Mini 1126 - Game over - Was Averagely Suspicious saved?
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Nice job on interpretation.subgenius wrote:unvote: Ashblade
vote: Hiraki
For copying Bill's FoS, even after Barry explained his mistake and put his vote where his mouth is. Trying to appear townie by mirroring others is a definite scum tell.
Actually no, let's not use sarcasm here. That was a horrible job.
There's no reason to vote Errant. His post wasOBVIOUSLYsarcasm.
Also, the point that you're accusing me of copying is quite frightful. If I wanted to copy someone, I'd vote Errant. However, Errant is null at this moment, and shouldn't be voted. Someone on his wagon needs to die first.
I take back my FoS though. I didn't mean Barry. I meant Bill.
He needs to actually die.
Bold: Nice job on Meta TellingBill wrote:Your admission that you didn't vote to start Day 1 was silly at best, given that the game consensus was that it waslikelier that scum players would want to delay the start.I'm thinking there's a decent enough chance that you're simply ballsy, and thought you'd be able to deflect the resulting attention into pressure on somebody else.Which doesn't bode well for you.
Italics: Decent Chance and voting. Ehehehemeee. No, this doesn't make any sense.
Wikkiden can die too, just because his vote sucks.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
1) Alright seriously? Errantus didn't score to start the game. Whooptedoo. If you can honestly tell me that it's asubgenius wrote:If you insist.
I happen to think this particular meta interpretation makes a certain amount of sense. It was, in fact, to scum's advantage to delay the start of the game, and Erratus admitted that he didn't vote to start the game. I don't think this is damning evidence against Erratus, but it is a bit fishy, and a better reason to cast a vote than is usually seen at this point in the game.Hiraki wrote: Bold: Nice job on Meta Telling
I already said this, but I think feeling that a person has a "decent chance" of being scum is more than enough reason to cast a vote against them. I don't consider Bill's vote or use of the word "decent" scummy or nonsensical.Italics: Decent Chance and voting. Ehehehemeee. No, this doesn't make any sense.
Are you honestly going to tell me that you're more than "decently" sure of Bill's alignment?
Why didn't you write out your reasons out when you first FoS'd Barry?smallscumtell, I'm going to murder you.
2) You're missing the point. Bill's case wasn't even decent. His entire post was based off the motive of Errantus' actions. FFS. I could be writing this because I'm scum and want to live. This isn't decent.
3) To be honest, I was hoping I could find some idiot to accuse me of voting with no reasoning, since Bill's first post already sucked. Didn't happen though.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
This basically.Papa Zito wrote:Barry, that's an interesting dance you're doing there. Must be some sort of native tribal thing.
Currently I support wagons on Bill, mockingjaye and subgenius (hail Slack!). If any of them were to dangle in the gentle spring breezes I'd be satisfied. Conditional to those flips I would support wagons on Rob and you.
All that said, I only have one vote. And I have it placed on the one I currently find most likely to flip red.
I'm really honestly not sure why I have to explain all this.
1) Don't call someone scummy because of accusations and pushing.Barry wrote:subgenius - I am struck by several things in your posts. You kept after Hiraki for a number of posts for his mistaken FoS on me, continuing to press on why there wasn't an explanation posted with the FoS at the time. Then, you backpedal in some of your posts, while stating that Hiraki looks scummy for backpedaling. You accuse Hiraki of "rewriting history", and though I may be missing it, I don't see that point.
2) I'll agree with the backpedaling.
3) The rewriting history is more in the point of I changed what I said (Ex: I wanted to FoS Bill, rather than you[Bill])
It's a bit annoying that yo're voting Sub on that basis. I mean FMPOV, Bill looks much worse.
Not really. But nice defense. Noted when Bill flips scum.RobCapone wrote:that is essentially what hiraki has done, I don't care if he votes you but he asks for reasons why people are voting you, when his reason for his vote is essentially nonsense.
