Mini 904 - Narnia: LWW Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
putting someone at L-3 in RVS is not a scum tell, as a quick bandwagon is a good way to get out of the RVS.
and halting, or preventing, a potential quick lynch is not a scum tell. why would scum be more likely to stop a quick lynch? it involve the complicated wifom that the scum is being hypocritical.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
it that "you" referring to me? if it is indeed me,Riceballtail wrote:Unvote; Vote:manho
You could at least respond to my comment. (Of which, Sib, you will notice is not a restatement of thought, still related to the game, and yet original!)
@PZ: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10078 - Lynch achieved on page 1.
what do you me to respond? you are agreeing with me, at least on that a quick wagon is a good way to get out of RVS, so i don't think i need to respond on it.Riceballtail wrote:
Yeah, I don't agree that a quick wagon is the best way to get out of RVS, but it is a way that works. You can generally get a look from how some people vote (wagon or not) and their reasoning as well.manho wrote:L-3 is miles from a lynch, L-1 is close. and a quick bandwagon is the most useful way to get out of RVS, at least in the games i'm in.
but who need a town credit? but some town player like to have town credit, so scum don't have a higher incentive to stop a quick lynch.Papa Zito wrote:
Townie cred.manho wrote:why would scum be more likely to stop a quick lynch?
OMGUS,bv310 wrote:Also,Unvote: ManhoLooks like RVS ended earlier than usual.unvote: bv310
@riceballtail, so why are you voting me?-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
really don't know you are asking this... you need to be more specific next time if you want to ask something and expect an ansswer.Riceballtail wrote:
In essence, what makes a quickwagon a good way to get out of RVS?kikuchiyo wrote:RBT: What was your question? I am having trouble discerning it.
i know it from my experience. the RVSs end quickly in the games with a quickwagon.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
that starbuck-wagon is a shit. there is no reason behind the wagon. and dybeck is the scum behind that, asking for an early roleclaim, asking for an early roleclaim, asking for others to support the wagon, asking for others to vote starbuck to get her at L-1 for a claim, etc.
when i skim through the thread, i came across this:
dybeck is definitely leading the town by that time, when he was pushing starbuck for a claim, so why ask for another to take the lead?dybeck wrote:Does anyone have way to keep this game from stalling that is neither a Starbuck claim nor a massclaim?
I think that the problem lies in the fact that I don't have a feel for any single player that strikes me as overwhelmingly pro-town. If anyone feels that they are that player, they should consider taking a lead here. This game is stalling badly and we're on a clock.
There must be a way - but I'm not coming up with it.
If we end up lynching Starbuck, it will be half for the reasons that everyone's stated so far, and half for the lack of a credible alternative option.
but the scummy point is the bolded last sentence that shift his responsibility for the starbuck (mis?)lynch to the whole town. it sounds like dybeck is expecting a town flip from starbuck and try to avoid the attention then.
vote: dybeck-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
i'm not saying starbuck must be town, but that the wagon behind it is really bad. i'll have to agree with kiku that the starbuck lynch is very informative, and i'll support the lynch if deadline approach while dybeck is not near a lynch.Riceballtail wrote:Manho's defense of Star is noted as well, mostly for being a chainsaw.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
i think we still have time before the deadline and we can get more information from starbuck, like a case by her.Riceballtail wrote:
Glad you see things my way.dybeck wrote:
Talk is cheap, Manho.manho wrote:the case on starbuck is bad, and dybeck is the scum behind it. but as kiku said, we need starbuck's flip to get more information, like starbuck flipping town makes dybeck more scum, but starbuck flipping scum makes dybeck more town.
