Did you just name claim AND start personal insults on page 2 and call HER a newbie?Timeater wrote:I know what a softclaim is newbiegirl, lol.
No point in negative voting anyone at the moment.
Did you just name claim AND start personal insults on page 2 and call HER a newbie?Timeater wrote:I know what a softclaim is newbiegirl, lol.
You started the insults and the attacks and when someone swings back you run? *shakes head sadly*Timeater wrote:Gonna ask to be replaced, not really vibing with this game and I have several other open games I'd like to concentrate on. Sorry!
His playstyle didn't seem town to freak like that when under fire and turn tail and run. If he is town he needs to grow his skin thicker. If he's scum he needs to learn how to throw off suspiscion without panicking. Rest assured if he becomes in danger I'll unvote. Still waiting for his replacement.Vivian Darkblaam wrote:Again with the poor reasoning on a vote. You're voting him for a personal reason that has nothing to do with him being scum? Since when was it OK to lynch somebody because you didn't like them?
Um...Ergo replaced on page 4. You don't think he read 4 pages by the time he posted? His post sounded like he read the game. Am I for quicklynching Ergo? No. Is your reasoning weak? Yes.Vivian Darkblaam wrote:You're not going to seriously suggest that Timeater's replacement request and subsequent lack of replacementesque behavior alone are reason for a cold lynch without even giving Erg0 a chance to read the damn game. Also, the fact that his wagon was polarizing is not a legitimate reason to lynch. Yes, we could protentially pick up valuable information, but it would only be on three or four pages of play.
Waiting for Grimmy's response once he gets back. I'd still like him to justify his vote in a sane way.
Really?Battousai wrote:Muerrto, when looking back at Time's last post, it doesn't sound like he was surprised to be replaced, but rather surprised that he wasn't yet.
Timeater wrote:I'm making time because I care. AndI dont believe I ever said I dont have time for the game, I believe I said I'm not able to devote myself to this game and give it the attention it deservesbecause I'm busy with other games. Your constant hounding is pretty suspicious tbh.Please dont make me have to defend myself again.
Bolding mine of course. This sure sounds like he'd planned on posting another time to defend himself but that he was using the 'replacement' thing to avoid doing it. Then he was surprised he got replaced before he could do it.Timeater wrote:Skitzerwtf ninja*pokes with stick*
Okay, thanks. <3 Have fun.
Because if that IS the case he needs to work on that. And according to his posts I gotta agree with Popular, Time seemed to be quite taken with the game.Vivian Darkblaam wrote:He asked to be replaced in 39. (Think about it, even if he wasn't miserable in this game; if he had to choose one game to replace out of, why not the one where everybody's suddenly started giving him crap?)
Nope. Time and Ergo are different people and town can act scummy when they don't know what they're doing. That said, I never said Ergo was town, I said I've never seen him as scum(even on the other site, strange that, have you ever actually BEEN scum?) so I'm not sure if his playstyle changes and he seems to be playing like normal atm.Battousai wrote:If you thought time was scum, wouldn't you think Ergo be scum?
Vivian, my bad.ShadowGirl wrote:Muerrto, I don't think that was me...?I agreed with Popular because he was right why do both Popular and Shadowgirl have a problem with that? I never buddied up or anything, I simply agreed.
Because you're grasping at straws for a reason to throw suspiscion?populartajo wrote:Why does that make me scum, Muerrto?Muerrto wrote:Ummm...Popular, would you like to explain the prod request on me when I had posted less than 24 hours earlier? Or did you want to continue cursing in caps...
All threats to the town eliminated? That's kind of standard in most mafia games.TonyMontana wrote:Well, I guess the fact that a line from his claim was identical (As in word for word) to my own town role was what I took notice of first. It's somewhat of a common phrase for pro-town role PMs, and I'm unsure of if you could assume it's being used, judging from what you get as a scum.
