Mini 774: Case Closed Mafia (One Truth Prevails!)
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
I'm on page 6 and already afraid that there is gonna be a smart myslinch regarding Fire. I'm pretty positive that there is scum on that waggon. I'm not waiting till I finish my reading to tell you this because I'm afraid someone might hammer.
DONT DARE HAMMER!!!
If you do... I'll pursue you tomorrow till you're lynched...
Leave us replacements time to post and get answered.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Yeah... right. You are scared of me... If you must know... I'm really suspicious of you SC so start imagining what you're going to say when I come down on you. Your whole pushing both cases without commiting and trying to follow the trend of Fire without argumenting is gonna be hard to explain. You assumed that miller would be best to have around? (with all his pro town actions? [/sarcasm])
You know replacements are scum's worst enemy right? (unless they're scum, of course)
So... Fosing me before I can question you is not gonna work. I already got you in my sight.
Stay tuned for my post. I assume it will be ready tomorrow night (I got other things to do besides this, if not I would be delighted to present it much sooner)-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Oh... and:Alexhans wrote:alreadyafraidthat there is gonna be a smart myslinch
Notice the afraid? You're stretching. I never said he was town. I just had that fear. A quicklynch can be disastrous and after your vote on page 6 it sure seemed going that way. Fosing me for the first thing I write? Is it because you know I've seen you as scum and think I may tunnelvission you or something?SC wrote:The only way I'm making sense of this is if you know Firestarter to be town, which is impossible in a day start unless you're scum.
Same as before. Haven't read the whole game. Just looked at the last votecount to see where we were standing.milllar wrote:Especially when only any possibility he might actually not be scum, came in much later. It is as if you reading, but you already know something.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Yes. It is smart for scum to accomplish a mislynch... So? (I mean, as you will se when I order my notes and post, that there is probably scum in that waggon)
Yeah. I replaced you as scum therefore I know a bit of your thoughts processes. And maybe that would lead you to think I'm gonna suspect you. Anyway, I don't think I'm gonna pull meta on you. I should study more cases were you're town first.
Well. Enough with the partially informed posts. I'll come back when I have all the info about the day. This talking without knowing is not me. I just found strange that of all players you would be the one that fosed me.I'm back...-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Wow... Usually what scum says when they don't know how to push a quicklynch when not every player is playing. I haven't posted my notes in 24 hs and you are already calling for a hammer? Aren't you a little bit interested in what I might have to say?Battousai wrote:I think we have waited long enough for the inactives to post/be replaced. The game is starting to die down which is worse.
Vote: Firestarter
Wait a bit more and I'll order my notes and post them... I just didn't want to flood the thread with a response to every quote I found strange because it will probably not be read. I'm trying to make a Tl;Dr... Also, I had some meta that showed that millar has random voted in the last finished games he's played and voted a self voter because he couldn't stand self voting while now he ignored Koresh and said he didn't random vote.
Patience. Content IS coming. There's no need to rush the vote if you're town. Scum are the only ones interested in keeping content talk to a minimum... Be pro-town.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Ok... Fuck the Tl;Dr... I'll post the some notes I made. It's not in order. It is a mess. But you are in a hurry so... Later I will try to right a summary of my views and my questions.
* Millar is a player that may post 2000 times in 1 day. (Similar to Zwets but with better intentions, he usually tries to scumhunt).
* In this game he has laid a trap with the non voting.
He doesn't vote in random stage? Why?millar13 wrote:I don't vote in the random stage, but HIYA
open 124 and some other games that I will look up later (i lost the txt I'd written about it) are not consistent with his non-voting now.
*Why does everybody say Fire insulted or was rude when millar wrote earlier:
Ok. Millar. It was all well until you made this comment. Just because you think you know doesn't necesarilly mean you're right. Say what you want but with respect to others please. I think personal attacks don't contribute at all to the game.millar wrote:In this game you have to be a little over the top...you need to blow the small clues out of proportion otherwise really you need to leave mafiascum and go back to playing cluedo with your kid sister.
Ok... 18 posts and I see Kolash self voting??? :shocked: Are we gonna have anti town players here?
millar not voting in RVs.
Seems to be really careful about letting everyone know it's random.Rage wrote:Vote: Pacman281292
Entirely random. I just want to participate!
I disagree completely.millar wrote:I've only known scum players to try and make a game serious A.S.A.P
so doing so was a scum tell
Towny doesn't feel akward around the random stage
I'm more on the lines of SC than Koresh in my thinking. I think what millar did was to set up a silly trap and call out the first player that voted for him.
Wow... Millar the experienced is condescending with newb SC...Millar wrote:Strangecoug is probably a townie who believes he is a "scum-hunter" but is going in all gones blazing.
FoSing in RVS is scary...
Is there such thing as UnFosing?Millar wrote:If you read Post 42 Sajin you would have noticed, that I no longer FOS Battousai and instead I am looking at Firestarter in stead
Millar REALLY needs to be careful with the wording.And I don't feel that way at all. Although, I do feel you FOS is a predicatable defensive mechanismIn terms of Strangecoug he is coming off as a generic town player, I have played with a number of times.
Ok. Millar. It was all well until you made this comment. Just because you think you know doesn't necesarilly mean you're right. Say what you want but with respect to others please. I think personal attacks don't contribute at all to the game.millar wrote:In this game you have to be a little over the top...you need to blow the small clues out of proportion otherwise really you need to leave mafiascum and go back to playing cluedo with your kid sister.
mmm... I don't like SC's way of making fire suspicious too without much foundations. He just makes him look suspicious with 1-liners.
Why should he feel that it was necessary to explain he would be changing his playstyle?Isaac wrote:Let's get this going. Gonna try out a new playstyle here, so be prepared lol =P
111: Battou says Firestarter did OMGUS? HOW?
So this is all you had to say about Isaac's hasty post?StrangerCoug wrote:
Or, to some extent, a StrangerCoug. I'm getting better, though.Isacc wrote:Firestarter claims null-tells can't give reads. Have you meta'd Millar yet? If so, you should know that he is an Empking, or a Zwet, meaning that most of the stuff you are accusing him of are null-tells.
Isaac had posted right before that. While I don't agree with Fire's quick association I don't see why would you have missed this.StrangerCoug wrote:
And you're not saying who it is straight up because?Firestarter wrote:We just found millar13's scumbuddy...
[/quote]StrangerCoug wrote:
I've already said what I think about you, and Firestarter's going downhill.millar13 wrote:Also I would like to know where both Korlash and Strangecoug stand at the moment, considering these are the only other active two that really have contributed anything of reall value thus far to this game
I don't think two hours is a fair time limit. Upgrade to anFirestarter wrote:Ok, millar13, you have 2 hours to post your case on me, Ill be gone for this time.HoS: Firestarter.
WHY???? WHY DO YOU ACCUSE FIRE?
the only "case" you had on him was his not voting Millar...
FoS:StrangerCoug
dude, after all that had happened since your last post this is not enough. Especially since Fire has already a huge waggon on him.
Fire wrote:The fact is millar, you called me likely scum in your 5th post, after my first 4 posts, which were in the RVS, like it or not.
Your case goes back way further than Isaac's or Battousai's posts.
This just makes it definite? Why would town IGNORE someone? Because they're confortable with the position they're now and would like everyone else to vote with so little?Millar wrote:From now on I am IGNORING you. And yes you did twist me words especially concerning the "concrete" bit. Stop with your spin and accept your fate
Sensless accusations...millar wrote:it is because he only reads the posts he wants too...and even then, he chooses to read them in a way that suits "his game"
Bussing each other day 1???? Why do you see the need to do that? This is you again trying to make both suspicious as if you liked to see one lynched today and the other tomorrow.SC wrote:From what I see at this point, Firestarter and millar13 might as well be bussing each other
Post 151 and you already say that fire is going downhill and push his lynch?
153:
why did you thought that?Sajin wrote: I think we get more information out of a firestarter lynch at this point.
So here you're excusing that you will vote the most likely to get lynched...SC wrote:Remember that I was voting millar13 before I switched to you. If I believe that my top two suspects are equally scummy, I will vote the person closer to getting lynched so my vote does not act as dead weight
*Isaac made a post in wich the first thing he did was say fire was scum and then proceded to misinterpret the broken finger issue. Fire said that with broken fingers you might miss a letter but not write an entirely different word. I agree.
isaac 107 do you really think this a case? a good post? one definite scum read and 2 town reads when they're just starting the game?
You sure changed your mind quickly...millar 106 wrote:I knew your vote would stay on me, from the first time you un-voted me. The needless uvotes in-between just shows me that you may just be a townie who doesn't actually have full confidence in his scum-hunting abilities. In fact the more I think about it, it isn't that your coming off scummy but more that you just aren't a very good townie.
I won't post because someone is doing good? lame. And he did answer your post.Isaac wrote:I would post a more content-rich post, however Millar seems to be doing well enough on his own, and we all know that Firestarter won't pay any attention to me anyways (as he still never even countered or acknowledged my original arguments against him).
*SC states that millar case is good... but doesn't say why. SC thinks they might be bussing... (on day 1:?)
This attacking without examples... Why you think he responded bad under pressure? I think his defense post was pretty decent.SC wrote:Most of what concerns me about millar13 is the early part of this game. You, on the other hand, have been responding very poorly to pressure lately
Remember the quote where YOU we're aggresive. How's it different?Millar wrote:Now you clearly are not just a plain vanilla townie...that is more than clear from post 121. Clearly you are sitting on some sort of power position (I doubt you pro-town, so the assumption almost concretes scum) otherwise you wouldn't be so frustrated and resorting to using offensive language. Why would someone with no real power feel the need to swear and your such horrible and disgusting I do not know.
Did you even stop to think that maybe scum is following your waggon? Argumentun Ad Populus is not enough.Millar wrote:is that a large amount of my case is built upon the fact that people actually see you in the same way as I do
But it is odd. As the examples I gave you don't show you doing the same...millar wrote:It isn't compulsory and therefore, be not taking part really should not be seen as some sort of issue
Dude... Didn't you read his obvscum as a joke? I did. It was like his 3rd post... Since when you dictate what is and isn't random?millar wrote:You then for some unknown reason suggest that both of them are scum, and then unvote andVote afatchic (by the time you have voted a second time, you have ended your personal random stage
He had a case IMO. You had just contradicted yourself with the scum wants to end RVS.millar wrote:Once again you you jumped on a altercation and made it your business to vote against for the third timewith no real case.
Now, here you make a good point. His unvoting so fast feels weird. Especially when you were not in danger of being lynched.millar wrote:Only two posts later you have then unvoted me, and put me on MAJOR FOS. Making you undecisive but also seeming as the fact that pacman didn't actually seem to back you reason, as the reason why you felt you need to back off yourself.
Wich ones?millar wrote:Isaac made some good points, not all great or perfect, but some good points none the less
Same idea I had.fire wrote: When I flip town, does your "Idea" of millar & me bussing each other excuse him from a lynching?
It's the same thing I wrote earlier.fire wrote:You say Ive been responding poorly to pressure, and that Ive been going downhill...
At least have the balls to point to some examples, I cannot defend against the invisible.
