Mini 746: Speed Dating - I've Had The Time Of My Life (Over)

don_johnson · Post Post #459 (isolation #0) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:16 pm

here and catching up.

don_johnson · Post Post #481 (isolation #1) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:11 am

unvote

until i'm caught up.

don_johnson · Post Post #514 (isolation #2) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:02 am

not done with my catching up, but i am trying to stay current as well.

this:

DrippingGoofball wrote:You know what? I give up.

I always say, "paraphrasing a townie PM takes minutes, but a good fakeclaim can take days."

Sometimes I should take my own advice. Can I be nominated for a Scummie? There must be a prize for "least thought-through fakeclaim."

seems like a confession?

you all realize that kmd has claimed the same role?

ooc: i have school tonight but am hoping to be fully caught up tomorrow.

don_johnson · Post Post #554 (isolation #3) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:45 am

i'm still catching up. i'm going to be bummed if this game is already over.

don_johnson · Post Post #565 (isolation #4) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:33 am

v/la until 3/31(tuesday)

i should be able to get some reading in before then.

don_johnson · Post Post #570 (isolation #5) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:35 am

still catching up. so i'm paired with other "nk immune cop"? interesting.

the count wrote:* walks into sunset with his love, The Count turns around, and winks at The Countess*

i feel like such a loser.

don_johnson · Post Post #577 (isolation #6) » Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:13 pm

so, i take it kmd's counterclaim of the nkimmune cop was a joke?

don_johnson · Post Post #580 (isolation #7) » Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:36 pm

OOC: sorry to hear that. thanks for the extension, though.

don_johnson · Post Post #583 (isolation #8) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:22 pm

is that the only evidence on KMD?

don_johnson · Post Post #587 (isolation #9) » Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:40 pm

caboose: not atm, but i plan on having a first rate post when i get back.

v/la until 4/14

this games a bitch to get through, so i am not upset from the lack of recent activity.

don_johnson · Post Post #598 (isolation #10) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:21 am

i am almost caught up here. these rules are confusing as hell.

don_johnson · Post Post #609 (isolation #11) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:20 am

fakeclaim= scummy. almost always does.

don_johnson · Post Post #616 (isolation #12) » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:01 am

i don't buy the shared vote/game mixup excuse. also, everyone seems to have dismissed the fake counterclaim? it didn't read so obvious a joke on my go through.

don_johnson · Post Post #628 (isolation #13) » Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:26 am

sorry guys, i have been slacking in this game. if this doesn't work out i might ask for a replacement but i am okay with the case on monkey.

vote: monkey

don_johnson · Post Post #646 (isolation #14) » Fri May 08, 2009 3:34 pm

i am okay with it.

don_johnson · Post Post #652 (isolation #15) » Tue May 12, 2009 4:30 am

should we start without the countess? i am fine with dice roll.

don_johnson · Post Post #657 (isolation #16) » Tue May 12, 2009 10:29 am

Ms. Montgomery

i'm a divorcee. i don't care who i leave with as i am a horny slut. i win when the married people leave.

manually rolled a six. i'll pass to KMD.(molester 1-2, countess 3-4, kmd 5-6)

don_johnson · Post Post #666 (isolation #17) » Wed May 13, 2009 4:19 pm

vote: the countess

i don't believe you.

don_johnson · Post Post #675 (isolation #18) » Fri May 15, 2009 2:35 pm

Kmd4390 wrote:Not sure I believe molest.

i have to agree. it sounds awfully convenient.

don_johnson · Post Post #687 (isolation #19) » Mon May 18, 2009 3:24 am

molestargazer wrote:don - Why is it so convenient?

isn't it obvious?

don_johnson · Post Post #689 (isolation #20) » Mon May 18, 2009 4:19 am

molestargazer wrote:If I'm asking you, then evidently not to me. Please just answer the question.

because it would be a wonderful fake claim to set up a scum win.

don_johnson · Post Post #695 (isolation #21) » Mon May 18, 2009 10:58 am

hm. kind of odd that you would vote him before even thinking about using his alleged ability. it makes me a bit more comfortable with my vote on countess, who is paired with you. i wonder if we may already have scum sitting together.

don_johnson · Post Post #713 (isolation #22) » Fri May 22, 2009 3:15 am

countess is scum. it makes the most sense.

don_johnson · Post Post #715 (isolation #23) » Fri May 22, 2009 5:57 am

i am not scum, so i would have to refute the second pairing there. countess could also be scum with someone else, however. what are the seatings again?

don_johnson · Post Post #723 (isolation #24) » Fri May 22, 2009 3:17 pm

Kmd4390 wrote:
Nightfall wrote:-_-'

....So who exactly do you think is actually scum?

And why is it less risky to keep the countess alive?
Either you and Don or The Count and The Countess.

It's less risky because I think if she is scum, The Count was her partner and he's already dead.

what if you are scum with the countess? this scenario sets you up to win. i think countess is scum. i am not sure she is scum with the count. flavor wise, it makes more sense for her to be paired with a guest. you are basing this entire strategy on the fact that count and countess are scum team

or

nightfall and myself. hm.

don_johnson · Post Post #731 (isolation #25) » Sun May 24, 2009 9:01 am

personally, i am okay with a countess/kmd lynch.

nightfall has been a null read for me. i think countess is scum, but am up in the air as to her partner. i would offer to go with countess, but i know i am not scum and would therefore prefer to take a shot at voting out the entire scum team. my other preference would be mole/countess. jahudo is at best a null read for me.

v/la until tuesday morning

don_johnson · Post Post #734 (isolation #26) » Sun May 24, 2009 12:04 pm

Kmd4390 wrote:
don_johnson wrote:personally, i am okay with a countess/kmd lynch.

nightfall has been a null read for me. i think countess is scum, but am up in the air as to her partner. i would offer to go with countess, but i know i am not scum and would therefore prefer to take a shot at voting out the entire scum team. my other preference would be mole/countess. jahudo is at best a null read for me.

v/la until tuesday morning
And either of those lynches would give a hypothetical Don/Nightfall scum team the win.

Coincidence?

i know i am not scum, so don/nightfall is absurd.

jahudo: have you read this game? i am not comfortable with handing out "town" reads on anyone. this is an extremely convoluted process. i admit, i am playing this one mostly on gut, but it is the best i can offer.

don_johnson · Post Post #741 (isolation #27) » Tue May 26, 2009 6:58 pm

Kmd4390 wrote:
don_johnson wrote:
i know i am not scum, so don/nightfall is absurd.
What about Nightfall/The Countess?

seems like kind of an irrelevant question when i have laid out my choices already.

mole/countess or kmd/countess.

jahudo and nightfall are the two i wouldn't vote.

don_johnson · Post Post #743 (isolation #28) » Wed May 27, 2009 5:51 am

don_johnson wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:
don_johnson wrote:
i know i am not scum, so don/nightfall is absurd.
What about Nightfall/The Countess?
seems like kind of an irrelevant question when i have laid out my choices already.

kmd/countess.

jahudo and nightfall are the two i wouldn't vote.

well. there you have it then.

don_johnson · Post Post #746 (isolation #29) » Wed May 27, 2009 5:43 pm

i am not scum. theory debunked.

don_johnson · Post Post #750 (isolation #30) » Thu May 28, 2009 2:55 pm

simply impossible. ^^ should try again.

don_johnson · Post Post #756 (isolation #31) » Fri May 29, 2009 4:58 am

Kmd4390 wrote:
Nightfall wrote:I'm not scum... -_-'

Kmd4390 wrote:Wow, that defense is pretty convincing. I may need to reconsider.
Seriously, are you guys even gonna try?

i am trying. noone is listening. kmd/countess. i think its the game winner. but, oh well.

don_johnson · Post Post #758 (isolation #32) » Fri May 29, 2009 6:25 am

why? we know not what powers scum may yet have.

don_johnson · Post Post #760 (isolation #33) » Fri May 29, 2009 8:04 am

think about it.

don_johnson · Post Post #768 (isolation #34) » Sat May 30, 2009 3:56 pm

of course, those "tricky" role pms.

don_johnson · Post Post #780 (isolation #35) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:58 am

i am happy with kmd/countess lynch. mole: you are content to give kmd a pass on one of the most important points of the game?

don_johnson · Post Post #783 (isolation #36) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:28 am

Kmd4390 wrote:Don, why are you not ok with lynching Nightfall/Countess and then Me/you. Do you think one of Jahudo/Molest is scum? If not, the town wins under this plan.

i tend to think the scum team is kmd/countess. like i said, we have no idea what scum abilities may yet exist. also, according to win conditions, if nightfall is telling the truth then that leaves him as a loser. capece?

don_johnson · Post Post #785 (isolation #37) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:46 am

Kmd4390 wrote:
Do you really have
that
strong of a town read on Nightfall that you refuse to lynch him with someone who you think is scum? Why not just play to
your
win condition and not worry about his.

my statement was in direct response to your statement of town "winning". i am merely pointing out that we all don't win if the hypotheticals set forth are true.

kmd wrote:And if I was scum with The Countess, why would I be ok with lynching her with Nightfall and myself with you.

as i have said: we have no idea what scum abilities lie in wait(if any). so trusting you is not my preferred option.

kmd wrote:I am actually VERY confident in a Don/Nightfall scum team right now.

as opposed to before? i am surprised that your confidence wavered at all, given that you have been pushing the idea for quite some time.

don_johnson · Post Post #790 (isolation #38) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:07 am

how is it "sure-fire"? if nightfall is town then its game over.

don_johnson · Post Post #794 (isolation #39) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:17 am

mole wrote:If there IS two scum left alive, we are IMO likely enough to hit a scum with you two to make it worth the risk.

kmd wrote:I completely agree with MolestingTheCountsChildren on this one.

the risk is a possible town loss.

don_johnson · Post Post #799 (isolation #40) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:46 am

mole wrote:If The Count wasn't scum, I think it's fairly likely that one of the scum is either DJ or Nightfall.

why?

don_johnson · Post Post #801 (isolation #41) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:41 pm

touche.

vote: kmd

we will have to agree to disagree.

don_johnson · Post Post #806 (isolation #42) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:53 pm

and if i were scum with nightfall, it would be in my benefit for the tables to rotate. sorry, but my vote stands.

don_johnson · Post Post #811 (isolation #43) » Sat Jun 06, 2009 5:41 am

sorry, no evidence, just speculation.

countess: do what you think is best. the only thing i know for sure is that i am not scum. kmd seems to really want this lynch. again, if i were scum with nightfall, it would benefit me for the tables to rotate. my vote stands.

don_johnson · Post Post #825 (isolation #44) » Tue Jun 09, 2009 3:40 am

jahudo wrote:This setup is bizarre and I'm ready to finish the game and see what happens.

"finish the game" is an odd choice of words here.

countess: it seems as though its up to you. kmd seems to be trying to portray our recent actions as though they aren't in fact scum hunting and that we should return to it. This feels like a misdirection to me. i don't see how kmd isn't scum here.

i am not scum and i don't think nightfall is. even if he is i know i am not and we have no confirmation that one scum has or has not been lynched, so jahudo's "finish" comment seems a little premature.

don_johnson · Post Post #832 (isolation #45) » Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:02 pm

i am holding you to that.

don_johnson · Post Post #835 (isolation #46) » Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:16 am

honestly, jahudo, with countess voting her table partner this should be an easy decision. one of the two of them is most likely scum(if not both). mole can wait.

don_johnson · Post Post #837 (isolation #47) » Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:41 am

Kmd4390 wrote:
don_johnson wrote:honestly, jahudo, with countess voting her table partner this should be an easy decision. one of the two of them is most likely scum(if not both). mole can wait.
If The Countess was scum, why would she vote me? She couldn't possibly be more obvtown right now.

WIFOM. so are you saying it is not in scums best interest to appear obvtown?

don_johnson · Post Post #843 (isolation #48) » Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:12 am

^^ why would you not bring this up earlier? exactly what was the gambit: let's lose the game?

don_johnson · Post Post #853 (isolation #49) » Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:36 pm

unvote.

can you explain this please? layman's terms.

don_johnson · Post Post #855 (isolation #50) » Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:09 am

i haven't suspected jahudo at all, but on reread i found molest's play extremely questionable.

hmm. so you originally lied about your power?

don_johnson · Post Post #858 (isolation #51) » Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:41 am

vote: jahudo

i didn't read the "alright" as a scum-tell, but i can't explain the vote switch after the fact. it certainly makes sense with a jahudo/mole scumteam. i understand what you are saying kmd, a bit sketchy, but this recent chain of events makes sense.

don_johnson · Post Post #861 (isolation #52) » Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:56 am

what does a previous game have to do with anything?

is the defense of your actions going to be "meta"? (no, i haven't clicked on the links. probably won't in the future either. meta is useless and wifomic.)

don_johnson · Post Post #897 (isolation #53) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:27 am

still waiting on the countess?

jahudo: how do you feel about your tablemate?

don_johnson · Post Post #905 (isolation #54) » Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:09 am

so are you claiming scum?

don_johnson · Post Post #920 (isolation #55) » Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:36 am

my apologies for shamelessly lurking through to endgame. honestly, i started reading this game, got to the end of day 1 and thought,

"i don't need to do this. i'm scum."

were nigthfall and i even allowed to talk?

yeah, jahudo's blunder helped us out big time. DGB played perfect, so i guess we are secondary winners.

this was fun either way.