Wait this is too fun. Everyone back off a sec and let him explain how what I said above proves I don't have it...even though I knew the line he was referencing above I obv don't have it on my PM.populartajo wrote:It only proves that Muerrto has another win condition
populartajo wrote:When did I say you were lurking?
Ok. Not that I haven't said this enough, but you are an ass, period. An annoying, condescending, ass.populartajo wrote:I sincerely didn't accuse him of lurking. He just posted a "Mod, Im not voting for myself" with no additional input even though he has been posting relatively considerable in their other games.
Besides supporting my case against Time and then suddenly supporting the wagon against me for the weakest reasons (I never linked him with Ergo), he hasnt done anything notable for scumhunting.
Why do you love him so much, huh?
This was on Sunday Sep 21st at 11 am ESTpopulartajo wrote:Wheres Muerrto and Ergo?
Mod: Prod them.
I had just posted less than 24 hours earlier but you made it sound like I'd been gone a week and even called for a prod??Muerrto wrote:First off, just to let you know, I wasn't prodded. Second,
You called for my prod when I posted friday, then saturday, and I even cross posted with you? It had been less than 24 hours since my last post.
And attempting to link me with Ergo/Time? Nice. No wonder you had a problem with me agreeing with you about Ergo.
I voted Time on Sep 7th at 7:31 pm EST. Not random. He soft claimed on page TWO.populartajo wrote:MuerrtoPretty much scum.Has gone to agree with me all the game (supporting a decent wagon) to positive vote me. WTF!! I mildly suspected him before because that is usually a scum technique. Agree with a townie in a decent case, push it and then when things go wrong, blame me for it. Also I never lnked you with Ergo. And I still ahve the feeling you're active lurking. Overdefensive much?
How can I go to decent reasoner to obvious scum?!
Second link of me and Ergo.populartajo wrote:Right now, Im calling Muerrto-Falcone-FuzzyLightning or Ergo scumgroup. Hope Im right.
This is your defense to the votes against you...populartajo wrote:Wow, just wow.
Take that, scumbags and lambs.
I still havent seen any reasoning about me being possible town and scum just going against the easy target. (Muerrto, TonyMontana,not sure about Falcone)
And I have seen some shit arguments. Really.
Peace.
Appealing to emotion, cursing, telling us we're all stupid for voting you, etc.populartajo wrote:TonyMontana's post is utter bullshit and I feel good at least some people realize that.
Notice how Ergo and Muerrto dont give a shit about that post.
And I still dont see enough Muerrto hate. He jumped against me for the dumbest reasons ever.
I REALLY WANT to answer the motherfucking questions but I still dont know who they are. I thought post 198 (summary of a PBP analysis after my infamous post that got deleted) would be enough. I dont know what you want.
This was directed at Fuzzy who you never replied to with an answer.populartajo wrote:You dont get it, do you?
Don't get to play alot of games, do you?populartajo wrote:Why the claim?
1) I dont want to be lynched for shit reasons.
And Fuzzy, why do you think Ergo and Muerrto (post 211 and 212, respectively) didnt comment anything about Tony's 213, the worst post Ive seen in mafiascum in a while?
Excellent argument. Well structured, solid base, well voiced thoughts and points. Just all round...yeah.populartajo wrote:LOL, Tony's 210.
And people can you unvote me?
Um...populartajo wrote:How am I trying to divide the town?
Like that?populartajo wrote:Who believes my claim and who doesnt?
Because suspecting you obviously isn't paying attention to the game, right? How's that logic work again?populartajo wrote: Poeple if you're town you got to stop acting scummy and pay attention to the game.
What would we win if you came up scum? What would you win if Tony or myself came up town? You do know how insanely WIFOM all your arguments are, right?populartajo wrote:Why isnt people suspecting TonyMontana? Or Muerrto?
What would you gain of my lynch if you're so concentrated in me? What would you do when I come up town?
Except not all players are voting you. Very poor argument and yet didn't address the fact that your suspiscions were all OMGUS.populartajo wrote:Except that Im not doing that. If I were OMGUSing, all players here would be scum.Muerrto wrote:You're also still pointing OMGUS fingers.
populartajo wrote:And Im defending myself and Im scumhunting. Hard things to do when all my decent atacks are considered OMGUS because probably all the town is against me?