Basically I'm seeing a bad play by millar that quickly found himself in a fight to death (from his side) with fire and a lot of opportunistic people jumped on the waggon without much explanation and tried to beat Fire with just the amount of people and not logic.
I'm still at page 8 because I went back several times to re-read a few things to be clear about them. While they are a few scummy things about fire...
Especially his calling Isaac scumbuddy (wrong move) I have a bad feeling about his waggon and have a decent town read on him-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Good morning.
Wrong. I'm suspicious of a lot of things. Don't worry about me being anti town, is just that I came to the game asked people not to hammer while I was reading and started doubting SC's motives to make both Fire and millar but push the more popular lynch... Before I could even post my thoughts he had already fosed me... ??? What's that? He could ask me a question, but maybe he needed that fos to make me suspicious......Anyone else have a problem with this stuff? He has some crazy meta and tunnelvision on coug, and gives one of the biggest anti-town threats I've seen in awhile.
I don't think they case on fire is as clear as a lot of people pretend. I don't like Isaac's vote at all, nor I like battou's attitude of wanting to move on... Usually when there are replacements people don't say let's get this going, They've had enough time, hammer, hammer.
If Fire is town I want his lynch to have been thoroughly discussed before it's done. Otherwise tomorrow everyone will wash their hands and point at millar.
Nor was millars... he was fosing everybody.SC wrote:Uh, hello? Firestarter's mouth was not where his money was
OK. But what did you the impression of bussing?SC wrote:OK, first off, your implication that scum would not bus on Day 1 is WIFOM. I've done it as scum myself, although doing so in that particular game was very dangerous and a contributing factor to my loss.
Also, accusing two people of trying to bus each other ≠ lining up lynches.
@Lindis: I'm not gonna rule out one if the other flips scum. It's just that I don't like the isolated suggestion that they might be bussing and nothing else. That looks like adding more baseless suspicion to the game.
I'm defending fire fierce because I've followed the game and thought: What the hell? How is fire taking more heat (lol) than millar if millar was much more full of inconsistencies? Why everything else is pretty much ignored? I ask people not to hammer because I'm catching up and I get fosed and then a vote to L-1 comes up. I wanna play before DAy 1 ends or I'll get nothing for tomorrow. In no way I'm pinning SC as scum or anything, I just don't like a lot of the things he did and definetly want explanations.
I thought I was going to enter a game with some kind of choice but you're all pretty much set on fire. I want to find out for myself, and from what I've seen until now. I'm not convinced, at all.
@Sajin:Then why not millar for example? He has a lot of posts too.
This is what I've been trying to say.Sajin wrote:Referencing all those scum tactics is scummy in my opinion. Purely because doing so casts doubt rather than digs up any information.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Ok. you did not fos everybody, it was my impression for defending your non voting and saying you'd rather fos them. Just Battou and fire in succession.millar13 wrote:
FOS everybody?alexhans:
Nor was millars... he was fosing everybody.
Where exactly. Either quote them ALL or please leave
Is that all you had to comment on? Nothing else called your attention?-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
WARNING: LONG POST
If you die and flip town, there will still be stuff that I can get on millar13 for.
Apparently, Sajin defines bussing a little more strictly than I do. I think your case on
Firestarter is great, and I believe most of it, but you're doing things yourself that's setting
off alarms. That's all I think I need for a bussing accusation—you can be the first person to
vote somebody and still be bussing that person. [/quote]
I don't understand how do you reach the conclusion that if millar is scummy he could be bussing.
Maybe he is scum and he is buddying, maybe he is town and he is right about fire, maybe not.
@korlash: I don't like your attitude regarding the tactics issue. You defended millar for
saying battou applied tactics but pretty much said that anything applied as a tactic. So there
is no reason for millar to vote battou.
Also. I don't like the interpretations of
170 expresses a lot of the motives why I'm not liking the Fire waggon. He makes sense IMO.
This is stretch. Things have happened and he logically suspects some more than others. The notfire 170 wrote:He states he's still 50/50 on me, wouldn't town be 50/50 on anyone in game,
especially after just coming out of the random stage? He then looks at lurkers, saying that scum
may be contained within them, why not place a vote on one them to get them to post?
voting lurkers is just gameplay. And he said that he was careful with his votes. Maybe a Fos
would be more consistent but it's really his choice.
@SC: I would appreciate more your bussing theory if you had pointed out that it has to do with
millar's "scum partner" mistake. That might be an innocent mistake, but might not. This is not
to be dismissed as lightly as you did.
look at 170. I think
it raises pretty good questions. For example the fact that millar had said fire was bad townie
like and rapidly reverted to scum. Then, another thing I don't like about SC is that he
practically stopped pursuing millar with questions since millar said that he was townie.
[quote="fire]So if you wrote, "Im scum", and you came back half an hour later and told us it was
a mistake, it should have read "Im town".. that were to allow you this based on the fact you've
2 broken fingers???[/quote]lol. This is going in my wiki quotes.
The way in wich millar set on fire is strange and the way in wich he tried to prove his case by
saying others agreed with him strikes me as he thinking that he didn't have a good enough case.
Besides from the vote-hopping and saying that Isaac was a scumm buddy.
This applies to you too millar.millar wrote:I don't know how to respond with out screaming, but this doesn't actually
completely some up as an actual case. You have actually based a large amount of your anaysis on
your own opinion and also what you seem to believe IS FACT. It is almost as if you believe you
know what everyone is thinking and you know exactly what they are planning to do.
Ok MasterMafia... Did your case had hard case and evidents? Wasn't it also YOURmillar wrote:When you make a case, you actually have to have some sort of actual case with
some hard case and evidents and not just PERSONAL OPINION.
personal opinion?
172 doesn't answer or refute 170 AT ALL! It just dismisses it as bad posting and inveting... I
DONT LIKE THIS.
Wow. Calling for a lynch without answering his postmillar wrote:I admit I have come to point, where I don't see how Firestarter can stay and the
game can progress at the same time.
?
175: Come on people!
look at this!!! It's him avoiding fire and dismissing him. He seems to be confortable with his
position and trying to get him quick lynched.
176: Still keeps at the same thing.
I feel like he has transformed into Zwets.
So who are you investigatingmillar wrote:Good Point, a town player would feel the need to concentrate on just one player
if another one was given him a lot of grief as well.
besides fire?
I feel the same way.fire wrote:Gotta love the reactions from the 3 of you...
Instead of analysing the case, you come on here and try and verbally beat me up...
-battou was the first to address fire's case without just attacking him but logically trying to
discuss.
@millar: do you? What about the Fire waggon?battou wrote:From what I have read of Millar's posts, he feels D1 bandwagons are usually
controlled by scum since there is so little information to go on.
Millar. There's a game where you were town and someone self voted and you told themmillar wrote:I am pretty sure, that town do self-vote sometimes. I have done it once, and if
my hunch is correct Korlash who is doing it could very well be on the side of the town as well.
that it was scummy and voted for them contradicting this and your view that scum want's to get
out of RVS.
How is this post useful? It's you spamming the thread to make fire more suspicious by baselessmillar wrote:Battousai you post is valued, as personally I don't think I can attempt to
really justify firestarters claims on me...he just wants his cake and wants to eat is also. An
indirect post, was far more useful
repetition.millar wrote:I've only known scum players to try and make a game serious A.S.A.P
so doing so was a scum tell
Its clearly says that I thought the action was a SCUM-TELL...it doesn't actually mention me
calling anyone scummy. You have to realize that is two very different things. [/quot€]
I don't know how everybody else reads this buy I read it as if it you were saying that it WAS a
scum tell, therefore the person doing it is scummy. How can one drop scum tells but not be
scummy? Maybe if they were null tells.
What does this mean? Live in the past? That he uses what has happened until now? We all mustmillar wrote: I have you on 60/40 and once again you remain to LIVE IN THE PAST
live int the past because the past is where we made our actions and we have to answer for them.
Ok. Isaac is right about asking Fire to answer but he SHOULD read the cases on other players because all info help. You can't tunnel vision so much. Plus, you're only gonna pay attention to the millar case if fire flips town? So you can go for millar? That's why you don't wanna talk about it now? So you don't defend him and later try to use the same posts to lynch him?Isaac wrote:Instead of analyzing the case? I'm not interested in your case on Millar, as I am not Millar and I am perfectly capable of analyzing him myself. I am interested in you responding to my case on you which you consistently ignore, even now!
You are my number 1 suspect, and at almost L-1. Any case you make attacking another person filters through the "scum trying to shift his lynch" alarm at this point. Your case on Millar may be useful later, if you flip town, however right now there is no logical reason for me to analyze your wall-o-text Millar cases.
Basically you're saying: Don't scumhunt. Defend yourself till we finally lynch you.Isaac wrote:Frankly, you aren't in any position to be making attacks, we all know you are suspicious of the people making strong attacks on you. Right now, you should be focused on answering my questions and/or defending yourself.
Trying to prove yourself with Argument ad Populum yet again. What if they're scum and it's part of an agenda?millar wrote:The fact that another person agrees with me says it all really
What about:millar wrote:Stupid acting like an idiot with posts like this
"Funny guy, no.. really ya are Wink"millar wrote:Typing the wrong word is a scum-tell.
Well lah dee dah...I must be scum then.
I think you're wrong. I feel he has played better than you. I think you've got no right to tell him he is playing like an idiotic (If both of you are town, if you're scum it could be part of your strategy).millar wrote:That wasn't abuse, I was just stating what you are doing...playing like an idiotic because your reasoning is idiotic. If i were to call you a mofo that would be abuse.
mmm... Fishing for a role? What do you guess his role is?Korlash wrote:I do want to get a quick word in before I start my grueling process of trying to take this all in... Is Fire at L-2? has anyone asked him to claim or has a claim at all been covered? Did he claim already?
Oh god! you say nothing and then try to pull a freudian slip like a wizard pulling a bunny from a hat... er... that didn't came out right...millar wrote:Firestarter:-
Your Tunnel vision is handicapping you......IRONY!
Isacc you need to calm down...IRONY!
Also I think this is a freudian slip:- "BTW, Town need to read these posts. End of. "
Why not fellow townies...you addressed the town once again as if you are a separate organism
Whatever, this is you pushing his lynch and manufacturing additional evidence. Usually scum will be more careful to say: We, the town, need to... us townies, I am a town, etc, etc. Town players may not pay that much attention to this.
urgh... to many CAPS in this game. Too much trying to out-shout the other player.
I don't follow. What's your idea here?Battousai wrote:Firestarter- Why don't you do a simple name claim? That way if you have a power-role or a vanilla townie role, it won't be obvious.
mmm... have you all noticed that the only thing being discussed is fire's case? How's that good for town?
What are your reasons behind this?Sajin wrote:I second the name claim idea firestarter
This type of attacks annoy me and drive new players away from the site because they feel insulted. You can avoid it Isaac and still make a good case.Isaac wrote:Firestarter, you need to work on reading comprehension.
Again, Why? Why should he claim?Isaac wrote:Firestarter: Time for a claim. You're at L-2, someone else said earlier they were considering putting you at L-1. Claim, because you are only digging yourself deeper by talking.
