Mini 686 - Chess Mafia (Done)
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Have you implemented something so I know which of the three people I will be replacing? Not that it matters for anything but continuity sake.EmpTyger wrote:Thok:
This is a perfect game for us, isn't it- no lynching or nightkills to end any intense argument that might put us at each others' throats. Welcome aboard! Black will be PMing you your alignment.
For the record, I've actually read about 30 or so pages of the game in the last day or so, but more for amusement value than anything once I knew about the chess game=win condition stuff. For obvious reasons, I won't be saying anything about the chess game until I actually know my alignment.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
I've gotten a role PM, and I'm replacing ZazieR.
Move Kd3, as per EmpTyger's explanation of why Kd1 is bad. Ke1 is essentially us saying we want 3 move repetition, and anything else seems to lose material.
Move Count
Kd3 (3):Herodotus, EmpTyger, ThokI replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Mr. Black appears to be updating the board in the first post. (He hasn't updated the player list yet.)Abstract Actuary wrote:Mr. Black, can you continue to post the board after each move. I'm still having trouble with the R1e2 move that it won't allow, but the workaround I used earlier does the trick. So you can start with this, if you'd like.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
I assume you mean Rxg8+, or RxQ+ (Rxg7 is both impossible, and bad for White if it is possible).Sudo_Nym wrote:I can see no reason to do anything other thanMove: Rxg7
But yeah, taking the queen is the right move. I'll vote for it once everybody gets a chance to show up for today.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Unless there's a strong response to it that I've missed, Qxd5+ is a much better move, since we can play Kxe2 next move after black is forced to respond to the check.Indigo Heron wrote:I like Qxd5+, but Kxe2 looks interesting.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
A couple quick comments
1. Technically it needs to be "move x", not "vote x".
2. For the sake of everybody, we're including a move count each time we move or unmove.
3. I'd like to hear the other 5 players post, in case I've missed something big.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
As I mentioned in my previous post, BxQ was what causes that move to lose. (In chess notation, that's short for Bishop takes Queen, and I can't imagine us winning down a rook and a bishop.)Haylen wrote:Can you explain why it instantly loses? The king can only move one space at a time...unless it's the bishop i've just noticed sat in the corner that can take her?
To be fair, we'd still have the ability to lynch people and pretend this was an actual mafia game. But still, I'd like to win the chess game, since that's almost certainly easier.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
After 38. Qf3+ and 39. Qxe2, Re7 by black is really obnoxious because of the threat of Re3+ followed by abusing the discovered check if we move Kd2 in response. We're probably still winning after even if we deal with that, but it's fairly obnoxious.
After Kxe2, the king is in a much better situation. Rook checks aren't something we need to be to worried about, as much as the rook supported by the bishop.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
You're missing the point. If we do that line, we're stuck having to worry about the threat of Re3+ for the next 3-4 moves (which keeps us from doing interesting stuff with our queen, for example), while black gets time to consolidate his position. The threat of Re3+ basically forces us to keep the Q guarding the e3 square when it could be doing useful stuff instead, and is more powerful then the move Re3.Sudo_Nym wrote:We don't need to move Kd2 in response to Re3+. We can trade the queen for the rook and bishop instead. We're up a pawn, which is passed, so we should win the promotion race, and then it's an easy KQ vs. K ending.
If we do Kxe2, black has a lot less pressure and counterplay.
(I agree with the sentiment of trading the queen for the rook and the bishop; I think Kxe2 is more likely to get black to put himself in a position where he does that.)I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Sigh. Here's what I'm imagining will be the result of Qf3+
>
That looks really drawish to me (or at best, looks like a 40-60 move endgame; the dream scenario where black stupidly trades his rook and bishop for our queen won't happen.) By comparison, I like the position after Kxe2 much better; black has less tempos to set up a stonewall and are queen is much better positioned.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Because I want the to be able to move the queen so we can actually do something with it; c3 frees up the c2 square for the white king so the queen no longer has to guard e3.Sudo_Nym wrote:Why 41. c3?
WE DON"T HAVE A THREAT TO TRADE THE R+B FOR THE QUEEN!!!! That's the point. Look at the position after the line I've posted; how are we going about breaking through black's position? There are ways, but they feel long and painful.In any event, it's not trading the R+B for the Q that leads to the win. It's the threat.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Fair enough. I'm probably overestimating how easy the win is after Kxe2.EmpTyger wrote:Thok/Sudo:
Take a breath you 2 and settle down. I think you're both right, because there's more than 1 way to win a chess game.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
I've thought of about 3 different responses to this, and I've decided that all of them are too snarky to be good for the long term health of the game.Sudo_Nym wrote:
Not exactly useful, Thok. Maybe you should think before you post. (Assuming you aren't scum.)Thok wrote:Veerus, think before you post. (Assuming you aren't scum.)
