Two weeks isn't short; it's normal.Spoony 11 wrote:early nights andshort deadlines?
Mini 1161 - Neruzian Era Mafia (Over!)
-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Confirming and etc.
*votes "no" on Nights to ruin everyone else's fun**votes "yes" on Nights*
Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
*quickly changes first vote of VINDICTIVE HATE on charter*Juls 25 wrote:VOTE: Vi
We only vote the ones we love.
Vote: Neuky(L-6)
Something seems off, although I'm not sure I can explain it.
@mod: Probably V/LA this weekendEverything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
That's part of it.Sloth 37 wrote:I think it's the wagoning at the first sign of a semblance of a reasonable vote, Vi.
But, wait, aren't you encouraging others to do the same thing?Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Then it should be okay for you to give me YOUR opinion about the wagons right now, right?Sloth 39 wrote:Never said I was. I've only been asking about RVS wagons.
I'd also like to know what you think of Empking's accusation.
you didn't say anything in this post that empking didn't say in his post above yours, why quote so much if you're not going to say anything usefulhiplop 45 wrote:
you didn't say anything in this post, why quote so much if you're not going to say anything usefulLooker wrote:pappums rat wrote:Unvote
Vote: Sloth- You're doing it wrong.
Sloth wrote:Never said I was. I've only been asking about RVS wagons.- In reference to your wagon question, I think we should have three legitimate wagons before killing anyone.
charter wrote:
The bigger, the better.Sloth wrote:Charter, what are your thoughts on RVS wagons?- I agree.
- Your Empking vote's hilarious, by the way.
Empking wrote:Vote: Sloth- He looks like scum pretending to be useful.- And you look like scum. VOTE: Empking
---
I definitely think my Neuky vote is best right now. More than anyone else it seems like he's trying to hide.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
And it looks like the answer to "got thread?" is evidently "no".
---
Sloth, that was a bit of a dodge. We have better-than-random votes going down now. Why Hiplop over the various other nonrandom votes going around?
The "better than nothing" defense isn't particularly convincing; looking helpful and being scum are not mutually exclusive.
---
And what are you going to do about that?Teaspoon 64 wrote:
surely saying a vote is for pressure negates the point of it.charter wrote:Right now I could pick any of Looker, TS, or Pappums as people that need to get more pressure. So I pickVote Looker.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Time zones don't have anything to do with it.Sheepy 69 wrote:
Let's see - the game starts and in the 1st 24 hours I've posted my RV, and a reply to a question from Sloth. - hardly prod material yet. 10 hours later (while I'm asleep), Vi posts the above. Folks, please try and remember we are all in different time zones.Vi wrote:I definitely think my Neuky vote is best right now. More than anyone else it seems like he's trying to hide.
*RV post in the middle of evolving discussion
*Post clarifying that yes, you were actually trying to say as little as possible
I also saw your name on the active posters list while I was typing 36 and 38, so I knew you were around and not saying anything then too.
So you are correct about why I voted, and you even listed the suspect behavior I got back.
Actually, in this case I didn't. I felt kind of slow afterward. <.<le sheep 69 wrote:I also see no reason for[Sloth]to confirm your thoughts to you (presumably you already know what you meant).
I see why you're calling buddying on Sloth but I don't think that was what was actually happening.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
I do that to everyone; no offense is meant. You should be worried when I STOP doing that.Neuky 71 wrote:Name calling from Vi? - I'm a bit disappointed if indeed that's what it is. (We could all do that, but it'd end up a bit of a barney..)
You're overstating it quite a bit.Neuky 71 wrote:Anyway, as you are also online at the moment, what do you think of Sloth's comment on the shortened nights?
What was the point of post 77?
Sloth - I see why you voted hiplop; I was asking why him over the others.
Hey pap-rat, before I forget to ask again, what's your avatar from?
hiplop, who'sTown?
Unvote: Neuky(L-4)
Vote: Quilford
Blatant of Faraday is indeed blatant and indeed .Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Is there any reason you're still only talking about one person at a time?Sloth 90 wrote:Also, Vi,[hiplop]just read the scummiest to me at that point. Maybe it's just noobishness but his lack of any sort of opinion about the game is weak - however, I feel like his openness about his apathy is leaning towards a town tell.