Oh! but if you don't investigate his case on millar you can't see if millar is right about him or not. It may be VERY SIGNIFICANT. If he is manufacturing a case then he is probably scum, if he is making a good case then he millar's case would be suffer.Isaac wrote:I said, I am not going to post an entire analysis of your case on Millar. I do not need to debate an entire Millar case, mainly because I don't feel super suspicious of him yet.
I'm not vivian kudo.
Suddenly, something doesn't help you and you quickly dismiss it?millar13 wrote:Name claims don't actually mean anything to be honest, and this has somehow taken the pressure off completely as we gone off topic.
What do you mean?millar13 wrote:Also I don't like the idea of name claim, the fact that the action was done by you Battousai has actually totally throw me off balance as what to think.
well... looks like Isaac was pretty much set on fire...Isacc wrote:Well, here's what can be analyzed from the name.
Being the mother of the main guy, the name is probably attached to a town player.
However, being a show featuringmanycharacters, it would not be hard for a scum to find a pro-town sounding name.
Also, seeing as she does not appear till episode 43, a part of me doubts the likelihood that the character would appear in this game.
All of this said: I am for a full role claim, before we get to any lynch.
I disagree. Maybe you'll realize at endgame when you find out who is scum (possibly in that waggon).millar13 wrote:Saying your vanilla townie is this game, is like you have brown hair. It doesn't actually mean anything.
However, if you are a vanilla townie then you are the worst example and most scummy one I have ever...and I mean EVER come across
Never tired of pushing.millar13 wrote:Also, don't you think the mod may have randomly assigned role to name? Quite often names give end up as red herrings.
While I would prefer another lynch I can understand your reasons and find you to be a decent player. I don't know why you want to get the game going with your last L-1 vote (after I asked you not to) when we need so much replacements.Battou wrote:Since Firestarter claimed Vanilla, it would be best just to lynch him. If he is town, then the scum know he is not a powerrole, which then give them a better chance of hitting one.
While we wait, I think we should play the rest of today under the assumption we lynch Firestarter and he turned up vanilla townie. I will post tomorrow as it is getting late and I gotta get up early for my first class tomorrow.
@korlash: When you asked for flavour in the claim... what do you mean? You now he can't quote the mod right?.
Am I wrong or he isn't allowed to quote or fake quote the role pm?
243: WOW! here millar tries to blame Fire with the same argument he dismissed when used against him... Battou noted this.
You're not adding things to your case. Just attacking him. Yes, it is helping you get your lynch but I'm not sure if it's helping the town.millar wrote:That makes no sense...so my vote is standing on you currently and yet you expect me to backdown and distance myself from you.
How you think these posts are not helping me I do not know.
riiiight...millar13 wrote:Its not that its is the spelling that I have an issue with, its the fact I don't believe his name claim is true.millar13 wrote:Considering its is spelt:
-KAFUFFLE
-it is APPARENTLY
and the fact that the language is broken in places, I am willing to say that you used a minor characters name (who was a protagonist) and made up the role PM as well.
Well. This makes YOU look more town IMO. Admitting you're not sure.millar13 wrote:To be honest I am at a cross roads.
1) The previous case and the reasons I thought he was scum are still strong in my decision
2) This claim and what has followed is now actually making me think that actually their is a chance that he might have actually been telling the truth and he is town. (This would not excuse his scummy nature though)
If you thought he should talk about something else... Why not tell him what? Why not asking questions?StrangerCoug wrote:I don't buy Firestarter, but the name claim has nothing to do with it. I agree that he shouldn't talk about it like there's nothing else to talk about, though. "I'm so and so, and I do such and such" would have be enough for me.
Then why is he voting Fire?Millar wrote:If anything, SC suspects me more than you because he has had his vote and suspicions on me for much longermillar wrote:We are at least two weeks off the end of the Day, and I don't see any need to rush in.
Why the rush? The only ones that have been in the spotlight are millar and Fire... 4 others with low or null activity... Do you think it's good to have nothing to go on Day 2?Battousai wrote:We need to lynch Firestarter...... he claimed vanilla.
Same question.Isaac wrote:QFT.
This is true...StrangerCoug wrote: You have accused me of certain things specifically (we know what they are), yet Sajin is scummier than me based on gut. This is making absolutely no sense to me.
@Fire: how did you think it was helpful to post a gut call without a single reason?
While I don't like mislynching I think that battou's point of better lynching a vanilla than another player and knowing that Fire won't be killed tonight is not a good idea.korlasch wrote:I agree with the discrepancies and wifom part, but lynching him for claiming vanilla is stupid. I admit his claim doesn't help but it's hardly a 'main point'...
3 Pages to go!-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
First I'll adresss the last posts.
I thought you had fosed more people. I was wrong.millar wrote:The problem with that post is you went from EVERYONE to just two people. You didn't relate to why, and how it was changed. You over exaggeratedand to make matters worse didn't actually bother to quote, which mean you already knew you were trying to make it sound more than it actually was. It might seem like a null-tell, but after awhile enough null tells form a foundational base for a scum member.
... *sigh* look, I'll keep it simple:millar wrote:What makes you assume that if Fire comes up town, that I am necessarily proven scum. If he somehow flips town, it is down to his scumlike play rather than being my fault that I noticed he was scum. People like yourself are almost sounding like you ALREADY know Fire is town, and therefore want a wagon to form as soon as possible.
You and Fire are the only ones who have been in the spotlight. If fire is not scum (wich I don't think right now) tomorrow there won't probably be much to go on. I'm foresseing that scum will try to make you be in the spotlight again because of your case on fire. The other people in the waggon agreed with you but didn't post so big cases. SC and Isaac especially.
You seriously think Fire is scum? I don't. I haven't been involved on the emotional battle that has been going on. I'm a bit colder. I don't find him scummy enough.
God. Already assuming things? I looked up at your ISO to count how many people you had fosed... I thought it was more and was surprised when it was only Battou and Fire. You talked a lot about foses though.
After a while a lot of null tells are scummy??? What is that? Have I commited a lot of null tells in your opinion?
SC seems to be the only person with logic? He's been acting like buddying you and has tunnel visioned hard on Fire since it seemed the majority wanted that...millar wrote:Strangecoug is the only person with logic, as in many ways his idea of me and Firestarting bussing is the only point that actually sounds like it has any solid meaning to it. It doesn't have to neccersary be right, to have strength to it.
Why I don't find him agreeing with millar surprising if it involves making his only attacker scummy? 1) he befriends millar 2) he attacks me 3) he doesn't state reasons.SC wrote:That's a very good case against alexhans there
I meant that any of them can be S/s, t/t or s/t... I don't see how would you think one is more likely than the otherSC wrote:"Buddying"? I define that as defending a player in a scummy manner, and I don't see where millar13 and Firestarter have defended each other all game.
at the beginning at millar. yes.SC wrote:I've BEEN asking questions.
Then only to Fire until he was sure of being lynched.
When I replaced. You fosed me.
When I said I was wary of you. Then you started asking ME questions and trying to make me look scummy.
@SC: I still don't follow your logic of bussing... You said it more than once throughout the game... Why not just say that one being scum doesn't rule the other out? Why repeatedly say they might be bussing?
HOLE READ DONE LAST LONG POST(relief for many)
that you might get 4 weeks of gameplay instead of 2...korlesh wrote:What is the difference between spending 2 extra weeks on Day 1 or spending those 2 weeks in D2?
I agree. Scum would prefer a lynch now than later if that is definite.Fire wrote:If you seriously think I would spend 2 weeks helping out town, as scum, you are seriously deluded.
I may have come late but... HELLO!Fire wrote:If no-one thinks that leaving me alive until D1 expires, fair enough.
mmm... I don't know. Sometimes it's scum but sometimes it may be indecition.lindis wrote:I disagree. A vote is not sacred. Expect to see me put votes around often. Its all a part of the pressure game. I actually find it slightly scummy when people rarely vote at all, especially in the face of good evidence (granted, that is subjective). I find it akin to lurking, its like sitting on the sidelines.
QFT.lindis wrote:We're all adults here, but I still think I should say, this is only a game folks. Lets try not to rip each other apart when we play.
This worries me a lot.lindis wrote:Stranger and isacc basically sit back and give millar a pat on the back and say he's doing a good job so far.
What would you say if someone suggested a name massclaim?lindis wrote:I dislike seeing people try to figure info from just the name. That assumes the mod isn't competent to prevent his game from being broken. I advise against it.
I liked your analysis of townie lynching or not. I'm not sure if it's right given all the possible WIFOM that will happen (regarding Fire) tomorrow if we mislynch today.
QFT.lindis wrote:There's so much spotlight on fire and millar this whole game, it would be easy for scum to just be quiet and let the day pan out.
Good idea with the not millar/fire question.
SO YOU REFUSE TO ANSWER THE QUESTION? YOu think you suspecting scum and being killed later is an obvious procedure for scum?sajin wrote:And claiming who we think is town and who is not here lets scum set up day 2 better. We already have a decent lynch.
@krolash: same question. Everything can and will be manufactured and WIFOMeD by scum... So what? We should shut up?Ok, fire and stranger riding millar was working. he was breaking, but you guys took it a bit far. You were nitpicking over really inane things, like his wording.
In fact, I know SC to be agressive with his victim. SO it's consistent with his play (town or scum).SC wrote:I'm sorry, but it takes more than "you're overdoing this" to get me to relax the pressure.
Dismissing him as not wanting to play? I'm having very bad vibes about you Coug (SC)...You shouldn't have to nullify him if he attacks you. You should refute his logic.SC wrote:Firestarter seems not to care about being lynched, which to me is tantamount to resignation from the game, yet he's still pushing millar13 and me. I'm confused as to whether he really wants to continue playing.
QFT.Fire wrote:It seems that most are happy to not say anything until Im lynched, therefore minimising the chance they'll come across scummy.
How is the time wasted?Korlash wrote:He's fine with being lynched and is asking for more time to waste
QFT.Lindis wrote:Actually, Firestarter's resignation towards being lynched makes him seem more townie to me. Why?
If he was scum, he I can see acting resigned and acceptant to being lynched as a gambit, and indeed, firestarter did just that back when he was at l-4 (I believe it was l-4 at that point).
I agree with you.Lindis wrote: As a side note, I think it's scummy how quickly you people want to end this day. Rushing a day only leads to mistakes being made, and bad judgment calls. But of course, that's all a matter of opinion.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
@SC:
Right, but you said "That's aThe standout here is that two people ≠ everybody.very good caseagainst alexhans there". You think it's a case? Isn't it just a point where I was wrong? Do you think a very good case merits a lynch? You called millar's case on Fire a good case but this is a "Very good case"?
2) So would you be ok with a millar lynch right now instead of Fire?
3) He does want to play. He's been posting a lot. He just had everyone (NOT really everyone, A great number of people) voting against him and dismissing his answers. I think it can be pretty demoralizing. You suggest a town player to self-hammer? That is anti-town! Only scum self-hammer when they don't want to disclose any more information.... Plus there will be one less person in his lynch waggon that has to explain their motives.
4) Let me handle millar. He at least seems, although some times wrong, to have good intentions.
