Mini 974: Thrillville Mafia - Over
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
finally you admitted not reading that case. why did you agree with it then if you hadn't read it? because you are the lazy scum who agree with any seemingly valid case, like imhim's case which is so long.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:
1. Good question. Re-reading through InHimShallibe's case on Andrius, it sounds like he wasn't really being serious about it. That could be difficult to point out if I'm ever able to do so.mb53 wrote:@SSBF: What parts of inhim's case did you think were good? Why just an FoS not a vote? Why do you think that CMAR is vote-worthy?-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
fair enough.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:
The reason why I originally agreed to liking InHimShallibe's case is because I took it so seriously, which could be due to my lack of humor. I also did read the case completely, once when it was posted up and another time when mb53 asked me to point out the good parts of InHimShallIbe's case. Now that I have re-read the post, I realize he wasn't being serious.manho wrote:finally you admitted not reading that case. why did you agree with it then if you hadn't read it? because you are the lazy scum who agree with any seemingly valid case, like imhim's case which is so long.unvote
vote: ReaperCharliefor that blatant wagon-hopping vote.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
no, i don't think he is scum now.ReaperCharlie wrote:
You think he's scum.... yet you're voting me for voting him?manho wrote:
nah, i didn't vote SSBF because of that answer you want from the question. i vote him because i think he is scum.ReaperCharlie wrote:Let me ask you too: What is the point of a bandwagon?
*brain explodes*
I swear, this feels like a newbie game.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
in 188, i was explaining why i voted SSBF long ago, (or why i didn't unvote as it was a random vote at the beginning). i had unvoted SSBF before 188. change post 188 into past tense and you can understand better.ReaperCharlie wrote:@manho: so... in 188 youdothink he is scum, and then in 191 you don't? What?!?!
Unvote: Vote: manho-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
i would rather scum not know the roles, so option 2.
scum can adjust their play when knowing what they are facing, for example:
1. scum vs tracker, scum will ask a less scummy member to kill a more pro-town town.
2. scum vs watcher, scum will ask whoever they like to kill a less pro-town player.
and there is not much use for us to know what power we have, or i can't think of any.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
it is hypothetical only. and it is only an example.Timeater wrote:
What. This assumes you know how the scum work in this game. E.G. scum can delegate killing abilities to certain members of the scum team. Are you just hypothesizing or do you know this for a fact? Interesting.scum can adjust their play when knowing what they are facing, for example:
1. scum vs tracker, scum will ask a less scummy member to kill a more pro-town town.
2. scum vs watcher, scum will ask whoever they like to kill a less pro-town player.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
manho in 186 wrote:vote: ReaperCharliefor that blatant wagon-hopping vote.
lol, you can't say someone is OMGUS voting you by voting before you've ever voted him.ReaperCharlie in 199 wrote:@manho: so... in 188 youdothink he is scum, and then in 191 you don't? What?!?!
Unvote: Vote: manho
and you really think you can vote someone without giving a valid reason?-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
this is bad.ReaperCharlie wrote:
This, except I've fixed it.SlySly wrote:I am willing to move toanotheranyplayer if a convincing case comes forth.
but this is worse.ReaperCharlie wrote:I don't care who is lynched. Timeater is no longer off limits due to his claim. Lynch him for all I care. Lynch anyone. Heck, lynch ME.
ANYONE WILL DO, THX.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
where is mrsandman?
i've counted 5 votes each on timeater and SSBF, along with plum voting chrono and sandman voting RC. so L-2 for both.