You're asking a lot of theoretical questions but saying little to nothing about whether people are actuallyscummy.
No, I was calling Neuky a sheep because... he is a sheep.Quilford 93 wrote:Wait, weren't you just calling someone names for sheeping?
Unvote: Quilford(L-5)
Vote: Scott Brosius
Paragon of activity.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
+Annoying NeukyFaraday 98 wrote:Vi how much are you enjoying this game so far?
+Glad to have you here
-Not getting as far as I'd like
-because there are only like eight people playing
I'm not following your Sloth and T-spoon reads.
---
Quilford - When are you going to say something that isn't defensive?
---
Half the game is under the radar. Scott B. just decided to show up and say "hi, I'm under the radar! I like my on-wagon vote btw" and think he can get away with it.Neuky 101 wrote:@ Vi (and Quilford) I've noticed other players under the radar as well as Scott Brosius - is there any particular reason for voting him and not pursuing the others?
There are too many people absent for them all to be scum, and blanketly pursuing them all at once would be futile to say the least. Meanwhile, frankly there's not a lot to say to the people who ARE posting right now.
---
Empking 103 wrote:Vote: Vi - Gut
If they're the ones I'm thinking of, mostly humor.Empking 103 wrote:Vi: Those sheep comments. What was the point of them?
---
Hey Teaspoon, you realize that under your logic you're keeping a vote on a Townie, right? 'Might wanna change it.
---
hiplop 108 wrote:is quilford at l-1? i don't want to hammer but im sort of suspecting him now
Unvote: Scott Brosius(L-6 maybe)
Vote: hiplop
@mod: Vote count plz
---
pap-rat is Town.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Sloth's questioning makes more sense coming from someone who isn't interested in scumhunting.Faraday 115 wrote:I'll get back to you on the sloth/ts reads, if I can work them out. I think Sloth's questioning makes more sense as a townie but i don't knowEverything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Hey, I was supposed to be the first person to call Lurker... Lurker.Faraday wrote:@ Mod Prod Charter and Lurker
*pokes your reads a little more* *with glee*
---
While I'm here.
Empking, anyone you want to talk about? (notto, about)Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Elephant in room: The reasons for voting Qwilfish don't exist, at least not from anyone voting himSloth 123 wrote:Vi, why pick Hiplop over the others? Same question.sanscharter.
If hiplop can tell me how and when he started finding Quilford suspicious enough to jump on a wagon he thought was high enough to be around L-1, I will buy a hat so I can eat it.
*sets timer*
charter 122 wrote:Oh, Vi's vote on Scott was terribad as well.
Would you like to discuss the merits of those votes? I'm sure I'll come out on top.charter 124 wrote:Wow, Vi's hiplop vote was bad too, this is a disturbing pattern.
...Quilford 126 wrote:Yes, I am nervous scum.
1) That would require me to speak in a straightforward and non-circuitous manner. :vi:Quilford 126 wrote:1) Why would you not just state that you think I'm being defensive?
2) Why did you sheep my vote on Scott?
2) That depends on your definition of sheeping.
I voted Scott for the same reasons as you, but would have done so regardless of whether you had voted him or not.
"Sheeping" is blindly following someone's vote because they say so, like my vote on you was sheeping Faraday.
V/LA for weekendEverything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
It bothers me - I know I've been tempted to pull the sarcastic "yes, you're right, I'm scum" line when it was actually true.Quilford 129 wrote:
Why would you feel the need to quote this?Vi wrote:
...Quilford 126 wrote:Yes, I am nervous scum.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Too tired to catch up but doing it anyway.
Vi- Rumors of my "sheeping" have been greatly exaggerated.
Unless its definition changed to "not placing the first vote on someone" and I wasn't told about it.