Yeah that's not really smart. That's just getting butt-hurt really.RobCapone wrote:if someone calls me scum, I don't defend that person's wagon
What's your point? You said this randomly and actually it's gotten me annoyed.RobCapone wrote:it seems like you are trying to stall the inevitable and hope something happens to get the attention off of you, the deadline means nothing in the grand scheme of things if people are convinced you are scum.
He's not really avoiding it though.RobCapone wrote:but you supported his wagon and now it is at L-2 you seem to be avoiding it, idk just doesn't make sense to me.
Yeah so RobCapone or Bill. Take your pick please.
Just to say, if anyone was wondering, here was my initial reasoning for wanting Rob as dead as Bill.
But um.RobCapone wrote:Subs, play more, read wiki less
those scum tells became invalid the moment they were posted
unvote, vote subs
I have been trying to tell if subs was just newbish cause he sounds alot like how I played when I first joined, but seeing he has been here since 2008(regardless if he "hasn't played in a while") he should not be playing like this if he is town, so I have to assume he probably isn't and just trying to play it off that isn't working.
You could press that name(subgenius). And you'd be able to go to his profile.
And search his posts.
And find that he's played barely any games.
Also, "he should not be playing like this if he is town"
What the hell is that supposed to mean? Are town people supposed to act like all town people? You're making no sense, assuming with no information, and you're voting him because scumtells from the Wiki apparently are invalid the moment that he posted in here. Does something not make sense here, or is it everything?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Well good thing I didn't ask you to make a case, and I did make a case. This is just a notation. I don't need to make a case for anyone really.RobC wrote:not really isn't really a valid response, your reason is nonsense and if you are going to ask people to make cases, you shoudl be willing to do the same. so make a case on the person you are voting for
Person X calls you scum. Person Z says he has an innocent on you and a guilty on confirmed town, Person X. I do believe that you should defend Person X.RobC wrote:no it isn't getting but-hurt, I may not attack the person who is accusing me of being scum, but I am damn sure am not going to defend them. your defending subs makes no sense and you haven't provided reasons for why he is not scum. and again you have not provided anything valid for your vote. My reasoning may not make sense to you, but I don't have to convince you of my reason for my vote.
This is valid because you're ignoring and being anti-town. That's good enough for me to vote.
Great. You can think. Obviously we shouldn't quicklynch anyone. It's kind of already known that we're not.RobC wrote:I didn't say this randomly, he brought it up like it actually means something. the fact that we have a long deadline means nothing and doesn't mean that if we suspect someone of scum, we should wait out the entire 2 weeks before lynching him
Right. Because applying pressure is now scummy. Noted. If you honestly thought he wanted to lynch that quickly, then I sigh.RobC wrote:um yes he said he supports a Sub wagon and now there is one, he wants to move focus off of it. that is scummy play, added that Zito hasn't really provided anything of value and hasn't scum hunted is yet another reason I pointed it out.
1. Okay. But what's your point? Are you honestly going to lynch him on the basis of that?RobC wrote:I don't know how many game he has played on the old mafiascum site and you really can't check. plus I didn't think I had to check his game log when I saw he was here since 2008.
but back to the other question, town can act however he wants but to me he seems like he is trying to earn town points when he makes comments like this
2. The use of the word town makes me quite wary of a slip, me spies.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Bullshit and you know it. Erratus wagon was opportunistic. Bill was the one who liked opportunity.Hayker wrote:Question @ Zito: Why were you so quick to clear Erratus like that? It was a bandwagon that was pretty much guaranteed to happen with what was said pre-game.
Rob is just being stupid at the moment. Bill was scummy, and he knows it.
And for the record, there is no possible way that I'm lurking. It's D1, 11 Pages. I've had no prod checks.
Here's a better question.
Rob. Why aren't you voting me?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Whoops.Hiraki wrote: I take back my FoS though. I didn't mean Barry. I meant Bill.
He needs to actually die.