5) Maybe he feels he CANT continue. But it's better to ask him. All I know is that his defenses have gone unheard. Sow the seeds of discord? What do you mean by that? Does it preocupie you he signaled you as a possible millar scumbuddy? (I don't think this, mind you)
And I'm gonna tell everyone something else before SC starts attacking me further.. Pacman wasn't doubted at all up till now. Why would I put all this effort and try to defend things that Fire said and boost discussion against a lynch if I was scum? It would be really much easier to just add some little things and go along with the flow of the game. I might be a bit messy. But I'm trying to help the town.
------------------
@korlasch:
Ok. But, as Battou suggested earlier (though now he has already voted) we could just assume that Fire is gonna flip town and keep talking until the end of day. Then when he flips, we will have talked a lot more than up till now.Korlash wrote:
Because he asked a really dumb question and then responded with a vague inane answer when i questioned him about it. Neither one of them shows me he plans on using the extra time in a useful manner.Alex wrote:How is the time wasted?
And we really need to get replacements before day 2 starts. Or it will be really hard to play.
MY first long post were my notes, questions are not necesarilly accusations. I posted them like that because I was afraid that someone might hammer after Battou's L-1.Dude, it's not fishing when someone is at L-2. If anything I'll argue I was trying to save his life. Maybe if you try to keep the BS accusations to a minimum your posts wouldn't be so long.
I know what paraphrasing is. You don't need to mock me.I'm sorry, have you not heard? It's this new invention called paraphrasing. You pull key words and prashes from your flavor and then fill in the rest with your own stuff. As far as what I meant, I mean any themed flavor put in his role PM that coud help confirm it as a real role. I hardly asked him to "quote" anything.
Look. I'm ok if you just give me the answers. Why do you act like that when answering? I want to know things. It doesn't necesarilly mean I think you're scum. I just think this game has been excessively focused on only 2 people.
Rephrasing:This is a very confusing statement just because of the wording. But overlooking that as it doesn't matter, yes, that is a dumb point.
- I don't like mislynching.
- Battou said that if we don't lynch a claimed vanilla that is seen as scummy by a big amount of people scum will go for another player (hoping to hit a PR) and try to get him lynched eventually.
- I somewhat agree with it but I have mixed feelings.
------------
This is what I've been fearing. This is why I wanted discussion and not a hammer.millar wrote:There is a chance, and I think it is growing in likelihood that Firestarter and myself could both me townies, and that a wagon is rolling. Scum might actually be lurking or watching as the town implodes.
----------------
oh... SC... the game you mentioned with so many replacements... how did it go?-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Wow. I'm actually glad how you rushed to vote me. Self-defense? Afraid? It's really interesting. And finally the game will move from just Fire/millar.
I'm blowing things out of proportion but you seconded a point made by millar and already think I'm scummy enough to vote? You say a very good case merits a lynch and the case against is a very good case? (Great! Lynch the replacement who is wary of you)SC wrote:It very well could be, but again, you shouldn't be blowing things out of proportion.
*sigh* I mean I can handle MY communication with millar. I don't control him.SC wrote:millar13 can handle himself.
He can do it but we won't follow just because he said so.SC wrote:You sow the seeds of discord by creating internal conflict within your enemy. He's basically said "go after these people when I'm dead and buried". If he's scum and the people he says to attack end up flipping town, then he will be guilty of lining up lynches, something I've accused him of once before.
Yeah... WIFOM... I don't say it should prove my innocence... I'm telling everyone to think about it. But you seem trying to attack me for little things.SC wrote:This is the second time you've committed WIFOM, and that along with you constantly saying one thing when the reality is another is really getting on my nerves here.
Then I'm right. Rushing to lynch and too many replacements can crap a game all over.SC wrote:The Mafia won prisoner's dilemma.
Finally. Know that this is in-game. I think you're scummy. I appreciate you all the same OUTSIDE this game
-----
@korlasch:
-Discussion, IMO, is always good. Scum usually messes up along the way. Regardless of the attitudes.
-Maybe it will be fine to get replacements at night. I don't know... It will definetly be a long night.
And how am I supposed to answer that? It's lame. Some people feel that when you question them you're making a case because you think they're guilty.korlasch wrote:And did I ever say you called me scum? sounds like someone has a guilty Conscience...-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
mmm... You may have a point regarding the replacement's willingness based on the amount of pages...
But I think I want to discuss at least a bit further what I've been writing... I want answers from the active players that I talked to.
And opinions on SC's case on me. My doubts regarding SC. etc.
oh... sorry I edit with notepad and didn't remember your name exactly... You mind if I call you Kor?
You realize you messed your name up?Kor wrote:The answer would be, "No Korlasch, you said thatI'm back...-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
I'm saying that voting without giving reasons is not satisfying for the town. At least state them simply but do it or it will not help us.Sajin wrote:
last page I said I am suspicious and you quote and agree with me. Then you slam me for actualizing my suspicions with a vote a page later. What gives?alexhans wrote:
QFT.Battousai wrote:Sajin- What are you suspicious of SC for? Don't say "I agree with Firestarter."
Its the same thing we didn't like about SC when he agreed with millar's case on fire.I'm back...-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
But we don't know who scum is! We all discuss and try to find scum tells and argue points until someone looks probable scum.Kor wrote:No... it is not... Scum Run Discussion is alway detrimental and disasterous to the town.
Then you haven't paid much attention to the game. He clearly stated how hekai wrote:Also, his 240 looks alot like a partial role pm quote, and I'm confused
as to why he wasn't modkilled.
posted the flavour without quoting.
Hah! That's your whole case? did you even read the entire game? No commentary on anything that has happened? No thoughts about anything?Kairyuu wrote: Strangercoug is scum.
That is the exact type of scumslip that no one caught me on way back when in FacedownIf you die and flip town, there will still be stuff that I can get on millar13
for.
and Thirsty.
Plus there's the whole issue with being so eager to please, especially regarding
Isacc.
vote: Strangercoug
Ok. So far you just came down and stated that 2 people were town (one gut call) and two were scum... You must be a great scum-hunter! You know so much and explain so little... You accuse me but leave it at that? Couldn't you at least state a key reason? Are you to lazy to dig it up or to look for a case to manufacture? And someone said I was anti-town... posting votes on Thursday and saying you won't explain till Saturday ... come on.Kairyuu wrote: alexhans is scum too.Too many reasons to count, but I'm too lazy to dig them up. Maybe Saturday (prom is tommorrow, so you get nothing then).
right now
Well... from your wiki I see you're and agressive player and you are far more concerned with semantics than you should be, apparently... Whatever. I thought being agressive meant attacking with reasons too.
@Sajin. I too feel you haven't provided a decent case against SC. You just seemed to go along with the flow.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
@Korlash: I understand your point of lynching Fire(Although I consider him town and would prefer to lynch someone I consider Scum), As I said to battou. But I don't undestand why we must rush it.
You're giving to much emphasis in the info we will gain when he flips... I don't think it's gonna make us find scum that easy.
How is he detrimental to the town?
If you're scum andyou start at day 2 you can choose from alive people and conviniently push towards who you want lynched. If you say who you think is scum before you won't be able to change so easyly without explaining. Why do you refuse to say who you suspect? This is mafia! It's our job.Have you even given a point why sharing the "lists" right before a lynch is so much more important then sharing it at the start of day 2
By your style we should be anti town along the day so we don't get nightkilled... That's what Wall-e did on a game... act scummy to avoid nightkill. He was lynched If you must take one for the team. Then do it. Because if your suspicions follow go down to your grave then it's useless for town if you were right.
I, as Fire, feel you're too tunnel-visioned.
Rephrase pleaseKor wrote:... *sigh* No scum want to appear pro-town. saying "I've been helping out town for two weeks" is more likely done by scum then saying "If you are town you need to be lynched today" and whatever else people think I said that was scummy.
It's ok. ALEXHANS! I sparked new discussion though. If Fire was lynched just when I arrived there would only have been Fire vs Everyone (Almost, I tend to use everyone often, you see) and nothing else.This is because your wagon had lost some support, some people were calling you town, and that new guy said you looked sincere or whatever. I've been most concerned with trying to get your wagonback up to full speed and so I've been going after those thoughts and not the fact your claim is BS. Although granted i should have brought that up again earlier, for that it is my bad.
And sorry nw guy, not time to look up your name but you know who you are. This is not meant to be insulting I'm just super short on time and am trying to bust this out ASAP before I leave.
I don't think discussion is bad, by the way. I feel that discussion from everybody is always good. NO matter if it's scum or town. It's registered. So it definetly can let scum-tells show.
The only discussion that might not be good is when you know or suspect someone to be a PR and say it out in the open. That's uncool.
Haven't you ever seen town accept their lynch? Scum would be more desperate to survive.2. You having been acceptant to your lynch is another reason you will be under suspicion in the future. Although it's hardly as big a deal as the claim so I'm just going to stick with that.
He actually resigned to the fact that he wouldn't be lynched. That's different.... Seeing as how you yourself had resolved to being lynched off M13 and SC's case they can't have been weak. that's a contradiction from you right there. Their case was so good you yourself agreed to lynch you... I mean... that kinda proves right there their case had to be super freaking awesome.
------------
@Kairyuu:
Oh! but it's there and you just voted based on a semantics thing... So.... you vote but don't full read? Specially since you won't be able to post soon? How's that pro-town?Kairyuu wrote:@alexhans: I'm too lazy to update my wiki. The semantics thing is barely valid any more. Also, as I said, prom is tonight, and I'll be out until probably 3 or 4 am with that, so you get to deal with me not doing a ful read until then.
just Checking your posts? You voted for him... that's not a check up. That's pretty serious.Kairyuu wrote:@Strangercoug: I'll respond fully to your points when I have some more time. I'm pretty much just doing quick checking in posts in all of my games and then leaving again.
-------
@Battou:
I agree. I consider it a null tell.BAttou wrote:I think the only reason some people (forgot who all is on the wagon right now) are voting Korlash is because he is being more outspoken about it, which, imo, is more townie.
I totally forgot Pacman was voting youKorlash wrote:I actually forget what Alex was voting me for... And what's his name used my inactivity as a reason. So neither of them are even voting me mainly for what I've been saying here.
unvote
he voted in 27 agreeing with your self vote... I don't know if it's a joke or he votes you because he don't like self voters.
That's your opinion. I've posted a lot of things giving examples of why I found millar inconsistent and making a bad case on Fire.Battousai wrote:M13's case wasn't weak...
--------
@Fire: You seriously believe Korlash is scum? Isn't your vote a grudge?
err... I guess you answered...
---------------Fire wrote:I dont think your silly, I think your being inherently scummy...
When I was on the chopping block, your posting was steady and deliberate, I feel.
Now that my lynch has become "less-inevitable" you are really trying to have it re-ignited, by whichever argument you deem necessary. Its become more desperate as time has passed, culminating in you wanting me lynched as town, and now as scum, fundamentally starting from very weak cases by M13, then SC
LOL. This is going to my wiki quotes.Korlash wrote:i don't need to cover my ass. What I am doing is for the benefit of the town as a whole, I'm like the hero of a movie who knows there's a plot to assassinate the president but no one believes me and everyone thinks my brother was a terorist and... wait... this is the plot of Eagle Eye... hmmm...
@everyone: Regarding the English or japanese thing... Does anyone else has english names in their role? Mine sounds japanese. Do you have a list of english/japanese name relation? I want to see if there's a translation in the english version or not.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Ok. But you used a semantics argument to support a poor quick vote. Regardless of what you or the wiki say.Did I say that it was totally invalid? No. I didn't. I said barely valid, meaning that I rarely use it anymore. Whoohoo.