"Not scumhunting" is actually kind of an offensive accusation but I don't care enough to rebut it right now.
but see belowSloth- Sloth's posts are still bad all the way down. I'm not Glork; people don't sheep me for my reputation unless they're scum, sarcastic, or see me going into top gear.
hiplop- has still not given any indication whatsoever as to why he would want to hammer (139) Quilford.
charter- You say that the Scott vote was a deflection from people who are "actively scummy"... like whom, at that time?
charter, cont.; Scott Brosius- The idea of me trying to protect Quilford from a single extra vote on a wagon I joined is ludicrous. In case my previous post didn't make it clear, there was no coherent case on Quilford. Pressing Neuky and Sloth wasn't going anywhere, so I voted with Faraday to see what he would do with a wagon. When someone I actually wanted to vote popped up, I moved my vote to him. This recent post from Scott B. pretty much demonstrates why again.
And really. Scum aren't interested in staying OFF wagons that look like they're going to a lynch. Scum are interested in finding whatever cheap excuses they can to stay ON wagons that are going to lynch. You of all people should know that.
charter, cont.; hiplop- I'm sure I explained the hiplop vote somewhere and it looks very different from how you pictured it... Oh, it's right here in my last post.
And it still doesn't exist.Vi 128 wrote:Elephant in room: The reasons for voting Qwilfish don't exist, at least not from anyone voting him sans charter.
If hiplop can tell me how and when he started finding Quilford suspicious enough to jump on a wagon he thought was high enough to be around L-1, I will buy a hat so I can eat it.
Faraday- Faraday being feminine in one post and a baller in the next is
I liked Faraday a lot before, but he's... actually being serious about the Quilford wagon. I know I'm tired and everything but I don't understand why he's so scummy he needs to be lynched.
Now that the wagon has gone down I'm very eager to see where he'll go now.
Empking- only posts to push Quilford toward getting lynched.
Quilford- has some bad ideas but the desperation isn't abjectly scummy like it seems some people are making it out to be. The L-1 wagon was a bad idea and the people on it are terrible human beings. Oh look, this parade should seem familiar.
Ignoring Faraday, it's probscum or better all the way down. I don't see myself voting anyone who ISN'T on this list Today.Neruz 188 wrote:Scott Brosius, Faraday, Sloth, charter, Empking, hiplop
Found Sloth 248. This is :goodposting: and charter's rebuttal in 249 is awful - it's not that you want to lynch claimed power roles, but that you specifically force yourself into lynching the first sap who claims. This is, again, something charter should know better than to do.
Sloth 251 gets it. So. Much.
---
tealdeer
Lynch one of these people. If your vote is on someone other than one of these people, you're doing it wrong.Neruz 188 wrote:Scott Brosius, Faraday,Sloth,charter, Empking, hiplop
hiplop is still an excellent vote for classic a-lurking, but charter is just about as good.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
It would be a somewhat easier decision to make if we had aMod: Vote Count...
How is charter scummier than hiplop specifically? Otherwise you should be joining MY wagon.
Or charter might answer that question for you now; it looks like he's postingEverything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
I was unsure on Sloth, and kind of still am.charter wrote:
Sloth and Quilford had serious votes. Looker was/is scummy.Vi wrote:You say that the Scott vote was a deflection from people who are "actively scummy"... like whom, at that time?
Quilford has been beaten into the ground.
Trying to explain to me how Scott B. isn't scummy and Looker is should be amusing; please try.
And if I was voting people for lurking that would be a problem.
Doesn't make sense at all. Scott wasn't the biggest lurker then or now.Vi wrote:When someone I actually wanted to vote popped up, I moved my vote to him. This recent post from Scott B. pretty much demonstrates why again.
eh wot
Hiplop did say why he thought Quilford was suspect.Vi wrote:charter, cont.; hiplop- I'm sure I explained the hiplop vote somewhere and it looks very different from how you pictured it... Oh, it's right here in my last post.
And it still doesn't exist.Vi 128 wrote:Elephant in room: The reasons for voting Qwilfish don't exist, at least not from anyone voting him sans charter.
If hiplop can tell me how and when he started finding Quilford suspicious enough to jump on a wagon he thought was high enough to be around L-1, I will buy a hat so I can eat it.
Post 95, whichever.
Post 126 was madeafterhiplop offered to nothammer.
That's actually what happened in one of my recent games (Of Rogues and Curses). We lynched scum D1 and D2, and the two or three or howevermany players who soft/claimed V. Townie early D1 were fairly obvTown from then on. That one troll who begged for us to stop claiming D1 was scum.
