Mini 695 - Futurama Mafia - Over

Gorrad · Post Post #85 (isolation #0) » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:50 am

Vote: Xtoxm

, because if I don't do so now I will later.

Gorrad · Post Post #86 (isolation #1) » Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:55 am

Woah! Made that post when I didn't realise it was page 4 already. Still voting Xtoxm, though. He's bloody well claimed anti-town (which is precisely what I would expect of him) and though I think he's just joking around, there's the shot he isn't.

Plus, if there's one thing I've learned in all my games with Xtoxm, it's that things get a lot easier for town when he's dead.

Gorrad · Post Post #88 (isolation #2) » Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:10 am

Y'see? Picking an arbitrary target due to an insult, without first asking for a claim and after only two posts by said person.

Well, if you expect me to butter you up or run away, you've got another thing coming. You DO make things easier for town when you're dead, I stick to this.

Gorrad · Post Post #90 (isolation #3) » Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:29 am

Why do you think the scum let you get to LYLO?

Gorrad · Post Post #95 (isolation #4) » Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:09 am

Unvote

Ok, here's what we do. We direct Xtoxm's kill every night, directly. We specifically state who else we want dead before anyone hammers. If this isn't decided on, it's the person with the second most number of votes. If A) Xtoxm kills ANYONE but who we specify, B) We're in or think we're in a LYLO situation, C) It becomes obvious that either Xtoxm's kill is the only kill or he does not have a kill, or D) He pisses us off too much, we lynch him. Personally, I think the SK claim is BS, but I'm willing to give him a shot.

Also, Xtoxm, I want a full flavor claim.

Gorrad · Post Post #97 (isolation #5) » Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:27 am

Hmph. It's got benefit to scum, you just have to think about it. The risks aren't worth it in my opinion, but this is Xtoxm.

Gorrad · Post Post #100 (isolation #6) » Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:52 am

LlamaFluff wrote:
Gorrad wrote:Hmph. It's got benefit to scum, you just have to think about it. The risks aren't worth it in my opinion, but this is Xtoxm.
I dont really see it being a benefit. There will be something that outs him as not being an SK pretty fast if he really isnt, from there he just gets lynched. The risks arent even close to being worth it, and the way he reacted to poro bringing up him being an SK doesnt feel like scum to me.

Fair enough. I can still think of benefits, but pardon me if I deign not to state them, on the chance that he is scum and hasn't thought of the same ones as I.

Gorrad · Post Post #110 (isolation #7) » Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:39 pm

...

Vote: Xtoxm

Gorrad · Post Post #122 (isolation #8) » Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:52 am

Xtoxm wrote:Well when I say play as vig, I mean play as I would play as a vig, and shoot who I think as scum, not to who people tell me to kill.

And there's why we lynch you.

Gorrad · Post Post #131 (isolation #9) » Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:13 am

I don't think a single Futurama character could be a jester except Zoidberg, and he makes more sense as a doc.

Gorrad · Post Post #133 (isolation #10) » Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:14 am

He'd be a good doctor if it wasn't for all the biology : P.

Gorrad · Post Post #135 (isolation #11) » Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:50 am

Point is, not the most likely Jester.

Gorrad · Post Post #168 (isolation #12) » Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:40 pm

WOOP WOOP WOOP WOOP WOOP WOOP!