Then why feel the need to vote without all the facts?Also, as to the second bit, learn to read. I said that I had less than an hour to read the whole thread and post. You try pulling off a full read of this game in that amount of time.
But what I'm saying is that you voted for SC (410) without having read the whole game and without a case but a little semantic detail you think is scummy. Then you mentioned me as SCUM (and tell me if it doesn't give the impression that you're very sure) but didn't explained why. Saying that there were too many reasons to count:Again, learn to read. In THAT POST. The one you QUOTED, I was checking in on the thread because I didn't have much time. Do not misrep me. I voted him in a completely different post.
Now you vote me for, apparently, misreping you...alexhans is scum too. Too many reasons to count, but I'm too lazy to dig them up right now. Maybe Saturday (prom is tommorrow, so you get nothing then).
This is the second time you've called me scum... But you don't give the reasons that you were supposed to give... That was all you had against SC? You switch your vote solely because of my last post?Kairyuu wrote:unvote
vote: alexhans
Misrep does not suit you, scum.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
I don't think it does...Kairyuu wrote:@alexhans:
That adresses all of your points. When I have more than a few minutes at a time to spend here then you get your reread. Until then you get to deal with me doing things as I go.Kairyuu, in post 470 wrote:Also, I do generally back things I say up with evidence. Lots of it. Pages and pages sometimes. However, this game was a pain in the ass to read in the hour I had to catch up and post before going to bed last night, so I skimmed instead. I'll probably just go with it for a bit, and then do a full reread once I have some more time on my hands in a few days.
You can answer these...That was all you had against SC? You switch your vote solely because of my last post?
Anyway, I'm gonna let you do your reread and tell me everything that has gone through your mind to act like you did.
Hope you had fun in the prom...-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
So... Battou... Do you think he is scum? Or just want him lynched for your gameplay reason? (meaning that he would be probably lynched later on)
I think his situation was desperate and he had given up trying to survive. Now, if he sees he has some hope... why does he have to curl up and die? I don't understand how that's supposed to be scummy.I'm back...-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
This is a lame question. Always. "Why didn't you say so before"? typical of wanting to dismiss a case instead of addressing it.And if you think Battousai's random vote is scummy, then why didn't you vote him the first time it was brought up?
Look, Battou voted M13 for not voting in RVS (being anti town) and then M13 voted Battout for applying tactics. Korlash agreed that they were tactics. No one else disputed that it was a serious vote. After, when called upon it. Battou says it was not serious but a random vote. That way he is not pressured.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
@battou:
I'll try to make myself clearer. I knew it was hard to explain.
Fire is about to be lynched...
Everyone (almost) seems to be against him and not care what he says. They just use it against him.
He's annoyed. He responds in desperation.
Finally, he sees that he is going to be lynched.
He accepts his fate but tries to help town by giving something else besides his lynch.
Then Super Alexhans comes and starts trying to move the game and look at other people.
The game gets moving and there are other cases/accusations.
Fire now knows that there is hope to lynch scum.
Now. Do you see my reasoning? Why would it be scummy to accept his fate? Why would be scummy to renew his hopes and try to lynch scum?
It's not scummy. It's a null tell. I'm not saying it makes him town, I'm just refuting a point that Kor used to validate his lynch.
Come on dude, let's not joke ourselves... IT IS different. You were voting for him for a decent reason. Something that he could respond to. If I say you smell like my socks and vote you there's nothing you can do about it but shrug. Your vote was definetly not the same.Battou wrote:How is that a contradiction? I random voted him, and my reason was that he didn't want to vote. How is that different from voting someone for, I don't know, just finishing a game containing an enemy to town, named Rage?
Whatever. as long as you agree it wasn't entirely random. We could call it semi-random with motives.Battou wrote:I was also gone when the whole thing happened, so if I wasn't I would have said my vote was random earlier. But of course we can't know that, and can only speculate if I would have.
Hell! Im gonna make this clear:
@everyone: Do you think Fire is scum or not?-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Cool. really cool. You don't remember so you want to say that one post was misrep and that that is scummy to excuse yourself? Come on.... You can't just call someone scum saying that there are so many reasons to count and after not being able to remember ONE!Kairyuu wrote:At the moment, I don't remember what jumped out at me in my skim through.However, the misrep didn't look too good either.I'm calling the rest gut until I reread.
Sorry, I just don't remember. I'm in too many games right now.
That's why you musn't say things if you can't back them up. I assume you're now gonna try to cover your attitude finding some equally weak things as your misrep accussation...-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
I don't care about winning town points. It's just that I don't like your attitude since the beginning. You could be a bit more conservative and wait till you have something to attack people. Imagine how you'd feel if someone says... Kairyuu is scum for so many reasons I can't state right now... And then they leave it at that... You would say... WTF! this guy's pushing other people on me without even saying why...I'm back...-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
What does it have to do with giving reasons for something that he supposedly already knows or otherwise wouldn't have stated? What if I say you are scum (matter of factly) for so many reasons and don't back them up...Isacc wrote:I have to defend Kairyuu here, as I have been out for the same period of time and for the same reasons (prom yay!), and you guys have posted such an utterly ridiculous Wall-o-text frenzy that it's nearly impossible to keep up. I am a pretty heavy poster at times and I even think it's getting out of hand with the super-massive overly-complicated posts.
I'm not worried with replacements taking their time (I took mine) but I don't like unsupported accussations flying around.Isacc wrote: And, I'm doing my best to catch back up, but you guys will have to wait a tad on me too, as it is the last week of school.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Just a reminder so you're not confused guys. Kairyuu is actually voting SC.
This is the post: 410
But I don't feel, although I am suspicious of SC, that his case is any good.
ahh, hell... I'll just quote it.
Korlash and Battou should note his Fire is town statement. You didn't even address it.Kairyuu wrote:millar is town, and waaay better than he was when he first got here a couple months ago.
He's scumhunting, and making some sense. My read is mostly gut though, and I'm not digging through that again for town tells, mostly because that would be stupid either way.
Firestarter is town too (though I wish I wasn't so sure of that, since he's a nuisance).
This one is more solid. The resignation was way too sincere to be faked, and the position he was in when it happened was too dangerous to try that as scum.
Also, his 240 looks alot like a partial role pm quote, and I'm confused as to why he wasn't modkilled.
Strangercoug is scum.
That is the exact type of scumslip that no one caught me on way back when in Facedown and Thirsty.If you die and flip town, there will still be stuff that I can get on millar13 for.
Plus there's the whole issue with being so eager to please, especially regarding Isacc.
vote: Strangercoug
alexhans is scum too. Too many reasons to count, but I'm too lazy to dig them up right now. Maybe Saturday (prom is tommorrow, so you get nothing then).
The modkill thing was clear. I don't know why he suggests after saying someone is town, that he should be modkilled. That's not very cool.
Then goes after SC for a supposed Slip and that he is to eager to please (without giving examples) and that alone is enough for a vote. Then mentions me but never says anything else.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Comprised read on every player.
Battousai:He leaves Fire at L-1 after I said I didn't want him hammered. Sometimes feels town sometimes scum. He acts like a judge asking here and there.
Korlash:while I may not agree with his line of thoughts. I don't see him as particularly scummy. He asked for flavour but then condemned Fire for that flavour. Says we are wasting time. That, I didn't like.
GhostWriter:Am I missing something or does he still needs a replacement?
Lindisfarne (Dubya):Neutral read. He has posted logical and good observations and asked good questions. I like him. made a good point that SC and Isaac just patted on the back while millar carried the case.
Isacc:In his first real post he already states that Fire is scum. Casually when Fire was getting heat. Opportunistic? I don't like his attitude towards Fire. Pushing too hard. Also the fact that he announced that he was going to change his playstyle... meta-inmune? Very aggressive. Ad Hominem. Super tunnel vision. re-reading apparently.
Firestarter:Well... He did so many things. The suspicion on millar, I think was genuine and right. Then everybody (almost) started attacking him and he got paranoid and started yelling at everyone in frustration. I didn't like when he said that he had found a scumbuddy in Isaac that matter-of-factly. Now he is throwing votes at any players he suspects. It's like a merry go round. He is totally unsure and thinking... A is scum... then searches A thinking he is scum and finds a lot of supposed scum tells... then he switches to B... same process... I think he is loosing investigation credibility. I strongly suspect he is town and that his claim is true. Maybe he just needs to keep it a bit simpler.
Inquisitor Vulcan Skorn (Rage):Hasn't caught up yet. Apparently.
Millar13:I see a lot of mistakes and inconsistencies. But I also think that are most likely town play seeing he is now having second thoughts. He got a bit tunnel visioned and carried away.
Sajin:He votes for SC without justification. Low content. Seemed to go along with Fire's vote and SC's vote without much justification. Strange reaction when I told him to explain his SC vote.
StrangerCoug:Well. My most suspicious character. I was preparing my post and he fosed me for the slightest thing, I wrote my suspicions and he voted for me. Now Sajin votes for him, he votes for Sajin. He supported the case that looked more like a lynch. Pushed hard on fire without explaining much but made sure that millar was seen as suspicious too and stated repeatedly that they looked like bussing. Odd. He was quick to dismiss the fire claim. millar noted a generalization by my part and SC calls it inmediatly a "very good" case. I was going on hard into SC at the time.
Kairyuu (Afatchic):AFC did nothing but joked around with SC, OMGUS jokes. Nothing. I wouldn't discard scumteam. Kairyuu replaced and accuses SC and me as scum. About SC he gives a little bit of a case. Against me. Nothing. Until I question him and he votes me for misrep. Now unvotes.
------------------
Vote Pattern:
Battou: Millar13, Fire, unvote, Fire.
AFC/Kayriuu: SC, unvote, SC, Alexhans.
Lindisfarne (Dubya): Korlash
Fire: Rage, AFC, millar, unvote, millar, unvote, millar, SC, Korlash, Battou.
Korlash: Korlash, Fire
Inquisitor Vulcan Skorn (Rage):pacman, unvote
Alexhans (pacman): Korlash, unvote.
Isaac: GhostWriter, Fire, unvote
millar: Fire, Unvote, Fire.
Sajin: Fire, SC.
SC: AFC, millar, Fire, Alexhans, Sajin.
GhostWriter: Dubya.
--------------
Some thoughts about the last posts:
And I had accused him strongly too.Sajin wrote: at the time of my pressuring him fire was voting him and kairu had accused but not posted anything.
QFTSC wrote:You had given absolutely no original input to my case when you voted me, and I was not the first person to step up and comment about it.
Although I am wary of SC in this fight between him and Sajin SC is the winner due to his more intelligent ways of discussing.
I don't like this at all. Saying you're not gonna make a case because they're going to say is weak means you believe your case is weak or null.Sajin wrote:Besides if I personally list them then SC would just claim some were not attacks, and this one was weak etc etc.
This was the post where Sajin voted SC: 376.
In fact, I'm gonna quote it:
then when I ask reasons along with Battou.Sajin wrote:
I cannot elaborate without breaking forum conduct rules, namely referencing other mafia websites and/or ongoing games. Suffice it to say its happened before.Firestarter wrote:
Please elaborate on this point.Sajin wrote:I have been fooled enough by fake tells to know this.
