Mini 1161 - Neruzian Era Mafia (Over!)
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
Unless I am mistaken, I am pretty sure Looker's vote on you was an RVS vote...Empking wrote:I think I should point out that despite the (artificially) large size of that last post it said absolutely nothing relevant to the game save the absurdity (which is almost certainally not true) of we should have three legitimate wagons before killing anyone.
Care to explain?* And you look like scum. VOTE: Empking¯\_(ツ)_/¯-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
Hey Faraday long time no see.
As tempted as I am to vote Faraday for his questionable choices in trouser-wearing, someone else has caught my eye.
Both of those reasons for voting Sloth sound no good to me, and here is why. As for your first accusation, pointing out something to Vi is not the same as buddying. People do this all the time, and there is nothing wrong with it. Second accusation = WTF. Overreaction? No. He was making a simple comment about not liking long nights. I saw exactlyNeuky wrote:
Unless he's a pal of yours, that sounds like buddying to me. I also see no reason for him to confirm your thoughts to you (presumably you already know what you meant). So, was he instead taking the opportunity to make me look more suspicious? I don't know of course, it's early days, but I don't like the buddying feel to it. (Yes I know town can buddy town etc, but to quote yourself, "Something seems off").Sloth wrote:I think it's the wagoning at the first sign of a semblance of a reasonable vote, Vi.
I also noticed Sloth's 1st hello post:
Bolded bit reads to me like an over-reaction to the question.Sloth wrote:Yes to the nights thing too, for the record.Long nights = boring as all hell.
VOTE: Sloth L-3nothingwrong with this statement. It seems to me that you are the one overreacting here. You get the slightest pressure and you start reaching for someone else to shift suspicions onto. Me no likey.
Unvote
Vote Neuky¯\_(ツ)_/¯-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
Unvote
Vote Empking
Zero scumhunting, way too much defending of himself with no real pressureat all(like half to 3/4 of his posts are this), and a poor vote on Quilford.
Scumreads: Empking, Scott, and Twisted Spoon. (In that order)
Townreads: Vi, Quilford, Charter, Zdenek, Faraday. (In that order)
Hiplop, you may have already answered this question, but why exactly did you ask if Quilford was at L-1?¯\_(ツ)_/¯-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
I am happy with my vote on Empking. He is playing completely different than the way he did in Mini 1105 when he was town, he didn't ask meaningless questions every sentence and he actually proactively looked for scum. His play this game is entirely different and is awfully scummy, all he has done is defend himself.confirm vote: Empking
Quilford isn't looking so good anymore, the observation someone made about him hiding from this thread right after he was wagoned to L-1 is spot on. Quilford, who are your top three scumreads? We have had 16 pages to come to conclusions, it shouldn't be that hard to come up with some reads.
Scott is looking better, although he was wrong in his description about Faraday's thoughts on Quilford. I dont think that was on purpose though, so Scott moves to null-leaning-town for now.
Sloth, Neuky, and Zdenek all look town to me.
Hiplop: why did you vote Empking in the first place? Why does he seem scummy to you?¯\_(ツ)_/¯-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
Empking wrote:pappums rat wrote:Unvote
Vote Empking
Zero scumhunting
Define "scumhunting". Also: Why do you think I did zero scumhunting?
, way too much defending of himself with no real pressureat all(like half to 3/4 of his posts are this),
Excluding this post where have I defended myself?
Well, I guess that is pretty much all the questions you have asked me directly, but all three of them have been pointless. All you have done all game is defend yourself and ask people questions about why they suspect you. You have mentioned where you thought there was some distancing and other things, but the vast majority of your posts have been self-defense.¯\_(ツ)_/¯-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
-
-
pappums rat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: November 20, 2010
Faraday wrote:Pappums that vig shot man was bad. Ts should have been NAILED to the wall night 1.
I know
I had figured TS was probably going to get lynched the following day anyway, and I was set on Neuky mainly due to these two posts:
Neuky wrote:
Unless he's a pal of yours, that sounds like buddying to me. I also see no reason for him to confirm your thoughts to you (presumably you already know what you meant). So, was he instead taking the opportunity to make me look more suspicious? I don't know of course, it's early days, but I don't like the buddying feel to it. (Yes I know town can buddy town etc, but to quote yourself, "Something seems off").Sloth wrote:I think it's the wagoning at the first sign of a semblance of a reasonable vote, Vi.
I also noticed Sloth's 1st hello post:
Bolded bit reads to me like an over-reaction to the question.Sloth wrote:Yes to the nights thing too, for the record.Long nights = boring as all hell.
VOTE: Sloth L-3
Neuky wrote:Name calling from Vi? - I'm a bit disappointed if indeed that's what it is. (We could all do that, but it'd end up a bit of a barney..)
Sometimes I log on and read, but don't have time to post. (I usually post at lunchtimes at work, or late evenings). I do try and keep up. I also see Quilford is active at the moment but not posting - but I'll not hold that against him unless it's part of a bigger case.
Anyway, as you are also online at the moment, what do you think of Sloth's comment on the shortened nights?
In my mind he was obvscum, and I didn't push him further because if I did and he didn't get lynched and then turned up dead day 2 the scum would have fingered me as the vig. Not that it would have mattered since I turned up dead from the mafia's kill. Thanks for thinking of me Vi. </3¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.