Obvious scum is obvious. He's being waaaaay too aggressive at this stage in the game to be town.
I don't know why talking about Hoopla's claim is such a big deal. Simply don't target her at night.
WTF is wrong with a havingfitz wagon?havingfitz wrote:WTF is the problem with a Hoopla wagon? If people suspect her they should vote her. And why say bandwagon hoppers need to go immediately after hopping on my bandwagon...do you need to go? Furry's 'case' on me does make me a little leery of him but not enough to move my vote.
Why thank you.Hoopla wrote:Liking his play so far - it's been minimal, but he's raised decent points each time, and also doesn't fit in with my theory of scum being open to or pushing a policy lynch on me. Probably town from my perspective.
havingfitz wrote:Nikanor....nothin is wrong with a havingfitz BW if there are valid reasons (which I do not think there are). My point was you called out people for bandwagonning in the same post in which you yourself jump on my bandwagon. That seems a bit a contradiction...which I find suspcious.
Oso's case & vote. It looked like you were trying to get on a wagon early.q21 wrote:What opportunity was I scummily taking advantage of?
No, it's because although I think Oso is town from his analysis, I think that his vote is on town. Like, you know that feeling where you just know that it's two townies going at it in a big argument? That's how I feel about them. That Oso and RH are both town.Inflataman wrote:Nikanor - this looks awfully wishy-washy, if that's the right word. "I like Oso's post, OH BUT I DON'T THINK RH IS SCUM NO SIR". Seems a bit of a pre-emptive defense? Eh, other than this, nothing else has caught my eye on Nik.
But I like him. I think he's town, so I'm not going to waste my time attacking him.q21 wrote:I'm waiting to Nikanor to appear and call Pie's RH vote an opportunistic bandwagon vote.
About that... I'm actually fairly sure that Reck is town as well. Sorry.q21 wrote:And why is that Reckoner; because to me it seems either lazy or scummy... or possibly both.
a) Yep, inflataman.Wacky Inflatable Arm-flailing Tube Man wrote:Inflataman? <_<
I get what you're saying, it just seemed odd to throw in a comment on RH when I was reading over it. In addition, I disagree with the feeling that RH is town for now. Why do you think he's town again?
Players wrote:Nikanor
q21
Hoopla
Oso
xRECKONERx
Slepz
TheButtonmen Radical Hijinx
havingfitz
Furry
JacobSavage
Gwynplaine
InflatablePie
Three of those five are scum. I suggest we lynch some of them and see where it gets us.Players after Nik's town reads are eliminated wrote: q21
Slepz
havingfitz
JacobSavage
Gwynplaine
I asked the people I think are scummy for a reason. Right now it looks like Gwynplaine's vote is bussing.Inflates wrote:Nik asking certain people to switch their vote is a bit odd. Makes me sad that I didn't get an invitation either. I feel like that weirdo kid in high school that's really quiet and no one likes him or talks to him and he doesn't get a heads-up on the parties going on even though he wouldn't really mind going... which I was, but that's not the point.
I've placed Reck among my top town reads, yet I've cut a deal to see my top scum read lynched. Not only that, but I'm now guilty of setting up lynches, which is about the scummiest thing one can do.Furry wrote:Lynching someone he thinks is town. Time to lynch him, like now. Seriously.
No, I know exactly how a PGO works. It's a reflex vigilante. I wanted him to shoot Hoopla because I don't believe that we have both a vigilante and a reflex vigilante in a normal game. Either Hoopla is lying and needs to die, or Jacob is lying and needs to die. If Hoopla is lying, Jacob killing Hoopla would be good. If Jacob is lying, Jacob killing Hoopla would be good.Gwyn wrote:It's probably worth noting that Nikanor was the first to suggest that JacobSavage kill Hoopla, which is really only a good idea if you think she's lying or don't know how the PGO works. He's never voiced an opinion on Hoopla's claim one way or the other, but she was on his list of "town reads" in iso 13. Probably, like Oso and InflatablePie, he was just unclear on the mechanics.
No, I won't forget. I'm going to remember that as the most ridiculous way to catch scum ever.q21 wrote:And lets not forget the bargain he tried to make with JS.
Yes, I consider dsister a lurker.Last (and only) post by dsister wrote:(I'll post more tonight, granted the site doesn't stop working again...)Time wrote:Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:54 pm