629 reality mafia-game over
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
Hmm... well, in a normal game this would the random voting stage. But I guess in this setup, with two people on the block, it's not really random at all. If everyone went random one of the two would be lynched without any discussion.IcemanE: Why did you just vote now with no info for nhat?
unvote
Good point.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
Yikes, that's an incredibly good point. Damn it.farside22 wrote:I don't know if I want someone who is smart enough to do puzzles as we are working as individuals. See bold
babygirl86 wrote: *There may at some point be puzzles,, trivia, etc. provided for the town.You may not solve this as a group,as there are different rewards that can be won. If you wish to solve the puzzle, please pm me your answer. I will announce the answer.
unvote-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
But chances are much, much better that at least one of the players on the chopping block would be town, if this is a balanced game.OP wrote: But it's also possible for their to be TWO anti-town players to choose from, so if we no-lynched, we could possibly let two mafia members away, versus lynching one.
If this is what we're going to base lynches off of, we should have both players solve a puzzle. Anyone have ideas?Khel wrote: the poorer puzzle solver be lynched, if any person ought to be lynched.
As far as puzzles overall, if you've ever seen a reality show like Survivor or that Donald Trump show, you know that when it comes to INDIVIDUAL challenges (which is what the mod implied these challenges would be) you want the STUPIDER player alive - he's easier to beat and thusly win a reward over.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
It says there are challenges that we CAN'T solve as a team, so I'm guessing they're individual...Nothing in the OP suggests that these are competitive challenges, though.
This is an excellent point. nhat solved one puzzle. And that's all that has happened.That said, there's nothing that suggests cerebus is a poor puzzle solver, and I don't think that's a valid reason to vote him.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
Another excellent point.Talmadge Monroe wrote:
I realize they are individual, what I am saying is that the OP does not specify that they are competitive. Every player in the game could solve the puzzle and get a bonus, for all we know.icemanE wrote: It says there are challenges that we CAN'T solve as a team, so I'm guessing they're individual...
I wouldn't be opposed to a no lynch - but by the same token, I wouldn't be opposed to a lynch on either candidate, if there's a good reason for it.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
I get a little sniff of distancing off this.skitzer wrote:Vote:cerebus3
My strategy for this game on day 1 is to go against whatever farside22 is doing, because I am fairly confident this is NOT farside22 town play. Therefore, by going against her, I am more likely to get her scum buddies unless she is using a complex and strategic form of WIFOM.
That's all.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
It's a skill I've been honing for years. The filibuster. [/joke] But like I said in my post, I was in a rush. Now I'm not.Wow this says nothing what so ever. How do you ever do it.
This is not good. It is speculating on roles. It's a very odd backwards defense of BM in a post that attacks him, especially the bolded part (bolding is mine). Asking for a claim from BM, I don't know if I like it. There's no real reason for it right now. It can only hurt the town. I agree that there probably aren't two cops, though. That would be a bit much.chicken wrote: I highly doubt that there are two cops in this game. What other kind of townie power role could benefit from going to night so hastily? If there's a tracker, then that's not so urgent in my opinion. A doc trying to usher in a night is unreasonable.Perhaps BM just had a hard-on to see what would happen when it went to night, who knows?That's the million dollar question.
I do, yeah.farside wrote: Did you really think the interplay with Scarlett and I was her just being herself? (seriously?)
Also, maybe I'm biased, but I doubt flavor-claiming will do much for us. I just finished Xyzzy's psychotic mod game, you should have a look - I got caught up in the role-names, which wound up having nothing to do with alignment whatsoever - every player in the game save one was named after a mafiascum.net player, and the lone player who was not was a PIRATE FROM TEXAS, and a townie.
If you really want to mass-flavor claim I'm down, but eh, with no way at all of verifying the flavor claims, and no suggestion that there's a correlation between flavor and alignment, it seems pointless.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
After today I say we make a policy to lynch every day - the issue with this setup is that it's not guaranteed that we'll have a candidate on the chopping block that we actually want to lynch.
The exception to this rule, of course, is if two confirmed protown poweroles are the candidates for lynch, or there are other extenuating circumstances. But NL'ing won't do anything but allow the scum to pick off our most useful players as time goes on. Tonight should give us good info though, with a doc and tracker working together.
I agree, it's fairly common that if one person has a flavor in a themed game, all of 'em do. I also agree that flavor probably doesn't correlate directly with alignment - the cop being everyone's best friend, eh, it doesn't click.Tom wrote: as soon as I got my PM I figured it was a safe assumption that everybody has a flavor role.
Let's hope for better lynch candidates tomorrow.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
If I follow the "Don't mention Khelv and BM" rule, I will have to make up picks randomly as it seems both farside and ash have. Just out of curiosity, how am I your top pick for scum? I don't believe I've heard anything about this before.
2 scummiest:Out of the other 9 players, could everyone please list the 2 they find scummiest and the 2 they find least scummy?