Bold: Nice job on Meta TellingBill wrote:Your admission that you didn't vote to start Day 1 was silly at best, given that the game consensus was that it waslikelier that scum players would want to delay the start.I'm thinking there's a decent enough chance that you're simply ballsy, and thought you'd be able to deflect the resulting attention into pressure on somebody else.Which doesn't bode well for you.
Italics: Decent Chance and voting. Ehehehemeee. No, this doesn't make any sense.
Wikkiden can die too, just because his vote sucks.
I doubt that I qualify for either.RobCapone wrote:lurking is posting just enough to avoid prods or to stay off the radar
So you don't believe I am scum.RobCapone wrote:2. I am voting for the person I think is the most likely to be scum, I haven't seen any reason to change my vote right now although I like that vote by Hayker on Zito, he is somoeone who could stand to have a little pressure on him.
Well.-
-
Hiraki
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
I haven't taken a good look at the wagon, but you're the one that shows out the most. I haven't been overdefensive about it, because it's such a false claim, and the reason I asked the question is because it seems like Rob thinks I'm scum.Bill McQuill wrote:All right, since I been gone:
Passcue me? Am I the only one being raked over the coals for "opportunistically" voting for Erratus in this post? And what's with the over-defensiveness about whether or not you've lurked? And how would Rob's answer to that question give you any information at all? Is there something scummy about... not voting for you?Hiraki wrote:Bullshit and you know it. Erratus wagon was opportunistic. Bill was the one who liked opportunity.
Rob is just being stupid at the moment. Bill was scummy, and he knows it.
And for the record, there is no possible way that I'm lurking. It's D1, 11 Pages. I've had no prod checks.
Here's a better question.
Rob. Why aren't you voting me?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Or because no more townies want to get on the wagon.
That's probably it.
FYI: Ice posted today.
Zito posted yesterday.
Hayker posted yesterday night.
And bviogot replaced in yesterday.
Therefore, we can assess that. People do not spend every waking second on mafiascum.net and that everyone here should stop botching about lurkers. AKA: RobCapone
P.E.: See? Barry only got one "lurker". Good job there.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
The problem is, is that I've only commented on people saying that I've lurked once.Barry wrote:And Hiraki, one more time in case you are still somewhat paranoid about being called a lurker - I don't think you are a lurker. I do think you need to be sure which game you're posting in, however. That doesn't make you a lurker, and doesn't make you town or scum - just a bit confused.
I don't know who's lurking, I wanted your opinion. That's it. Just wanted to throw that out there, I'll see what your views are fully later.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Oh yeah totally right. You got me Rob. I'm lurking. Do you know it's hard arguing with a brick wall? The other side doesn't seem to understand your arguments very well.RobCapone wrote:
See I was right about you lurkingHiraki wrote:Oh cool. You guys have finally realized who's scum.
Unvote, Vote: RobCapone
p.edit - I have not given up, I won't be lynched today
Meh. That would be annoying.PapaZito wrote:He's setting up for a PR claim.
Sigh.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
I think you may have missed http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 8#p2805908 post.penpen wrote:Papa Zito wrote:He's setting up for a PR claim.
Sigh.
Penpen what do you think of our friend Hiraki here.
I see Hiraki as the opposite of RobCapone.
I don't understand why he would make a post saying that he gives up for unless, he is scum.
Unvote
I really don't care what Rob says anymore. It annoys me, and 99% of what he says is wrong, is not a valid scumtell, and is stupid. You can take your pick on which one most of his posts are, but honestly. I'm not arguing with him anymore.
However, I'm bored, and I recieved an idea. Rob, is lurking a scumtell to you?
Myself. To be honest, no one here is showing me that they're 100% town, so therefore I can't really tell. I'll stick with scumhunting for now, and I'll get better reads down the road. For the moment, Rod and Bill are scum, and need to die. Everyone else is null.penpen wrote:I wish Bill would post more.
