Mini 859 - Cleansing of Falls Church - Over
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Will mention these when everybody has stated their non-serious posts.Sanjay wrote:Zaz, would you mind telling me which of my posts are ambiguous to you?
I don't actually consider Lynch All Name Butchers a reliable tactic and I didn't really think I caught all the scum in the random voting stage and I am not actually a flying pumpkin.
What posts from what players were giving you trouble exactly?Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
I can only answer this question when I'm fully done reading, so please wait.Peabody wrote:Honestly, I was pretty serious from the very beginning. Post 43 was my first serious post.
Zaz, what is your take on the game so far? I think everyone is waiting for this question to be answered.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Ok, done making notes. There might be more later on when everybody has stated which posts weren't serious.
Anyway, as some might know, my posts are always in 'spam'-style. For those who don't know what that means, you'll find out soon enough. My 'spam fest' starts now ^.^
P.S. Warning, you don't want to post during the 'spam fest'Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Why did you point out the bolded?DeathRowKitty wrote:I'm not liking FC right now.
This came in his 6th post, immediately following (51 seconds after) his first serious post,FC wrote:And, can people like Sanjay. nook, and bear (among others) stop saying stupid things and actually try to do something?while we were still essentially in the RVS (arguably we're still in the RVS).
Other than that, giving BB a way out and the ‘too scummy to be scum’ – fallacy. As for his vote, it’s based upon disagreement. Not liking that. Post 93 reinforces this statement.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Post 107 – Which is why Bear’s vote after the no-lynch was for you and not for FC? Why didn’t you address this vote from Bear when you thought he was trying to catch scum by voting no-lynch?
Actually, talking about this, how come you didn’t even ask anything about it?
You giving him a way out is also noted. (Shrine)Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Not buying this explanation. How did you get the idea to vote yourself?BigBear wrote:
I'm gonna shoot down that theory of... whose ever it was. I chose to vote no lynch, to generate discussion. Look it worked. I mostly wanted to get out of the RVS. Looks like we made it yay!Looker wrote:Who had the most votes when BigBear decided to go no lynch?
I also don’t like this defence:Bear wrote: So scummy that i can't be scum? This isn't Zwet-mafia. No, I'm not really implying Wifom. And i don't even understand psychology that much, what makes you think that I know how to perfect reverse psychology?Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Can you rephrase the quoted part of FC?DeathRowKitty wrote:
It sounds like you're acknowledging your option is less likely (albeit implicitly). Defending a vote you know is based on bad reasoning is scummy (scum want to appear to believe in their votes).FC wrote:BigBear might me doing this on purpose. It's a possible idea that he is scum that does some things that are SO terrible that people think he's not scum. A possible reverse psychology strategy.
Scum slip-up?shrine wrote:I am not Scum, let alone aligned with [BigBear].
Also, why didn’t you question Shrine further on his ‘scum-slip’?Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
If you didn’t like Shrine’s godfather comment, than what about Looker’s godfather comment here?EtherealCookie wrote:I didn't like the godfather comment. He said he wasn't serious I don't care. I'm keeping it there.
Alsooooooooo:
Is it really useful not to put someone at L-2 right out of the random voting stage? What do you hope to accomplish by not putting him at L-2?
Is it really useful to use sarcasm right out of the random voting stage? What do you hope to accomplish by using sarcasm?[sarcasm]You're right. I should have commented on the post I didn't see until now. Also, I very clearly said bandwagoning was bad.[/sarcasm]
Also, the deflection is noted. Just like the deflection in Post 138.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
I don’t What does it mean?Looker wrote:
Could it be that he's playing from gut...? And we all know whatShrinehme's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1895712#1895712]Post 129[/url] wrote:
The rest of your post contains comments referring to other players, and the one comment that I already showed you was misinterpreted.EtherealCookie wrote:
Not very vague if you read the rest of my post .Shrinehme wrote:How vague.
You never explained from where your "bad vibes" come from, is what I mean. You gave nothing else for me to refute or explain, so I think it's vague.thatmeans...Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Disagreed on the following (Though EC seems to agree with one):
Also, can you elaborate how the last two quotes from EC seem contradictory?Peabody wrote:
All of a sudden you acknowledge you could be wrong... but you could be right... Why is your vote even on BigBear?Far_Cry wrote:BigBear might me doing this on purpose. It's a possible idea that he is scum that does some things that are SO terrible that people think he's not scum. A possible reverse psychology strategy.
