Adel wrote:
I kind of suspect that thier understanding of the setup was so incompleat that they (both of them) thought that as lovers they needed to avoid being suspected of being lovers.armlx wrote:
I agree. Most other I people I have discussed that with do.I think that townies would be more worried about finding scum than avoiding suspicion themselves.
Can 3fj shed some light on this?
Vote: Adel-
-
Caboose
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
Are you pushing for a mislynch of Farside and I? It looks like you and E.King are trying to push for my mislynch Day 2. I didn't have access to the site between the times I posted and you try to make the argument that I'm lurking. Please explain. Also, why is GoatRevolt keeping his joke vote on me nearing the end of D1?armlx wrote:
I think Emp responded, but I wanted to say that not pro-town != scummy always.And armlx, at post 273 you say something about a comment. Can we hear it now or does it still have to wait?
Jahudo has been waffling on Adel/Jebus all game. Me no like. Supports the Caboose + Adel team theory.
Vote Adelas I said post diagram.
I think Adel has made some good points since I last posted, like the one that Farside quoted.
Even though I know I will get flak for this, I'm going to do what I think is right.With three days to go until deadline ti is looking like my odds for survival are slim.
This is a setup that sharply penalized towns that go for the lazy day 1 lynch.
I really hope that all townies give some thought to the posts I've made since the diagram I posted. The reason I kept on asking who could possibly be scum with me was because, as I see it, each other townie couple should be able to conclude that there is one and only one other couple that I could possibly be scum with. By lynching that couple, my townieness could be confirmed. I was hoping for some clear thinking and good posting by other townies, but that isn't happening. I do not like the shift from Empking to armlx, but I am supporting the armlx lynch because he is not me. Empking is not an "easy mislynch" and my opinion of his alignment is not based off of the formatt he uses to make his posts. At this point, that seems to be splitting hairs, when the majority of the town seems to be unaware that my wagon is leading to a pretty obvious mislynch.
Bussing in this game is suicide, and Empking placed me at lynch -1 without anyone doing anything to defend Mana_Ku and me.
It is horribly ironic that the townies on my wagon are making the same mistake that Jebus made: not understanding the set-up.
Unvote
Vote: armlx
@ Farside: please do the same-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
The fact that your trying to set Farside and I up for a mislynch tomorrow is all the proof I need.Empking wrote:The lack of proof for, is all the proof I need.
Caboose and Farside are your (most likely IMO) partners.
It depends on who is lynched today, who I'll look into tomorrow (if their is a tomorrow)-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
EBWOP:Caboose wrote:
The fact thatEmpking wrote:The lack of proof for, is all the proof I need.
Caboose and Farside are your (most likely IMO) partners.
It depends on who is lynched today, who I'll look into tomorrow (if their is a tomorrow)yourtrying to set Farside and I up for a mislynch tomorrow is all the proof I need.
That should be "you're"-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
How was Adel going to get lynched if I unvoted?Empking wrote:
I don't know, you're the one that doesn't understand it.Caboose wrote:
How does that make any sense?Empking wrote:Only you were voting for Adel out of you and Farside. You stopped posting then when you returned you couldn't unvote because then Adel would've been lynched.-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
I don't think that Adel's argument relied on the fact that I had a vote on him.Empking wrote:
Because his argument would've been ruined if you unvoted.Caboose wrote:
How was Adel going to get lynched if I unvoted?Empking wrote:
I don't know, you're the one that doesn't understand it.Caboose wrote:
How does that make any sense?Empking wrote:Only you were voting for Adel out of you and Farside. You stopped posting then when you returned you couldn't unvote because then Adel would've been lynched.-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
That could be a good argument... if I was indeed a lurker.Jahudo wrote:Does Empking mean the argument that every lover pair had one vote on him?
If a lover pair has both members out of the wagon, they must be the other scum backing away? But since everyone knows this Caboose doesn't want to be the first to unvote because then everyone will make the connection and kill them anyway?