If somebody wants me to give my partial analysis of veerus's post that sparked my comment, then I will. But I'd like to think that some of you can analyze a chess position on your own.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
If you've played with me before, you'll notice that being a jerk isn't much of a scum tell for me.Sudo_Nym wrote:I know the analysis- I wasn't jumping on the fact that you don't like the move. I was jumping on the fact that you were acting like an asshole.
I'll try to tone it down. But veerus in his most recent post is at best town not doing the proper amount of analysis and is at worst scum trying to talk us into a bad line. I'm not sure why my tone should make you ignore that fact.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
For reference, Algebraic Chess Notation. There's a rival system call Descriptive Chess Notation that you might be more familiar with. Having some sort of notation is useful shorthand when you start talking about lines that are 10 moves ahead, or if you are recording your moves either for a tournament game or to record for future study.Haylen wrote:I dont like using this letters systemI replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Qc5 isn't bad. I suspect there are a half dozen moves of similar quality; Qd7 and Qf5 also seem to warrant some investigation.
(I don't have a particularly strong opinion of a move because none is obviously better to me yet.)I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
This isn't really true. It's unclear to me that we can break through black just with the queen alone, and I suspect we'll need to bring up the king and push the d pawn at some point.veerus wrote:we need to keep the initiative, which means we need to keep checking..
Checking is good if it gets us material, but we need to avoid the tendency to check merely to check.
That said, Qd7 does put pressure on Black that he needs to think about.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
The more I think about it, the more I like Qf5.
Qa8 feels like checking for the sake of checking.Note to everyone: Qa8 seems just as viable, as well as Qc5. Qd7 to prop the centre passed pawn will drain Black's materiel.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
My comment referred to black's pawns collectively; I'm not neglecting any pieces. Do you think IH was being metaphorical, or do you think there's some play after Qa8 that I'm missing?EmpTyger wrote:I don't think that's the pawn that IH is referring to.
On Qf5, I have some idea of how I want to respond to each possible Black response that I'm happy with. I haven't reached that point with any other move yet.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
There's nothing wrong with doing it now, but after analyzing it I think Qf5 is a better move.veerus wrote:
That is true and it gives birth to this idea -- do we really need to move our queen now? It's on a good square. What about Kd3 instead -- get the king back under the cover so black doesn't get a tempo by checking. It's not like we won't need to move the king up to advance the pawn. Is there anything wrong with doing it now?Indigo Heron wrote:It still does not change things that we, White will still attempt to push the central pawn with the queen and king supporting it.
Black currently can't gain a tempo by checking along the e-file, and its unclear he can ever do it.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
After 40. Qc5 Bf6, 41. Qa7+ is possibly worth pursuingveerus wrote:we need to move the pawn off a black square.. Qc5 followed by Bf6 creates unnecessary complications..
I'm more worried about 40 ... Bc1 however.
My current problem with 40 d5 at the moment is trying to figure out the long term plan after 40 ... Be7. Strangely, that line of thought suggests going with 40 Qd7 (not to reposition the queen, but to keep the bishop off d7.)
The pawn at d4 is relatively safe for now; black doesn't really have a way to attack bring a second attacker onto it.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
We'd likely trade our g and d pawns for all of black's queen side pawns, which is something I don't necessarily have a problem with, since we're better able to take advantage of the passed pawns.veerus wrote:41. Qa7+ Kh6.... then what, we exchange a pawn on the 2nd rank for a pawn on the 4th?
That said,Move Qd7I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Nah, we're winning the chess game. It's just a slow method of winning.Haylen wrote:Eveyone's going against my strategies and I don't know what move to make now cause we can't take any of the power pieces .__. Can't we just give up and start lynching people?
The basic idea is that black can't really do anything, since he has to keep us from promoting the d pawn. So we can slowly take advantage of weaknesses in his position to win more material.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
If I'm reading the thread correctly, we generally have a week long deadline, and Mr. Black opened the day late on Tuesday. So theoretically we should have roughly 56 hours (2 1/3 days) from the of time of this post.veerus wrote:half the people have yet to weight in with their opinions... when's the deadline?I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Meh.Sudo_Nym wrote:That's not a good attitude to have. When life seems jolly rotten, then there's something you've forgotten...
Not that I disagree, but Haylen's comment clearly reflects her chess ability and how people are reacting to it. As a scum tell it is mostly worthless (it ranges from a very slight town tell to a null tell in my opinion.)
If you have any thoughts on d5 versus Qd7 versus Qc5 (although we're probably not going to play that), feel free to discuss them. That said, I'll be moving my vote to d5 to avoid deadline if people don't run up something else.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Also,Thok wrote:If you have any thoughts on d5 versus Qd7 versus Qc5 (although we're probably not going to play that), feel free to discuss them.
