Nobody Special wrote:@chesskid (and, well, everyone): I don't just suck at RVS, I suck at Mafia. Ask anyone.
NS made this post to excuse for his total lack of content?
Exe wrote:Nobody Special wrote:@chesskid (and, well, everyone): I don't just suck at RVS, I suck at Mafia. Ask anyone.
Btw, forgot to mention, "I'm a bad player," is a really crap defense.
QFT.
chesskid3 wrote:Well, if it appears everyone on my wagon is going to leave their votes, should I claim?
Because I'd like to lynch scum today, not a PR. Just sayin'.
Scum didn't have a good spot for their next vote, I think. The cooldog wagon didn't really start yet and TL/NS wagons had disappeared. While the chesskid lynch was quite obviously not an option anymore, the wagon stayed there. Was it surprising that Wingless, TL and NS lingered? I don't think so.
Wingless hopped to the next bad wagon, CooLDoG. Sure his 180 didn't make sense, but Dog had been protown all game long. That has to count for something.
Tasky's 191 is not as bad as it seems. He is wrong, but might actually be town.
TheLonging wrote:So you want to play Anti-town, along with NS? Very well.
Here tasky is linked to NS. If TL is scum, tasky would be more likely town, while NS more likely scum.
Uprising wrote:I'm really afraid of voting incorrectly. Is there anyone we specifically want to lynch?
PASSIVE PASSIVE PASSIVE.
unvote vote Uprising
. Uprisings doesn't have any intention to hunt scum, and his posts which aren't that many.
Uprising wrote:I have no idea who scum is. CooLDoG and Chesskid3 seem most likely to me.
UNVOTE: VOTE: CooLDoG
?
He doesn't know, but the two major bandwagons are most likely scum. YEAAAAH
NS's 216 calls for more chesskid votes and these are the two next posts:
CooLDoG wrote:I agree with the above, even if it makes me sound scummy. I have no fear in claiming ether, if you guys push me hard enough....
Nobody Special wrote:"The above" can cover an awful lot of stuff. Why so vague? Inherent scumminess? Yeah, that's it.
FoS: cOOldOg
This is framing someone, but waiting for support for the vote. I really dislike this from NS.
Zang is quite tunneling on Tasky. Given the other bandwagons, I don't blame him.
Exe wrote:Weekends are my limited-posting time, as some of you who have played with me before may know. However, have time for a quick post.
Moospiker disappearing is not good. I still think his vote on Chess was pretty iffy, so I want to hear from him.
However, the Cooldog wagon is pretty solid. His defensiveness over 3 votes screams scum. And his vote on chess never made any sense, especially the whole "I don't want Chess lynched, I just think he should be put at L-1."
NS switching to Cooldog when his wagon is picking up speed makes perfect sense as scum bussing. Cooldog-scum = NS-scum IMO.
Unvote. Vote: Cooldog
People defending themselves don't have to be scum. Defending is pretty much a null-tell. I dislike the bussing argument.
Enigma's 238 is great. I dislike his opening to the option of hammering Cooldog, but nobody is perfect.
Slaxx's entrance is decent. Chesskid's enigma vote is terrible.
Chesskid got off the enigma wagon... and the Wingless copies the case and gets on.
Uprising wrote:VOTE: Enigma
Now that I've reread, I'm feeling him scum moreso than before. The tunneling isn't too kind, either.
3rd vote, just after Zang voted. Uprising was waiting for support. If Uprising is scum, Zang is most likely town.
Mod, does rolename imply allignment?
Why should I answer this question?