That said, I like your arguments here.
unvote, vote: strangercoug
I "slamed" him?? weird reaction. This is my quoteSajin wrote:
last page I said I am suspicious and you quote and agree with me.alexhans wrote:
QFT.Battousai wrote:Sajin- What are you suspicious of SC for? Don't say "I agree with Firestarter."
Its the same thing we didn't like about SC when he agreed with millar's case on fire.Then you slam mefor actualizing my suspicions with a vote a page later. What gives?
While I agree with the point the way in wich Sajin handled himself regarding SC's vote was wrong.alexhans wrote:
This is what I've been trying to say.Sajin wrote:Referencing all those scum tactics is scummy in my opinion. Purely because doing so casts doubt rather than digs up any information.
Sc, however, quickly attacked Sajin. That seems to be his MO. Attacking his attacker. Like his fos on me and then vote.
I also dislike the way in wich SC tries to pin Sajin down with the 80/20 statement. That's a lawyer-like trap. Not good. Sajin isn't voting Fire.
The thing about Sajin is that he switched from defending a Fire lynch because it would give us info to an SC lynch the he didn't explain much when SC seemed to be in the spotlightb because of me and Fire.
Well... I've decided to vote. I think it's the right choice.
Vote StrangerCoug.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
I hope you'll tell us someday why on earth do you found me so scummy that there were to many reasons to count... I think I just touched your pride there and you won't let go. You can admit you were wrong you know. Anyway, You're welcome to ask me any questions you want.@alexhans: I have not unvoted, and don't plan to unless someone else strikes me as scummier than you when I finally get around to reading the full thread.I'm back...-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
meh... I go to the wiki to look for meta but I saw that and found it to be relevant. I think it talks about people a bit. It can tell us if people joke or are dead serious about their games. Anyway, what really annoys me is his calling me scum matter of factly without explaining.@alex: don't base anything off people's wikis. Hell, anyone who reads mine would really get the wrong idea about me. It's just a little place for some silly info, not the best place to delve playstyle from.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
I'm not over defending... I'm not understanding.... I don't care if it's L-1 or L-5000... I just want to see what he has to say for himself. Isn't his attitude strange? I just want him be responsible for his actions.What kair is doing is not very scummy, alex is being a bit overly defensive in my eyes
Explain, in your own words, what you think Kair is doing and why it's not very scummy.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
@Lindis: Yeah... but he never said I was scummy... he said:
SC is scum (and votes)
Alexhans is scum.
That looks pretty sure of himself to not know what to accuse me of later. And when I question him he votes me for misrep??? Come on... I think I'm entitled to require some content that expresses his reasons for his actions.
whatever. I want explanations.but I know that badgering him about it or his attitude won't speed things up at allI'm back...-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Guess I'm used to people lynching whoever answers less near deadline... especially if they have been so much in the spotlight.Battousai wrote:
Your attempt to make him look townie for just anything is noted.alexhans wrote:He is still first in the votecount if I'm not mistaken so it wouldn't be a good tactic if he were scum... However, your attempt to make him look scummy for just anything is noted.
But seriously, WIFOM completely. In fact scum could skip out while ahead to dodge any last minute questions and discussion, and to leave their vote on someone without having to explain why it was kept to deadline. I'm pretty sure it is a nulltell.
@kor: I just wish that those who don't share are not killed tonight because that would make their info worthless.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Who did ever say no lynch man? Are you more certain that SC is scum or that Fire is scum? If you think SC is scummier vote for SC regardless of how many votes Fire has... You musn't act taking others into account when voting. Vote for who you think is more scummy and no one is gonna will fault you if you give enough reasons.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Me wanting to participate in the game before a lynch is scummy? Me wanting to prevent a lynch of a player I found town is scummy? This sounds like you're trying to grab any post I write and pretend it's scummy.Kayriuu wrote:If Fire is scum, then this is a damning post for sure. Also, threats of pressure are stupid, because if you threaten scum they could just kill you and be done with it. This sounds like you are looking for an excuse to go after anyone who ends the Day before you've set up your false connections.
Did he question me? NO! he just fosed me before I could even post my thoughts. I believe he saw it as a threat to the assembled Fire lynch.Kayriuu wrote:This is totally OMGUS. SC questions you, so you say you're suspicious of him? Pfftt.
dude... You said SC and me were scum and that I OMGUS him??? How does that make sense?
I don't follow. What does "When i get to SC" mean?Kayriuu wrote:This may be a valid point. When I get to SC, if this holds then this may count in your favor.
Millar has played well? Did you read the same game as me? He was full of inconsistencies since his first posts... broken fingers, tactics, Not voting scum seriousness, etc, etc. I disagree.Kayriuu wrote:millar has played well. I have a pretty decent town read on him. So yeah, SC is right here. millar>Firestarter.
Did you miss the part where I say "unless they're scum"? No, I don't defend myself. I say that usually replacements are helpful for town because they're more objective.Kayriuu wrote:This is bullshit. Are you seriously trying to defend yourself with the fact that you're a replacement? You are at your own skill level regardless of whether you start a game or replace in.
Elaborate. I don't understand.Kayriuu wrote:Thank you for confirming SC's point in the process of denying it.
Do you know what that FoS is for? For saying "smart mislynch". Serious dude...Kayriuu wrote:You really seem to have your hackles up here. There is no reason to get so antsy over a simple FOS.Alexhans wrote:Wow... Usually what scum says when they don't know how to push a quicklynch when not every player is playing. I haven't posted my notes in 24 hs and you are already calling for a hammer? Aren't you a little bit interested in what I might have to say?
No, this reads as "How come you want to hammer when I haven't even been able to post".Kayriuu wrote:This reads as "OMG don't lynch my scumbuddy before I get a chance to shift the wagon!"Kayriuu wrote:Please note how much of a complete hypocrite you are. You were doing the EXACT SAME THING that I've been doing, and you have the nerve to call me out for it? PFFFTTT!!
Have I? I wrote as soon as I could and in no way called anyone scum for sure as you did. I also stated a preview of my suspicions. You just called me scum and told me to deal with it because you didn't know what to say.
What are those crap reasons in your opinion? You thought SC was scum for one supposed slip. And I give a whole case and you call it crap?Kayriuu wrote:And then you make, what, is that a case? On who? You pretty much rail on everyone voting Fire, but only accuse SC of being scummy, and for crap reasons
You're saying nothing here. You're just tossing accusations dude. If you say something explain why... I could just go with...Kayriuu wrote:Now we get to your "long post," which is allll over the place. There is no cohesive argument in there. It's pretty much just you trying to fling as much crap on as many people as you can. Possibly trying to see what sticks so you can press further.
A few more posts chock full of crap slinging and buddying to batt and we get to the point where I got here. From there on I've said what I needed to say on you.
"kairyuu sucks, he doesn't make sense, his vote is crap, he is scum" but that wouldn't be valid because I wouldn't be backing up my statement.
....*sigh*. I just thought you didn't have a case on him to call him scum. You just said he was scum (and looked very positive) or one phrase he had said. That was not a good case. If I vote for SC is because I find him probably scummy. But if someone jumps on his waggon for no reason I will be highly suspicious. That's exactly what happened with Sajin's vote. I didn't like it at all. Even though he votes the same as me. What if SC is town? I'm gonna leave opportunistics get away with lynching him? no.Kayriuu wrote:Also, note that you seem to have a problem with my attacking SC, even though YOU were all over him for most of the game. Pot kettle much?
It's better than before. But if you look at my answers you'll see that I'm not satisfied at all.Kayriuu wrote:Case enough for you?
Is this necessary? Or are you covering your ass? So you don't think SC is scum anymore?Kayriuu wrote:@all: Based on observations from this post, I think that alexhans implicates Firestarter as scum, and since deadline lynch is almost assuredly going to be Fire,simply due to deadline, I will
Fire was about to be lynched... Do really think I, as scum, would try to defend a practically condemned partner? Wouldn't that be a giveaway? And what if Fire flips town? Are you gonna accuse me of buddying? because that's what I'm predicting
Regardless of any info we may get? good. Really pro town.Kayriuu wrote:alexhans scum for tomorrow kthxbai
----
Again... Why? What is good...? Specify. What do you think about my answers?SC wrote:Good case on alexhans, though.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Hello! "Smart Mislynch"!!!???Battou wrote:I'd like to point out this is wrong. SC fos'd you after your second post, where you call Fire town and the threat to anyone who hammers (I believe that would be consider a thought of yours). Therefore, SC had a right to Fos you if he found that scummy.
Here it is...
So the fact that I think Fire is town is taken as if I knew he was town and therefore mafia? Riiiiight...StrangerCoug wrote:
Excuse me, but, uh... "smart mislynch"? The only way I'm making sense of this is if you know Firestarter to be town, which is impossible in a day start unless you're scum.alexhans wrote:I'm on page 6 and already afraid that there is gonna be a smart myslinch regarding Fire.
FoS: alexhans
As I've said, I found highly relevant that a player that I had just replaced as scum (and finished a game with) would FoS me for the first thing I post. I looked like prevention against me. Accuse him before he accuses you. And he was casually the player I was liking less when I wrote what I wrote.
Oh... So THAT was scummy? Saying smart mislynch? I honestly can't believe it.Battou wrote:So this states you know SC FoS'd you for one of your thoughts, its just that you don't agree with SC that it was scummy.
You don't see what's wrong with saying my cases are crap and that Im buddying, bussing, talking crap, without saying what he is referring to?Battou wrote:I don't get what was wrong with that. My interpretation was that you were basically testing the waters by making as many cases as you can, which is more likely to come from scum than town.
When I'm testing the waters? How?
And if you mean that asking questions and investigating more than 1 person is scummy then you're the one who's making scummy statements... What do you want me to do? Tunnel vision? That IS scummy. I'm gonna be open minded and look for evidence for myself. Not follow up on another guy's post without saying anything relevant.
So you FoS me exactly why? Taken me away? What do you mean? Give a clear reason... Am I avoiding something?Battou wrote:FoS: Alex
These answers have really taken away from your defense of Kairyuu's case.
Have you read the case? I thought you judged better... He just dismisses my case to SC as crap, say I'm talking BS, I fling as much crap on many people as I can, Full of crap, buddying, hypocrite, first I'm defending my scumbuddy then I'm buddying... All of that COMPLETELY unexplained. look at the post and tell me if he explains succesfully what he is talking about.
@everyone: Read Kairyuu's post... And then tell me if his case is a case and if battou's FoS is valid.
I implicate Fire as scum??? That's his excuse for voting him??? Good one.Kairyuu wrote:@all: Based on observations from this post, I think that alexhans implicates Firestarter as scum, and since deadline lynch is almost assuredly going to be Fire, simply due to deadline, I will
Let me remember something:
Quick, convenient, change of mind. SC doesn't think you're acting weird and so you rapidly forget about him right? but now, since you wanna jump on the waggon you do a 180 degress turn and find Fire as scum? If you honestly thought I was scum you would be voting me. Not fire.Kairyuu wrote:Firestarter is town too (though I wish I wasn't so sure of that, since he's a nuisance).