Current Move Count:
d5 (3) - Sudo_Nym, Abstract Actuary, Haylen
Qd7 (2) - Indigo Heron, ThokI replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
I'm willing to hammer d5 in about 6-7 hours (which would be 3-4 hours before the deadline hits.) I prefer Qd7, but on rethinking I don't think Black's responses to d5 are as strong as I thought they were and I also realize there's a deadline around.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
What do you think about the chess game? (Theoretically I care about what you think about the mafia part of the game as well, but for the moment the chess part is more important.)CSL wrote:Well, having a player who is here is better than a person who was on a long v/la, right?I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
They're only completely irrelevant as long as we are winning the chess game. Plus, a little poking for reactions is useful if I want to be able to guess scum correctly after town wins the chess game. You know, for bonus points or something.Sudo_Nym wrote:I thought for sure that the actual mafia alignments were almost completely irrelevant.
Mostly, the point of my comment was "CSL, talk about the chess game instead of pointing out that you will be more active then the guy you replaced." But you know, with something resembling a bit more tact.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
There are useful tactical advantages for both Ke3 and Kd3. I think I prefer Ke3, but I also suspect the difference is small enough not to matter.EmpTyger wrote:Don't think it matters between Ke3 and Kd3, but go for it if you want to, Thok or whoever.
Both are clearly better than Qc8.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
With just the queen, their king isn't in that much danger. I do think Qe5 is interesting, but if you want to play it you should think about what you plan to do after 41. Qe5 Kf7.Haylen wrote:Move Qe5
Nuff said. There choice is to save the bishop or save the king. They;ll save the king, there is very few places it can go then. We'll have the king cornered.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Black doesn't really have a better space for his bishop than where it currently is, so a bishop check doesn't really gain black a tempo. It's not like were planning to keep the king at either d3 or e3 in the long run anyways.Indigo Heron wrote:Again, Ke3 is just asking for Black to check it to slow tempo down.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Do you feel the same way about Kd3? What moves do you like?CSL wrote:Will not accept Ke3. It is not a move I'd make at this late stage.
I prefer Ke3 to Kd3, but not enough so that I wouldn't vote for Kd3 if we decide advancing the king is the right general plan but others won't vote for Ke3.
(On a side note, we really ought to get a good chess computer to run through the game and white's choices once the game is over.)I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
If you want people to play Qe5, you should answer my question about how we respond to Kf7. (This goes to CSL as well.)Haylen wrote:I think we should all listen to haylen.
Chess isn't mafia. Nobody is going to listen to gut, because both sides have perfect information.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Laziness mostly. (OK, I'd like to see Haylen or CSL try to answer my question, and I honestly should spend a little bit of time analyzing Qe5+ for myself but I can vote in the meantime.)EmpTyger wrote:Herodotus/Sudo/Thok:
Anything you're waiting on? Or can you vote for your preferred king move? Because we need to decide on one or the other so that we're not splitting the vote at deadline.
Move: Ke3
movecount:
Ke3 (3) - veerus, EmpTyger, Thok
Qe5 (1) - Haylen
Kd3 (1) - Abstract ActuaryI replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
I will say that 6-12 weeks of gameplay strikes me as an underestimate. Unless a horrible blunder happens soon, 20 weeks sounds like a more reasonable lower bound (assuming 20 moves and a week per move, both of which seem like reasonable assumptions.)Mr. Flay wrote:Mr. Black said that you probably have 6-12 weeks of gameplay left.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
I think Qd7 is better than Qe5, for what it's worth.EmpTyger wrote:What about Qd7? Not ready to vote, but so far I'm liking it better than Qe4 or Qe5.
I agree with you, but I had already pointed out the strength of that move yesterday. That was the time to yell at me. (Actually the time to yell was a few moves earlier, as there's one move I truly regret mentioning.) But your concern is the reason I haven't really said that much about the responses to Qe4.Thok:
Can you try to not give Black move advice? Obviously you should point out problems if there's need of persuading us to vote differently, but don't just gratuitously suggest the best response for Black. I'm not sure how much long-term analytic capability they have.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
I'm not convinced there's an obvious line of play after the Qd7/Ke4 sequence. I specifically don't believe there's a line that depends on us immediately putting the queen on d7. (Also, I suspect you might be missing something in the possible end game scenarios.)EmpTyger wrote:I'm not seeing any advantages to Qe4 and one big disadvantage- we wouldn't be playing Ke4 any time soon. Is there something clever I'm missing with Qe4? (y/n)
Moreover, Qe4 doesn't completely rule out the possibility of later playing Qe5 and Qd7.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005