actually, i had just read timeater but not SSBF last time when i said so, as i remember getting a strong town vibe from SSBF earlier. i'll read SSBF for the last time. if i get that town vibe again, i'll not consider voting him today unless he claim scum. i may change my vote to SSBF if i couldn't find that town vibe. call me bussing if you like.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
there is no way SSBF is scum. the only possible scum tell is his blind jump on imhim's "case" on Andrius:
but he didn't vote at all. it is more like a "this case a worth noting, and i'll come back to it later" than a "this is a good case and a good chance to get a mislynch".Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:I agree with InHimShallIBe with his case on Andrius. I'll look into him more later.FoS: Andrius
lynch me if SSBF really flips scum.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
the bolded part is too hypocritical, especilly for someone who clearly stated, both in-thread and in the signature that he is scummy as town and like to use gut as a reason.MehPlusRawr wrote:Hopefully nobody, because I wanna hammer for the first time. Hope he's scum!(I've already provided my reasons for wanting to vote him)
Unvote, vote: SSBF-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
the "hope he's scum" shows that you are not that sure he is scum, while the "i've already provide the reasons" shows you are quite confident that he is scum. there is great contradiction.
you can either:
1. i'm not sure who is scum, but would like someone to be lynched, so hope SSBF is the scum, or
2. i think SSBF is scum, as the reasons stated before, so i'm going to hammer it.
but not the mixture of the two.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
i think i can understand your thought when you hammered now. but i really hate people say "hope s/he's scum" when hammering.MehPlusRawr wrote:
Why would I hammer someone that I didn't think was scum? Of course I thought he was scum.manho wrote:@MPR, so you thought SSBF is scum or not at that time when you voted?-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
as i always misread it as scum tell.MehPlusRawr wrote:
Why?manho wrote:
i think i can understand your thought when you hammered now. but i really hate people say "hope s/he's scum" when hammering.MehPlusRawr wrote:
Why would I hammer someone that I didn't think was scum? Of course I thought he was scum.manho wrote:@MPR, so you thought SSBF is scum or not at that time when you voted?-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
and how can you miss my 351/353 posts? the only reason is that you are just looking for possible scum tell to accuse someone, but not reading.MagnaofIllusion wrote:manho
95 – Horrible vote for SSBF – “Just because”LOL
121 – Rallying votes with no reason – scummythe reason is clear
172 – Horrible reasoning that re-reading amounts to not reading in the first place.i really don't know what you are saying
186 – Calls out RC for bandwagoning when it’s what he has been doing – scummywhere did I bandwagoned?
247 – Bad argument that pointing out multiple players having scummy behavior is ‘too hard scum-hunting’ and thus scummy in manho’s eyes.too hard scum-hunting is a scum tell, just like too hard trying to look pro-town, for me
263 – Yet another unexplained votelol, you are trying too hard scum-hunting. my vote was on RC long ago, and that was a responce for 262
337 – Yet another unexplained vote, but on Timeater who is no longer ‘in danger’so you were skimming through the thread and accuse all posts that only have a vote? read 336
vote: magna-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
@magna, it seems you've missed my response, so i'm quoting it again. bolded is my response, read it.manho wrote:
and how can you miss my 351/353 posts? the only reason is that you are just looking for possible scum tell to accuse someone, but not reading.MagnaofIllusion wrote:manho
95 – Horrible vote for SSBF – “Just because”LOL
121 – Rallying votes with no reason – scummythe reason is clear
172 – Horrible reasoning that re-reading amounts to not reading in the first place.i really don't know what you are saying
186 – Calls out RC for bandwagoning when it’s what he has been doing – scummywhere did I bandwagoned?
247 – Bad argument that pointing out multiple players having scummy behavior is ‘too hard scum-hunting’ and thus scummy in manho’s eyes.too hard scum-hunting is a scum tell, just like too hard trying to look pro-town, for me
263 – Yet another unexplained votelol, you are trying too hard scum-hunting. my vote was on RC long ago, and that was a responce for 262
337 – Yet another unexplained vote, but on Timeater who is no longer ‘in danger’so you were skimming through the thread and accuse all posts that only have a vote? read 336
vote: magna-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
i really can't remember why i voted him then...MagnaofIllusion wrote:
I read your response. I don’t have infinite time to respond to everyone at once, so please don’t make assumptions.manho wrote:@magna, it seems you've missed my response, so i'm quoting it again. bolded is my response, read it.
Glad you crafted a well-thought out response here.manho wrote:LOL
that is not a faulty reason then. and do you know what is pressure? it is those votes that made SSBF respond and made me so sure he is pro-town. so it is actually pro-town.
