Open 24-Texas Justice Mafia (GAME OVER) - before 460

Guardian · Post Post #177 (isolation #0) » Tue Jun 26, 2007 4:21 pm

I've read this game twice. The three scum are ThAdmiral, Whome?, and xyz. None of them should live to see tomorrow. I fully expect a perfect win in this game.

ThAdmiral's method of "confirming" a townie, is complete bullshit - the scum have a nightkill. He wants to have an "I shot such and such, I am confirmed" tactic. Plus Jdodge is voting him. I mean come on, who can argue with that?

The initial Whome? wagon was complete BS, but a few pages back, in his weather forecast, notice how he OMGUS's three of the players on his wagon and votes Simenon. Notice how he TheAdmiral also votes Simenon. It's cute when the scum do that.

Nar also reeks of scumminess. His random vig = good idea policy is absolutely horrible for the town, and I definitely feel that nar felt he could get away with it. Xyz, bad luck on replacing in too late... but even then, I love how xyz voted Jdodge for not leading enough. Notice how Jdodge is pushing a ThAdmiral wagon - a wagon that has failed to attract even one additional player! Yet xyz felt the need to vote for him.

This game is too easy.

vote: Whome?

as he has the most votes of the three.

Guardian · Post Post #179 (isolation #1) » Tue Jun 26, 2007 4:50 pm

Oh? What makes you imagine that? To me, it seems like a horrible, anti-town, plan, devised by scum. How's that for discussion?

.

Guardian · Post Post #189 (isolation #2) » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:37 pm

Asking for a claim in a game named OPEN 24 with exactly two different roles is also scummy.

.

Guardian · Post Post #196 (isolation #3) » Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:08 pm

YogurtBandit wrote:Xyzzy, you just put yor scumbuddy at -1.

qft

Can someone lynch WhoMe? yet?

Guardian · Post Post #198 (isolation #4) » Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:12 pm

The polite version is "quoted for truthery".

Any objection to being lynched? I got your buddies correct, right?

Guardian · Post Post #210 (isolation #5) » Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:30 am

I probably won't use my vig as ThAdmiral and xyz are likely to be shot by others, and if I'm wrong I'd rather save my bullet for now. I am not sure to what extent claiming in advance that you are going to use your vig kill is a good idea; it gives the scum more information to decide how to use

their

kill. On the other hand, it helps others decide if they should use their shots and if so who to target. Any thoughts on this?

Jordan, I would be happy voting xyz too, another likely scum, but Whome? has definitely been as scummy or more scummy than xyz, and has failed to defend himself (I feel I've given him ample time) from my accusation that his FOS's were just one huge OMGUS, and also has failed to build a substantive case on anyone.

Guardian · Post Post #214 (isolation #6) » Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:14 pm

Thank you! Finally! With Jdodge on ThAdmiral and Albert on xyz, I'm definitely saving my bullet.

Guardian · Post Post #236 (isolation #7) » Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:59 am

Gah. Would have made the same post if I were town, seriously. Didn't see a choice but to bus my partners there, those three as scum was my analysis before replacing in. Was kinda shocked when I was scum.

I shot Jdodge, a vig must have shot you Simenon.

gg town...