I watched Shrek 3 in French last night. Hope you are impressed.
Mini 497 - Game Over
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
As a mod and game balancer, having a jester in a mini normal is highly highly unlikely.kabenon007 wrote:I don't know if this type of character cxan exist in a mini normal, but I have seen a character called the Jester or something like it, I think. And his win condition is to have the town lynch him. I doubt dusterhan is a jester, that doesn't seem to be likely in a mini normal. But his playing has been odd. None of his posts have been clear in any way, almost every one has some sort of enigma in it. He plays almost like he's trying to get us to believe he is scum or something, which, even if he is town, is extremely unhelpful to the town as a whole.-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
This is quite clearly an exaggeration.Knuck wrote:Vote: Aimee
Also Dusterhan why are you trying to get rid of Sephiroth, you have a reason right?
Dusterhan only voted for Sephiroth - there was basically no danger of him being lynched.
I'm curious about this reply, since Sephiroth here seems far too defensive about a random vote.Sephiroth wrote:
What is the reasoning behind your vote for me? What do you hope to gain by voting as you are?dusterhan wrote:Hey people!!!!
Vote: Sephiroth
cos he's got the most vote so far.
8)-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
No, you quite clearly also say that "going with the flow is scummy", and then say he is confusing and "anti-town". This most certainly suggests that you find him scummy.Sephiroth wrote:The biggest attack I had on Duster. I said I was liking him less and less, I didnt even actually call him suspicious in any of my posts, simply call that one post suspect.
Also,FoS: Atticus. I notice he's managed to post a number of times, yet hasn't actually commented on any of the major issues at this point.-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
Yeah, okay.Sephiroth wrote:I quite clearly say I consider one action that he took to be suspect. Not that he was scummy. Pretty much everyone here has been guilty of at least one action I've found suspect, but do I think everyone is scummy? No. Also, I didn't call him anti town or confusing, I said his comment was.
I can understand this opinion actually. Normally when someone says "X did something which I find scummy", it normally implies that you are suspicious of X.
However, since I haven't seen it clearly displayed anywhere - are you at this point suspicious of dusterhan?
I'm most unimpressed with Atticus' "content". Try harder, kthx.-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
Hi, I promised content, and here I am! Here's my thoughts on everyone so far.
-TinVision-:Nothing outright until he says that dusterhan should "stop acting absurd for the sake of it," and it isn't a pro-town tactic. Can't really argue with that. I find this interesting:
I'm not sure why he's giving you a newbie town tell - can you explain this please?-TinVision- wrote:Note that I have no reason to think that dusterhan is scum at this point. In fact, given my experience in Newbie #361, I've gotten a strong newb town vibe. All I am saying is that his behavior is not pro-town, and that he should rectify that.
However, 2 days later, you seem to change your opinion. Considering dusterhan's lurking as a scum-tell you vote for him. I could see this as scum bandwagoning, since this rather notable change of opinion led to a vote.
There is a difference, however. Whilst Atticus has been "lurking in plain sight", and posting yet not scum hunting, there have been times where dusterhan has just not been around. His lurking could be seen far more differently, and as a result, in my eyes, less scummy.-TinVision- wrote:Who’s blaming you? “Failed to present my reasoning”? I did present my reasoning. IT'S BLATANT LURKING. You know the thing that you keep harping about in Atticus and ignoring totally in dusterhan?
Talking of Atticus, why are you completely ignoring him? It seems odd that you are accusing dusterhan of something, yet ignoring Atticus who is doing exactly the same thing.
Anyway, I'm far more interested in his belief that dusterhan was like a newb townie, and (although less) interested in what caused such a dramatic change of opinion.
Atticus:At the beginning, he simply did not scum-hunt whatsoever. He was just posting, not really saying much, and then going away again. He's recently got a bit better, saying he is suspicious of Kabenon's vote on duster, as well as questioning Nirp a bit. Overall, I'm a bit unimpressed, and would like him to comment more on other things, and continue to scum-hunt.
destructor:Seems active enough. Don't like his conclusion on dusterhan.
Same as TinVision.destructor wrote:I read dusterhan's posts from the other game he's playing in and he was similarly confusing in it, seemingly without realising the negative effect it's having on the Town. I dunno, maybe he's scum in both games, but my first feeling is that he's pro-Town. I realise there's a heap of WIFOM junk going on here, so...Whydoes this make you feel pro-town?
Also, I find destructor's attacks on TinVision a bit much. He seems to be going slightly over to attack at this stage. Maybe it's just me, but my gut is telling me perhaps destructor is trying too hard.
If you think someone is scum, why keep them around? Just because he is useless as scum or town doesn't mean he is any less of a threat. If he is scum, he is part of the enemy and we should get rid of him. This is a bit of an odd argument really.destructor wrote:I feel like lynching dusterhan would be a waste. Either he's fairly harmless scum or bad pro-Town. With the possibilty of the latter in mind, I feel that it isn't the best idea to lynch him, at least not today.
dusterhan:We've already had this debate about him. Frankly, I'm finding those going after him more scummy than him, but at the same time, he needs to stop lurking and contribute.
To be honest, if he is doing this in other games, it's probably his playstyle, thus has no real indication of his alignment.
joost:I agree with lots of what he has to say. However, I don't agree with his explanation that dusterhan is likely scum - I've explained above why I don't think his actions are any real tell about his alignment. I like his observation about Kabenon, and I'm seeing active scum-hunting from him.
Kabenon:I'm not quite sure why he pressured dusterhan - it's been shown already that he doesn't seem to respond to pressure that much.
I do agree that dusterhan's unhelpful attitude is different to being scummy. Nonetheless, I am uneasy about his vote on dusterhan. Mainly because he said before he didn't find him scummy, and it had already been established he wasn't responding to pressure. Furthermore, I'm sensing it's slightly opportunistic.
Knuck:Again, not much from him either, but I like the way he noticed TinVision's change of opinion, and he also seems to share my opinion of dusterhan (his actions are scummy, nor pro-town).
Nekka-Lucifer:Wow, I can't believe I let this through. Nekka has done exactlythe same as Atticus - absolutely zero scum-hunting, and his only attempted scum hunting was to say that "dusterhan's lurking is scummy", which I don't agree with either. Definitely need to keep an eye out for him.
Nirp:He's not really contributed much, other than about dusterhan. Overall, I think his vote was a bit premature, but not entirely scummy on its own. I'm getting a town read from him at the moment.
Sephiroth:Aggressive, definitely. However, this is evidently a playstyle thing. Overall, I actually like his responses and his opinions, especially about dusterhan. I've found nothing scummy from him at the moment.
SilverPhoenix:Really has been too quiet at this point. I don't really understand his TinVision FoS early on, and has since lurked and thus avoided the dusterhan issue basically to its entirety.
Overall, I'd say I'm most suspicious of TinVision, Atticus, Kabenon and Nekka-Lucifer. In fact, I'm going tovote: Nekka Luciferas a pressure vote - I want to see content.-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
Fair enough, but you have to understand that some players have intentionally useless playstyles (for example Fritzler and Lowell), yet they are strong players. Judging by what others have said, he plays like this in other games - and he is causing confusion, as the large number of posts solely about him demonstrate.destructor wrote:
I think he IS less of a threat if he's 'useless'. Unless, of course, if his actions do cause serious confusion, which perhaps they did early on. Scum who are so far undetected, who may have slipped up at some point today, they are greater threats.Aimee wrote:If you think someone is scum, why keep them around? Just because he is useless as scum or town doesn't mean he is any less of a threat. If he is scum, he is part of the enemy and we should get rid of him. This is a bit of an odd argument really.
Yes I agree with this completely. I'd also like to focus more on those not scum-hunting, mainly Nekka-Lucifer.destructor wrote:Anyway, you missed my main point regarding dusterhan. It wasn't that we should not get rid of him, even if he is scum, but that according to what we'd seen so far, he wasn't a good lynch for today and thatwe should be focusing on other players, most of whom have posted more to analyse. I still think this is true.
If you check Sephiroth's posts, he does actually say that he doesn't find dusterhan suspicious. I'm therefore not sure about your point here.destructor wrote:You said you find 'those going after [dusterhan] scummy', yet found nothing scummy from Sephiroth?
Overall, my earlier opinion on Sephiroth was based on a rather misleading post, and a different playstyle that I hadn't encountered (from him, anyway), which is why I was more suspicious earlier than I am now.-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
I'm alarmed that your willing to judge dusterhan's behaviour on Dr. Blackstrike's behaviour.-TinVision- wrote:@Aimee: Like I said (and provided the link), recently in Newbie #361, a newbie player by the name of Dr. Blackstrike made a few posts early in the day that were similar to dusterhan's in silliness and caused a lot of confusion. He was eventually lynched, and proved to be town. Thus, even though it's a small sample size, I read dusterhan's early posts as a newb town tell.
Also, everyone has different playstyles. Some people are genuinely unhelpful and aggressive in all their games (for example Fritzler), but that doesn't therefore have any indication of his alignment.
However, since somebody elsedidsay that dusterhan wasn't playing like this in another game, I'll be checking out his games to see.
I agree with your thoughts on Atticus, but disagree with your conclusion 9that he isn't scummy). I'm not really seeing any curiosity from him - he's more reactive than pro-active (same with what I perceived Nekka to be, although now that seems to be explained by real-life reasons), meaning that I sense he's only posting when asked and such like, and not genuinely scum-hunting.-TinVision- wrote:Regarding Atticus, I find him less scummy/annoying because while there's not much content, he is at least here, reading the thread and responding to posts made that address him.
No, my case on him is that he isn'tAtticus wrote:Why did joost hop on an N-L vote? The reasoning Aimee gave for voting the latter was weak, in my opinion, simply that he was barely posting any content. However, that joost went to it, and backed off right after N-L asked for a replacement is odd, to me.scum-hunting. This is quite important, since I've seen scum run along not really doing much before. It allows them to remain relatively non-committal about stuff and things.
dusterhan's vote against joost seems rather OMGUS.
Also,unvote, since I feel my vote would be wasted while waiting for a replacement. I'll be watching Nekka's replacement carefully, however.-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
I really agree with destructor's arguments against TinVision (although at the same time I think he is rather aggressively arguing them.) Nonetheless, I feel destructor is more likely to be town, and TV more likely to be scum after their excahnge - I wasn't impressed with the answers he gave.
@destructor - you label the answers "satisfactory". Why?
Atticus wrote:The case destructor makes on TV is interesting, but I don't think it's anything I'd be voting on anytime soon.Fos: Atticus
Translation: "I shall sit here for a while, and when the bandwagon grows I can hop on."
What did this post contribute?
You just spent all of that explaining why he could be scum. Why then do you find him town?OpposedForce wrote:Atticus- I found him during my read posting making very short posts. He usually posts when somebody refers a question to him making him more reactive then proactive. Didn't really contribute much in his own words to the discussion. However I get a pro-town feeling on him.-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
Really?Atticus wrote:
'Tis what I'm trying to do...Aimee wrote:...
unvote, vote: Atticus
Try again?
You are quite clearly lurking in plain sight. Please provide some content.Atticus wrote:Sephiroth wrote:...
Also, atticus, how is this:
While dusterhan's post implies that he would leave it up to the others to find mafia, mine says, "Hey, I'm sorry because even though I promised to start looking at players, I've failed to get anything I find conclusive."Atticus wrote: Ugh! I can't get a read on anybody! 'Tis frustrating! I've
different from this:
which warranted this?dusterhan wrote:i've got no idea who could be mafia... so, lets leave me alone and discuss who else could be a scumAtticus wrote:Dusterhan... Tsk tsk tsk... You need to stop volunteering for things you can't do. Examples: answering questions, playing the game mafia.
I do apologize for stirring a false lead with that post, it was simply if anyone was wondering as to whether or not Atticus was ever going to do that analysis. Also, not to OMGUS or anything, but I find it interesting that Aimee would change her vote based on that simple post, without putting so much reason behind it as joost did for a mere FoS.-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
-
-
Aimee Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: February 21, 2007
- Location: Flowerville
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.