Ok, lets just massclaim then. Then we can lynch whoever. But YOU know that running up three people to claim day one is a terrible, terrible idea.Found Sloth 248. This is :goodposting: and charter's rebuttal in 249 is awful - it's not that you want to lynch claimed power roles, but that you specifically force yourself into lynching the first sap who claims. This is, again, something charter should know better than to do.
I remember I had another example when I made the previous post but I can't remember it now.
There's also the time when iamausername policy-forced the Town to lynch the first Vanilla who claimed. iaun was scum, AceMarksman was reasonably obviously Town.
Massclaiming has nothing to do with it.
---
Cut by Sloth - I'm going to stay a while longer because of what I noted under the third quote block.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Faraday 259 wrote:will get back to this when i get over the fact quilford isn't scum.Don't take your time.That is indeed one of the more disturbing V/LA posts I've seen.
I'd ask why, but the ensuing argument would be pointless so etc.charter 261 wrote:At that point, Looker was much scummier.
I've certainly pushed for power role lynchescharter 263 wrote:I can tell that you all won't have the balls to lynch someone who claims a power role today, so getting more people to claim is a bad idea.
Vote: Empking(L-4)
Sheeping pap-ratpap-rat is definitely going the right way.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
On second thought, go back to not taking your time.Vi 275 wrote:Faraday 259 wrote:will get back to this when i get over the fact quilford isn't scum.Don't take your time.That is indeed one of the more disturbing V/LA posts I've seen.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
How so?the wanting to lynch a vanilla thing isn't scummy, it's something i'd expect out of him regardless of alignment.
How so?I actually like his position w/r/t the quilford wagon before the claim very much.
Also,yes. (as inyesI've lost track of what you're saying)
--
@Empking: See catch-up post from last night.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
No comment on Faraday's post.
---
...who's Andrew?
I don't disagree that you're posting to maintain the status quo on bad wagons and asking why people want to chop your fishy head off.
I'm also not going to formalize my accusation, because I don't have to.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
@Empking -
Not necessarily
Not really; multiple people can look scummy at once
Parentheses don't match; I can't tell if there's a second part to this
When it's you asking people to provide a precise case against you, quite possibly.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
1) Gambits are the first one that comes to mind, though that probably wasn't the case here.
2) If he was actually getting lynched, what would that have done? The point is that it's not the silver bullet you're making it out to be.
4) Post 284 is one example.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
I think Quilford can answer that.Why do you think Quilford didn't vote me?
I refuse to believe you are this pedantic.You were making an absolute stament about "all" my posts. Surely its a null tell to want to unambigiously disprove that?Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
I doubt it.~Empking wrote:
Quilford can read your mind?Vi wrote:
I think Quilford can answer that.Why do you think Quilford didn't vote me?
I know what my answer is, but I'd like to see what Qwilfish says.
You can figure it out yourself.
Of course not. That's why I asked you to clarify the period time your "all" refered to.
I refuse to believe you are this pedantic.You were making an absolute stament about "all" my posts. Surely its a null tell to want to unambigiously disprove that?
You're not convincing me, and this is just wasting space and time.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
I think Quilford can see that remark in passing.Empking wrote:
Yet you make no attempt to get Quilfish to say something?Vi wrote:
I doubt it.~Empking wrote:
Quilford can read your mind?Vi wrote:
I think Quilford can answer that.Why do you think Quilford didn't vote me?
I know what my answer is, but I'd like to see what Qwilfish says.
Isn't your vote on quilford just for pressure anyway?Empking is definitely being scummy, though im not prepared to switch my vote from quilford yet, need a tad bit more convincing i suppose.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
What IS hiplop's scum meta?Twistedspoon 300 wrote:Sure, the L-1 reason for Quilford was horrendous by Hiplop, but I know his scum meta and this doesn't seem to follow suit :/
FTFY. Mostly on your end.Faraday 302 wrote:Vi/Faraday intereactions are so fucking awkward.
Everyone already knows what I'm talking about. Consider also the futility of convincing scum they are scum.Yoshi 309 wrote:Vi's #285: Why don't you feel the need to formalize your accusations of Emp?
---
Example please.hiplop 305 wrote:In your eyes, hip, what is the reason you're voting Quilford?
