TonyMontana wrote:Rashiminos wrote:Yep, perfectly hammerphobic here.
Guilty as charged. The last time I played mafia, the hammers were flying left and right.
In any case, I unvoted to make room for a claim from lowell 2 pages and 5 days ago. I guess it ain't happenin..
So why is the vote not coming back on at this point?
Rashiminos wrote:Asking for a claim while unvoting is barking without the threat of a bite.
My emo sister wins this one. (<3 Rashi)
Tommy wrote:No, I'm not saying he's coherently playing like a village idiot. I'm saying he's coherently playing like scum. Rather unsubtle scum, but scum.
I do not see a tommy/lowell scumteam.
Rashimnos wrote:
What difference does the number of votes on Lowell make?
IGMEOY
Idealistic, but I wouldn't say practical.
bionic wrote:Actually my vote has been on crywolf and the first time she promised an in-depth post without providing one is in my initial argument.
Aye, my mistake.
Flowquewagads wrote:But it's a good catch, I should have been more elaborate. I hate doing walls of text, sometimes to my own detriment. You have full right to call me out on that.
IGMEOY
I'll be watching your posts, this feels wrong.
Iamusername wrote:I've seen enough Oman games to know that I always find him scummy, and this is no exception.
I have no quarrel with this, but I want you to be smart about it.
Iamusername wrote:And, btw, I still don't get the "we're promised a lot more information in night than usual" statement. Yes, we're pretty likely to have a cop, but that doesn't mean the rest of us will be getting any great wealth of info tonight. I don't understand at all how "we probably have a cop" is a justification for lynching Lowell.
Its not a justification for lynching Lowell, its a justification to not be afraid of night (i.e. afraid of lynching).
user wrote:Don't I get a "bad move"?
Meh, I took less issue with your vote. It was less slushy.
gorckat wrote:but a player has asked me to delete them because they were distracting, so I've done so.
This sucks, but I'll leave alone for now. After the game we'll discuss this.
crywolf wrote:But if I decide to go vote Lowell again, inevitibly hammering him, and for some reason it ends up being a mislynch, all the heat gets placed right back on me.
1. If you're town, don't be afraid only scum should be afraid (note: this isn't a scumtell, cause town do it too). 2. Everyone on a lynch is responsible.
Bionic wrote:- I have a thing against self-debating posts where somebody appears to act in opposition to what their words are saying.
You will hate me later. I do these often.
Ythill wrote:Instead, they are intent on lynching the VI.
You don't believe Lowell could be scum? Avoiding the wagon?
Darox wrote:This is obviously a joke, so tell me. What is the real case against me?
I see scum say this more often then town. Though I see town say it enough to make me hesitate. BTW: There isn't a huge case against you, you're understating it though.
flewwhygads wrote:Bandwagons I'll endorse is still Darox (he's been dismissing the case against him as a joke. Not a good defence in my book) and Crywolf.
I may join you on one of these tomorrow depending.
TOmmy wrote:2) When you say "Lowell's play style means nothing to his allignment", do you mean that it's actually impossible to find any evidence against him, and that a Lowell-lynch will always be a blind guess?
This is pretty accurate in regards to VIs. Gatorguy, Lowell, thinktank
Elias wrote:Oman so far has seemed fairly strong in his posts and reads protown to me.
<3
Elias wrote:I dont think the Darox case is strong enough for me to vote at deadline, though there are some points to consider tomorrow
True dat
Elias wrote:Crywolf doesnt read as scum to me, but as noob town who is trying a bit to please town.
I agree.
Elias wrote:Something to look at later in the game but not a good day 1 lynch.
I think its gonna be a long long time, till touchdown brings me round again to find. I'm not the man they think I am back home. OH NO NO NO!
Elias wrote:At deadline I will most likely vote lowell, as he provides the most information for us about other peoples alignments. For instance, if lowell is scum, his 100% belief of Iamausernames claim indicates to me that user is scum. There are some other decent connections I've drawn as well, which I will save til tomorrow.
ROOOOOCCKKKKEEETTTT MANNNNNNNN! ROCKETMAN!
Bionic wrote:Oman is always strong / assertive in his posts FYI.
Fo Shizzle, muh Nizzle. This is true
Bionic wrote: In the only other game I played with him, he was a mafia spy and pegged me as cop.
Even before I investigated you. To be fair, the mafia "spy" he's talking about was a mafia rolecop and my cop suspicions were confirmed rather easily.
Bionic wrote:Oman is a solid player and writing him off as protown after so few posts is a huge mistake IMO. You will set yourself up to be lead around whatever direction he wants if he is scum.
Wait...I thought we were friends... Anyone, you'll know I'm scum when claims come. That tracker claim bought me a day, it was goat's excellent play that won it.
Bionic wrote:crywolf - acting scummy (no posts have sturck me as protown) without precedent for doing such as town
Umm...every "scummy" thing crywolf has done is essentially precendented as newbie town.
Rashiminos wrote:Overall I'm liking the general amount of :goodposting:
This is :goodposting:
bionicchop2 wrote:Darox wrote:Claim or die is not the same as 'He hasn't claimed yet, kill him.'
?????????
!!!!!!!!
Guys, with deadline this close (within the week I think) we all need to get on one target, and I'm saying NOT DAROX!
It's unfortunate that good oral sex excuses bad chemistry. - Korts