In post 6, Junpei wrote:RQS!
1)
Of fire and ice, I proceed.
From my cage I have been freed.
The cage of flesh and bone,
with what I once forbode.
What was in your cage?
2) Some prefer logic, others their gut, how say you?
3) Are you one who anticipates the enemy move, or one who reacts to the enemy's moves?
4) In a world where you could never be critisized for being wrong (because no one would know that you are wrong) would you lie more often than normal? Would you speak your mind/do things more than normal?
Gotta go for now, but when I get back, I'll analyze the mechanics more.
1) Magic.
2) Gut to tell who I should spend my time using more of my logic on, logic to tell which of those people are Scum.
3) The former.
4) Depends on why they'd never know I was wrong, really. I would probably lie less as a deity figure to set an example, but if it was just some sort of logic-warp I'd probably lie more. I'm pretty used to speaking my mind anyway, so I doubt I'd do that more.
In post 44, Whiskers wrote:In post 6, Junpei wrote:RQS!
1)
Of fire and ice, I proceed.
From my cage I have been freed.
The cage of flesh and bone,
with what I once forbode.
What was in your cage?
2) Some prefer logic, others their gut, how say you?
3) Are you one who anticipates the enemy move, or one who reacts to the enemy's moves?
4) In a world where you could never be critisized for being wrong (because no one would know that you are wrong) would you lie more often than normal? Would you speak your mind/do things more than normal?
Gotta go for now, but when I get back, I'll analyze the mechanics more.
1:Iwas in my cage. I don't know what you were describing, but it was in it's cage, not mine.
2: Logic, but gut is easier. I prefer Logic from others.
3: I anticipate. I write out scenarios and go, "Well, if we massclaim now, then this, this, this, or this could happen. If X is scum and this happens, then Y is definitely town, but if" And go through every plausible scenario. Somepony else said something about how you can't Not react to what happens, and that's true. But I like to try to plan/think ahead. I also make sure it's out in the open so everypony can benefit from it.
4: I don't even know how to react to this. If I could not be wrong, I would be far more sure of myself. But I know that some of the appeal of lying is the idea that you have to be able to get away with it.
The way you pose the question, I picture myself dressed in a gold toga and an olive wreath and eating grapes and I am ceasar of the world and everypony is waiting in a loooong, single-file line to ask me a question and since I know everything apparently (or I can never be considered to be wrong), I answer all their questions and they revere me for it.
There you go, there's your stupid frickin' Rqs.
As far as #1, I assumed you were in the cage with whatever it was. How I got to magic: By the proceeding of ice and fire, there's clearly a mystical element, and it was something forbidden. Think alchemy for anyone who's played Golden Sun.
Personally, I'm glad we have this RQS. It lets you know people better. Not only is that good because it feels like you're playing with friends, but it makes analyzing people a lot easier. i.e. if someone's clearly a jokester, you can factor in that when they've shifted votes for joke reasons in RVS a lot.
In post 50, VisceraEyes wrote:hiplop it's not an interrogation bro. Why don't you like being questioned? Is it that you don't like being under scrutiny? DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE HIPLOP?!?!??1!??!ELEVEN
Dammit, you beat me to it.
In post 52, Otolia wrote:I am against pseudo-voting for someone until the kill is done by the Mafia. Voting clearly identify the danger for the scum. We have to work without in order to set-up a clean field for the PR to work with. Once the kill is done and provided that the PR didn't die, we can work on agreeing upon the Night Lynch.
What do you think that ?
Why not push your biggest gut Town tell to ensure they live, then? Too risky/scummy looking if you get called out before you can reveal it yourself? Biggest Town tell not town enough to justify said risk?
In post 61, Darox wrote:Nope, unless you're really terrible at reacting.
If you're doing anything right, you should already have considered all the possible moves they could make and an appropriate response so that you can leap into action with after only minor tweaking to your plans as the situation demands
This. See: Xanatos Speed Chess.
In post 74, Otolia wrote:Tracking is related to the people accomplishing the action, thus it doesn't matter which person the scum is likely to kill because what matters for the tracker is who is gonna make the kill. Giving your reads is fine, pseudo-voting is not because when you can express your reads on many people, you can only vote for one which clearly pinpoint the danger for the scum and manipulate that to their liking.
The tracker has to pick a target before the scum and that's a hindrance, but likewise the scum has to decide which townie to kill. That's a race against time between town PRs and scum and when we are before the kill, we shouldn't vote.
Then vote a Towntell to manipulate the goddamn kill. Lying as Town is perfectly acceptable if you do it right, the problem's simply that it's dangerous if it goes wrong.
In post 75, VisceraEyes wrote:But HOW people vote also helps determine who is the most suspicious. For instance, what if someone thinks YOU are the most townie player in the game and I'VE now decided I'm voting for you. Well, wow, NOW the tracker has someone they find suspicious to track! People just giving their reads isn't enough, VOTES are what matter Oto. How we use our ONE vote is what is important in the grand scheme of things. Reads don't mean ANYTHING by comparison.
Can you not caps words you're emphasizing? It makes it more difficult to read. italics or bold is better.
I was very, very close to voting Otolia, but I've re-read and I like him well enough.
I originally thought he was wrong on not voting, but he's actually right this point. Mafia random killing > mafia killing someone who looks Town. Voting definitely does pinpoint who is or isn't seen as scummy - it's why we always vote normally. Depriving the mafia of that information make their kill closer to a random kill. Tracker choice is essentially wine between whether mafia will pick a more ProTown scum to kill, thinking tracker will track a suspicion of his, or a scummier player, thinking tracker will assume that they wouldn't do that. Doctor is better with ProTown players, but it's certainly up for debate whether forcing a less informed mafia kill is better. Set-up speculation in the first pages is the best thing (or one of the) you can do, really.
Meta argument after 3 pages is obv. bullshit, and deserved to be called as such unless you want it to break RVS, and I hate meta arguments anyway.
Don't really like any vote at this point, would like to see VE v. Otolia pan out.
VE's #81 is correct, but so is Otolia's #88. VE's obv. trying to alpha male the Town, but whether that's because he's on a "I've caught Scum" drive, or because he's Scum himself I'm not sure.