Either bus your scumbuddy or stop trying to improve your townie credentials by repeatedly saying things that you don't intend to follow up with a vote.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
@wolf, i don't see the reason behind starbuck's wagon strong enought, and think that was a scum-pushed wagon, so my initial suspicious go to dybeck. but then find that the starbuck lynch is very informative, and starbuck is still neutral in my scum list, so decide to lynch her. i didn't say we need starbuck lynch quickly, and i'm still waiting for a case from her before her lynch.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
L-1. and it is not a good time, 3 days before the deadline, to start another wagon just for a claim. you won't have enough time to put me at L-1 and back to the starbuck lynch.dybeck wrote:Manho: suppose, for argument's sake, that this new wagon on you builds up steam. At what point will you claim?-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
so everyone is starting new cases when deadline is just 3 days away? lynching the claimed vanilla townie is almost a standard procedure
there is no way we can do the following things: settling into another wagon, getting a claim from the lynchee, unvoting after the lynchee claim a powerrole, getting to another wagon and repeating the same procedure, and finally lynching someone, in 3 days.
so please get back to starbuck's lynch.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
so where is the new case and how is it better than the old one?wolframnhart wrote:
if the new case seems better then the old one, who cares if it is three days away? Stop trying to convince people to vote you because of time restraints.manho wrote:so everyone is starting new cases when deadline is just 3 days away? lynching the claimed vanilla townie is almost a standard procedure
there is no way we can do the following things: settling into another wagon, getting a claim from the lynchee, unvoting after the lynchee claim a powerrole, getting to another wagon and repeating the same procedure, and finally lynching someone, in 3 days.
so please get back to starbuck's lynch.
yesWe can do the following things:
Settle onto another wagon - we are doing so with you right now.
getting another claim from the another lynchee, that's me currently, and you need two more votes on me to get a claim from me.Getting a claim from the lynchee - Not sure I understand this one but Starbuck did claim if thats what you mean.
sure, but you also need some time for everyone to have a chance to counter role claim.Unvoting after a lynchee claims power role - Depends on role and if people find it believable
yes, but this procedure need to repeat for sometime if you find each claim believable. and if you are finding the *insert the name starbuck claimed and i forgotten* claim believable, most claims are believable.Getting onto another wagon and going through same procedure - looks like that might be happening here.
you need 7 votes to get a lynch, and given that some player post only once a day, you probably can't get that in this little time.Finally lynching someone - How is this not going to happen?
i have given my case and reason why it is useless to try to get another wagon this late, especially after we spent so much time to pressure starbuck and get a vanilla claim. and why is my post scummy?Your reasons are horrible, you have no real case, and your posts are just scummy as hell.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
if my understanding is right, we need 7 votes to lynch even at deadline.Kdub wrote:RULES
Voting
B1) Votes must be bolded like this:Vote: Playername.
B2) You mayUnvote, but it is not required before voting someone else.
B3) A lynch will occur when one player has the majority of votes for the day.
B4) Once a player has the majority of votes needed for a lynch, the lynch is final and further votes and unvotes will not count.
B5) You mayVote: No lynch. A no-lynch will occur when the majority of votes for the day are for no lynch.
B6) If a lynch is not reached by the time the deadline arrives, there will be no lynch.
i'm saying the other people, such as dybeck-the-scum, that pressure you.Starbuck wrote:You also didn't put any time in on pressuring me. You actually started off defending me and backpedaled rather quickly.
i think you are townie, but it is almost standard procedure to lynch claimed VT and there is no use starting another wagon now.
we really should end the day after starbuck gives her case. any more information given is a benefit to the scum, and that's why dybeck-the-scum are trying so hard to get claims from others.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
nearly forgotten that the starbuck-lynch is an information lynch, at least imo. so i go through my own iso to see what conclusion i had drawn.
"the lynch is scum-pushed, and the scum behind it is dybeck"
"if starbuck flips town, dybeck must be scum"
"there is at least one, maybe two, scum in the set {dybeck, bv, kiku}"
i think the vig-fishing by kiku was targetted at me. i would definately vig dybeck if i'm the vig. but i'm not. so why did dybeck die? i really don't see the reason for killing dybeck, as he is one of the most likely lynch today. i think he was vigged by someone else. but it's also possible that the scum want us to be confused about the kill.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
@kiku, is the above post the main reason for your vote on snail?evilsnail wrote:Meh, I'm not seeing the RBT case. He's been opportunistic with his vote, sure, and he hasn't contributed too much, but there are plenty of people who play like that when town.
i don't think the RBT case also.
and i've read the first part of the game, in which starbuck was pushing to a claim. i'm sure it was pushed by scum, but dybeck was not the scum behind it. i've decided that i still think the lynch was scum-pushed, even dybeck flipped town. kiku and PZ are likely to be the scum behind it.