Hes scummy, everything he types seems forced
You can find the reasons people don't like Empking by reading the thread (specifically my posts and pap-rat's).Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
DarthYoshi is scum/my? You said that before but there's about as much reason behind it as usual.
I can see the idea behind charterscum wanting tokill kill killeveryone immediately because :charter: but I don't think NOT doing that is indicative of charterTown.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Teaspoon #21 wrote:Sure, the L-1 reason for Quilford was horrendous by Hiplop, but I know his scum meta and this doesn't seem to follow suit :/
So what you're saying is that this meta reason doesn't exist.Teaspoon #23 wrote:so yeah, I guess his meta is similar, however since I have no hiplop town meta, I can't make a conclusion as to if it is solely scum hiplop who posts fluff
Faraday 322 wrote:I'm not saying it's the strongest town tell ever, but I think it's pretty lgit.
Oh really.Faraday 316 wrote:and charter looks v town. his early play is strongly town
Looking back I think I can see why people are calling DarthYoshi scummy. So many semi-useless questions and clutter, relatively few meaningful statements. That and pap-rat isn't active lurking. (fake edit: typed before I saw charter's post)
That's an odd choice of smiley. I'm assuming you have a Town read on Faraday?Sloth 347 wrote:Faraday, you calling all my scumreads town is starting to get a little annoying
While Scott B.'s post physically hurt to read, I can't disagree with the accusation on Quilford. Three days gone (but not from the site) and comes back to show us what active lurkingreallylooks like.
I thought about switching my vote but Empking is avoiding this thread as much as Quilford.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
That was quick.
*I have a Town read on pap-rat
*He isn't trying to ask why he's getting picked on (let alone only saying that)
*He would read my post enough to know he's not the only one getting called out
Although whatever you have cake for, happythat.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
It would be really sweet if you thought that much of me. ♥Empking wrote:
So you're voting me because I'm avoiding the thread.Vi wrote:That was quick.
*I have a Town read on pap-ratAnd the reason you are of the opinion that I'm avoiding the thread is because you find me scummy.I'm pretty sure there's a flaw in your logic somewhere.
It verifies the accusation, yes.
So the reason you said I'm avoiding the thread is because after saying that I asked why I was getting picked on?*He isn't trying to ask why he's getting picked on (let alone only saying that)
I called pap-rat Town a long time ago and he hasn't done anything to shake that read.
Yes but you most definitely weren't calling out PR for some reason.*He would read my post enough to know he's not the only one getting called out
Explain.Yeah after seeing your response I'm pretty sure that whole comment "While Scott B.'s post physically hurt to read, I can't disagree with the accusation on Quilford. Three days gone (but not from the site) and comes back to show us what active lurking really looks like.
I thought about switching my vote but Empking is avoiding this thread as much as Quilford." was just distancing from your budddy.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
ITT I'm not allowed to have more than one suspect?
I also wasn't referring to changing my vote to Quilford.
And, I just got out of a game where two of the three scum were lurkers, not badposters. What say we do things right this time?~Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
His name starts with 'h' and ends in 'iplop'.Empking 374 wrote:Who were you planning on changing your vote to?
@Faraday 376 - The thing is, it's not the inconsistencies that look bad, it's the lack of information at all.
Wait wait wait. I'm all for a hiplop lynch but not on policy grounds.Teaspoon 377 wrote:either way, Hiplop will have to be lynched eventually, and I don't see why not now. He's a lylo hazard to say the least
Is hiplop scum, or is hiplop useless?
Zdenek, come over to the Empking wagon. We're serving flounder, and it doesn't even talk back unless you poke it with a fork.
Scott - If you don't have a second scum read, do you have any Town reads?Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
I'll compromise by adding you to Zdenek's invitation to the sushi bar.Faraday 385 wrote:god damn it I don't even know. he fooled the fuck out of me last time. but I REALLY don't think he's doing that here.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
:fail:Faraday wrote:Empking ( 3 ) - pappums rat, Vi, Faraday
The stuff you can find in a university cafeteria is pretty good, if expensive and possibly not even sushi to begin with.Faraday wrote:I fucking hate sushi though. Actually, lying, never tried it, just assume I'd hate it.
Anything that's even close to the wasabi is almost too hot for me, though.
