Mini 1117 - Manhattan Special - [GAME OVER]

LimMePls · Post Post #615 (isolation #0) » Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:00 am

@Fugitive: Cause he was on the site, presumably browsing the thread, and he failed to even bother trying to secure a lynch?

@EA/Emp: amirite!?

Fugitive wrote:Who the hell is Nexus? Oh... TheLonging.

What was the purpose of this statement?

LimMePls · Post Post #634 (isolation #1) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:23 am

Unvote
Vote: Fugitive

That's L-1.

LimMePls · Post Post #635 (isolation #2) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:23 am

Fugitive wrote:
Erratus Apathos wrote:
Fugitive wrote:
EA wrote:
Fugitive wrote:Also, it's a tad insulting you think I'd be stupid enough to intentionally avoid a thread and post somewhere else
Then why didn't you post?
No reason to. Why waste space with fluffy useless posts?
So you act offended at the accusation that you intentionally avoided the thread when
that is exactly what you did.
No, I'm offended that I'm accused of being scum for doing something that's not a scum-tell.

The "I hate being caught for the 'wrong reasons'" tell.

LimMePls · Post Post #650 (isolation #3) » Tue Mar 01, 2011 4:06 am

Someone hammer already.

LimMePls · Post Post #657 (isolation #4) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:46 am

Vote: Sapo

LimMePls · Post Post #659 (isolation #5) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 9:31 am

Cause they're scum? If you want NL instead why aren't you voting it?

LimMePls · Post Post #675 (isolation #6) » Mon Mar 07, 2011 5:37 am

Massclaim if we're going to NL is just stupid.

If we're going to lynch Sapo, Massclaim is stupid. If we have multiple lynch candidates, then massclaim makes more sense.

Sapo's eagerness to start the massclaim only further means we should give them rope and save the MC for tomorrow.

LimMePls · Post Post #677 (isolation #7) » Mon Mar 07, 2011 8:00 am

Substrike22 wrote:How is that not true? Today we have a 17-18% chance of hitting scum, tomorrow it's 20%?

This is using numbers to be misleading. This would be true if we were lynching from the player list in a vacuum, but we are not doing that, we're lynching from a subset of the player list that is unlikely to change due to NK (ie the scum aren't gonna NK other scummy players). Therefore our chances actually get worse because we'll still be lynching from the same pool of players, only we'll be doing it with 1 less townie.

LimMePls · Post Post #678 (isolation #8) » Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:11 pm

Also, even if your numbers were accurate, why is a 2% chance worth giving up a town player?