Hiraki, Who do you think are town?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
EBWOP:
Yeah. I forgot to preview it.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 8#p2805908
Just pretend that never happened.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
I said I don't need to make a case. Not I don't need to make a case on Bill. I have made a case, and I'm sticking with it. Whether or not you like it, I really don't care.RobCapone wrote:
Cause town lurk too and they may get wrongly accused, I've been dealing with lurkers for a long time, it's the biggest pet peeve of mine but it's the way they lurkHiraki wrote:How can you have Lurker Town, if lurking is a scumtell to you. That makes no sense. Also, how would you find lurking town? I'm intrigued in this.
To add on, if I'm scum, why would I buss Bill D1?
someone who is comletely clueless abou what's going on is lower on my scumdar than someone who shows up at certain times and seems to know what's going on
are you suggesting mafia won't bus their partner day 1?
Are you really serious with that question anywY when I have called you out that your case on Bill is nonsense because you haven't made a case in him. To which you said something about not having to make one.
So yes I think you are half/ass bussing Bill and yes mafia bus their partners day 1, day 2, , any fucking day they want.
I'm not suggesting that the mafia wouldn't buss their partner, I'm saying it'd be highly illogical on D1 for the mafia to do so. I don't see the point in it, therefore, I asked you the question. Nice assumption. (b")b
Also, what does "someone who is completely cluless..." mean? Are you saying if someone played the newbie card and didn't talk you'd label them as obv. lurk town?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
A day is 24 hours.RobCapone wrote:
1. I never said 24 hoursGreyICE wrote:
He posted at 1:34.RobCapone wrote:He doesn't post all day and swoops in to bandwagon, not a misrep
He posted again at 3:30 to change his vote.
2 hours != 24 hours.
2. Learn to not misrep yourself cause it was 1:34 AM so it was 14 hours
in that 14 hours lots took place, did he care to comment? No he pops in right when the votes pile on to throw his on very opportunistically. The votes came on me super quick.
Thus he proved his scum lurkyness IMO
Once I'm dead and flip town all I ask is he get lynched as my dying request.
Sorry, I didn't realize that 1:34 AM that it might be night.
And I might need something.
Like sleep.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Or, I have a policy where we shouldn't lynch claimed PRs until they can be proven to be scum.RobCapone wrote:See if hiraki was so set on me getting lynched, why unvote?
Glanced at Subs post and it's mostly butt hurt for me calling him scum and twisting me trying to get hiraki to explain why he defends his accuser as trying to drum upvotes
if someone calls me scum and I'm innocent, I'm not going to defend that person if they are being called scum. It's retarded logic
if anything it means I'm wrong on subs but right on hiraki
If you were at L-2, why did you claim?
Btw. you're thinking the scum-innocent logic wrong. If someone has valid proof that you're scum(report) and you're innocent, then the investigator is scum. However, if someone suspects you to be scum, and you're innocent, there is no scum motive to defend the person that accuses you, so it'd be town.
To note: I have a spare 20 before I leave.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Let me rephrase my last statement. I'm not going to lynch a PR on D1 without poof that he must be scum. Even though I think that Rob is extremely scummy, I'm willing to allow him to stay alive.EA wrote:That's a terrible policy. Explain why you are unwilling to lynch Rob.
To go on, let's talk about Rob.
Hey Rob. If you really want me dead, you should try making a convincing case. The statements that I've been lurking, and that I have no "real"case on Billy being scum aren't working well. Mostly to the point that you're the only one who believes I'm lurking, and that I do have a case on Billy's first post, you just don't agree with it. I could add onto it, but I'm not focused on him, at least not anymore.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
That was enough to push it, however I see your point. Therefore, I'll take the vote off.RobCapone wrote:again are you retarded hiraki? i used the same wording penpen used, I don't want town to vote me cause I am town also.
and way to go against your own policy, so now you contradict yourself.
I am sorry the rest of town can't see what I seeUnvote
No one can see your case because you haven't posted one. You expect me to defend your shitty vote with the fact by me saying town. AKA: Your defense throughout the entire game.