This one is more solid. The resignation was way too sincere to be faked, and the position he was in when it happened was too dangerous to try that as scum.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
Why is the wording suspicious?
So, you're gonna excuse him for POV? Then no one is responsible for making clear, explained cases because they're entitled to a point of view?
Ok. Then why you never excused fire like that? Why don't you excuse me like that? Isn't it my POV?
NO. We should be obliged to present cases that explain what we mean. otherwise we're just being anti-town.
Imagine this situation. You're town. You have a gut feeling on someone. He is town too but of course you don't know it. You think he is scummy but don't know why so you just basically manufacture some things and call crap everything he does without developing... You'll never get a decent response because you never made a case... you just stated your point of view withouot presenting evidence to support it. You're never gonna be able to find out if he is town or not.
In the same lines of Kairyuu's post... I could make every single player in the game scummy if I wanted... even those who havent posted. You just gotta say some unsupported, opinionated stuff and look really convinced.
ADDED. just seen this:
Exactly. He fosed me for saying "smart mislynch"! come on... and then when I accused him he suddenly starts seeing me as more and more scummy. He thinks the "everyone" thing called out by millar is a "very good" (without saying why of course) when he had previously said that Fire was only a good case and finally he votes for me. If you don't find that highly relevant then I don't know what else to say to you.Before you could post thoughts. You make it sound like you didn't even make a statement before he FoS'd you, while in actuallity you had a post about Fire being town and wanting to stop a smart mislynch. Then when Kairyuu mentioned it, you dismissed the reason of SC's FoS.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
behold, Long post
I was trying to meta you on other games you replaced into to see if you're naturally agressive or conveniently agressive but apparently it's just you. Anyway in Mini 716: El Puma you gave far better cases than here although you were quick to call half the people in the game scum.
Alexhans wrote:I'm on page 6 and already afraid that there is gonna be a smart myslinch regarding Fire. I'm pretty positive that there is scum on that waggon. I'm not waiting till I finish my reading to tell you this because I'm afraid someone might hammer.
DONT DARE HAMMER!!!
If you do... I'll pursue you tomorrow till you're lynched...
Leave us replacements time to post and get answered.Kairyuu wrote:If Fire is scum, then this is a damning post for sure. Also, threats of pressure are stupid, because if you threaten scum they could just kill you and be done with it. This sounds like you are looking for an excuse to go after anyone who ends the Day before you've set up your false connections.
I don't know what to do with you, seriously... Look, you're saying that if fire is scum then me defending him is scummy but then say that I'm scummy independently? It's a mess of contradictions since you first posted... If fire seems townier than me... Why not vote me instead of fire? About my threat being stupid... I disagree. If someone hammers and then I'm dead you will have something to work with... Why did they kill me?Kairyuu wrote:@alexhans:
Right. Yeah. That's totally what I accused you of. Try actually addressing my points instead of trying to dodge them.Me wanting to participate in the game before a lynch is scummy? Me wanting to prevent a lynch of a player I found town is scummy?
I'm looking for an excuse? NO! Im trying to get to play the game! If I let them know then pro-town players will wait for my input and scum will have to be careful.
Wich doesn't mean anything because those people could be either scum or just wrong. And what's important here is if YOU think is BS and why.Kairyuu wrote:
This has already been addressed as bullshit by other people.Did he question me? NO! he just fosed me before I could even post my thoughts. I believe he saw it as a threat to the assembled Fire lynch.
fair enough. And if you actually lynch me and realize Im town what will that indicate? And if I was lynched before fire? what would THAT indicate?Kairyuu wrote:
As isYou said SC and me were scum and that I OMGUS him??? How does that make sense?quiteobvious by the rest of my post, your actions have caused me to think that SC is likely town.
While I don't mind that you can prefer to wait posting your case on SC (If you go by the same logic of Kor and Battou) I don't see why you think you should wipe all suspicion to the point that your case will be foregone altogether.Kairyuu wrote:
I was originally planning to make another post detailing my case on Strangercoug, but your actions have made me think that that can wait until D2, or possibly be foregone altogether.I don't follow. What does "When i get to SC" mean?
Not any finished games I can't comment on. I haven't liked his playstyle at all but I have town read on him, there's a lot of reasons why in my first posts. I just think it's a pity that he has fallen behind in this game.Kairyuu wrote:
My turn to ask a question. Have you read any of millar's other games? He improved dramatically during this game. To the point where I am actually beginning to like his play. Besides, attacking millar for playing poorly=/=attacking him for being scummy.Millar has played well? Did you read the same game as me? He was full of inconsistencies since his first posts... broken fingers, tactics, Not voting scum seriousness, etc, etc. I disagree.
I don't agree. Replacement is notified that he is allowed to join. Replacement starts reading totally free of the emotions of the moment. Therefore, a town replacement has IMO a slight advantage as to finding scum. If you say that I got emotional with SC's Fos you may be right in a way but it was definetly after I already suspected him and had a good read of half the game.Kairyuu wrote:
Replacements only come in with an objective read if they read the gameDid you miss the part where I say "unless they're scum"? No, I don't defend myself. I say that usually replacements are helpful for town because they're more objective.beforereplacing in. Your point says nothing.
Again I don't know what's your point.Kairyuu wrote:
SC said you were scared, and in the process of saying he was wrong, you said youElaborate. I don't understand.fearedsomething, confirming that SC was right while you tried to deny it.
- I think Fire is town after my read.
- I see Fire looks likely to be lynched
- I read the votecount in the last page.
- I think he is at L-1
- I panic that I might not even give input to the game and possibly be NKd
- I write what I write and then realize he is at L-2, I clarify.
- I get a fos from the most suspicious player IMO for saying smart mislynch.
- I POINT OUT THAT I WAS AFRAID (OF COURSE) THAT A TOWN PLAYER WAS GONNA BE LYNCHED BEFORE i COULD SAY ANYTHING.
- You pretend that if fire is scum then I am scum because me being afraid can only be possible if I'm scum and don't want my scumbuddy lynched.
What did they say? If you say something against me I expect that you try to be clear. Not vaguely say that other people have answered this. I'm asking you.Kairyuu wrote:
Another point already covered by other people.Do you know what that FoS is for? For saying "smart mislynch". Serious dude...
... If you dismiss my thoughts like that you're not being pro-town. In fact, you look pretty set. I'm wondering if it is because I repeatedly demanded that you state your case and you got pissed. If that's the case I would urge you to reconsider and try to investigate all players because you may just be running down the tunnel-vission road.Kairyuu wrote:
PFFFTTT!!No, this reads as "How come you want to hammer when I haven't even been able to post".
Ok. I'm checking this in your meta. I just didn't like it one bit.Kairyuu wrote:
And guess what I said. OH YEAH, that I was going to post AS SOON AS I HAD MORE TIME. The expression of suspicion is irrelevent. That is just the way I do things.Have I? I wrote as soon as I could and in no way called anyone scum for sure as you did. I also stated a preview of my suspicions. You just called me scum and told me to deal with it because you didn't know what to say.
Wrong. I posted my notes (in a rush due to Battou's L-1) on why I thought Fire's vote was wrong and that it was probably scum driven. My main case was on SC.Kairyuu wrote:
You gave a "whole case" on EVERYONE VOTING FIRESTARTER. That is not a case. That is a shitstorm.What are those crap reasons in your opinion? You thought SC was scum for one supposed slip. And I give a whole case and you call it crap?
No... But you're just calling my cases crap in general, and that I'm a hypocryte, and my posts are bullshit... I can't answer to that. I could also just say that you don't make sense and vote crappyly but I wouldn't be explaining anythhing and it wouldn't be enough. And what's more, I wouldn't get a useful answer from you (to determin your alignment).Kairyuu wrote:
What do you expect me to do? Go through all fo your reasoning on other people and cut it down? Hell no. I provided my view. Unless you can prove that your random flailing had a purpose other than what I proposed, then that view will not change.You're saying nothing here. You're just tossing accusations dude. If you say something explain why... I could just go with...
YOU CALLED MY CASE CRAP! And you say Im not the Grand Arbiter of Votes? Well... neither are you. What gives YOU the right to call my case crap without even explaining?Kairyuu wrote:
I provided a reason for my vote on SC, and provided reasoning as to why that was scummy. I do not....*sigh*. I just thought you didn't have a case on him to call him scum. You just said he was scum (and looked very positive) or one phrase he had said. That was not a good case. If I vote for SC is because I find him probably scummy. But if someone jumps on his waggon for no reason I will be highly suspicious.careifyouthink that my vote was well reasoned or not. You are not the Grand Arbiter of Votes.
Wrong. I can see where someone makes valid points. For example millar's point about me writing everyone instead of just 2 is valid. I usually generalize and say everyone too much but it was a good point anyway. Your points are not like that.Kairyuu wrote:
I don't care. It is an irrefutable fact that no one who is under suspicion actually agrees with the cases made against them.It's better than before. But if you look at my answers you'll see that I'm not satisfied at all.
You mean Fire? You said fire was town... anyway... You rather lynch a town player than no lynch, That is correct IMO... but do you really think there's gonna be a no lynch if you vote me instead of Fire when you think fire is probably town and I probably scum? That, I do not understand.Kairyuu wrote:
Thank you captain obvious. I only stated that I think SC is town like 4 times in that post. Also, I'm not covering my ass. There is no other conceivable lynch that will happen today, and any lynch>No Lynch.Is this necessary? Or are you covering your ass? So you don't think SC is scum anymore?
Following your thoughts I'd have to be really stupid because when they finally lynched Fire (As it looks like is gonna happen) I would be under obvious scrutiny... If I were scum I would rather buss him to shove of suspicion from myself (You'll probably say it's WIFOM, I'll say it's my logic). Am I not defending myself? Battou calls me for overreacting in my defense and you say I'm acting incredulous? I just want to make the best for the town out of any situation. How am I supposed to defend in your opinion? Insult you and say your case is crap or what?Kairyuu wrote:
Yes. I do. Neglecting the fact that this is WIFOM (I do not consider WIFOM to be bad either way), the fact that you must act incredulous instead of actually defending yourself does nothing to assuage my suspicions.Do really think I, as scum, would try to defend a practically condemned partner? Wouldn't that be a giveaway?
But, unfortunately you think that I'm scum therefore he is scum so you vote him? Why not vote me in that case? Just because his waggon is bigger?Kairyuu wrote:
You are scummy independantly of Firestarter. Therefore, you are scummy regardless of his flip. Hence why I would prefer to lynch you over him.And what if Fire flips town? Are you gonna accuse me of buddying? because that's what I'm predicting
Can you give us a similar list to the one I assembled about what you think about the players in the game? (Fire, SC, me, Battou, Kor, etc)
And where's everyone else? this post discussion with kayr is boring and demoralizing me... Where are the replacements?-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
unfortunately, another long post for Kayriuu. It may be funny to follow the back and forth though so I encourage you to do it when you have the time and willingness to do so
Has it ever occurred to you that you might be wrong?Kairyuu wrote:
I have a brilliant idea. How about you admit you're scum and we can move on.I don't know what to do with you, seriously...
lol. Look how you start adding adjectives to reinforce your case. Ad nauseam. Looks like you're even starting to believe it yourself... XDKairyuu wrote:
Strawman. Your defense of Firestarter is not even close to the only point in my case. You areLook, you're saying that if fire is scum then me defending him is scummy but then say that I'm scummy independently?extremelyscummy regardless of Firestarter's flip.