But if no one was the first to unvote, the lynch would happen anyway given the majority rules deadline. It's win-win for the town then, I guess. Unless Adel wasn't scum.
But I'm not, so the argument doesn't have legs.-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
Huh? What are you talking about? This is a very strange turn of events.Adel wrote:
You knew I was town, and refused to vote for your scumbuddy armlx.farside22 wrote:
Especially as I defended you. NiceAdel wrote:vote: farside
read up and post lots, please.
So WHAT!?(btw, I'm 2-0 as town in Polygamist games now)
So we should automatically just assume that what you're saying is true?
That pisses me off.-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
Adel wrote:If I wasn't an especially strong player, I would be dead right now.
I don't like these two posts. I think that you're trying to make the "I'm-too-valuable-of-a-player-to-lynch" arguement. But please correct me if I am mistaken.Adel wrote:(btw, I'm 2-0 as town in Polygamist games now)
I was the last vote on armlx. It could have possibly been the lynching vote if everyone hadn't flooded over to the CK bandwagon.Adel wrote:You knew I was town, and refused to vote for your scumbuddy armlx.
Now, make the arguement that I'm his scumbuddy.
I couldn't agree more. Somebody Day 1 said that I would be their back-up vote if they had one. You couldn't go after me since that would be too obvious that you're going for an easy target, so you go after my lover.Jenethron wrote:Looks like you are going after an easy target.
Vote: Adel-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
I say that because everyone assumes that I was lurking for most of day one. Check my post record. There's a window from August 24 to Sept. 2 where I couldn't access the site altogether. That blows the lurking theory.And what's up with all these 'you're going after an easy target', 'I'm not an easy target that's why you go after my lover' and 'I'm an easy vote'?
Say, what?...I don't like the reason given for the armlx vote.
Tell mewith a straight facethat I would put my alleged scumbuddy in lynching position24 hoursbefore deadline.-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
Alright.Empking wrote:I think I said I wanmted Caboose to claim, not Armix.
They said Football but I think they meant American football.
I pretty much made it clear that I didn't know what I was doing since I never played in this set up before and Farside told me to look out for people who vote in clusters.
That's pretty much all I remember of it.-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
I kind of forgot about this game for a while. Sorry.
That's WIFOM. You could make the argument that the scum could be avoiding to appear that they are trying for a Farside quicklynch.TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:Because I see four votes on farside, one from each pair. Which means that if farside was town, scum could have finished her off. But that has not happened. Which leads me to believe that farside is scum.
P.S. - bandwagon voting isn't a scumtell-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
Yes, that is what I've got. It seems like it's valid too:TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:WIFOM? Seriously, caboose, that's what you've got? What you're suggesting is that scum are refusing towin the gameimmediately, to make it easier to win the game later. Now farside's argument is at least feasible, scum may simply have not had a chance to to quickhammer.
The longer those votes stay, though, the less feasible that argument is going to get.
Just looked at Jenthron and Kloud's profile. Kloud has been around posting elsewhere since his last post on this game. Jenthron's computer went down it seems and has not posted since the 23rd. So if Kloud votes does the fact that no one quick hammer look less scummy knowing one player is out of commision?Makes it harder for the scum to do a quick hammer if one of there own are MIA.
Like I said I experience this myself in Poly game where Grimmy went MIA as well so right now the idea of scum hammering looks WIFOM to me based on the two low contributers.-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
LOL. kloud just pretty much proved Farside's point.
Not WIFOM at all. I'm saying that I wouldn't put the lynching vote on my scumbuddy with 24 hours to go before deadline in this kind of set-up, where scum bussing is suicide. If I was scum, that move would be pretty dicey, don't you think?Now, say, this is WIFOM:
I wrote:Tell me with a straight face that I would put my alleged scumbuddy in lynching position 24 hours before deadline.-
-
Caboose Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: July 28, 2008
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-