The same faulty reason that everyone else was voting for SSBF, that he voted along with InHim’s joke case? If so the reason is incredibly scummy since SSBF didn’t actually vote for Andrius while you ignored Timeater actually voting based on the joke case.manho wrote:the reason is clear
do you really think i need to skim through that line?
I could say something condescending like “you just skimmed what I wrote, read it” but I’ll just simply explain for your benefit.manho wrote:i really don't know what you are saying
who knows whether he really read it or not?
SSBF said he re-read through the case for clarity. You misrep horribly and say he admitted to not never reading it at all. I’m also starting to notice that accusing people incorrectly about not reading the thread is a thing you do often.manho wrote:
finally you admitted not reading that case. why did you agree with it then if you hadn't read it? because you are the lazy scum who agree with any seemingly valid case, like imhim's case which is so long.SSBF wrote: 1. Good question. Re-reading through InHimShallibe's case on Andrius, it sounds like he wasn't really being serious about it. That could be difficult to point out if I'm ever able to do so.
passionate scum-hunting is anti-town. you need to be calm when scum-hunting, or you will fall into tunnelling and OMGUS. but you are right, passionate scum-hunting is similar to too hard scum-hunting. it will try to drop it then, but trying too hard to look pro-town is still a tell of mine.
Please explain what differentiates passionate scum-hunting from ‘trying too hard’. Also you say these things are scum-tells for you. Habitual voting with no support is a scum-tell for me. Thus I pointed out that you repeated did so. If you expect other people to accept your personal scum-tells be prepared to accept their personal scum-tells also.manho wrote:too hard scum-hunting is a scum tell, just like too hard trying to look pro-town, for me
explain the scum motivation in habitual voting with no support, please. and define "no support" also.
"voting without support" is a support for my vote on RC, so my vote on RC is not a vote without support.
You original reason for voting for RC -manho wrote:lol, you are trying too hard scum-hunting. my vote was on RC long ago, and that was a responce for 262
Your support for your revote at 263:manho at 186 wrote:vote: ReaperCharlie for that blatant wagon-hopping vote.
manho at 247 wrote:Just iso'ed ReaperCharlie. he has been scum-hunting, but too hard. he has accused half of the players. here is the list:
Timeater
MrSandman
SSBF
manho
Chronopie
Andrius
and his vote is jumping all around, but without much reasons. my vote stay and i'll make a case when i've time.
You are accusing RC as being scum because you can’t find support for his votes while voting in that same manner yourself. Weren’t his reasons ‘obvious’ to you? Cognitive dissonance is a scum-tell. Also, what happened to that mythical case you were talking about?manho at 249 wrote: yes, that's the point. i can't find the reasons for most of the accusations.
and you are avoiding my question. did you realise that I've already voted RC in 186?
so are you meaning i shouldn't be voting Timeater, after the wagon started to dissipate? It was near deadline then, and the leading wagon is still Timeater and SSBF. I've a town read then on SSBF, so i was supporting that counter-wagon.
Once again you miss the point. Timeater had already claimed and his wagon was dissipating by 336. That you chose then to ‘shift’ from scummy(in your mind) RC to Timeater. You chose the ‘safe’ time to vote for Timeater under any combination of scum and town between the two of you. It’s opportunistic.manho wrote:so you were skimming through the thread and accuse all posts that only have a vote? read 336
also, in the VC in post 374, Timeater still lead in votes, so it was not dissipating then.
i've only casted 3 votes, before that post by you. the first one on SSBF is the only one without much support, while the second one on RC has a well-stated reason behind it in the same post, and the third one is needed in that given situation. so i'm not constantly voting without support. i'll stop stating you are skimming then.
I already laid out why I believe those posts are null-tells so your belief that they are scummier than your constant non-supported voting doesn’t really impact me. So please stop incorrectly stating that I’m skimming, but feel free to continue to own up to your scummy play in other places.manho wrote:i actually think they are scummier than my voting without a reason things. and you are ignoring them as you are not reading but just skimming and looking for easy targets.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
Timeater is a counter-wagon for SSBF, and i don't see him as highly scum but only neutral-to-scum, but that is good enough for me. my top suspect was RC then.MagnaofIllusion wrote:Two questions –
1. Since he (Timeater) was your last vote and you were ‘sure’ SSBF was Town do you think he is scum or were you just looking for a place to park your vote?