Because saying I should claim scum makes me scum, right? Because this is what you call scumhunting, right?populartajo wrote:Muerrto, what about if you just claim scum? Whats your win condition?
Um..I just sorted the whole thread by your posts and quoted almost all of them. Unless you can RE-STATE your case on me using ONLY quotes you're full of it and since I already read back through all of them, I already know you are.populartajo wrote:I have a case against Muerrto. (read my previous posts for reference) I dont think he's scum just for that win condition debate. Some people apparently do but you fail to realize that.
And I feel like Im repeating myself.
Because anyone who disagrees with you and doesn't automatically take your claim as golden doesn't know how to play?populartajo wrote:Dont you KNOW to analyse people's reactions?
Already said where you linked us twice. And already debunked the 'agreed with me all game' crap. This is your case?populartajo wrote:Muerrto agreed with me all the game. Then he suddenly turned against me for reasons I still dont understand. When did I link him with Ergo? (BTW, where's this guy?)
Several times as I've now quoted.populartajo wrote:When did I say you were lurking?
Already debunked both of these. As far as scumhunting, I'm quite fine with my vote on you, where it's been most of the game.populartajo wrote:I sincerely didn't accuse him of lurking. He just posted a "Mod, Im not voting for myself" with no additional input even though he has been posting relatively considerable in their other games.
Besides supporting my case against Time and then suddenly supporting the wagon against me for the weakest reasons (I never linked him with Ergo), he hasnt done anything notable for scumhunting.
Um...even if you believe he's a power role, how would that make me scum?TonyMontana wrote:Yeah, we're gonna lynch a powerrole, on the case that he was reaaaaaaaally lucky. ¬¬
Positive vote: Muerrto
Why did that take you 2 weeks and 10 pages to say?populartajo wrote:First of all, I must admit I made a mistake when rereading and didnt notice that Muerrto had posted recently so that he didnt need a prod.
How can I possibly worry about suspecting anyone else when you post stuff like that? I mean if you flip scum Tony's obv partner but right now I'm quite cool with watching you burn.populartajo wrote:As Falcone has pointed out there are three possibilities regarding my claim.
a)I could be the real watcher and I have a town win condition
b)I could be scum and I somehow have a town win condition in my PM.
c)I should stop playing mafia and spend all my money in lottery tickets becuase I am extremely lucky : I guessed town's win condition.
Really? Are you serious?Vivian Darkblaam wrote:@Muerrto: It's stuff like the above posts that I'm talking about. Even if that post is very scummy (it might be), you haven't explained why, and you have used the very same hyperbole and fallacious appeals you've dinged tajo for.
Choice A, he's town and a watcher. Choice B is retarded. Scum with a town win condition? Why the hell would you have a town win condition as scum? Choice C is also retarded. Guessing the number between 1-1000 is lucky. Guessing that you win as town when all threats are elimanated etc is NOT lucky, it's obvious. I have no clue where this 1 in 5 crap came from and sadly, neither does Tajo. Read back, that statistic was given by Tony, not Tajo. Tajo simply ran with it because it painted him in a better light.populartajo wrote:As Falcone has pointed out there are three possibilities regarding my claim.
a)I could be the real watcher and I have a town win condition
b)I could be scum and I somehow have a town win condition in my PM.
c)I should stop playing mafia and spend all my money in lottery tickets becuase I am extremely lucky : I guessed town's win condition.
Powerful wagon? When I voted you only had ONE other vote(possibly 2, there's no vote count anywhere near there unfortunately but still no where near a wagon let alone a powerful one). I agreed it was weird Time all of a sudden decided to leave and that's been the basis of your entire case against me so far. I agreed Time was scummy so then when you start doing scummy things and I disagree I'm now scum for 'flipping'? How the hell can anyone actually justify this 'case'?populartajo wrote:The reasons why he voted me werent scumtells and were just weak reasons to join a powerful wagon like mine. I wouldnt suspect him this much if he hadnt agreed with me in the first part of the game. He just changed his opinions as soon as he thought I linked him with Ergo.
My point is that he couldnt blame for shit reasoning before (because he agreed with me) then why exactly did he vote me?
I realize my play hasnt been optimal after almost all the town went against me. I just tend to get frustrated when Im attacked for weak reasons. But his reasons for his vote were much before this.
Pretty obvious you're town? Not scumhunting because I'm scumhunting YOU? Do you possibly ever post anything WORTH reading? Saying 'I'm obv town duh why u scumhunting me cause I R town diescumdie' is NOT, repeat NOT a case. I'm not sure how many times I can say that.populartajo wrote:Also, he hasnt presented a case besides mine-s. Hes not scumhunting and keeps pushing my case even though its pretty obvious that Im town.
Can we please lynch him? Oh yeah, make sure he does a analysis of all players here before, kay?
No. My point was 'guessing' the win condition is total crap as a reason to be clearing someone. It's not a difficult guess.ShadowGirl wrote:What, so are you saying the most logical conclusion is that he's not scum and indeed the watcher?
You've played in a game where scum got the townie PM in their PM? Really? Interesting. Because I've been in over 30 on this site alone and have never seen that.competentpsycho wrote:He is saying scum having recieved the town win condition from the mod, not as his own win condition, but just for informational purposes, i.e. to counterbalance arguments based on win condition (basically some mods do this to keep the game on an even playing field). If this didn't happen it would be EXTREMELY easy for town to find scum using win condition.Muerrto wrote:Choice B is retarded. Scum with a town win condition? Why the hell would you have a town win condition as scum?
Um...Falcone posted simply 3 choices. You added the cute little 'lottery' crap in there just like all your other posts trying to use the same argument you've used all game 'I'm town and if you disagree then u r stoopid'. That's all you've said literally all game.populartajo wrote:I was thinking that but this is what he posted.Batto wrote:You said he isn't reading, where it is you who didn't read. In the post you quoted Muerrto from when listing the 3 things against him, the quote even says that Falcone made the list, so I don't get how he wasn't reading.He OBVIOUSLY isnt reading since he's accusing me of something Falcone posted. Please pay more attention.Muerrto wrote:How can I possibly worry about suspecting anyone else whenpopulartajo wrote:As Falcone has pointed out there are three possibilities regarding my claim.
a)I could be the real watcher and I have a town win condition
b)I could be scum and I somehow have a town win condition in my PM.
c)I should stop playing mafia and spend all my money in lottery tickets becuase I am extremely lucky : I guessed town's win condition.you post stuff like that?I mean if you flip scum Tony's obv partner but right now I'm quite cool with watching you burn.
Um...actually that's the exact definition of tunnelvision. Can you explain the difference please?populartajo wrote:I've been tunnelvisioned as town but thats not the point Im attacking. His attacks on me arent tunnelvisions. He HASNT scumhunted and worst he accuses me of not doing that when its pretty OBVIOUS that at least Im doing a better job in gathering information. I dont know who else he suspects. I have done a PBPA and I have stated my opinions of more than one player. Did he? This isnt tunnelvision.Batto wrote:You then say because Muerrto is focused on you he has to be scum. Tunnelvision is a null tell, IMO.
You linked us both as lurkers. You also never explained why you tried to make the case I WAS lurking when I obviously wasn't, something you later admitted. Also, how exactly was my change DRASTIC? I agreed Time was acting scummy, I then mentioned it was odd you had a problem with me agreeing. By your own logic, if I agree with you that someone's scummy then I'm pro-town yes? Or were you wrong about Time? Or were we distancing? Make up your mind.populartajo wrote:No. Im saying that his change of mind is so drastic to be motivated for town motives and his attacks are extremely weak for his experience. Lest put an example. Assume you think a player is scummy. Muerrto supports your reasoning. Therefore Muerrto thinks you're probably town because you're supporting protown behavior and good reasoning. Right? Ok. What would you think of that player if you post this ....Batto wrote:Another reason you gave for saying Muerrto is scum is that he agreed with you that time was scummy, BUT later decideds to attack you. So what you are saying is that if someone agrees about you for one thing, they must agree with you on EVERYTHING else....he posts thispopulartajo wrote:Falcone, what do you think of Ergo's case and lurking? Do you think is a bad case?
Wheres Muerrto and Ergo?
Mod: Prod them.
Muerrto, thoughts?WHERE'S THE FREAKING LINK? WHY DO I DESERVE A VOTE? NO ONE HAS EXPLAINED THIS YET.Muerrto wrote:First off, just to let you know, I wasn't prodded. Second,
Unvote positive, poisitive vote : Popular
You called for my prod when I posted friday, then saturday, and I even cross posted with you? It had been less than 24 hours since my last post.
And attempting to link me with Ergo/Time? Nice. No wonder you had a problem with me agreeing with you about Ergo.
So because he agrees with me and not you he's not thinking for himself? And how have I pushed your lynch softly? I'm voting you, I'm attacking you constantly, I'm front and center against you, there's no soft here. But scum or not, you CAN be civil. Other people have been stating that you're acting like an ass as well. Can you stop please?populartajo wrote:Please tell me how my scumhuting is bad. What is scumhunting for you? And yes he's pushing my lynch softly. He posted a bad case some days ago and all that he has been doing now is Tajo is scummy, Tajo uses retarded logic, Tajo lets keep it civil, Tajo why didnt you post that before?. He doesnt have to do much, ya know? You're doing all his work.Batto wrote:You say he is lying about your scumhunting and pushing your lynch softly. Hmm, I happen to agree with his conclusion on your scumhunting for the most part and I don't believe he has pushed your case softly, especially since he has only been attacking you.
Stop defending someone that isnt confirmed town. THINK FOR YOURSELF.
Is that anything similar to you using WIFOM to saying because tajo said he's town(by 'quoting' his PM) that he's town and since I disagree I'm scum?TonyMontana wrote:So basically, you are using wifom to turn both of tajo's hypothetical flips into scumtells for me?Grimmy wrote:Another suspect: Tony Montana.
you seem to be defending Tajo a little TOO much.
-if he flips town, you feel it will clear you as you attached yourself to him with your defense of him.
-If he flips scum, and you are his scum buddy, people will think that you made the mistake of buddying to scum and got fooled. This provides cover for you (I beleive someone put together a "if tajo is scum, then tony is town" arguement earlier)
Can you post your case on me then?TonyMontana wrote:No. Not similar at all.Muerrto wrote:Is that anything similar to you using WIFOM to saying because tajo said he's town(by 'quoting' his PM) that he's town and since I disagree I'm scum?
How does this not link us?competentpsycho wrote:hmmm... my vote stays with Muerrto for now, but its getting close. I'm thinking both he and Grim are probably scum.
My post before that was less than 24 hours before and it was over the weekend. In addition there were others that it had been longer since they posted that he didn't call out. Can you explain that?competentpsycho wrote:I have never seen anyone suspect two people of being scumpartners from being away from the thread for a while at the same time. Yes you posted right before him, but only by 2 minutes and his post was extremely long, so I can easily see how he didn't see it. Your post before that was over 1.5 days before, and seeing as how you were posting fairly often right before that, I could see it, not agree with it, but see where he was coming from.
1. In my experience, when your defense is 'I'm town and you're stupid' you end up being scum. Every post or attack against you was answered with some version of that quote. If that's not the case, try to be more civil and build a logical defense.populartajo wrote:Muerrto, lets do things easier for the two of us. Can you summarize why I am still scum?
Sorry, just did a PBPA in another game, you can check. And being accused of lurking in a couple games and it's pissing me off =ppopulartajo wrote:I will respond your posts later this evening to show how wrong your appreciations are but the curious thing, Muerrto, is that you think I am scum for reasons that are posterior to your vote. There's no reason for that illogical vote, then?
Also how about you comment on all players here?
Well 1's ongoing where I actually abondoned it but there's multiple game where I complained about people prodding me over the weekend.Vivian Darkblaam wrote:Seriously? You should probably chill out a tad (but actually related to this game, I would like to see an example of this claim before I beleive it).
1. Angerpopulartajo wrote: Again I claimed for time/frustration reasons. This paragraph is just an extension of paragraph number 1. THAT IS NOT A SCUMTELL. And its pretty obvious I didnt fakeclaim.
So Muerrto you're going to keep pushing this weak case or are you going to acept that you're finally scum?
Peace.
Um...no YOU have to consider all of them but since I know my role I don't.competentpsycho wrote:How does limiting choices to only those that help you prove anything?Muerrto wrote:Scenario A, you could be bussing Time. B, I could be wrong and following your fabricated case on him. C, I could be wrong and so could you and we're both targetting some townie.
3 of those 3 scenarios mean you are town, so do I take that as proof that you are? If you are going to present an arguments based on scenarios, you have to consider all of them.
The first paragraph is excellent posting. lots of good posting and not just random cursing and insulting cases. Insulting cases when you can't think of a good fake one is a definite scum tell.competentpsycho wrote:You seem to be intent on using shit argument after shit argument to justify your vote. Using shit arguments is a bit of a scumtell, especially when it is a pattern, but trying to hide the fact that your argument is crap by the way you word it is fairly obvious to me. Either you are scum or completely incompetent town. I am 95% sure its the former. I like my vote exactly where it is.
Also,I seem to remember you claiming that he agreed with you since you first stated suspicion on Time. I will go back and read to make sure, but don't have time to double check this for now, just putting it out for now so I remember.B, I could be wrong and following your fabricated case on him.
Because it was unneccesary. Kind of like unvoting someone when they're nowhere near a lynch but not voting anyone else. It's pointless. Why did you feel you needed to do it even though you hadn't all day?TonyMontana wrote:Because i can. What's the point of having negative vote powers, if you're not gonna use em to promote your intentions? -.-
I already admitted my vote was because I was ticked he tried to get me prodded when it wasn't needed. However, it's his reaction to the vote that speak volumes more.Vivian Darkblaam wrote:Also, tajo's argument that Muerrto "totally agreed" (or even just "agreed") with him is somewhat weak, but the real substance of it, that Muerrto's vote for tajo was unprecedented and with weak stated reasonings still holds fairly strong.
I already admitted it was a horrible reason. I also said your reactions made it stick.populartajo wrote:Can anyone explain me why does this deserve a vote?Muerrto wrote:I already admitted my vote was because I was ticked he tried to get me prodded when it wasn't needed.
No, I mean his vehemence and insults instead of simply saying 'that was a retarded reason to vote me' or 'how does my asking for your prod make me scum'? Also, town would've most likely said 'oops didn't see you just posted' instead of trying to pursue the crappy case on me.competentpsycho wrote:You mean a reaction like voting someone for asking for a prod? I really don't see how his reaction to you voting for him for a crappy reason makes him scum. Could you explain how it does?Muerrto wrote:I already admitted it was a horrible reason. I also said your reactions made it stick.populartajo wrote:Can anyone explain me why does this deserve a vote?Muerrto wrote:I already admitted my vote was because I was ticked he tried to get me prodded when it wasn't needed.
Agreed. Your(Tajo's not yours) defense being 'I'm town and if you don't think so then you're obv scum' is in fact a definite scum tell. Especially since he's been doing it for like 20 pages now.TonyMontana wrote:Being abrasive or tact-less is not a scumtell.Muerrto wrote:No, I mean his vehemence and insults instead of simply saying 'that was a retarded reason to vote me' or 'how does my asking for your prod make me scum'? Also, town would've most likely said 'oops didn't see you just posted' instead of trying to pursue the crappy case on me.
You do realise CP that you've been defending him all game long and that if he DOES flip scum you'll be lynched immediately. See, as town, you don't know his role. So unless you're claiming mason, I'd back down a tad.competentpsycho wrote: Interesting post Grimmy. He said nothing about you being scum, or you not being with him in that post. He just stated that you are attacking his playstyle rather than his reasoning. This is an extreme strawman to the point of stupidity. I have arrived at the conclusion that you play stupidly, which makes telling if you are scum really hard. You don't even seem to read the posts you quote, just inject your argument that doesn't fit in.
Also, how can anyone prove their innocence really here. You need to have some proof that he IS scum to be voting. All you have for an argument is a playstyle that you and Muerrto keep saying that he has used all game long. He just posted proof that there are people against him that he does not think are scum. Unlike you and Muerrto who have used strawmen, faulty logic, and shitty reasoning, I really don't see what the case on tajo is. Can someone who is voting for him please post a list of things that prove (or point toward) him being scum?
He reacted that way to EVERYONE that attacked him though. His defense all game has been 'I'm town'. My case has been posted multiple times.competentpsycho wrote:And you seem to be avoiding my question. Post some things that point toward him being scum, besides this playstyle that you don't like so much. The only thing I have seen from you (that you haven't taken back as a reason) is the fact that he reacted to your shitty vote on him angrily. I would be angry if someone voted me for asking for a prod also. I have seen OMGUS from both of you, which is basically your only stated reason ATM for voting for him. How does that make him more scummy than you? What other reasons make you think he is scum?
No, I'm telling him to stop defending Tajo like he knows Tajo's role. And to his credit, CP admitted he was doing it, admitted it was a bad idea, and admitted he was defending someone against bad arguments.Battousai wrote:Muerrto wrote:You do realise CP that you've been defending him all game long and that if he DOES flip scum you'll be lynched immediately. See, as town, you don't know his role. So unless you're claiming mason, I'd back down a tad.SFOS: Muerrto
This just sounds like you're threatening CP in order for him to stop helping save tajo.
Lol you've read my posts, right? I agree completely about being agressive, not sitting back, etc. but it's the fact your constant defense of someone you just put third on your scum list that is definitely strange.competentpsycho wrote:I always play kind of overeagerly. Sorry if that makes you think I may be scum but eventually every game someone is going to suspect you. I just rather that I would have drudged up information leading to the lynch of scum if I do get lynched than sitting back just to survive not helping at all.
Ditto.ShadowGirl wrote: Five days 'til deadline...
Bleh, I'm fine with where my vote is.
AShadowGirl wrote:You're fine with potentially lynching a PR on day one?
Sigh...did you want to explain this or just say it? Looking back on your posts I can already see the answer but just wondering...populartajo wrote:The above post doesnt make sense in 100 ways.
Sounds about right. I wouldn't know =ppopulartajo wrote:I could win when all threats to the mafia are eliminated? Really?
Really, Muerrto? Do you think thats the mafia win condition?
populartajo wrote:Finally, guys.
TonyMontana's post is utter bullshit and I feel good at least some people realize that.
Notice how Ergo and Muerrto dont give a shit about that post.
populartajo wrote:Wow, just wow.TonyMontana wrote:Unvote
Sorry, must have missed it?No comment on the question I asked of you several times.
populartajo wrote:3) Pretty sure I catched at least two scum in my wagon. Now Im seeing Tony and Muerrto,maybe Ergo as possible candidats.
And Fuzzy, why do you think Ergo and Muerrto (post 211 and 212, respectively) didnt comment anything about Tony's 213, the worst post Ive seen in mafiascum in a while?
populartajo wrote:LOL, Tony's 210.
And people can you unvote me?
To this:populartajo wrote:How am I trying to divide the town?
Why isnt people suspecting TonyMontana? Or Muerrto?
less than 24 hours after that last post asking why more people didn't suspect Tony.populartajo wrote:Tony isnt scum BTW.