---
pap-rat - Scott B. is null leaningTown?Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
I'm undecided. His posts are bad, but they're blatant enough about it that I knowDarthYoshi wrote:@Vi: What's your current read on Scott?Iwouldn't do that as scum at least. Then again, I'm not a lot of people I know - Untrod Tripod-scum badposted his way through my most recent game, for instance. Pushing things scum-side is that his sig says that he's played over 20 games (most of them as Town), so it's not like he has no idea what he's doing.
I feel like there's something missing but I'm ADDing right now so etc.
Truthfully right now I'd rather lynch Empking and let Scott come out in the wash.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
That doesn't answer the question.Twistedspoon 397 wrote:
at the worst, scumVi wrote:
Wait wait wait. I'm all for a hiplop lynch but not on policy grounds.Teaspoon 377 wrote:either way, Hiplop will have to be lynched eventually, and I don't see why not now. He's a lylo hazard to say the least
Is hiplop scum, or is hiplop useless?
at the least, a LyLo hazard
both of which merit a lynch before LyLo at the very least. I highly doubt scum will kill hiplop if He's town, unless he is a strong, revealed PR :/
Neruz's mod commentary is made ofEverything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Was it the pushing of the Quilford wagon while it was easy that changed your mind, or the FoSses on easy targets?pap-rat 414 wrote:After reviewing your iso, I have to agree with you. I was mistaken, it seemed to me that you had been more defensive than you actually were. You have asked a lot of questions, but they have not been pointless. So I will unvote and re-read the thread with this in mind.
---
I was ADD-high when I read through Quilford's reaction; I'm more interested in his terrible wagon.Scott B. 418 wrote:I still don't understand why Quil's reaction to being at L-1 has everyone running. As I said earlier, the fact that his participation collapsed after the wagon disappeared is more telling than any "WELP THOUGHT HE WOULD CLAIM PR" baseless thought.
---
Optimistically, if Scott B. is Town and is having trouble getting into the game, it's a good place for him to start.DarthYoshi 420 wrote:The reason I ask is because I wonder about the benefit to be gained of asking scummy-ish looking players for town reads. If Scott doesn't have suspects, then he's probably either scum and won't be NKed (unless we have a vig/SK in the setup) or won't be NKed anyways if he's town because he isn't showing much interest in scumhunting. I'm not sure why you think he'll come out in the wash, then, and asking him to give out potentially unfounded towncred sounds like a dicey proposition.
More importantly, it forces him to take a stand on someone other than Quilford.
As it stands the focus on Quilford to the exclusion of everyone else is way out of place. Quilford looks bad, we get it. He's not the only person worth suspecting.
@Scott:Empking wagon, Y/N
---
Ithoppip 422 wrote:thats not the case though,i had a scumread on Empking, i asked for further explanation on him as i wanted to know if others were thinking the same as meistoo much to ask to get you to explain why, isn't it.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Gammagooey isn't in this game and it's not "literally", but basically this.Faraday 449 wrote:vote twistedspoon
literally claimed scum in twilight, gg.
Vote: Twistedspoon(L-4)
Faraday 450 wrote:if there's a miller in the game they should claim now IMO.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
I have a major problem with this.Sloth 459 wrote:
I have a major problem with this.DarthYoshi wrote:Vote: TwistedSpoon.
What Faraday said.
Baaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Vi 457 wrote:
Convincing of what?Sloth 456 wrote:Faraday you're gonna have to do an awful lot of convincing.
---
I don't think I've ever seen anyone distance themselves from a lynch THAT much while still validating it in what Qwilfish bolded.Teaspoon 462 wrote:is the reason because I'm not scum? Has anyone given a reason why my post in twilight was terribad?Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Faraday 476 wrote:[drawn-out Cop charade]
>_>
Oh, that makes sense. Carry on then.
hiplop's reaction is decidedly NOT what I would expect from scum in that situation.
No, especially with the post that came afterward.Faraday 477 wrote:Is this a townie reaction? It sort...sort of looks like one but I really don't know.
---
You're not talking about Twistedspoon where possible (although you're implying that the votes on him are bad), and I'd like to know why.Sloth 467 wrote:
Convincing me that Charter is town.Vi wrote:
Convincing of what?Sloth 456 wrote:Faraday you're gonna have to do an awful lot of convincing.
DarthYoshi's sheep vote is much much worse than Vi's or Faraday's because I honestly don't think he knows why he's voting for Twistedor why Twisted is confirmed scum.
Especially in light of the bolded, considering you had a chance to vote Teaspoon after Faraday claimed Cop and before Teaspoon got to L-2.
---
charter - Why no vote?Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Nobody said "confirmed scum" until you did. Someone said "claimed scum", which is something entirely different.Sloth 487 wrote:Anyways, the "confirmed scum" should have been in quotes.
Sloth 487 wrote:I don't think the votes on him are bad - stop putting words in my mouth.
so etc.Sloth 467 wrote:DarthYoshi's sheep vote is much much worse than Vi's or Faraday's
No, but that doesn't answer the issue I had long before you made that post.Sloth 489 wrote:And Vi, did you miss 479?
Why didn't you vote or even acknowledge Teaspoon until then?Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Not to plow a dead horse but you're saying Twistedspooncharter 493 wrote:Vi wrote:charter - Why no vote?
charter wrote:TS's jumping on Faraday's "guilty" on Hiplop gives TS loads of scumpoints.That's where my vote would be going, but if TS gets to L-1, his buddies will quicklynch him.isdefinitely getting lynched Today, correct? (else you would be voting someone else)
---
1) I'm willing to stop arguing over this. (The phrase "much much worse" btw)Sloth 494 wrote:
1) Where in there does it say that you and Faraday's votes are bad?Sloth 467 wrote:DarthYoshi's sheep vote is much much worse than Vi's or Faraday's
2) And about spoony I didn't think much else needed to be said. I wanted to focus on my target.
2) So let me get this straight.
Faraday: "Twistedspoon claimed scum in Twilight"
Sloth: "Pretty much nothing more to say there, VOTE: someone else"
Do you think charter has a better chance of being scum than Twistedspoon, even though you agree that Teaspoon isconfirmedclaimed scum?Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Um... yes?Teaspoon 509 wrote:does anyone understand how I claimed scum in twilight or<etc.>
---
Zdenek 508 - The post you quoted doesn't actually demonstrate anything
But look at it.
If hiplop claims Miller or yelps about a Framer, then Teaspoon is already in position to disbelieve it. If hiplop doesn't do any of the above, then clearly hiplop is the lynchTeaspoon wrote:you got a guilty on hiplop did you?
then I am pleased my suspicions were correct
VOTE: hiplop
*expects hiplop to claim miller or yelp about a framer*du jourbecause lolguilty. No matter how hiplop responded, Teaspoon was going to park a vote on him.
I twitched the first time I read the part of your post directed at Scott, but then I checked and sawScott B. #9 wrote:Vi, spoon appear town.Scott B. #10 wrote:Spoon, charter, quilford top scum reads now.
Scott B., what happened to override that Town read?Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Maybe I should rephrase.charter 524 wrote:
It looks like this will be the case, but unfortunately I don't get all the say in who gets lynched, just a small part.Vi wrote:Not to plow a dead horse but you're saying Twistedspoon is definitely getting lynched Today, correct?
Twistedspoon is the person you are definitely intending to lynch Today, correct?
Qwilfish 527 wrote:Also, a hammer would be bad considering how far away from deadline we are.
Both of you - why?Zdenek 529 wrote:If I was voting, I'd be voting Twistedspoon, but I see no reason to end the day quickly, so I'm happy to leave him at L-2.
Sloth 526 wrote:Claimed scum is obviously an exaggeration - I thought what he did in twilightwas scummy, yes, but thatdoesn't make him 100% scum in my eyes.
"He's not as scummy as advertised" (keeping in mind what everyone has been saying) to "I think he's scum, just like you do"?Sloth 533 wrote:When did I ever say that I think TS is town?I think he's scum, just like the rest of you.
(To answer your complaint in advance - no, this isn't an unfair paraphrase.)
---
I owe this game a reread.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Actually, I think it's time for YOU to start talking about last words and so forth. Your claim doesn't matter at this point.Twistedspoon wrote:
uh have you been reading the thread?Zdenek wrote:Since there's not much else to talk about since my last post:
Vote Twistedspoon
not much to talk about?
my claim for starters maybe?Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Faraday 554 - ...Fair.
Most of the time, no, scum don't have daytalk in Normals.Faraday 555 wrote:Hey Vi do you think the scum have daytalk? I think that'd make DY far more likely scum.
Twistedspoon -Less whining, more advice.Really? Good riddance.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Faraday wrote:whatFaraday wrote:VIG AND SK AND MAFIA
All of the above. I didn't think three-kill games were allowed in the Mini queue, and I review them. We can probably also bank on three Mafia instead of two if there are three kills - otherwise the entire Mafia can be wiped out in one Night. If nothing else, it's better to prepare for the worst.Faraday wrote:someone look for a charter breadcrumb thing or something.
wait, the most probable set-up is 8/3/1 isn't it so we've got like fucking 3 scum left mad.
I don't see anything in charter's posts that would suggest anything useful.
What this game needs right now is some NK psychology. Please hold...
I'm sure it has to do with my ridiculously awesome performance right now. 8)Faraday 570 wrote:so like this was me wondering why the fuck Vi isn't dead yet.
Or my comic relief powahs.
...or that I've been spinning my wheels all game. Though toward the end of D2 that was deliberate.
Re: massclaim - With two Town power roles down, there can't be much left to claim. On the other hand there's probably not much we can do.
Cut by DarthYoshi starting what I'm sure is going to be a fun Day for me... and... geez let me post.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
There's a point and you're missing it.DarthYoshi wrote:Vi--I actually disagree re: massclaim and town PRs. With two kill factions (presumably) plus a vig, there's gotta be 1-2 protective/RB roles in the setup methinks.
That's pretty much NOT the response I've gotten in my last few games, please and thank you. (and I played about as well in them as I have in this one)Faraday 579 wrote:and i think people would be like OMG Vi too.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Is that so.DarthYoshi 572 wrote:BTW, FWIW, charter opened D2 with saying that he "re-read" me and found me to be less scummy. That might be as close to a breadcrumb as we're going to get.
This is the part where you claim.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Then... a Track on you wouldn't clear you of anything at all. There would be no point in breadcrumbing that kind of investigation.DarthYoshi 583 wrote:
I'm pretty dumb. What point am I missing?Vi wrote:There's a point and you're missing it.
PEdit: Fine. I'm VT.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Somewhat, yes.Faraday wrote:oh now, it lowers his odds of being scum as scum have a roleblocker and guy that commits a nightkill.. i thought you had something juicy.
I'm not confident that it's a breadcrumb to begin with, but then who reads things overNight?~
@Faraday: We're at seven players. Either 4-2-1 or 5-1-1. Or knowing my luck there's something else I'm overlooking. In the former case we're actually in trouble. In the latter case we're one worst-case from Prisoner's Dilemma. Either way if we miss Today we're pretty much reliant on crosskills.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Penn and Teller would disapprove of me saying "impossible" but that's the general idea. An extra killing role on top of a full Vigilante wouldn't be allowed.Faraday wrote:
what if I told you I thought the set-up was 5/2 still. do I sound insane? is it likely?Vi wrote:@Faraday: We're at seven players. Either 4-2-1 or 5-1-1. Or knowing my luck there's something else I'm overlooking. In the former case we're actually in trouble. In the latter case we're one worst-case from Prisoner's Dilemma. Either way if we miss Today we're pretty much reliant on crosskills.Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
Wait a minute, that just brings me back to where I started.Vi wrote:
Penn and Teller would disapprove of me saying "impossible" but that's the general idea. An extra killing role on top of a full Vigilante wouldn't be allowed.Faraday wrote:
what if I told you I thought the set-up was 5/2 still. do I sound insane? is it likely?Vi wrote:@Faraday: We're at seven players. Either 4-2-1 or 5-1-1. Or knowing my luck there's something else I'm overlooking. In the former case we're actually in trouble. In the latter case we're one worst-case from Prisoner's Dilemma. Either way if we miss Today we're pretty much reliant on crosskills.
...on second thought, maybe it's not implausible.
Okay, I'm lost. *gives you a hint coin*Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5