Yeah right. Especially your thoughts on the triangle Fire-SC-Me and your reasons for voting him... Because he is the only possible lynch in your opinion, not because he is scum.Kairyuu wrote:
Bullshit. I have given reasons for these so-called "contradictions."It's a mess of contradictions since you first posted
So I can't ask other people to not hammer because they will kill me, but that would be useless info... All night info is subject to WIFOM. It's up to the town to decide if there's scum pushing conveniently a waggon. That's what the whole game is about, Not just this scenario. And if a town player hammers before someone adds to the conversation is just anti-town. He should let replacements have their say.Kairyuu wrote:
Let's analyze this little piece of WIFOM. If the person who hammers is scum, then they will have all of one person suspicious of them going into D2. That isn't all that worrying, and probably won't make you high on their kill priority list. However, if the hammerer is town, then the scum could frame said hammerer by killing you, and then bringing this up D2. Mob mentality could possibly kick in, and suddenly there's a wagon on the hammer vote because you died. Second scenerio is much more likely than first.About my threat being stupid... I disagree. If someone hammers and then I'm dead you will have something to work with... Why did they kill me?
ACtually, I think I commented in that topic. So you can see my thoughts over there too. But we can drop it. By understanding my logic you can gain a better understanding of my thought processes and my actions that you may think are scummy and realize theyre not.Kairyuu wrote:Except that you know who you are replacing, and any comments about this person will skew your objectivity. Trust me, there has been at least one thread in Mafia Discussion on this topic. If you were following the game before you requested to replace then you would have this edge you talk about, but this is not the case. Can we drop this bit?
Glad you made it clearer. Wrong. He said...Kayriuu wrote:Not what I am saying. Strangercoug said that you looked afraid regarding the Fire lynch, and while you were saying that he was wrong (i.e. that you were not afraid) you said that you feared a Fire lynch, which is EXACTLY what you were trying to deny.
I said:SC wrote:Excuse me, but, uh... "smart mislynch"? The only way I'm making sense of this is if you know Firestarter to be town, which is impossible in a day start unless you're scum.
So the one that brought up the "afraid" issue was me. Because I was afraid of a mislynch before I could even post my thoughts. SC says that the more important word is "smart".alexhans wrote:Oh...
and:Alexhans wrote:alreadyafraidthat there is gonna be a smart myslinch
Notice the afraid? You're stretching. I never said he was town. I just had that fear. A quicklynch can be disastrous and after your vote on page 6 it sure seemed going that way.SC wrote:The only way I'm making sense of this is if you know Firestarter to be town, which is impossible in a day start unless you're scum.
Therefore this whole point of yours is null.
This exactly what you're doing. No matter what do I write you'll find a way to say no to it or make it look like Im wrong or scummy.Kairyuu wrote: You repeated a previous point, which I had already addressed. I'm not gonna get into a "no, you're wrong" battle with you about that. Are you even looking at what I was addressing, or just arguing for the sake of arguing?
Yeah... acting totally convinced is usually useful for scum to sell fake cases. Anyway, if you'rer too set and have too much pride you'll end up believing you're right no matter what and dismiss any future evidence you might find against your "truth".Kairyuu wrote:
Of course I'm "set." I'm always "set." Attitude is a big part of the mind-game that it Mafia, and acting totally convinced at all times is quite effective at outing jumpy scum.In fact, you look pretty set. I'm wondering if it is because I repeatedly demanded that you state your case and you got pissed.
That's breaking under pressure? No, that's trying to throw some sense into you and resisting the urge to call you either stubborn or scum (because they way in wich you pursue your case follows that patterns). Because right now, if you're town, you're not helping anybody by only looking at me and perpetuing this whole nitpick discussion. I'll continue to answer because I'm the accussed and will post as much as it's necessary (trying to always be clear) to try to explain why a case against me might be flawed.Kairyuu wrote: You are currently shining strong and bright on my scumdar. until someone takes your place I will push and prod and pressure you until you break, like you are showing signs of doing right now with your "oh, you shouldn't only attack me. You should spread out your suspicion so that I don't get so worried about your attacks."
This is exactly what I was talking about earlier. You try to make me look bad with an obvious thing that I knew and told. I meta'd you a bit. I said what I thought BEFORE I wrote this. Despite the meta read I still don't like the way you posted so fast that people were scum without explaining (especially saying, too many things too count).Kairyuu wrote:
It is evident by the beginning of your post that you already did, and found out I was telling the truth.Ok. I'm checking this in your meta. I just didn't like it one bit.
HELLO!!! Look at el puma! Yoour first post acccused like 6 people too. I investigate as much as possible, as I said to Korlash before, I don't necessarily find people scummy. I just want to clear a few things and understand them, and see if there's something that doesn't add up.Kairyuu wrote: Well then your "main case" was hidden amongst attacks on everyone else on the Fire wagon. Are you trying to say that there are 6 scum in this game?
So you're entitled to being anti-town to get reactions? That looks like Empking's or Wall-e's playstyle. Not cool.Kairyuu wrote:
Yes you can, and you have been. As I mentioned above. Mafia is a mind game. My attitude elicits reactions that are just as helpful as the reactions and responses to my words.No... But you're just calling my cases crap in general, and that I'm a hypocryte, and my posts are bullshit... I can't answer to that.
maybe so... We'll find if you're that good as you think you are at the endgame.Kairyuu wrote:
All that means is that you haven't figured out how to use responses gathered that way to their fullest.And what's more, I wouldn't get a useful answer from you (to determin your alignment).
*sigh*, then you're clearly not making sense. What works for you can't work for me in your opinion. Definetly flawed thinking to find scum.Kairyuu wrote:
Yes. That is exactly what I said.YOU CALLED MY CASE CRAP! And you say Im not the Grand Arbiter of Votes?
Well... ... ... Really, I don't know what to say. If this is fun then it's very useful for winning the game... there are other, not so detrimental ways, to have fun.Kairyuu wrote:
I already told you, because I'm the Grand Arbiter of Votes. You're fun to screw around with.What gives YOU the right to call my case crap without even explaining?
I consider this is just BS. I havent defended well? That's your f/%&/, unsupported, grudgy, opinion. EXTENT OF THE CASE AGAINST ME??? Dude! Your "case" sucks! There, I said it. Try to re-read everything you've been posting with a clear mind. I just hoped to be able to talk some sense in to you but you were annoyed by my wanting you to post a case and when you finally did your pride won't let you realize any mistake you make.Kairyuu wrote:
Considering that you have not defended well againstWrong. I can see where someone makes valid points. For example millar's point about me writing everyone instead of just 2 is valid. I usually generalize and say everyone too much but it was a good point anyway. Your points are not like that.anyof the points I brought against you, I say you're caught scum who just realized the extent of the case against him.
Now you're the one WIFOMing... Think about what's more likely. Me entering the game fully and being active and trying to do what I think is the right thing or me entering softly, tasting the air, seeing what I can push without having problems, perhaps jump in the main waggon. One is probably town, the other is definetly scummy. It doesn't make sense to be THAT active as scum. You could probably drop a scum tell.Kairyuu wrote:
And you would also be able to pull this exact same card out in your defense. My point stands.Following your thoughts I'd have to be really stupid because when they finally lynched Fire (As it looks like is gonna happen) I would be under obvious scrutiny...
I would never expect to be clear of scrutiny if Fire is town. But IMO bussing or just letting him die would be so much easier. I don't care if you doubt it too. It's my opinion. And you don't know me.Kairyuu wrote:
I doubt that. Late bussing is noticed more often than not, and you would have this card to pull if he was lynched as scum and you defended him.If I were scum I would rather buss him to shove of suspicion from myself
I've defended against all you said. I've responded to every thing you asked me that you pretended that made me look scummy. But now you're saying I was just acting incredulous and that's not a true defense? You answered every response I made and didnt see a defense there.Kairyuu wrote:
Your "defense" is acting incredulous that we would suspect you of doing something like this. It is not true defense.Am I not defending myself?
You're so lame. According to you... I don't have a defense. I don't have a case. Do I even exist? You suck dude. You just dismiss everything in the view that that will make you right... Guess what? It doesn't.
WTF man. I did provide reasons why I was afraid of a mislynch. It's even a reason in itself. I investigated all the people I could. And your hint is stupid because you're saying that there's no possible defense to your case in your own eyes...Kairyuu wrote:
You could try that. Or you could try providing logical reasons for why you would freak out at a potential lynch, and then attack literally everyone on the wagon. (Hint: There is no good reason why someone would do that as town).How am I supposed to defend in your opinion? Insult you and say your case is crap or what?
Wasting your vote? He will be lynched anyway... you don't make sense. There's no danger of a mislynch so your excuse of voting him is not enough, specially, when you've stated that you think him to be town.Kairyuu wrote:
Yes, with the added condition that deadline is so close so voting you would be wasting my vote, whereas voting him is useful.But, unfortunately you think that I'm scum therefore he is scum so you vote him? Why not vote me in that case? Just because his waggon is bigger?
Not really. I'm just dissapoited that someone can be such a prideful stubborn. I'm in no way afraid of you. I just think you have been attacking me with the lamest case I've ever responded to and you don't wanna hear any reasons. So, if your scum I don't have a problem with it but if you're town you're being silly for being so wrong and not wanting to see any reason that might indicate your mistakes.Kairyuu wrote:
So you've realized that you're scum and doomed to die?this post discussion with kayr is boring and demoralizing me
Thank God. I was expecting another dismissing of every sentence I wrote...Kairyuu wrote:@all: In all likelyhood this will be my last post before deadline. Ireallyneed to study for my AP Gov exam tomorrow.
example:
Alexhans: Good Morning
Kayriuu: No, your's is good morning here it is noon. SCUM!-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
599: Regarding this post I must say that I'm a bit shocked but not totally. He seems the kind of player who can pull this kind of stunts. I still disagree with voting fire if he thinks another person is scum... If people started voting for SC it could actually be presented as an alternative and we would even have more info once either one of us flips. Who avoided wich waggon and why?
Ups... well... ask korlasKairyuu wrote:@alexhans: also, my name is Kairyuu, not Kayriuuch if he finds it annoying...
Don't worry. I believe you. Try to make the better out of the situation and don't use mafia terms when you discuss with them... Also, don't try to lynch neither of them.Isacc wrote:You guys will have to forgive me and trust me on this:
Huge fight with my parents. HUGE. Won't have time to post before deadline.
mmm... this wasn't really necessary... You could've just not voted until you could post (day 1 or 2)...Isacc wrote:My thoughts have changed a bit (sorta), but I can't really make a good analysis.
Firestarter is the only reasonable lynch by deadline however.
This is L-1 and I still would like to hear from the replacements before someone hammers.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
I would be really shocked if that happened... And saying so doesn't make me scummier or townier... So you're wasting your breath saying you're sure, SC... Doesn't change anything for good or for bad.
Also... You don't want to comment on Kairyuu's last read on you?
Somebody knows if the replacements are still on this planet? Lindis, inquisitive, etc.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina