#206, Reservoir Dogs: The Early Years - It's OVER!

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:43 pm

confirm

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #10 (isolation #1) » Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:44 pm

Oh well,it was worth a try.

I fixed it, you just needed a backslash on the second [color] tag. -Flay

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #18 (isolation #2) » Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:50 pm

In that case,

Vote: Thok

by the same logic.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #20 (isolation #3) » Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:18 pm

Oh yeah.

Draw on Thok

.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #35 (isolation #4) » Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:02 pm

~thinks of request for

Super Sounds of the Seventies

~

~prepares to cast lurker vote for Spork~

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #39 (isolation #5) » Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:28 am

Is this discussion helpful. Surely a more interesting question is: why is spork posting elsewhere but not here?

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #42 (isolation #6) » Sat Jul 09, 2005 7:34 am

Holster Thok
Draw on Spork

.

That's 3 out of a possible 6 (I always seem to be in one of the "scum spots" no matter what my role). That should be enough to get spork posting.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #45 (isolation #7) » Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:11 pm

Coron: that's a strange thing to say. Trying to get lurkers to post, by voting for them, only works if several people vote for them. One vote for a deliberate lurker is not going to stop them lurking.

WGM at Coron

.

Although I do like "waves gun menacingly" as a flavourful alternative to FOS.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #54 (isolation #8) » Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:01 pm

spork76 wrote:I'm watching the thread and as usual have nothing to say or comment on.

Very happy with my vote now.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #58 (isolation #9) » Tue Jul 12, 2005 9:30 pm

Let's just lynch spork. He's not contributing at all to this game and his death will cast light on all this argument.

(Wow, don't I sound like IS? ~shivers~)

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #60 (isolation #10) » Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:32 am

Is that it?

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #66 (isolation #11) » Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:11 pm

I'm bemused as to why Thok/JereIC think I'm scummy.

I've explained my reasons for voting Spork clearly. He lurked (he even admitted lurking), and then when called on it he refuses to make any real contribution. At worst that's is scummy and at best it is unhelpful to the town.

Why is voting for a person who lurks, and then refuses to contribute, scummy?

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #79 (isolation #12) » Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:08 am

spork76 wrote:what do you want me to say?

ANYTHING!!

Seriously, though, you have not made any substantial contribution to this game. If you would voice some reasoned suspicions, or give some reasoned comment on what has happened so far, people might think you were less scummy. But if you are not goint to make a meaningful contribution to the game then there is no reason not to lynch you.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #95 (isolation #13) » Sun Jul 17, 2005 9:31 pm

I want spork to claim before anyone puts on the lynching vote.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #97 (isolation #14) » Tue Jul 19, 2005 4:17 am

The Mod wrote:It's been more than 24 hours since anyone posted in this thread

I assume that is a result of my post 95.

Since this game is stalling, and spork has posted elsewhere but not in this game, I withdraw my post 95.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #106 (isolation #15) » Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:55 pm

Well, Coron, comfort yourself with the thought that Lucresia will look even worse for this post:

Lucresia wrote:there is one more vote to lynch spork. If spork does not respond soon with any reasonable answer, I implore the town to vote to lynch spork

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #107 (isolation #16) » Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:15 pm

... if spork turns out to be innocent.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #303 (isolation #17) » Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:18 am

This was a great set-up and I'm really sad that I "died" night 1 as I would have loved to have been involved as the game went on.

Thanks for running it!