You're not Natirasha, soStef [8] wrote:Vote Stef! I am having a horrible hair day.
+scumpoints for Stef
This vote reeks of OMGUS. Zazie called you down on self voting and vote hopping, two legit scumtells, and you vote her for...Stef [38] wrote:unvote, Vote: ZazieR
Serious vote and end of random for me.
You raise red flags that have no rational reason whatsoever and put a lot of meaning in random stage events.
...
There's one thing to try to end the random stage but it's a whole other ball game to do it like you did. I don't like it.
+more scumpoints for Stef
Dude, you're on page 2 of a mini game. Silly random time is over.Stef [38] wrote:You ask for reasoning in random stage when such a reasoning is not required ( thus the "random" word in "random stage" ) nor necessarily present.
Not sure where you learned that from.Stef [40] wrote:I've learned that the random stage has it's purpose and cutting it short only gives off less vibes and isn't that particularly helpful for the town.
By not acting scummy, like you.Stef [45] wrote:No they shouldn't have been helpful. It was the RVS. In the RVS the actions of players don't need to be helpful for the town even if the player is town. It shouldn't be anti-town, i agree, but you aren't accusing me of being anti-town. You are accusing me of not being helpful in the RVS which is bull. How can a town player help the town in RVS? Enlighten us please.
In other words, OMGUS.Stef [45] wrote:I am not really defending myself because the case you made is too weak and that's also why i've voted you.
No,Stef [48] wrote:Your logic fails. It was the RVS.
your
logic fails, scum, because you should've been out of the RVS. You're acting scummy, then excusing it by saying it's the RVS. Then when someone calls you down on it, you OMGUS vote them.Saying stuff "for reactions" is either sucky play or scum trying to cover their a$$es.Zach [53] wrote:I wasn't really concerned about Stefs vote hopping, he seemed to be trying to get inactive's to post, similar to my vote on Tinvision.
Chainsaw defense noted.Zach [53] wrote:Zazie's throwing a lot of suspicion on Stef, and although I can see how someone could find stef hopping around unhelpful, I think it's a big leap from Stefs not helping the town during the random vote stage to Stef is scum.
My scumdar is pinging. More chainsaw defense.Zach [67] wrote:Zazie, how am I trying to use you as a scapegoat? I do want to see Stef answer the questions you asked him, especially why he feels the random vote stage should go on longer than necessary, and why when Fhq and TV had the same reaction to your discussion that he targeted Fhg and ignored TV. However, I think your reaching a lot, I don't think his vote hopping was that big of a deal. Once he defended himself you said you didn't have a case on him in the beginning and were starting with something little, but you have one now. It feels like you backed him into a corner, and would have said that no matter how he defended himself. Maybe I'm being naive, but Stef does not seem that scummy to me. I would wait for a bigger slip than 'I think the random vote stage has a purpose' to put so much pressure on a player in a game where it only takes two townies to mislynch, and a townie dead today means we have to lynch right or lose tomorrow.
Pressure votes are BS.Zach [71] wrote:vote MafiaSSKHopefully he sees this and feels like responding.
Page 4 coming up.