Khelvaster (far and away the scummiest player thus far)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
BM
-
-
Most protown:
farside, BM
Yes, folks, BM is in both categories. When he's playing protown (which he has a good deal so far this game) he's a big help, but he's been quite scummy as well. So that's where I'm at.
And with that:vote: NL-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
That was a hammer, yes indeed. I don't agree with the exercise - so I want to end it. The "exclude BM and Khelvaster" clause destroys the validity of the exercise in the first place, and the fact that it was proposed by one of the two players who we aren't supposed to talk about makes it pointless. We're feeding BM info, that's all we're doing with this exercise, it's not protown at all.First you were not supposed to hammer (was that a hammer) for NL till everyone weighed in and two I said before I find your play scummy.
I don't follow... what does this mean?I don't like the way you are following.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
This game has been pretty black and white (other than BM) so far. I've voted for the obvious picks. I'll admit I've been a bit lurky, I'll try to put a bit more effort in tomorrow - but the "you can only pick from these two random players to lynch" rule kills me and for that reason I have moved this game to the bottom of my priority stack. Hopefully tomorrow we'll randomly have two good options, I guess.You have changed your vote whenever you see others voting a certain way you vote along with it. I haven't seen you make any effort in doing anything in this game.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
I'll do a reread, see if anything comes up. I can understand your frustration at actually playing vs. lurking. But I'm going to hold to my word of supporting a lynch every day.You see a person not posting anything and you think them not scum. I say look at K7 for people who do this and turned out scum. I at least have tried to play this game.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
I kinda want to put Tom near lynch to see how he acts. That's why I voted him. Plus having someone at L-2 is not good right now, I realized, so I pulled my vote off farside. I want someone lynched today but I want to hear both people talk under pressure.Vote stands if that is really your only defence.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
Well, who knows if we will or not? If a scum wins the puzzle today, his prize might be (as people have said there's was in previous challenges) to choose who's on the chopping block tomorrow! I feel we have to cut our losses and lynch today.Hopefully we get 2 scum on the block.
unvote - vote:farside
I saw it as an appeal to emotion as well.farside wrote: That is not an appeal to emotion that is a fact. Look up the difference scum.-
-
icemanE
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
How can there be value if you can randomly assign choices?If Khelv (who I don't think will return) and ashmite don't post, I'll assign them objects.
I'm failing to see the purpose of this exercise and wondering why Khelvaseter's wagon isn't growing. Did you all forget about his doc claim?
WTF?Khel wrote: To come out with the answer, I am the doctor. Of course, assuming I'm bluffing, the real doc should protect me at night. However, I don't expect any counterclaims. If there are, you can assume the counterclaimer is scum.
And I'm wary of OP's bizarre attempt to appear protown with his feather/rock ploy.
FoS: OP-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
No, he didn't die, which is why I asked why you haven't been lynched yet. About the 4 claims:Did Khel die? As far as I know he was still alive. But then he changed into me. Hope you like it.
What do you think about the claims as one of the four is definatly scum?
That's just for my own refernce, I'll look that over later.Cerebus - Slacker
Tombolo - Badass
farside - Comedian
OP - Star
But Pim, forgive me if I missed this, but did Khelvaster or yourself ever flavor claim? If not, would you mind doing so now?-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
His claim is why I want him lynched. This is not how you claim doc if you actually are the doc:That question was regarding why you wanted Khel lynched?
That's how you claim doc if you suck at being scum.khel wrote:To come out with the answer, I am the doctor. Of course, assuming I'm bluffing, the real doc should protect me at night. However, I don't expect any counterclaims. If there are, you can assume the counterclaimer is scum.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
Could you explain how being the star means you aren't scum? I breezed past this the first time, I guess. So far, it seems like flavors don't correlate to roles or alignment, so I don't see how being the star means anything.OP wrote: Well, based on what nhat just provided, vote: no lynch.
I'm not scum though. I realize that we shouldn't keep no lynching, and I even supported the policy, but, seeing as nhat claimed mason and I'm THE STAR!, we should have another no lynch, just so we don't mislynch.
With the info now that BM was watcher, this quote jumps out as quite interesting.OP wrote: Also, as part of his prize, Battle Mage hand picked the two on the chopping block. So IF BM was scum, he'd obviously pick two townies, one of which just happened to be mason, the other just vanilla townie. Especially after the no vote rule was proposed.
FoS: BattleMage
Where did you get that info?OP wrote: Well, it's usually the reality villians who are the recognizable ones. But I think, in this threads case, someone was already assigned the villian/house bitch, which I would assume would be scum.
Gotta say, I'm still shocked Khel hasn't been lynched based on his claim, but if OP is a more viable option, I'm fine with that. He looks a lot more suspicious in retrospect than I thought all game, and he was actually pretty inactive for a great portion of the game... pages went by without him saying a thing.
unvote - vote: OP-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-