Open 17 - Strawberry (Game Over) before 416

[IH]

vote:Ripley

Your FACE sounds fishy!

[IH]

I'll Rip l yee a new one?

Where's yer green shirt!?!?! It's green shirt thursday for wednesday!

[IH]

unvote, vote:Rosso

D00D I AM TEH BUSSING YOUZORZ LAWL, SH!

[IH]

unvote, vote:SV

You can't own land in Mexico if you live in America!

[IH]

Mm, I'm pretty sure I like a

unvote, vote:Brewski

The last time I heard a newbie accusing someone of not having proof and such, they were scum.

oh yes they were.

[IH]

May I ask why we are reaching a conclusion so fast on Brewski?

Maybe we should get him to roleclaim first. Many newbies are overeager, but that doesn't necessarily mean guilty.

We're just getting out of the random voting stage, not lynching.

Post 59:Earwig, just curious but.... whenever there was a little contention from a 3 person bandwagon, why did you unvote so quickly? He wasn't in danger of being lynched...

FoS:Earwig

Also I'd say that I'd think of Berries relating to female first. = D
Not like it matters or anything, but Berries just seem more feminine.
Of course I KNOW better because I look at gender tags. = ) Fill out your gender people, and pay attention to the tags. Life goes smoother.

[IH]

unvote, vote:RossoCarne

vote:kilmenator

that finishes it.
NAR has been compltely useless and following on everyones coattaails and now that his replacement has posted this its pretty much done. Synopsis posts are so fucking useless: i can just go read back, theres no analysis, and shit could be skewed if people were too lazy to read.

Also, anyone who defends lurkers because theres nothing to talk about needs to be killed NOW NOW NOW and then the lurkers need to be killed too

....So a you think someone is scummy.... but don't really say anything to much until that player is replaced. It confirms it for you from someone doing a reread post? That some people would be to lazy to read? How is this suspicious?

[IH]

unvote

Whoaaaa, a wagon to lynch minus two in around three hours of my post...

vote:Brewski

If you're going to be wagoning scum, at least TRY not to echo the person before you

[IH]

You put him at minus two. Did you even consider his response?

Looked like wagoning scum trying to hop on the wagon with someone elses reasoning.

Long days=Good for the town.

[IH]

Pot 116, appeal to emotion.

[IH]

I'll get into this game more this week (as well as alot of my other ones) whenever I'm not at the lake.

CAUSE WE'RE ROCKIN LIVE AT SPRING BREAK!

[IH]

(Dude, seriously, you voted her for having a longish post and summarizing when she

replaced

)

[IH]

Does nobody check the V/LA thread anymore? = |

Post coming later in the day.

[IH]

@ Al4xz

FoS:Berry

Secret scumtells are never good.

[IH]

So why is Brewski still alive? THis is clearly opportunistic scum....

[IH]

Actually, newbies say unknown alot. Regardless of alingment.

[IH]

Bah, I'm here.

[IH]

I'd say Brewski is the best lynch today....

[IH]

FoS:Jd and Acfan

Acfan has been unavailable for around a month or so, I will vouch for that, as he had to be replaced in the last nightless game I was in. (open 16 I think)

Two seconds and I will give my thoughts on Brewski.

[IH]

Mod:

Can we have a votecount, so we know where we stand for the deadine in two days?

[IH]

Here here here, I need to reread.

[IH]

Alright guys, sorry, I just could not get into this game at all. I will admit that yesterday I was voting Brewsky for suspicions at the very beginning of the game, and apologize for being a filthy lurker.

FoS:Rosso

I think.... Just a small point, but I think he recognized Brewski was the cop. He seemed to notice more than others in the early game that Brewski was over eager, and continually mentioned the cop. THis is just more of a gut feeling and delving into something unproveable. Nothing voteworthy, but something worth mentioning.

*(Note, Brewski also repeatedly said it would be a mistake to lynch him, so that might have tipped him off als -_-)

May I ask why we are reaching a conclusion so fast on Brewski?

Maybe we should get him to roleclaim first. Many newbies are overeager, but that doesn't necessarily mean guilty.

FoS:Kilemenator

ranger said maybe. I don't consider this pushing. I wouldn't even consider an FoS because of this one statement. Although, I have to wonder about you - in post 45 you seem awfully quick to jump on a bandwagon. Then in post 50 you get on ranger's case for suggesting we try to get someone to roleclaim. That makes me wonder about you. I'm not ready to FoS you yet, let alone vote, but:

FoS

No, he was pretty much hinting at a claim without coming out and saying it. You IGMEOYed him, but what he did wasn't scummy at all.

I still don't like Rosso's post 87. That was frickin useless, and a crap reason to vote somebody. He said he hated synopsis posts, but how can that be any kind of indication to alignments, ESPECIALLY for replacements?

It just seemed to me like an extra reason to put some force behind his vote on NAR/replacement IMO

oh and also, theres really nothing to respond to on that wagon, it came from nowhere for no good reason.

This was a lie.

I'm not exactly sure of the way Rosso was trying to unsubstantiate posts. It doesn't seem like the ways I've seen him as town before. It has variated slightly it seems....... The attitude hasn't changed, but the way he has been saying things isn't sitting right with me....

More like post 104. The last games I've played he didn't do that at all. The only purpose it served was to try and make Kilem's posts to look bad. Bleh.

*shrug* i bear down on someone for pretty damn just reasons and thats the basis of an attack?

can't really defend against that one.

why dont we just attack anyone who attacks anyone? That'd work great. USE YOUR HEADS PEOPLE!

Not to mention he tries to unsubstantiate the case even further. "Why don't we just attack anyone who attacks anyone", but the votes were clearly for not that reason. The votes were there because he voted for someone for posting a frickin synopsis.

FOS:JDodge

Post 129

Al4xz says in post 143 that he thinks that Rosso is town, but puts a vote on him.

I don't like SV's defense of Rosso either..

unvote whoever, Vote: kilmenator

If kil isn't scum you can lynch me next. Something he/she said reaks of scummyness. I read something and instantly knew he/she was scum. I'll tell you what it is once I realize it, but trust me kilmenator is scum.

FOS FOS FOS

No! Secret scumtells are always scummy!

Then JD in his following posts give him excuses? Instead of asking what it was? Pretty much supplies reasons......

Ripley's post 162 was good.

What I want to know is why Ripley's vote stayed on Caddock the whole game until the

8th

page.

I don't really see SV doing anything this game except for defending others.... I will go through her posts with the filter after this.

I think it was strange that the Acfan wagon took off. I personally think that scum helped jumpstart their buddies wagon.

On the COMPLETE opposite hand, we have Earwig, who lamely defended Acfan.

I don 't understand how the Rosso case was dulled down to being abrasive and annoying? He wasn't being just abrasive and annoying, he was doing it for a STUPID reason? He pushed a wagon on someone for replacing NAR, who was being stupid (which was scummy, I'llk give him that), and then added onto it opportunistically by saying that long posts and recap posts are scummy and making that the main basis of his case.

He first says that synopsis posts are scummy because someone could twist it around when they could read the real thing. But that means there is lazy town, and the only person who is likely to read a long post and not go back and double check is scum.

Not only that, he then revised his position by saying that synopsis posts are only not scummy when they provide an analysis, and even mentioned Kilem's paragraph of her opinions of such, before shooting it down.

He also said that Kilem had been uncomittal and had not given any opinions, which were certainly untrue.

JD also tried to save Acfan who had JUST claimed scum without asking for a deadline extension. In other words, giving the scum a free nightkill.

Bleh, this day has me conflicted...... As scummy as Rosso has been... JD and Earwig's defense and connections to Acfan draw me more to want to vote for them.

Vote:JD

[IH]

If no one has reached a majority at the deadline, no one will be lynched.

In other words, a normal lynch. He specified it earlier, I'm sure of it.

[IH]

That one AND the next one.

[IH]

yeah, that's like his other post. He really never addressed it, just tried to dismiss it with a comment, and never really took a stance. Just.... give a halfhearted answer and wait for it to leave.

[IH]

SV, what about JD? Just find Earwig a better play, or did you not notice JD?

[IH]

No, I'm saying they are about on even in scumminess.
I chose JD, because, if anything, his was less blatant. It was closer to being more of an insinuation, or just trying to look like he didn't care.

1.Yeah, but the roleclaim probably wasn't Acfan's claim being scum. Was it?
2.Just after the mod posted his deadline rules though?

[IH]

I'm ready for MM to catch up. Is it today yet?

or tomorrow?

<.<;;

[IH]

Abandon? VitR is still around? Why should we abandon it?

Plus, nobody ever looks in scumchat for replacements.

[IH]

[What are we stopping talkign about? I am not going to wait anymore to post my analysis at this point ebcause this game seems to be dying, plus, I feel comfortable putting pressure on a couple of people without finishing up. I am suspicious of IH-reasons previously stated, Earwig-his current behavior and some previous behavior, and blackberry-reasons previously stated. Being that I find IH the most likely to be scum at this point, I am going to
Vote:IH

So, despite every single one of these points linking Earwig and JD, you find me to be most likely scum?

May I ask why?

[IH]

unvote, Vote:Earwig

This is ridiculous.

I already said why I find you scummy IH, go ahead and take a look at my previousl posts, they outline it... and I could be down with a Earwig vote or a blackberry vote, but I am most comfortable with an IH vote as his scumminess has been more under the radar IMO, and scum most likely like to lay low, (at least in my experience they have.)

Yes I was under the radar.

I didn't post for like 10 pages.

Now would you call that being under the radar or lurking?

[IH]

Oh, and IH, could you please explain your last post? To me, it seems like you're admiting to lurking the first 10 pages or so.

Yes. There is a difference between lurking and being under the radar (Which I would consider actively lurking)

[IH]

:teach: Rosso is always anxious for a lynch!

Second of all, lurking and staying under the radar are two different things. Staying under the radar would mean I was posting and reading the game, but not committing to anything, just giving the sense I was here.

Lurking is just not posting, not reading the game, just not being here.

Probably a big pst coming, and I won't be here from sunday-Friday

[IH]

Wow. What a ridiculous argument.

You're willing to vote for earwig, because he's scummy.

But you find me to be scum more, because I'm scum like scummy scum, but not just scummy.

Seriously. "He's not scum, but he is scum scum" I was away for an entire week, and I'm trying to catch up because next week I'll be gone with probably NO access.

[IH]

Back guys I'm back, I'll go over the last few pages in a little bit, but I want to know what the heck Nabanov thinks of how I avoided the earwig accusations. I essentially started them against him AND JD.

[IH]

Sorry guys, this game died, and I kind of left it off my priorities when I came back.

Reading and such.

[IH]

Why haven't i been replaced? = |