2. If you thought he is scum why haven’t you addressed him today?-
-
manho Mafia Scum
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
i'll need some time to check my top 3 suspects, but the top suspect is Magno, for now.MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Following up on this – RC, your top scum-read at the end of Day 1, is dead. Who are your top three suspects?manho wrote:Timeater is a counter-wagon for SSBF, and i don't see him as highly scum but only neutral-to-scum, but that is good enough for me. my top suspect was RC then.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
bv has replaced timeater. and i've voted bv.animorpherv1 wrote:Vote Count!
Timeater (3): inHim, MagnaofIllusion, SlySly
MagnaofIllusion (2): CMAR, MehPlusRawr
Chronopie (1):Plum
Plum (1): Chronopie
bv310
Not voting (2): Timeater, Andrius
Day 2 ends at June 21st at 2:54 PM!
With 10 alive it's 6 to lynch!
Mass rpdo going out soon.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
bv replaced timeater, so the voters are the same.CryMeARiver wrote:Awwwwwwww, look at these three:
Now wrote:bv310(3): inHim, MagnaofIllusion, SlySly
It's sooooooooo cuuuuuuute, awwwwwww - Anyone who quick votes BV before the deadline will be punished. Do NOT let a no lynch happen. MoI is scummiest based on Sandman, R_C's flip, and his fail arguments.Over a week wrote:Timeater (3): inHim, MagnaofIllusion, SlySly-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
so this is what we got from massclaim:
1. Chronopie - Bullet-proof - ??? - ???
2. MehPlusRawr - Vanilla - ??? - ???
4. SlySly - Lie Detector - Kaleo Ekewaka - Manager
5. bv310 - Vanilla - Aucaman Ujarak - Guest
6. InHimshallibe - Vanilla - Itsuki Pippin - ???
7. Andrius - Vanilla - Marcel Adrian - Staff
8. CryMeARiver -??? - ??? - ???
10. manho - Vanilla - Lanto John - Guest
i doubt the name and rank matter much, but i still would like a full claim.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
edited massclaim:
1. Chronopie - Bullet-proof - ??? - Guest
2. MehPlusRawr- Vanilla - ??? - ???kyle99
4. SlySly - Lie Detector - Kaleo Ekewaka - Manager
5. bv310- Vanilla - Aucaman Ujarak - GuestTimeater
6. InHimshallibe - Vanilla - Itsuki Pippin - ???
7. Andrius - Vanilla - Marcel Adrian - Staff
8. Furry-Vanilla - Ewald Agaipos - GuestCryMeARiver
10. manho - Vanilla - Lanto John - Guest
the uncounterclaimed lie detector should be confirmed, as ani has said that all the roles will by default given to a townie, unless otherwise stated, like the mafia godfather n2.
but chronopie the bp is still not confirmed, as we don't even know if there is a bp. and a vig with a bullet-proof goon is a good option as it may be more balanced than a vig with bullet-proof townie.
and i think the cop should claim, if he has 2 more confirmed town for us. it will give us 4 confirmed vs 4 unconfirmed with 2 scum in it. we will have a 50% chance to hit scum even if we random lynch one of the unconfirmed. although we would most probably lose our cop, it won't be too much a lost for us, comparing with our lie detector got nightkilled. if the cop don't claim now, he should claim tomorrow, he will surely be nightkilled tomorrow night, so it will make 2 consecutive kills for the cop and lie detector no matter what. and i think our lie detector is as good as our cop (slysly should ask the mod to clarify the ability, such as to what extense can it detect a lie), maybe better if it can detect a lie from the godfather. therefore, imo, the benefit of the cop claiming is larger than him not claiming.-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong
-
-
manho Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1723
- Joined: March 9, 2009
- Location: Hong Kong