Here's the hammer. It's coming...
...
I should also contribute something. Is anyone else suspicious of jay? He somehow reminds me of a player I've played with in my last game who was scum, it's basically gut feeling though . And vezo, you're a enigma in every game lol. I've seen your work. Keep up the scumhunting; I'll be sure to cooperate and give my thoughts in plenty of posts--I posted frequently in my last game, people even complained .Tazaro wrote:I'm the replacement for Tasky. As much as I'd hope we'd be lucky enough to avoid a mislynch, I'll want to know what information transpires after quadz08 is lynched.
Here's the hammer. It's coming...
...VOTE: quadz08
I've come to this site to avoid that site more.vezokpiraka wrote:youtube
1) Day one was a whole lot of people opining in different directions. I voted for quadz08 because I want to see what happens after this day one lynch, and this day one is not a good provider of stuff to gauge people's alignment yet. It is easier to be suspicious of people after day one once the flip result of the lynch occurs and the nightkill occurs. I suspect from the content of day one that quadz08 is not scum--but this is just like most day one lynches (mislynches).Humble Poirot wrote:Did you even read the cases on him?
What about the cases of vezok?
You didn't even mention who that player was or in which game so that people could try to follow your train of thoughts.
Do you feel he is scumhunting?Tazaro wrote: . And vezo, you're a enigma in every game lol. I've seen your work. Keep up the scumhunting;
It DOES work. Yay, I know how to make a link work properly! Summarizing it the best I can, per Poirot's request, the crescendo of the attention was on Sauron and Leech after Leech claimed to be a cop who investigated Sauron as guilty. Leech was actually the one who was mafia. And I don't expect anyone other than Poirot to check it out, but I can tell you that I was a multiposter in that game too, and the game went interestingly because Leech was a good liar.Tazaro wrote:Poirot asked for a link to my previous game: Link to my previous game If this doesn't work, then just copy and paste the url into the top box of your browser screen.
Yeah, and you thought he was scum, eh. Mislynches almost always happen on day one, and people should think that they probably have the wrong guy on the noose on day one. But no nightkill? This deprives us of information about the mafia's nightkill strategy. We who survive need to be organized but not pounce on a player like quadz, but pounce on a player who's scumminess can't be just bad gameplay but is actually from bona fide scum tells.xvart wrote:Hmmm... You voted for someone you think is town?
xvart.
I said I did not suspect quadz08. I made it clear that it's an information lynch.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:[: I understand he replaced near the end of the deadline, but that didn't mean he should have immediately hammered quadz08. He gave no explanation on why he found quadz08 scummy.Tazaro
I agree with you. I was saying that diddin and KageLord targetted you; they want to do that for their purposes.vezokpiraka wrote:Scum always try to force a mislynch on me.
I'm sorry, but this strikes me as being overly offended by something I said.vezokpiraka wrote:You say I am a weak player.
Scum always try to force a mislynch on me.
If diddin flips town tazaro should be the next to go.
Well, you're saying "2 votes" about KageLord and quadz08, I assume? Were they terrible wagons votes if those two aren't scum? What exactly is terrible about those two votes, and what do you think about KageLord's alignment?, because you seem to agree with each other presently on vezo.diddin wrote:I unvoted because vezo was L-2 and the last 2 votes on his wagon were terrible, terrible votes.
How did I miss this? I actually think that vezo would sheep though. And I'm suspicious that this comment about KageLord could be an act of bussing on diddin's part. I have to rethink what I think about their alignments, and whether I'm more suspicious of KageLord or diddin.diddin wrote:KageLord: This is the vote I dislike most on the wagon, mostly because he's trying to use the fact the posts were 6 minutes apart to justify vezo sheeping with SSBF. Really looks like he's grasping at straws here.
It makes perfect sense to me. I agreed with the fact that he's an easy target when he said something like "They always try to mislynch me" and I saw him as being overly offended when he said I was scum as a result of my doing nothing more than calling him a weak player. It's moodiness.
I didn't know that KageLord said he was going to hammer; I missed that from my reading.Oso wrote:I had a town read on Tasky pretty much that carried over to you Tazaro. Have to be honest, you pulled that right back to the lower side of neutral with that hammer.
This is mainly curiosity, why didn't you let KG hammer? He had already said that he would hammer before deadline. Or had gotten that far in your read through before you hammered?
Well, that's what threw me off.vezokpiraka wrote:Nah. I wasn't but-hurt. I wasjust saying things without giving reasons like I always do. Sometimes I don't do this but...
How should I know?; his game play is VI.Sotty7 wrote:So you don't think vezo is scum in the least?Tazaro Post 458 wrote:And another. Yes, I said vezo was a weak player in this game. That's why he's easy to use by scum to divert attention.
I assume you've never played with vezo before.diddin wrote:Vezo lynch is looking better and better because tazaro's insistence vezo is just a VI could be a potential scumlink.
I played with him before. I'm defending him because he is being targetted by diddin and KageLord's tag-team of voting and I see it as a push to lynch the VI. Considering diddin's change FROM saying that Friend might be scumming so he'll look closer at Poirot TO saying he just wanted to RECONFIRM his town read on someone who he previously implied might be scum based on Friend. This change is fishy to me, and he's being very adamant about undermining what I'm saying about vezo.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:@Tazaro: You seem to know a lot about vezokpiraka's meta. Have you played a game with him or are you in an ongoing game with him. Furthermore, why do you keep defending vezokpiraka with the "meta/VI" excuse so much?
I hope vezo reads this; he definitely needs to claim.Oso wrote:vezo- Basically gave his vote to the quadz lynch, in my opinion, because it was the easiest thing to do at that point. Never pulled it off and is the single most scummiest vote on the quadz wagon. This is why my vote is staying on vezo at the moment. He had the scummiest reason (in this case, pretty much no reason) to be voting quadz. AND ALSO because of the confusion yesterday around several people thinking he had softclaimed a PR, I want to get rid of that confusion today.Outing a town PR in vezo's case, carries less risk to town than continuing without a claim. He's a scum magnet right now because of his play so far and I'd like to know for myself what role he would claim (or is).It would go a long way clearing up some of the static I am getting about my reads on other players based off of him.
This.Aranneas wrote:Would you folks feel comfortable summarizing the neighbour chat from last night for our benefit? Why/why not?
Fine with me. We'll see if they make you a distraction from diddin as a result of the claim, you are neck and neck with diddin, who as far as I know gave no sufficient explanation for why he targetted Sotty. I don't believe that Sotty being targetted by a jailkeeper because he's dangerous as scum is a good answer.vezokpiraka wrote:Should I claim now guys?
vezokpiraka wrote:People who don't want me to claim results: [0/3]
Is it any more uncommon than town jailkeeper? Unvoting vezo, I see. And I'm very much seeing a KageLord and diddin night one discussion in the mix of this Oso-targetting that was done by KageLord.KageLord wrote:since I'm pretty sure that Mafia Watcher is a very uncommon role, if ever used, I'llunvote