Weird word usage...Far_Cry wrote: Me bussing BigBear? How could anyoneknowthat BigBear and I are scum by page 5? Psychic?
You basically copied his voting pattern... You voted for yourself, just like BigBear, and now you are questioning BB's erratic behavior (Even after you self-voted?)EC wrote:He switches his vote a lot in the same posts and he's mean to other people(!!!!). I don't know why he'd vote for No Lynch either.
I think someone already pointed this out, but these two quotes seem contradictory:EC wrote:True. I think I'll just stay on the bandwagon for a bit, though.
I can't tell what you are trying to do with your Shrinehme vote EC... You said that it won't do anything. But you refuse to take the vote off of him. Then after you are questioned, you decided to act all hardcore about the vote. Seems like you are trying toEC wrote:What is a L-2 going to do right now anyhow? If someone actually does lynch him, that automatically tells us who is scum.feelyour vote..Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
You lurk and instead of giving your own intake, you ask for the opinion of the new guy? What’s up with that,brothernature wrote:Also checking in. Sorry. Playing in another game with an alt at the moment and haven't had time to check up lately. And maybe he meant to say sj, for Sanjay, Sanjay? And yes. Hearing Zaz's take on things would be most helpful.brothernature?Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
At least he has posted content, something you haven't done since a while. How come?brothernature wrote:Umn. I'm not sure very many of my posts were all that serious. Was just messing around most the time. But anyway, like we've all asked 100 times now, we'd like to hear your opinions on everything so far. Since he hasn't posted since a while,Vote: nookto get some pressure going.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
brothernature is on top. The list isn't ordered from most to less in the groups.Sanjay wrote:
Don't think I am ignoring your grandmother's wisdom, but why aren't you voting for the person on top of your scumlist?ZazieR wrote:And with that, I'm done and fully caught up ^.^
Vote brothernatureIgnore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
It's not. Going out of the RVS, means that real discussion will start. Letting the game move along further and giving a chance at finding scum. Games that drag out the RVS don't get discussion going. And if everybody keeps joking around, the RVS will only get dragged out further. In this case, a deadline will be very destructive.Sanjay wrote:I've heard some people say eagerness to get out of the RVS was a scumtell. I don't know if I necessarily buy it as a scumtell, but I thought it was worth asking about, especially because it didn't seem like Far_Cry had a lot to move out of the RVS with.
tl;dr: Leaving the RVS asap is good, dragging it out may be fun, but bad for the game.
No, I do meanSanjay wrote:
Was that supposed to read "lots of assumptionsZazieR wrote:Post 116 – First, lots of assumptions to destroy a theory. Secondly, why did you vote Confid over Looker,Sanjay? Don’t like it that it’s based upon disagreement.dodestroy a theory" or something? Because those assumptions are ones you have to make to support the theory, not destroy it. And I think all of those assumptions are pretty hard to believe.to. Connections can easily be found during the first day, especially during the RVS as many don't take it seriously. My example: Open 155.
3 mafia goons. The first two were attacking each other. For some reason, the third decided to direct the attention away from them, while later saying that his top suspicion was among those two players. His reason for doing this? To generate discussion.
So if Shrine turns up scum, Bear should be looked at.
Why?Sanjay wrote:I wasn't feeling that enthusiastic about my ConfidAnon voteIgnore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
I was more talking that you first pointed out Shrine's 'scumslip'. But he ignored it and you didn't mention it afterwards. I was wondering why you didn't mention it again after he ignored it, but you later answered that.DRK wrote:2. There really wasn't anything to question him about.
Possible Conversation:
-Hey shrine, how do you know you're not aligned with BB?
-I don't.
-Why did you say that then?
-[INSERT REASON/EXCUSE HERE]
The reason/excuse would probably either be "I think BB is scum" or "typo on my part" or something to that effect and wouldn't tell us much.
And don't give him a way out.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
I'm used to players using smileys when they joke around. But nobody used them here So I checked to be certain beforehand, so that if a post didn't get mention, I'd know it was serious and could analyse it without asking myself if it was serious or not.Sanjay wrote:Cool. I'm also still curious about why you asked people about how serious they were.
Apparently I was wrong about Looker and his theory, but for the most part I thought stuff was pretty clear.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD