Mini 549 (Tarhalindur Mostly Mountainous) - Game Over
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
I've been in a couple of games with Ectomancer before. That's just his play style. If you check out other games he's in or has been in, you'll see that.thenextepisode wrote:ectomancer's quick accusation of tamuz reeks of scum to me
his logic doesnt make any sense and i get the feeling he was trying to start a quick day 1 bandwagon for no reason
fos:ectomancerWhy are hemorrhoids called "hemorrhoids" instead of "assteroids"?-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
No, I'm trying to make everyone think we're scum buddies by defending you.Ectomancer wrote:Trying to get in my good graces Earwig? Scum...
On another note, SlySly has only had 3 posts. The first a random vote - nothing unusual there. The next 2 were nothing of substance. Seems to be lurking to me.
At first look, it might appear that Rosso Carne is lurking as well. I've been in game or 2 with him - this seems to be his play style. That, or he really is always scum.
Also, I have to agree with Nyktorion:
However, I'm going to go one step further.Nyktorion wrote:
Well, it is still possible to have many posts without really saying much (or in other words: to have a good difference between the number of posts and the number of relevant posts). And while you are right that my accusation might be miniscule in a progressed game, I think it is still a good reason for a vote considering the current ((semi-)random) state of the game, and the other possible reasons to vote for someone currently.Blackberry wrote:Nyktorion wrote:Unvote, Vote: Rosso Carnefor trying to look active without adding content.Although I appreciate the support on voting off the Nazi, I have a large problem with your ''reason''.
First -- ''Trying to look active'' makes no sense. One is either active or not active. There is no such thing as ''looking active.''
Second -- It's early in the game, how is someone supposed to add content this early when it's barely started?
Overall -- Your reason for voting RC is completely invalid. The accusation is a huge stretch and I'm unsure at this moment whether I consider this a scumtell or not.
However, I find it quite interesting how you fiercely you are rushing towards Rosso's defence in the face of my rather semi-random accusation. Might be a slight first tell that you both have the same alignment, and that you know about that.
Unvote: thenextepisode
Vote: Blackberry
Yes, I realize that puts Blackberry at 3 votes - no danger of lynch yet.Why are hemorrhoids called "hemorrhoids" instead of "assteroids"?-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
I can see my post had the desired effect.
Warning taken. It won't happen again. I meant it as a joke.Tarhalindur wrote:……….. In other news: Earwig, your post 49 is treading on the edge of some very dangerous territory. Please, for your sake, review Rule 3 carefully, and note that scumbuddy claims are something that I am unlikely to be lenient on. Consider this a warning. -Tar
……………………
Blackberry wrote:………………………..
Do you care to explain why you are voting me? O_o
On a side note -- I know nothing of RC's alignment. I simply found your "reason" suspiscious.
I was voting you because Nyktorion stated you were "fiercly" rushing to Rosso's defense, then he said that might be a tell that you were alligned with Rosso.
It was a pre-emptive statement. I was expecting everyone to get all over my case because I put someone at 3 votes. Yes, the whole point is to lynch someone.Ectomancer wrote:
What's this line all about? No danger of lynch yet? Isn't that rather the whole point of a vote, to lynch someone? Why do you need to reassure us that he is in no actual danger?Earwig wrote:
Vote: Blackberry
Yes, I realize that puts Blackberry at 3 votes - no danger of lynch yet.
I was going by the vote count. After checking, I see that I must have been on something - I obviously looked at it wrong.
While I'm at it:
UnvoteWhy are hemorrhoids called "hemorrhoids" instead of "assteroids"?-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Jester wrote:
Interesting that you didn't accuse myself or Dean Harper or johoohno of this. All three of us had fewer posts than SlySly up to your 49. For the record, I tend to play this game by making longish posts every two or three days. I also don't play MS on weekends unless the game is at a critical phase.Earwig wrote:On another note, SlySly has only had 3 posts. The first a random vote - nothing unusual there. The next 2 were nothing of substance. Seems to be lurking to me.
Also, a sort of newbie question. The title of the game is "Mostly Mountainous." From what I understand, a mountainous game is slang for one that has multiple mafia groups. Is that correct?
I was only trying to stir things up. SlySly wasn’t the only one with few or no posts.Why are hemorrhoids called "hemorrhoids" instead of "assteroids"?-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
I don't really care what you note, Tamuz.Tamuz wrote:BTW Earwig, your post is shit, I do note that you aren't doing anything real.
Also, I can't believe you let Ecto get under your skin. As he said - this is a GAME - nothing more. I've been in games with him before - This is how he plays.Why are hemorrhoids called "hemorrhoids" instead of "assteroids"?-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Vote: mozsuggs
for out of the blue voting me and not giving reason.
I have suspicions on several people, butam not voting because I am having a hard time with re-reading. I can't get it done in one session, and have to start all over again.
I will unvote if given a valid reason for the vote.Why are hemorrhoids called "hemorrhoids" instead of "assteroids"?-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
-
-
Earwig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: January 5, 2007
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Alright Scumtomancer -Ectomancer wrote:Alright Lurkerwig, you've sat around for 23 pages. Are you sure this is the move? Humor me by recounting the past case against Rosso Carne. Surely your latest reasons are meant to sit upon that foundation, so I'd be interested inyourinterpretation of that foundation.
My vote on Rosso has nothing to do with pat cases against him. In fact, Isort ofagree with Mizzy on this point. His sparse posting habits alone are not reason enough to think he's scum. I was in a game where he was town and he acted the sam way. It is still possible he's scum. At the very least he's a jack ass player. That doesn't make him scum either.
My vote on Rosso is simply because he had posted nothing in awhile, then out of the blue, places a vote on thenextepisode. I stated as much in the post I voted in. I at least gave reason for my vote.
@Tar:
Rosso posted Tuesday morning early - post 571. Not much to the post, but at least he did post. Why he above?Tarhalindur wrote:If Rosso Carne fails to post by tomorrow evening then he will be replaced.
My vote stands on Rosso - until he gives some reason for voting tneWhy are hemorrhoids called "hemorrhoids" instead of "assteroids"?
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.