Spoiler:
In post 769, geraintm wrote:thoughts on frogster
had a strong red on nosferatu earyl game, loads of long posts.
then switched and said gamma and banana were...but not the associated long posts with evidence.
back to long log posts on rc enimgma
528 - vague post hinting at scum but not disclosing any actual reads
weird read on CFJ about them being scum, but not wanting to lynch. instead focussing on nosferatu and banana
662 - raya is now scum
734 - wants to look at walter in case they are scum (and later asks permission from not mafia to join that wagon)
overall, they are throwing a lot of scum reads around. sticks with them but quickly moves onto the next shiny thing. not impressed
(tryng to go trough these in order of number of posts)
In post 770, geraintm wrote:thoughts on taylor swift
their entrance seems fine,i find their method of reading not townie or scummy just fine. except they manage to get two scum votes as they go through
679 - already said I dislike this when they group so many together as potential scum
690 - said already dislike them saying we aren't allowed to discuss their votes
by 730 have hard turned away from walter
thoughts - it was a good entrance, but posts have dialled back and now just seems in an style disagreement with nosferatu and I don't like the way they entered in hard against walter and now they aren't in their top 3.
I realise I already finding it easy to find bad things to say about everyone and not looking for good things.
Game: viewtopic.php?t=84025&f=2&st=0&sk=t&sd= ... er_sort=Go