vote: kiku-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
so kiku is using another crap case to get a mislynch...
if i'm not misunderstanding again, kiku's reason to vote snail is that "snail made a case on Narninian, but then shift the attention away. However, kiku think the original case a good one." i really don't think it is a good reason to vote someone, and i don't think anyone here is seeing this a main reason to vote. but then kiku accuse snail of "strawmanning" that snail avoid kiku's main "case". everyone reading the thread will know that the RBT things is the case rather than the Narninian things, so i think there is nothing wrong for snail to "strawmanning".
confirm vote: kiku-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
that's mean you are voting snail not for the narninian case, not for the RBT case, and not for the "strawmanning" case? so what's your reason behind the vote? can you give a clear, detailed and understandable case on snail?kikuchiyo wrote:
No. The original case Snail made wasmanho wrote:so kiku is using another crap case to get a mislynch...
if i'm not misunderstanding again, kiku's reason to vote snail is that "snail made a case on Narninian, but then shift the attention away. However, kiku think the original case a good one." i really don't think it is a good reason to vote someone, and i don't think anyone here is seeing this a main reason to vote. but then kiku accuse snail of "strawmanning" that snail avoid kiku's main "case". everyone reading the thread will know that the RBT things is the case rather than the Narninian things, so i think there is nothing wrong for snail to "strawmanning".
notgood. On first read I agreed it looked good. However, after doing an iso on Narn I disagree with the case. The strawmanning is not a huge issue for me, because I don't think I was as clear as I thought.
as madcrawdad said, kiku was voting starbuck and pushing for her lynch not for her "L-3 is bad", but for her disappearence when she said that was due real life stuff.
as for the question why the town are voting 3 townie in Day 1, i think the 3 wagons are all pushed by scum, namely kiku and probably PZ.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
the town-vs-town vibe is very different from the town-vs-scum vibe, so "one or both could be scum" is a correct saying, at least imo. and you shouldn't be worried about the case both of you are town, as you think snail is the scum. it is weird for a townie to vote someone and push for his lynch, but worry that he is town at the same time.kikuchiyo wrote:556 is a bit easy. Saying "one or both could be scum" could be a good way to set up a mislynch in the event we are both town.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
i agree with this. counterclaiming in lylo is a disaster, as we need to decide who to believe and lynch the fake-claiming one. we don't have a second chance in lylo. and if mod has provided safe-claims, it will not lead to a sure loss for the scum. so please claim now.kikuchiyo wrote:HH: We are nameclaiming. Case closed. I am the fucking high king of Narnia. Both Aslan and Susan have been outed in addittion to Peter. I need to know where we stand before we lynch today. A mislynch today most likely means lylo tomorrow. Mass nameclaim today prevents a counterclaim in lylo. Counterclaiming in lylo is scums best chance of winning as far as I can tell. If they want to sacrifice someone today then I am okay with that. They have no idea what our powers are. They already have three players to choose from. No reason for Edmund and Lucy not to come forward.
I play to win. If I have to lower my standards I have no issue with doing so.HH wrote:Why is a massclaim now "in the spirit of the game"?
Mass Name claim. I command it.
unvotemy brother, unless the CC comes.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
so we have the complete list here:
riceballtail - Professor Kirke
pwnman - Mr. Tumnus
kikuchiyo - Peter
Hackerhuck - Father Christmas
Papa Zito - Lucy
Wolframnhart - Oreius
Narninian - Edmund
manho - Susan
Evilsnail - Aslan
let's get back to scumhunting. what? kiku is peter and PZ is lucy? then i need to find my third suspect.
...checking my iso for a third suspect...
nope, i don't have a third suspect, and i will go for the least likely claim then, and that's wolf. i'll hammer it if deadline come.
i don't want to outguess our mod, but i really think aslan is indeed a safeclaim.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
i really can't stop thinking the mod come out and call himself aslan and safe the world if the scum win.evilsnail wrote:I'm fine with being rolecopped, though I don't see how you can think Aslan a safe claim. I mean, I guess it'd be cool to do that, since Aslan is the most innocent figure in the story, but it doesn't really make sense.
Anyway, I agree with PZ and pwnman on RBT. RBT's role seems a pretty normal one.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong