In post 488, Ashblade wrote: In post 448, Pseudonymous wrote:Ashblade, that kind of sounds hypocritical of you. Weren't you gone for a few days a while ago? Is it okay not to say anything if you declare V/LA? That's...neat.
Also, some friend you are, trying to beat your friends open like a pianta. I bet you're the kind of sadist who likes to kidnap people who are really close to you, then torture them behind a mask, scarring their flesh with a whip while laughing like a madmen. And when you're bored of that, you release them, and them comfort them, easing their pain, but really, you're just laughing inside your head because you're so evil!
Anyway, I was worried I'd have to replace out for a while, but I should be able to post an acceptable amount every day. If I don't, feel free to shoot me, lynch me, tie me up and whip me...whatever. I'm going to read through this again now.
Difference from me and you. When I'm not busy I post and when I'm busy I tell people I'm busy and try to post later to make up for it. Your posts are not playing the game and you haven't done anything for this. Before you get to go the 'hypocrite' card you need to think before you act.
And I think you need to learn something about giving friends crap, because we do it all the time. I swear though if you are using my post which if anyone thought I seriously thought TK was a pinata role they need to get their head examined.
Giving your friends crap, sadism, it's all basically schadenfreude, so basically you're a sadist, no matter how you try to justify it. I feel sorry for this Thirdkoopa fellow if you try to break him open like this all the time. But hey, it only makes you a freak if you think you're a freak for being sadistic...but you're denying that, aren't you? So basically you're admitting that you're a sadistic freak Ashblade? You don't need to deny it though. I think it's wonderful that you're a sadist. You shouldn't be hiding that; you should tell the world! You should put it on your resume, so that masochists will know that you're the perfect employee for them! I mean, you enjoy inflicting pain, they love having pain inflicted upon themselves...it's a match in heaven...the things you might end up doing may not be so pristine, but...well, as long as you're enjoying yourself, that's all that matters, right? Of course, I understand feeling ashamed about deriving pleasure from your love one's pain, but hey, that's who you are, and you can't change that!
You have a point, though, Ashblade. It doesn't look like I've really been playing the game, does it? Well, right now, it's because you guys are plain difficult to read. I mean, I meant to comment on it earlier, but I was enjoying replying to you so much that I forgot: this Day One was essentially everyone grasping that every single thing they could find, and acting like it was grounds for a solid argument. I found it silly trying to find some basis in all of that, and it's not like I know any of you particularly well, so I can't say something like "X is scummy because X does this as scum" or anything. But it's a start, right? The start of a mafia game is always going to be fuzzy, and there's nothing you can do about it.
Of course, we're past that stage now, so now we can hopefully have something to go off of.
In post 444, chkflip wrote:VOTE: Monk
Sorry guys, I forgot to bookmark this thread so I'd know when day started. Re-reading now.
This is a blatant empking sheep.
You voted Monk before you read anything? You really were just voting with whoever everyone else was voting with?
Later on, you read and agree with him anyway, but why'd you vote before reading in the first place?
Well, these two votes seem out of nowhere. Empking says it's a gut vote, and Hiraki doesn't list any reasoning. Maybe something from Day 1, but I'm not going to try to re-re-read that.
Later on, Empking switches to monk for this.
In post 440, Empking wrote:
In post 384, monk wrote:Mute thoughts on Killjoy?
Killjoy thoughts on Mute?
In post 391, monk wrote:They are my two scum picks at the moment and neither of them have said anything about the other, that is the reasoning I could care less that they have votes on them
CASE
I wonder how valid this pretending to scumhunt point is. I guess it's weird that his two top scumpicks happened to just have been voted...
Now Hiraki also votes monk, because of this quote which seems to convince Hiraki that monk is only pretending to scumhunt.
In post 391, monk wrote:They are my two scum picks at the moment and neither of them have said anything about the other, that is the reasoning I could care less that they have votes on them
I guess I can see how that could be convincing...
Well, while i was typing this, I thought that Empking and Hiraki seemed just a bit buddy buddy, but not really now. Now, I'm more interested in chkflip. And I'll make a vote just to make a vote.
VOTE: chkflip
Maybe it's just me, but when quoting a post, you should erase image links. Takes up useful space, y'know?