Fine. I wish there was an ignore button though, to make this plausible.Ashblade wrote:Hiraki, we get it. You think he's scum. Try taking the tunnel vision off for two seconds and realize that we don't even have to worry about it right now. You said it yourself you don't lynch PRs unless they can be proven to be scum and I'm pretty sure Rob can be proven to be scum later on.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
1. No.RobCapone wrote:I have posted a case throughout the thread
your ACTIVE lurking
your refusal to make a case when asked yet you ask others to make a case
your opportunstic swooping out of nowhere when my bandwagon starts to vote me an put me L-3 I believe
your defending your accuser (see my rapist or baseball card analogy, they both fit)
you purposely trying to turn things I say into a scumtell or scummy aka strawman
now where the fuck is your case on Bill, if you don't post a case on bill in your next post than it is an admission of guilt and we can lynch you.
2. I asked you, this is just you getting butt-hurt. What do you think of Bill?
3. Oh like I haven't suspected you at all.Oh wait.Just to note, your BW started to pick up when I was asleep, therefore I had to join with it.
4. This isn't baseball or rape. This is mafia. I can defend someone accusing me, and still be town or scum. It is null.
5. Oh yeah totally.
Your case sucks and there is no valid proof. Just tells that apply to certain people. Admit it. You're sure someone else is scum, rather than me.
Vote: Bill
You want a case on Bill? Fine. I'm done with you, and you deserve it. Not for being a good boy though.
First, I go with his EA BW.
Second, post #148 was definitely not AtE.
Third, post #157.
You easily made this into something it didn't need to be. He's only explaining his stance, and apologize for what he's done. I've done that as town and scum. While I can't speak for Wikki, I don't see scum in this. Call this a difference in opinions, but I think he's trying to stretch the truth to get a lynch.Bill wrote:He basically groveled for the town's forgiveness after an L-1 vote that approximately two players even commented on. He invoked being a newer player and apologized profusely for "ruining" the game after a more experienced player asked him why he skipped the Newbie game queue. He's trying to be deferential and cover his bases all at the same time.
Hey, I can even use Bill Logic to find Billscum!
(b")bBill wrote:Attacking bad play may not exactly equate to finding scum, but the idea is that certain patterns of bad play are bad because they tend to reveal scum to be scum.
Anyway, fourth. This isn't really scummy, but it ticked me off.
But the problem is Wikki is new. So, um, wouldn't this not apply to the current situation at all, except that Wikki is new? I guess you could call this fruitless crap, but I don't care about it that much to be honest.Bill wrote:Another tendency of scum is to come to the early defense of players perceived as new, since they're more likely to make mistakes later in the game and make easy mislynch targets, so your defense here is also noted.
Fifth. Most of his opinions don't take a firm stance on the situation at hand. They just talk about it. ISO 8 is a good example of this. Especially at the end where he names Mocking his #2 scum read for being null. Not only does that look opportunistic, but it doesn't sit well with me.
I will admit his recent posts have gotten better, so I may take a better look at him, but he's my #1 scum read at this point.
P.E.
Good riddance.RobCapone wrote:so I will stay on Hiraki and you guys can do what you what, as i said if hiraki flips town you will never see me play another game on this site again.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Sorry, I really just can't understand this post. At all.RobCapone wrote:I always love when someone says there is no proof they are scum, of course there is no proof day 1 but that is such a mentality of scum, only scum would say prove it.
you think I am scum, but I don't tell you to prove it, because I know you can't. you either believe it or you don't and I die by lynch or by NK, but regardless I will flip town
thanks for admitting you are scum, but you want us to prove it first-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
No, actually you're misinterpreting my post.RobCapone wrote:scum say prove it
town could care less because they know it can't be proved
you say
aka PROVE ITYour case sucks and there is no valid proof
simple enough for you or do you need a remedial english course first?
You have no valid proof from my posts of any real scum tells. All the tells that you posted can be seen as null or scummy to other players.
Oh, and P.M. me, even though you'll supposedly leave after I flip town, if anyone takes that english course from you.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
That's why I showed you case up there.RobCapone wrote:interpretation is always going to be different, everyone can make up their own mind, I am find with you. it's not like you have actually done anything worthwhile in this game, I mean you already admitted to being to lazy to make a case and you haven't scum hunted for shit either.
you are no better than furclow or drmyshotty at this point.
I guess PapaZito and I get to be ranked there. Do you feel special about that Zito?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Fuck you Rob.
#548. I made it just for you, and you blatantly ignore it.
I'm done with your bullshit, and I can't stand reading your godawful posts.
If you're going to complain to me thatI'mbeing lazy. At least have a fucking decency to check your facts, instead of making yourself the all-knowing RobCapone.
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Myself wrote:I will admit his recent posts have gotten better, so I may take a better look at him, but he's my #1 scum read at this point.
I told you that I wanted an ISO of everyone in the game. Because I don't have a computer right now, as in right now of 6:42 AM, I'm unable to give you the full specs of my vote.REPEAT wrote:at this point.
Not to mention, let's face it. My case on Bill was pretty crappy. I'm annoyed that no one said much about it, but I guess that's why a wagon didn't rise from it.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Yes, looking at the thread for two minutes is totally lurking. Especially-- I'm done talking to you.RobCapone wrote:btw I saw you lurking Hiraki
Here's why EA is scum.
He voted Bill for the reasoning that he posted just barely. Apparently, he can keep that vote until L-2, which is incredible to me.
What's also incredible to me, is why you voted Bill. You voted Subgenius and Hayker, but apparently they disappeared by the beginning of D2.
GreyICE didn't like bvi or penpen. I want to look at both later.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
Because Bill honestly wasn't that bad. The only reasoning I can see for half of this wagon is that he's inactive. That's not a very good reason at all. EA, on the otherhand, just randomly sees Bill as a target. Scum bells should've rung long ago.subgenius wrote:
GreyICE also didn't like Rob or me. We also have two other confirmed townies dead who had their own suspicions. Why focus on bvoigt and penpen in particular?Hiraki wrote: GreyICE didn't like bvi or penpen. I want to look at both later.
Do you think we'd be better off lynching EA than whoever it is that replaces Bill? Why?-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
I stopped reading there.bvi wrote:OK, this is getting ridiculous. Your top suspects for all of Day 1 were Rob and Bill
The problem wasn't that your reads changed, it was how drastically your reads changed. Did anyone that you voted D1 do anything drastically different D2?EA wrote:Wow, it's like reads change over time! What an amazing discovery Magellan!
See? Here's a problem. This, to me, is a horrendous reason to vote someone. Town could have a motive not to post content, and scum could just not post content. It's null. While I'm not sure what motive Bill has for being lazy, I don't need to care about that.I voted Bill for posting low content. Bill hasn't posted any content at all since then. So, uh, fuckin' obviously I'm keeping the vote.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
1) This shows that you'vereallybeen reading the thread.
2) Have you ever heard of a reaction test?(On iPod so no quotes.)
The problem with mine is that no one reacted.
Rob. FFS. Sorry I'm not such a post whore like you with having the constant need of looking at the thread 24/7. It's really annoying that you're going to call me out on, rather than anyone else.
This is why I hate talking to you. Every fucking action I do is scummy to you. This not an overreaction. You are just that god damn annoying.-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
So now you're admitting to the attempt of instigation, basically.RobCapone wrote:the lurking isn't as much of a scum tell to me
the defending the person calling you scummy and deciding to attack a person who is voting a person who was your scum read day 1 are bigger
also you admitting you made up a really weak case on Bill doesn't make sense if you are town. if you are town you don't make up a fake case on somebody, you make a case you believe in and if you don't believe in it than I have to conclude you are mafia.
I can't think of a time where I ever made a case I didn't believe in as town.
...
OH
MY
GOD.
-